Posts in Media (20 found)
Chris Coyier Yesterday

Oregon Rocketry

My co-worker Robert is into model rocketry. I made a few rockets in my day, but the hobby stopped at Estes . I didn’t really realize people take rocketry much further until knowing Robert. His partner Michelle produced a short video piece for OPB on the community around it here. I’d embed the video here, but it looks like OPB hosts their own video and doesn’t offer an embeddable format. A move I think it probably pretty smart for an independent, nonprofit media organization these days.

0 views
Manuel Moreale 5 days ago

My issue with the two sides

One fairly common concept you’ll inevitably stumble upon if you spend any modicum of time reading discussions on the web is the idea of “two sides”. Some will tell you that the two sides are not the same and one is clearly better than the other, others will argue that not taking one side means that you’re tacitly supporting the other, while someone else will tell you that trying to argue that maybe more nuanced positions exist, in addition to the two sides, is wrong and you’re a bad person for doing that. All this is fair, and I’m more than happy to concede that, in some circumstances, one side is indeed clearly better than the other. I’m also happy to concede that again, in some circumstances, not expressing a preference for one of the two camps, when one is clearly better than the other, can be seen as tacit support for the worse one. I’m also more than happy to agree that sometimes dragging a discussion into the mud that is the infinite fractal world of the fine details is not really all that helpful. Having said all that, I still think way too often conversations on the web have the tendency to completely obliterate any level of nuance. Which is understandable, considering most conversations are taking place on social media platforms that aren’t designed to have nuanced conversations in the first place. There are ideas and concepts that demand more than 300 characters to be expressed fully, but unfortunately, sometimes even saying that can be seen as problematic in some circles. And that is unfortunate. It is unfortunate because progress can only be had if people have enough space and time to express themselves fully and then have their ideas challenged constructively. And yes, I’m already hearing you screaming that some racist bigots out there don’t deserve to have their views treated respectfully and be given time and space. I get it, and I understand it. The problem I see with this, though, is that the internet is a weird place. A lot of people aren’t vocal. Most of them are just lurking around, absorbing content and forming ideas in their head and maybe discussing things in person with close friends and family. And amongst them, there probably are a lot of people who would be more than happy to support and join the good one of the two sides, but are probably kept at a distance because of the insanity they see unfolding. I’m gonna pick a stupid example to make this point a bit clearer. Let’s imagine the topic of the day is “kicking puppies”. One camp is happily going around supporting the kicking of puppies because it’s a fun thing to do, and puppies are worthless and annoying, while the other camp thinks puppies are adorable—they are—and they are living creatures and deserve to not be kicked and instead loved and adored. It’s fairly easy to see that one camp, clearly, is better than the other, and if you are a sane and decent person, you should not have a hard time figuring out which camp is worth siding with. And sure, you might be one of those people who might argue that in some cases, puppies can be problematic because maybe they are puppies of a terrible invasive species that will destroy the solar system in 3 years if we don’t kick them all now. But, generally speaking you should find it easy to side with one of the two sides, even if only with some asterisk attached. But what if the pro-puppies camp you hear from online doesn’t stop at "puppies should be loved" but also argues that people who kick puppies should all die now and be dissolved in acid and their families be shot into the sun? You clearly are supporting the puppies' cause, but you are definitely not on board with all the rest of the nonsense. What do you do then, when someone screams at you, asking which side you are siding with? You clearly love puppies, but you also don’t want to support drowning people in acid. So you’re fucked. You could try to explain your position, but nobody got time for that. Chances are, you say nothing, and you silently move away from the public discourse space, never to be seen or heard again. I don’t know about you, but I think that’s bad. It’s bad when a lot of people are scared to express what they think because they are scared of the repercussions. Because you can’t have a healthy society without open dialogue. And I don’t even know how we fix this at the internet level. I don’t think there even is a way to fix this to be perfectly honest with you. It’s up to the individuals to go through the effort of giving other people time and space to express themselves and engage in dialogue. And if that's the only way out, well, shit. Thank you for keeping RSS alive. You're awesome. Email me :: Sign my guestbook :: Support for 1$/month :: See my generous supporters :: Subscribe to People and Blogs

0 views
ava's blog 1 weeks ago

a frank piece about influencers

I wish we were all generally more aware of what a lie the popular influencer lifestyle is, at least of the vast majority. People that read blogs like mine are probably more aware, but others less so, especially children. Some are more media-literate than others and are able to detect the foolery, but usually just bits and pieces of it instead of the entire picture. So I just want to sit down and discuss the whole picture. The obvious has been spread around far and wide: Everyone knows the products they show are not the ones they actually use or like, they were paid to promote it and they got it for free. Some influencers have since opened up about the flood of PR packages and how much they either donate or sadly throw away. But what less people know is: The designer bags are fakes a lot of the time. If you are in the right online spaces where people care for spotting this stuff, you can see them post proof by zooming in at a specific part of videos and showing the original bag has a different clasp or a wider rim or has a number there or different packaging. When actually showing off real designer items, some have admitted to simply renting or buying for the video and then returning them, or that they are able to claim these items as a tax write-off for being in a video. The trips they constantly go on are brand trips they get for free. Even if not, we have all seen how they rent parts of fake planes to take a picture and pretend. Others have pretended to be on vacation for far longer than they actually were, slowly releasing pictures from one day over the course of 2-3 weeks to make it seem like they’re still there. The cars they show driving in some videos are leased for the video, or a test drive at the dealership, or bought with money they don’t have and go into debt for. They’re indebting themselves in the hopes that having this luxury item for content will bring in the money to make up for it. They call this financial irresponsibility “investing into their career”. The houses they allegedly buy are rented or just a temporary AirBnB. What I’ve also seen is that the background they use that seems perfect and aesthetic is often a set in a rented warehouse or a single corner in their apartment, while their actual living space doesn’t look like that at all. Especially cooking content is often not filmed in their own kitchen, but one they rent. If you want to know how far some are willing to take the lies: One influencer always records videos cooking for one and cleaning the house where only her items are seen because her content strategy is about being a single woman, but she was exposed for having had a boyfriend all this time. It’s totally fine to not want to show partners or them not wanting to be shown, but this influencer went as far as to completely hide any sort of hint in the videos, cleaning up the entire side of his sink, hiding his shoes, coats, and all that just to keep up a false image to a downright creepy degree. Everything for the personal brand! A while ago, a video went around lamenting that so many influencers, especially in NYC, are so boring and the same. The reason seems to be that they aren’t recording their true life, as it’s been shown that many of them have the same content manager, who applies the same cookie-cutter copy-and-paste lifestyle onto all of her clients. Shana Davis-Ross is the founder of the Ponte Firm, which created this sort of content franchise and what’s known as the “West Village Girl.” That’s why they do the same workouts, go to the same studios, wear the same outfits, and get matcha at the same cafés. The goal isn’t to be authentic or show their real life, it’s to create a brand-safe image so that brands might want to work with them. You aren’t seeing someone’s life, you’re seeing someone’s job. If you know customer service voice, it’s the same here but with influencer voice. If you’ve ever had to say complete bullshit just because it is mandatory under corporate policy, this is the same. Everything is filtered through their team, their content manager, the pre-approved brand text down to what is allowed in the image and what isn’t. For relatability, they like to lie about having a job. The nepo babies under them usually don’t, and most hide and delete comments about their rich families, or the fact that they earn most of their money by being “yacht girls”. Some are bold enough to talk about this online stuff as a job and then show their “full calendar” and if you zoom in, the calendar/todo list is: You know, what the rest of us are doing next to a fulltime job. Their alleged routines shown on camera are a lie: the times shown as a text on screen are not the actual times that these were filmed in. This content is recorded over several days and stitched together to seem like it was one day, and the times aren’t right. If you zoom into clocks being shown (like a wristwatch, wall clock, laptop clock etc.) it shows a completely different time. Not only that, but people such as Hannah Alonzo actually went out of their way to prove that the times aren’t right based on the position of the sun and the lighting in the shots. Now onto the ones trending especially hard right now: The crunchy wellness, fitness, orthorexia influencers are not only filtering and editing themselves to high heavens, they also hide the absolute damage they are doing to their bodies. 4-5h of high intensity training every day with no rest on a diet fit for a toddler is not normal or “wellness”. Their migrated filler is causing their face to be puffy and saggy and therefore hiding the ana-face they’d otherwise have. It’s also so crazy to me that we have grifters on TikTok talking about being a trad wife - pretending they don’t work, that the man is the head of the household, some even saying that women shouldn’t work or be able to vote. Meanwhile, they themselves are often the breadwinner in their household due to their social media income, they are business owners aggressively spreading their views online instead of letting their husband speak, they go on making their own decisions attending podcasts and other events and they make political statements while influencing their viewers. If that’s not a modern woman, I don’t know what is. Then there’s alpha males talking about red pill stuff, getting any woman you want, and pretending they’re getting all or most of their money through their own social media content and bullshit courses they’re offering. They’re always flexing their wealth and vaguely talking about some “management” and showing themselves on a laptop “working” or as if they’d be analyzing stocks or daytrading. But what they’re actually doing most of the time is being an OF manager. Some admit it here and there, like that asshole Jack Doherty, but most are more hush hush about it. That’s right, the vast majority these “successful” hypermasculine men who pretend they’re selfmade on TikTok are leeching off of women’s success and are literally pimps and gold diggers. They manage online sex workers’ content and promote it, and in turn get a cut. The models also often show up in their videos for added exposure. The men usually shorten it to “OFM” for “Only Fans Management”, or talk vaguely about being part of “an agency”. Thinking about this entire eco system is so nuts. Stupid ragebait videos and podcasts and courses to pretend you don’t like “sluts” or “feminists”, meanwhile your livelihood depends on these women and your work is posting their creampie content to their OF page and you’re probably on chat duty responding to some gooner so he spends more money. You justify this with “I’m just taking advantage of these losers bro” “I’m getting my bag bro” but it’s actually so embarrassing to be such a hypocrite. You’re not selfmade, you were hired by that 19 year old that makes more money than you to do annoying work she doesn’t wanna do, while publicly looking down on people like her. Then there’s also the MLM huns and the people flexing wealth trying to get you into “high ticket sales”, which is also a scam, but way, way too much to even get into. All this is why education, media literacy and critique is important. In the end, the life you might be envious of isn’t even lived by the person that’s promoting it. Take care of yourself, you’re better than this, and stop giving these clowns further attention whose only job is to flex on the people who can’t afford groceries anymore. Is this phenomenon new? No. My favorite castle I sometimes visit has a beautiful dining room, and when you stand in it and look up, you see a small balcony on each wall of it, which was for when the common folk would be invited to watch the rich people in the castle eat from up there. Apparently, we have always been freaks who got a kick out of watching someone else live an extremely lavish life while we struggle, but still. We don’t have to entertain this complete web of play-pretend online that tries to convince us to buy crap we don’t need. Reply via email Published 06 Oct, 2025 Make Matcha Have meeting Film TikTok

1 views
Manuel Moreale 1 weeks ago

On public online behaviour

I’m currently in “digital fasting” mode, trying to consume as little content as possible here on the internet. But I do have to be here for work, and so I still end up reading a few things here and there. Some of that content is sent to me via email by random people (always appreciate that) while other is just because I have to open links to blogs that are submitted to blogroll.org. And even though I am not on any social media platform, some of the nonsense that’s going on there still manages to reach me, albeit indirectly. Which is quite impressive, I have to say. It’s incredibly hard to both have an online presence and also completely seal yourself away from social media nonsense. And this is something that’s not going to get better anytime soon, unfortunately. Especially because the idea of a fediverse is blurring the line that separates these worlds. One thing that’s fun to observe, though, as a very passive and disinterested spectator, is how some patterns of behaviour seem to be platform agnostic. Which is just a very polite way for me to say that dickheads are omnipresent. It doesn’t matter what tech stack they have behind them: if you give them a public way to express themselves, they’ll inevitably shit on everything and everyone and just be despicable human beings, no matter what. And I really do believe that this is a byproduct of the public nature of social media. I sincerely doubt that they do this in private, because I don’t think it’s as rewarding. By doing it publicly, you can be part of the mob of the day, find yourself in the company of like-minded individuals (that you likely don’t know and might as well hate you in real life), and have fun berating someone. Then pat yourself on the back and get ready to join the next mob. This is something that’s entirely absent when interactions are moved to private channels of communication. I think it’s incredibly rare for a mob to try to pile on you via email. You can just keep marking everyone as spam, not even bothering to open their messages. And they get no kick out of it. There’s no personal reward to be found in sending a shitty email to someone. And that is why, even though I had nothing but enjoyable exchanges with everyone I crossed paths with online, I’ll still stick with email and DMs as the way to interact with the rest of you out there. And if you think you have a good argument to make to prove I’m wrong, I wanna hear it. My inbox is open . Thank you for keeping RSS alive. You're awesome. Email me :: Sign my guestbook :: Support for 1$/month :: See my generous supporters :: Subscribe to People and Blogs

0 views
Xe Iaso 2 weeks ago

Hastily made coffee video

I'm trying to get back into the flow of making videos more. In an effort to optimize my production pipeline, I'm going to be making a lot more "low effort" videos. This is the first one where I filmed a video of me making coffee on my phone. I think the next one is gonna be me making espresso.

1 views
DHH 2 weeks ago

Calling someone a "nazi" is a permission slip for violence

The last loonies on tech's woke island are getting desperate. It used to be that a wide variety of baseless accusations of racism, misogyny, or white supremacy could inflict grave social and professional consequences for the accused, but that's no longer true. So now they've had to up the ante, and that's why everyone is suddenly a nazi to these people. Because if you can't intimidate people into silence and compliance with the woke orthodoxies by threatening their job or their social circle, you might be able to threaten them with actual violence or worse. That's what the "nazi" accusation is there to convey: That violence has been authorized. The slogan has been around for a while: Punch a nazi. It has a sorta quaint, winking phrasing, so you'd be forgiven for thinking that maybe it wasn't actually meant as a real threat. But I think that theory has gone out the window. Just look at what happened to Charlie Kirk. This is a natural consequence of all the lost terrain. The DEI bureaucracies in tech have been decimated or dismantled. The tone-setting social media, X, can no longer be wielded for narrative control (and Bluesky keeps shrinking from purity purges). And finally, the American administration went from blue to red in 2024. Lost terrain means lost leverage. Which means the usual threats have stopped working because they relied on that institutional and broad social leverage to be effective. And these loonies know that. The threat of violence, however, is evergreen. It's the final resort of a movement that has lost a political and philosophical path to victory in the public square. It's sad, it's pathetic, but you're not wrong to be worried when political assassinations are justified and exalted in reference to the "nazi" threat.  But that's just all the more reason you can't give in, you can't give up. The defeat of wokeism in the workplace should give you comfort. These people are not invincible. The wheels have been falling off their political project for years now. You can and should say "no" when they come with the "nazi" nonsense too.

1 views
ava's blog 3 weeks ago

lost connections

There are past internet contacts that I still occasionally check up on. Like every year or two, I will randomly think of them and their username(s), and see what I can find, without still having any socials or following them anywhere. One of them is a person I used to be mutuals with on Tumblr way, way back. For years, we used to message, comment on each other’s posts and reblog, and she gave me courage and support when I broke up with someone. I watched her really build up her career and her own horse business, and it was amazing seeing her grow and change. But we lost touch at some point. Finding her over the years to see how she was doing was easy: She was so successful in her niche, well known, with official work-dedicated social media profiles and her own website that showed off her and her credentials, her approach in her business, and more. It used to be easy to find her main blog and her sideblog for her dog, too. I never reached out directly, it was just enough to know everything is well and remembering the old times. But when I checked this time, it was a lot harder, despite having both the usernames and her real name. It seems like 90% of it vanished; some articles about her remained, but nothing of herself. The Facebook page has a note from January 2025, saying she is not using it anymore and moving away from Meta (good!). Her Tumblr is now password-protected and her dog blog seems to be deleted (or maybe I just can’t find it). The website for her business is now completely matter-of-fact, impersonal, not mentioning her name, not showing her on pictures at all. It’s a lot colder than it used to be, no longer having this loving and personal language about horse wellness and working with kids. It lacks a lot of the scenic, romantic pictures and the entire backstory of how it came to be. The URL has changed, too, but it’s clearly still her horses being shown. At first I wondered if she had died, but I couldn’t find anything about that. I don’t think she sold the business, either, as she lives there and these are her animals. So I had to conclude that it was all intentional, that her time of being very present online and sharing herself openly and publicly were over. It made me wonder if her priorities simply naturally shifted after becoming a mum 3 years ago, or if something bad happened. I wonder if it had to do with the increasingly bad climate online on the platforms she frequented, or maybe even the political climate in the US. She had always been very leftist, outspoken feminist, pro abortion and more, and it’s only becoming more and more apparent now that that simply may not be something you can openly say in the US without maybe being punished for it one way or another. It made me a little sad. I can’t blame her, I did the same thing ages ago, starting 2018. But it really rubbed in that this era is over, our connection is severed, and that I now lose access to finding out what will happen to her, just like everyone else whose usernames I forgot or who just never logged back in anymore without an explanation or a link to other means of contact. I remember in the first few years of Facebook, it seemed like we would just be able to keep track of people for most likely a good chunk of our lives now, maybe even the rest of our life. No more wondering what someone from that forum or high school might be up to, or only having random run-ins at the grocery store to know about how someone’s doing. But looking at it now, so many people have deleted their Facebook account, no longer log in, or just lurk without posting anything. Same with other platforms. Sad how it all shifted, and how the internet doesn’t lend itself well to (re)connection and care in this way anymore (or maybe, just in specific corners that many do not frequent). Reply via email Published 19 Sep, 2025

0 views
Jeff Geerling 4 weeks ago

Digging deeper into YouTube's view count discrepancy

For a great many tech YouTube channels, views have been markedly down from desktop ("computer") users since August 10th (or so). This month-long event has kicked up some dust—enough that two British YouTubers, Spiffing Brit and Josh Strife Hayes are having a very British argument 1 over who's right about the root cause. Spiffing Brit argued it's a mix of YouTube's seasonality (it's back to school season) and channels falling off, or as TechLinked puts it, " git gud ", while Josh Strife Hayes points out the massive number of channels which identified a historic shift down in desktop views (compared to mobile, tablet, and TV) starting after August 10. This data was corroborated by this Moist Critical video as well.

0 views
Herman's blog 4 weeks ago

Slow social media

People often assume that I hate social media. And they'd be forgiven for believing that, since I am overtly critical of current social media platforms and the effects they have on individuals and society; and deleted all of my social media accounts back in 2019 . However, the underlying concept of social media is something I resonate with: Stay connected with the people you care about. It's just that the current form of social media is bastardised, and not social at all. Instead of improving relationships and fostering connection, they're advertisement-funded content mills which are explicitly designed and continually refined to keep you engaged, lonely, and unhappy. And once TikTok figured out that short-form video with a recommendation engine is digital crack, all other social media platforms quickly sprang into action to copy their secret sauce. Meta basically turned Instagram and Facebook from 'connecting with friends' into 'doom-scrolling random content'. Even Pinterest is starting to look like TikTok! They followed user engagement, but not the underlying preferences of their users. I posit that any for-profit social media will eventually degrade into recommendation media over time. I don't think most people using these platforms understand that they are the product. Instagram isn't built for you. It's built for marketers. It's built for celebrities to capitalise on their audiences. It's built for politicians and their cronies to sway sentiment. It's built to be as addictive as possible, and to capitalise on your insecurity and uncomfortability.

0 views
ava's blog 1 months ago

gazette post: resisting self-flanderization

Quick note that I published a post on Self-Flanderization for the Grizzly Gazette here :) Reply via email Published 14 Sep, 2025

0 views
Jeff Geerling 1 months ago

YouTube views are down (don't panic)

September 15 update : @YouTubeInsider confirmed that the issue is related to viewers who have adblockers enabled—YouTube's been in an arms race with ad blocking tools , and the fallout is a substantial cut in counted views for creators who have a large audience watching from desktop. Many YouTube content creators, myself included, noticed something in early to mid-August: views were down. After being on the platform since 2006 (though for me, not being a 'professional' YouTuber until about 5 years ago), I'm used to seasonal dips, adjustments after new tweaks to the algorithm or layout/design changes. But this was substantial .

0 views
neilzone 1 months ago

Ofcom's perhaps inadvertent list of porn sites allegedly without age assurance made me smile

I had to smile today that, when reading Ofcom’s website about its enforcement activities under the Online Safety Act 2023, I learned about a few porn sites of which I was not previously aware. Given the nature of Ofcom’s investigations, some of these sites are probably not enforcing age assurance for users in the UK. Ofcom’s website is not (of course; it has no reason to be) behind age assurance, so I wonder at what point it becomes a destination of choice for anyone who does not want to, or is unable to, verify their age to access pornography, as the source of a curated list of probably still accessible porn sites. It is right and proper that Ofcom is transparent about the service providers subject to investigations or enforcement activity, but all the same, it tickled me. This reminded me of a journal article that I was reading a while back - sadly, I don’t recall the name, or even the journal - about child access to pornography. The gist of the article was that lots of children were aware of, and (to a lesser extent) had accessed, online pornography. Its research methodology has consisted of asking children who were 16 or so some questions about sex and pornography, including giving them a list of porn sites and asking with which they were familiar. There were some sites on that list of which I was not aware, and I imagine that that was probably true of the child research participants in the study too. I would love to have read the ethics board approval for that one…

0 views
Simon Willison 1 months ago

V&A East Storehouse and Operation Mincemeat in London

We were back in London for a few days and yesterday had a day of culture. First up: the brand new V&A East Storehouse museum in the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park near Stratford, which opened on May 31st this year. This is a delightful new format for a museum. The building is primarily an off-site storage area for London's Victoria and Albert museum, storing 250,000 items that aren't on display in their main building. The twist is that it's also open to the public. Entrance is free, and you can climb stairs and walk through an airlock-style corridor into the climate controlled interior, then explore three floors of walkways between industrial shelving units holding thousands of items from the collection. There is almost no signage aside from an occasional number that can help you look up items in the online catalog.

0 views
DHH 1 months ago

National pride

The Danish flag is everywhere in Denmark. It's at the airport when parents greet their kids coming back from holiday. It's on the birthday cake when you invite people over. It's swinging from the flagpoles in house after house, especially in the countryside. It's on the buses on the monarch's birthday. It's everywhere and all the time. I love it

0 views
neilzone 2 months ago

The term 'NSFW' is problematic and overdue for retirement

“NSFW” is an initialism for “Not Safe For Work”. It is, IMHO, a lazy, unhelpful, even stigmatising, shorthand. Using more specific descriptions makes more sense to me. Some people’s work involves pornography, or dealing with photographs of graphic injuries, or whatever it might be. “NSFW” asserts that the tagged content is Not Safe For Work even if it is, in fact, someone’s work. It is disingenuous to say that someone’s work is not suitable for work. It is, by definition, suitable for their workplace. There’s a particular irony in asserting that “sex work is work”, and then saying that that sex work content must be tagged “Not Safe For Work”. Whose work / safety / comfort is being prioritised here? For this reason alone, I think that it is long past time to retire “NSFW”. Tagging something - a photo, a post, a website, an app, whatever - as “NSFW” does not give any meaningful information. Does it contain graphic injuries? Domestic or sexual violence? A word used as a slur? What about a word which can be used as a slur but has been reclaimed by the community it was used to target? A video of a sexual act? Non-sexual nudity? Breastfeeding? A ( gasp ) “female nipple”? Is it something which might be problematic in one country but perfectly acceptable in another? If the goal of the use of the “NSFW” tag is to help users decide whether or not to view the tagged content, it fails precisely because of its lack of clarity. Users cannot make an informed choice to view the content, or whether to view it now or some other time, if they do not know what it entails. Instead, I think that being specific is more helpful. There are, of course, degrees of specificity, but saying that something is a photo of a graphic injury with blood, or describes domestic violence, or contains a cartoon depiction of sexual activity, or whatever, seems far more helpful to me than just saying “NSFW”. I can see how vagueness might seen as helpful to a site/service operator, who does not want to detail what they actually want to prohibit. This is on the basis that it gives them a vague, catch-all term, which they can use to justify moderation actions. To me, this causes more problems than it solves. It leads to concerns about lack of transparency as to why any given item was deemed to have broken the “NSFW” rule, and consequently concerns about selective or capricious enforcement. Practically, it can lead to problems with consistency when decisions are taken by multiple individuals separately, since each may have their own viewpoint on what is “NSFW”. From the perspective of encouraging participation (and also from a freedom of expression perspective), rules or consequences linked to an intentionally vague, unclear term is unattractive. I have some sympathy for an approach which says that a vague term “NSFW” is necessary, because if they prohibited specific things, people would argue that what they have created does not fall within those specific areas, and so must be allowed. To me, the answer lies in how the provider communicates its process for updating its list, to react to changing circumstances. Some will inevitably see this as moving the goalposts, and you can’t please all the people all the time, but I think that there is a genuine value in trying to ensure clarity and certainty while also reserving (transparently invoked) flexibility.

0 views
DHH 2 months ago

YouTube has earned its crown

I often give Google a lot of shit for shutting down services whenever they're bored, hire a new executive, or face a three-day weekend. The company seems institutionally incapable of standing behind the majority of the products they launch for longer than a KPI cycle. But when the company does decide that something is pivotal to the business, it's an entirely different story

0 views
Chris Coyier 2 months ago

Your Own Newspaper, Or Not

You’ve likely heard me go on about how much I like an encourage using an RSS reader. Molly White frames it nicely : What if you could take all your favorite newsletters, ditch the data collection, and curate your own newspaper? It could include independent journalists, bloggers, mainstream media, worker-owned media collectives, and just about anyone else who publishes online. Even podcast episodes, videos from your favorite YouTube channels, and online forum posts could slot in, too. Only the stuff you want to see, all in one place, ready to read at your convenience. No email notifications interrupting your peace (unless you want them), no pressure to read articles immediately. Wouldn’t that be nice? Here are a few more reasons: I could keep going listing reasons and resources and yadda yadda, but right now, I’m thinking about the pushback. Why would someone not do this? Tell me! I’m curious. I know one pushback I’ve recently heard is that it’s easy to screw up. For instance, you’re like: I like The Verge. So you subscribe to The Verge RSS feed, and then only like a handful of other things. The Verge publishes a lot so now everytime you visit your reader, it’s all Verge stuff, and you just get sick of it in 2 days. That feels very fair. You gotta unsubscribe from that if that’s how you feel. It’s constantly work to curate your feeds so it’s a nice pace for you an a nice collection of stuff you actually do want to read. That’s work and not everyone wants work. They don’t want another inbox to manage, which is fair. If you don’t do the RSS thing, what are your reasons?

0 views
Weakty 3 months ago

The Manga of Taiyo Matsumoto

When I was a kid, someone in my family rented Spirited Away . I loved it. I hadn’t even known the name of the movie when I sat down to watch it. I was mesmerized. Afterward, I don’t think I ever asked, or thought to ask, if there were other movies by the same director. Years and years passed before I was able to put a name to that magical movie I had seen, but the story, the animation, everything about it sat waiting in my mind to be rediscovered. It wasn't until some 10 or 15 years later that I saw Spirited Away for the second time and it all came back to me in a rush. There was an indelible impression it had left on me and my childhood memory. It was an amazing feeling, and I followed that up by watching every single Studio Ghibli film I could get my hands on one christmas break during university. A similar thing has since happened with Taiyō Matsumoto's work. When I was probably 15 or 16, I watched Tekkonkinkreet with a friend. I remember her excitedly showing me the DVD case and me feeling somewhat skeptical. The drawings on it looked not as polished as other cartoons or as-of-yet-unnamed-magic-films I had seen somewhere in my distant past. Still, we watched it and I was stunned. I never followed up on it. I didn’t even know that movies like Tekkonkinkreet were based on manga . 
Needless to say, here I am, again, more than ten years later, diving deep into the oevre of Matsumoto, reading pretty much every comic I can get my hands on. Thankfully, the library where I live is well stocked with his works, and in the past year, I've read Ping Pong, Gogo Monster, No. 5, Sunny, Cats of the Louvre, Tokyo these days , and I’m saving a re-read of Tekkonkinkreet for last. There's something unique about Matsumoto’s work that is inspiring and engaging for me. His drawing style is different from most manga comics I’ve read. It's loose yet refined and energetic; I have read that he draws freehand (which I think means that he's just drawing straight with ink on paper?). I was surprised by how “unpolished” his work felt in comparison to others— sometimes even seemingly childish (although for certain works, this is done to an intentional effect (see No. 5 and GoGo Monster )). As time passed and I read more of his work, I realized that such adjectives were crude and ill-fitting. I’m often struck by characters that are drawn "reductively" with scrunched up faces, are “out of proportion”, or simplified. I think part of me is in awe of this choice because I’ve regrettably internalized that a published comic should be…not like this? Over the years of studying drawing and thinking about getting "better" at drawing, I haven’t even thought about the stylistic choices to render something in a scrappier way. Of course, with Matsumoto’s work, these occasional "scrappy" panels are in juxtaposition to unquestionably polished and impressive panels. I suppose seeing this gives me a liberating feeling toward what comics can be. As usual, there are no rules .  Taiyō Matsumoto’s works feature flowing narratives that can be both fast-paced and temperate. What’s more, his works span several genres: sports, fantasy, slice-of-life, dystopian fiction, coming-of-age, among others. Works like Gogo Monster, Ping Pong, Sunny, and Tekkonkinkreet have a throughline of coming-of-age / childhood adversity, but all works seem to have a flush cast of characters where, by the end of the work, you feel like you’ve left an entire world behind. 
I recommend you take a moment to get into his work. There are so many interesting books that he's created. Some are quite fantastical, and others are slice-of-life, and I love all of it. I’d recommend starting with Ping Pong Vol. 1. Growing up, I really didn’t like comics. Anything with superheroes turned me off. They were too stark, complicated, and visually overwhelming. If I had known I could have read a comic about a young, melancholic ping-pong star when I was a kid, well, I’d probably have read all of Matsumoto’s works much earlier.

0 views