A Word on Omarchy
Pro tip: If you’ve arrived here via a link aggregator, feel free to skip ahead to the Summary for a conveniently digestible tl;dr that spares you all the tedious details, yet still provides enough ammunition to trash-talk this post in the comments of whatever platform you stumbled upon it. In the recent months, there has been a noticeable shift away from the Windows desktop, as well as from macOS , to Linux, driven by various frustrations, such as the Windows 11 Recall feature. While there have historically been more than enough Linux distributions to choose from, for each skill level and amount of desired pain, a recent Arch -based configuration has seemingly made strides across the Linux landscape: Omarchy . This pre-configured Arch system is the brainchild of David Heinemeier Hansson , a Danish web developer and entrepreneur known as one of the co-founders of 37signals and for developing the Ruby on Rails framework. The name Omarchy appears to be a portmanteau of Arch , the Linux distribution that Hansson ’s configuration is based upon, and お任せ, which translates to omakase and means to leave something up to someone else (任せる, makaseru, to entrust ). When ordering omakase in a restaurant, you’re leaving it up to the chef to serve you whatever they think is best. Oma(kase) + (A)rch + y is supposedly where the name comes from. It’s important to note that, contrary to what Hansson says in the introduction video , Omarchy is not an actual Linux distribution . Instead, it’s an opinionated installation of Arch Linux that aims to make it easy to set up and run an Arch desktop, seemingly with as much TUI-hacker-esque aesthetic as possible. Omarchy comes bundled with Hyprland , a tiling window manager that focuses on customizability and graphic effects, but apparently not as much on code quality and safety . However, the sudden hype around Omarchy , which at this point has attracted attention and seemingly even funding from companies like Framework (Computer Inc.) ( attention ) and Cloudflare ( attention and seemingly funding ), made me want to take a closer look at the supposed cool kid on the block to understand what it was all about. Omarchy is a pre-configured installation of the Arch distribution that comes with a TUI installer on a 6.2GB ISO. It ships with a collection of shell scripts that use existing FOSS software (e.g. walker ) to implement individual features. The project is based on the work that the FOSS community, especially the Arch Linux maintainers, have done over the years, and ties together individual components to offer a supposed ready-to-use desktop experience. Omarchy also adds some links to different websites, disguised as “Apps” , but more on that later. This, however, seems to be enough to spark an avalanche of attention and, more importantly, financial support for the project. Anyway, let’s give Omarchy an actual try, and see what chef Hansson recommended to us. The Omarchy installer is a simple text user interface that tries to replicate what Charm has pioneered with their TUI libraries: A smooth command-line interface that preserves the simplicity of the good old days , yet enhances the experience with playful colors, emojis, and animations for the younger, future generation of users. Unlike mature installers, Omarchy ’s installer script doesn’t allow for much customization, which is probably to be expected with an “Opinionated Arch/Hyprland Setup” . Info: Omarchy uses gum , a Charm tool, under the hood. One of the first things that struck me as unexpected was the fact that I was able to use as my user password, an easy-to-guess word that Omarchy will also use for the drive encryption, without any resistance from the installer. Most modern Linux distributions actively prevent users from setting easily guessable or brute-forceable passwords. Moreover, taking into account that the system relies heavily on sudo (instead of the more modern doas ), and also considering that the default installation configures the maximum number of password retries to 10 (instead of the more cautious limit of three), it raises an important question: Does Omarchy care about security? Let’s take a look at the Omarchy manual to find out: Omarchy takes security extremely seriously. This is meant to be an operating system that you can use to do Real Work in the Real World . Where losing a laptop can’t lead to a security emergency. According to the manual, taking security extremely seriously means enabling full-disk encryption (but without rejecting simple keys), blocking all ports except for 22 (SSH, on a desktop) and 53317 (LocalSend), continuously running (even though staying bleeding-edge has repeatedly proven to be in insufficient security measure in the past) and maintaining a Cloudflare protected package mirror. That’s seemingly all. Hm. Proceeding with the installation, the TUI prompts for an email address, which makes the whole process feel a bit like the Windows setup routine. While one might assume Omarchy is simply trying to accommodate its new user base, the actual reason appears to be much simpler: . If, however, you’d be expecting for Omarchy to set up GPG with proper defaults, configure SSH with equally secure defaults, and perhaps offer an option to create new GPG/SSH keys or import existing ones, in order to enable proper commit and push signing for Git, you will be left disappointed. Unfortunately, none of this is the case. The Git config doesn’t enable commit or push signing, neither the GPG nor the SSH client configurations set secure defaults, and the user isn’t offered a way to import existing keys or create new ones. Given that Hansson himself usually does not sign his commits, it seems that these aspects are not particularly high on the project’s list of priorities. The rest of the installer routine is fairly straightforward and offers little customization, so I won’t bore you with the details, but you can check the screenshots below. After initially downloading the official ISO file, the first boot of the system greets you with a terminal window informing you that it needs to update a few packages . And by “a few” it means another 1.8GB. I’m still not entirely sure why the v3.0.2 ISO is a hefty 6.2GB, or why it requires downloading an additional 1.8GB after installation on a system with internet access. For comparison, the official Arch installer image is just 1.4GB in size . While downloading the updates (which took over an hour for me), and with over 15GB of storage consumed on my hard drive, I set out to experience the full Omarchy goodness! After hovering over a few icons on the Waybar , I discovered the menu button on the very left. It’s not a traditional menu, but rather a shortcut to the aforementioned walker launcher tool, which contains a few submenus: The menu reads: Apps, Learn, Trigger, Style, Setup, Install, Remove, Update, About, System; It feels like a random assortment of categories, settings, package manager subcommands, and actions. From a UX perspective, this main menu doesn’t make much sense to me. But I’m feeling lucky, so let’s just go ahead and type “Browser” ! Hm, nothing. “Firefox” , maybe? Nope. “Chrome” ? Nah. “Chromium” ? No. Unfortunately the search in the menu is not universal and requires you to first click into the Apps category. The Apps category seems to list all available GUI (and some TUI) applications. Let’s take a look at the default apps that Omarchy comes with: The bundled “apps” are: 1Password, Alacritty, Basecamp, Bluetooth, Calculator, ChatGPT, Chromium, Discord, Disk Usage, Docker, Document Viewer, Electron 37, Figma, Files, GitHub, Google Contacts, Google Messages, Google Photos, HEY, Image Viewer, Kdenlive, LibreOffice, LibreOffice Base, LibreOffice Calc, LibreOffice Draw, LibreOffice Impress, LibreOffice Math, LibreOffice Writer, Limine-snapper-restore, LocalSend, Media Player, Neovim, OBS Studio, Obsidian, OpenJDK Java 25 Console, OpenJDK Java 25 Shell, Pinta, Print Settings, Signal, Spotify, Typora, WhatsApp, X, Xournal++, YouTube, Zoom; Aside from the fact that nearly a third of the apps are essentially just browser windows pointing to websites , which leaves me wondering where the 15GB of used storage went, the selection of apps is also… well, let’s call it opinionated , for now at least. Starting with the browser, Omarchy comes with Chromium by default, specifically version 141.0.7390.107 in my case, which, unlike, for example, ungoogled-chromium , has disabled support for manifest v2 and thus doesn’t include extensions like uBlock Origin or any other advanced add-ons. In fact, the browser is completely vanilla, with no decent configuration. The only extension it includes is the copy-url extension, which serves a rather obscure purpose: Providing a non-intuitive way to copy the current page’s URL to your clipboard using an even less intuitive shortcut ( ) while using any of the “Apps” that are essentially just browser windows without browser controls. Other than that, it’s pretty much stock Chromium. It allows all third-party cookies, doesn’t send “Do Not Track” requests, sends browsing data to Google Safe Browsing , but doesn’t enforce HTTPS. It has JavaScript optimization enabled for all websites, which increases the attack surface, and it uses Google as the default search engine. There’s not a single opinionated setting in the configuration of the default browser on Omarchy , let alone in the choice of browser itself. And the fact that the only extension installed and active by default is an obscure workaround for the lack of URL bars in “App” windows doesn’t exactly make this first impression of what is likely one of the most important components for the typical Omarchy user very appealing. Alright, let’s have a look at what is probably the second most important app after the browser for many people in the target audience: Basecamp ! Just kidding. Obviously, it’s the terminal. Omarchy comes with Alacritty by default, which is a bit of an odd choice in 2025, especially for a desktop that seemingly prioritizes form over function, given the ultra-conservative approach the Alacritty developers take toward anything related to form and sometimes even function. I would have rather expected Kitty , WezTerm , or Ghostty . That said, Alacritty works and is fairly configurable. Unfortunately, like the browser and various other tools such as Git, there’s little to no opinionated configuration happening, especially one that would enhance integration with the Omarchy ecosystem. Omarchy seemingly highlights the availability of NeoVim by default, yet doesn’t explicitly configure Alacritty’s vi mode , leaving it at its factory defaults . In fact, aside from the keybinding for full-screen mode, which is a less-than-ideal shortcut for anyone with a keyboard smaller than 100% (unless specifically mapped), the Alacritty config doesn’t define any other shortcuts to integrate the terminal more seamlessly into the supposed opinionated workflow. Not even the desktop’s key-repeat rate is configured to a reasonable value, as it takes about a second for it to kick in. Fun fact: When you leave your computer idling on your desk, the screensaver you’ll encounter isn’t an actual hyprlock that locks your desktop and uses PAM authentication to prevent unauthorized access. Instead, it’s a shell script that launches a full-screen Alacritty window to display a CPU-intensive ASCII animation. While Omarchy does use hyprlock , its timeout is set longer than that of the screensaver. Because you can’t dismiss the screensaver with your mouse (only with your keyboard) it might give inexperienced users a false sense of security. This is yet another example of prioritizing gimmicky animations over actual functionality and, to some degree, security. Like the browser and the terminal emulator, the default shell configuration is a pretty basic B….ash , and useful extensions like Starship are barely configured. For example, I ed into a boilerplate Python project directory, activated its venv , and expected Starship to display some useful information, like the virtual environment name or the Python version. However, none of these details appeared in my prompt. “Surely if I do the same in a Ruby on Rails project, Starship will show me some useful info!” I thought, and ed into a Rails boilerplate project. Nope. In fact… Omarchy doesn’t come with Rails pre-installed. I assume Hansson ’s target audience doesn’t primarily consist of Rails developers, despite the unconditional , but let’s not get ahead of ourselves. It is nevertheless puzzling that Omarchy doesn’t come with at least Ruby pre-installed. I find it a bit odd that the person who literally built the most successful Ruby framework on earth is pre-installing “Apps” like HEY , Spotify , and X , but not his own FOSS creation or even just the Ruby interpreter. If you want Rails , you have to navigate through the menu to “Install” , then “Development” , and finally select "‘Ruby on Rails" to make RoR available on your system. Not just Ruby , though. And even going the extra mile to do so still won’t make Starship display any additional useful info when inside a Rails project folder. PS: The script that installs these development tools bypasses the system’s default package manager and repository, opting instead to use mise to install interpreters and compilers. This is yet another example of security not being taken quite as seriously as it should be. At the very least, the script should inform the user that this is about to happen and offer the option to use the package manager instead, if the distributed version meets the user’s needs. Fun fact: At the time of writing, mise installed Ruby 3.4.7. The latest package available through the package manager is – you guessed it – 3.4.7. As mentioned earlier, Omarchy is built entirely using Bash scripts, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with that. When done correctly and kept at a sane limit, Bash scripts are powerful and relatively easy to maintain. However, the scripts in Omarchy are unfortunately riddled with little oversights that can cause issues. Those scripts are also used in places in which a proper software implementation would have made more sense. Take the theme scripts, for example. If you go ahead and create a new theme under and name it , and then run a couple of times until the tool hits your new theme, you can see one effect of these oversights. Nothing catastrophic happened, except now won’t work anymore. If you’d want to annoy an unsuspecting Omarchy user, you could do this: While this is such a tiny detail to complain about, it is an equally low-hanging fruit to write scripts in a way in which this won’t happen. Apart from the numerous places where globbing and word splitting can occur, there are other instances of code that could have also been written a little bit more elegantly. Take this line , for example: To drop and from the , you don’t have to call and pipe to . Instead, you can simply use Bash’s built-in regex matching to do so: Similarly, in this line there’s no need to test for a successful exit code with a dedicated check, when you can simply make the call from within the condition: And frankly, I have no idea what this line is supposed to be: What are you doing, Hansson? Are you alright? Make no mistake to believe that the remarks made above are the only issues with Hansson ’s scripts in Omarchy . While these specific examples are nitpicks, they paint a picture that is only getting less colorful the more we look into the details. We can continue to gauge the quality of the scripts by looking beyond just syntax. Take, for example, the migration : This script runs five commands in sequence within an condition: first , followed by two invocations, then again, and finally . While this might work as expected “on a sunny day” , the first command could fail for various reasons. If it does, the subsequent commands may encounter issues that the script doesn’t account for, and the outcome of this migration will be differently from what the author anticipated. For experienced users, the impact in such a case may be minimal, but for others, it may present a more significant hurdle. Furthermore, as can be seen in here , the invoking process cannot detect if only one of the five commands failed. As a result, the entire migration might be marked as skipped , despite changes being made to the system. But let’s continue to look into specifically the migrations in just a moment. The real concern here, however, is the widespread absence of exception handling, either through status code checks for previously executed commands or via dependent executions (e.g., ). In most scripts, there is no validation to ensure that actions have the desired effect and the current state actually represents the desired outcome. Almost all sequentially executed commands depend upon one another, yet the author doesn’t make sure that if fails the script won’t just blindly run . Note: Although sets , which would cause a script like the one presented above to fail when the first command fails, the migrations are invoked by sourcing the script. This script, in turn, invokes the script using the helper function . However, this function executes the script in the following way: In this case, the options are not inherited by the actual migration , meaning it won’t stop immediately when an error occurs. This behavior makes sense, as abruptly stopping the installation would leave the system in an undefined state. But even if we ignored that and assumed that migrations would stop when the first command would fail, it still wouldn’t actually handle the exception, but merely stop the following commands from performing actions on an unexpected state. To understand the broader issue and its impact on security, we need to dive deeper into the system’s functioning, and especially into migrations . This helps illustrate how the fragile nature of Omarchy could take a dangerous turn, especially considering the lack of tests, let alone any dedicated testing infrastructure. Let’s start by adding some context and examining how configurations are applied in Omarchy . Inspired by his work as a web developer, Hansson has attempted to bring concepts from his web projects into the scripts that shape his Linux setup. In Omarchy , configuration changes are handled through migration scripts, as we just saw, which are in principle similar to the database migrations you might recall from Rails projects. However, unlike SQL or the Ruby DSL used in Active Record Migrations , these Bash scripts do not merely contain a structured query language; They execute actual system commands during installation. More importantly: They are not idempotent by default! While the idea of migrations isn’t inherently problematic, in this case, it can (and has) introduce(d) issues that go/went unnoticed by the Omarchy maintainers for extended periods, but more on that in a second. The migration files in Omarchy are a collection of ambiguously named scripts, each containing a set of changes to the system. These changes aren’t confined to specific configuration files or components. They can be entirely arbitrary, depending on what the migration is attempting to implement at the time it is written. To modify a configuration file, these migrations typically rely on the command. For instance, the first migration intended to change from to might execute something like . The then following one would have to account for the previous change: . Another common approach involves removing a specific line with and appending the new settings via . However, since multiple migrations are executed sequentially, often touching the same files and running the same commands, determining the final state of a configuration file can become a tedious process. There is no clear indication of which migration modifies which file, nor any specific keywords (e.g., ) to grep for and help identify the relevant migration(s) when searching through the code. Moreover, because migrations rely on fixed paths and vary in their commands, it’s impossible to test them against mock files/folders, to predict their outcome. These scripts can invoke anything from sourcing other scripts to running commands, with no restrictions on what they can or cannot do. There’s no “framework” or API within which these scripts operate. To understand what I mean by that, let’s take a quick look at a fairly widely used pile of scripts that is of similar importance to a system’s functionality: OpenRC . While the init.d scripts in OpenRC are also just that, namely scripts, they follow a relatively well-defined API : Note: I’m not claiming that OpenRC ’s implementation is flawless or the ultimate solution, far from it. However, given the current state of the Omarchy project, it’s fair to say that OpenRC is significantly better within its existing constraints. Omarchy , however, does not use any sort of API for that matter. Instead, scripts can basically do whatever they want, in whichever way they deem adequate. Without such well defined interfaces , it is hard to understand the effects that migrations will have, especially when changes to individual services are split across a number of different migration scripts. Here’s a fun challenge: Try to figure out how your folder looks after installation by only inspecting the migration files. To make matters worse, other scripts (outside the migration folder) may also modify configurations that were previously altered by migrations , at runtime, such as . Note: To the disappointment of every NixOS user, unlike database migrations in Rails , the migrations in Omarchy don’t support rollbacks and, judging by their current structure, are unlikely to do so moving forward. The only chance Omarchy users have in case a migration should ever brick their existing system is to make use of the available snapshots . All of this (the lack of interfaces , the missing exception handling and checks for desired outcomes, the overlapping modification, etc.) creates a chaotic environment that is hard to overview and maintain, which can severely compromise system integrity and, by extension, security. Want an example? On my fresh installation, I wanted to validate the following claim from the manual : Firewall is enabled by default: All incoming traffic by default except for port 22 for ssh and port 53317 for LocalSend. We even lock down Docker access using the ufw-docker setup to prevent that your containers are accidentally exposed to the world. What I discovered upon closer inspection, however, is that Omarchy ’s firewall doesn’t actually run, despite its pre-configured ruleset . Yes, you read that right, everyone installing the v3.0.2 ISO (and presumably earlier versions) of Omarchy is left with a system that doesn’t block any of the ports that individual software might open during runtime. Please bear in mind that apart from the full-disk encryption, the firewall is the only security measure that Omarchy puts in place. And it’s off by default. Only once I manually enabled and started using / , it did activate the rules mentioned in the handbook. As highlighted in the original issue , it appears that, with the chaos that are the migration- , preflight- and first-run- scripts no one ever realized that you need to tell to explicitly enable a service for it to actually run. And because it’s all made up of Bash scripts that can do whatever they want, you cannot easily test these things to notice that the state that was expected for a specific service was not reached. Unlike in Rails , where you can initialize your (test) database and run each migration manually if necessary to make sure that the schema reaches the desired state and that the database is seeded correctly, this agglomeration of Bash scripts is not structured data. Hence, applying the same principle to something as arbitrary as a Bash script is not as easily possible, at least not without clearly defined structures and interfaces . As a user who trusted Omarchy to secure their installation, I would be upset, to say the least. The system failed to keep users safe, and more importantly, nobody noticed for a long time. There was no hotfix ISO issued, nor even a heads-up to existing users alongside the implemented fix ( e.g. ). While mistakes happen, simply brushing them under the rug feels like rather negligent behavior. When looking into the future, the mess that is the Bash scripts certainly won’t decrease in complexity, making me doubt that things like these won’t happen again. Note: The firewall fix was listed in v2.1.1. However, on my installation of v3.0.2 the firewall would still not come up automatically. I double-checked this by running the installation of v3.0.2 twice, and both times the firewall would not autostart after the second reboot. While writing this post, v3.1.0 ( update: v3.1.1 ) was released and I also checked the issue there. v3.1.0 appears to have finally fixed the firewall issue. Having that said, it shows how much of a mess the whole system is, when things that were identified and supposedly fixed multiple versions ago still don’t work in newer releases weeks later. Tl;dr: v3.1.0 appears to be the first release to actually fix the firewall issue, even though it was identified and presumably fixed in v2.1.1, according to the changelog. With the firewall active, it becomes apparent that Omarchy ’s configuration does indeed leave port 22 (SSH) open, even though the SSH daemon is not running by default. While I couldn’t find a clear explanation for why this port is left open on a desktop system without an active SSH server, my assumption is that it’s intended to allow the user to remotely access their workstation should they ever need to. It’s important to note that the file in Omarchy , like many other system files, remains unchanged. Users might reasonably assume that, since Omarchy intentionally leaves the SSH port open, it must have also configured the SSH server with sensible defaults. Unfortunately, this is not the case. In a typical Arch installation, users would eventually come across the “Protection” section on the OpenSSH wiki page, where they would learn about the crucial settings that should be adjusted for security reasons. However, when using a system like Omarchy , which is marketed as an opinionated setup that takes security seriously , users might expect these considerations to be handled for them, making it all the more troubling that no sensible configuration is in place, despite the deliberate decision to leave the SSH port open for future use. Hansson seemingly struggles to get even basics like right. The fact that there’s so little oversight, that users are allowed to set weak password for both, their account and drive encryption, and that the only other security measure put in place, the firewall, simply hasn’t been working, does not speak in favor of Omarchy . Info: is abstraction layer that simplifies managing the powerful / firewall and it stands for “ u ncomplicated f ire w all”. Going into this review I wasn’t expecting a hardened Linux installation with SELinux , intrusion detection mechanisms, and all these things. But Hansson is repeatedly addressing users of Windows and macOS (operating systems with working firewalls and notably more security measures in place) who are frustrated with their OS, as a target audience. At this point, however, Omarchy is a significantly worse option for those users. Not only does Omarchy give a hard pass on Linux Security Modules , linux-hardened , musl , hardened_malloc , or tools like OpenSnitch , and fails to properly address security-related topics like SSH, GPG or maybe even AGE and AGE/Yubikey , but it in fact weakens the system security with changes like the increase of and login password retries and the decrease of faillock timeouts . Omarchy appears to be undoing security measures that were put in place by the software- and by the Arch -developers, while the basis it uses for building the system does not appear to be reliable enough to protect its users from future mishaps. Then there is the big picture of Omarchy that Hansson tries to curate, which is that of a TUI-centered, hacker -esque desktop that promises productivity and so on. He even goes as far as calling it “a pro system” . However, as we clearly see from the implementation, configuration and the project’s approach to security, this is unlike anything you would expect from a pro system . The entire image of a TUI-centered productivity environment is further contradicted in many different places, primarily by the lack of opinions and configuration . If the focus is supposed to be on “pro” usage, and especially the command-line, then… The configuration doesn’t live up to its sales pitch, and there are many aspects that either don’t make sense or aren’t truly opinionated , meaning they’re no different from a standard Arch Linux installation. In fact, I would go as far as to say that Omarchy is barely a ready-to-use system at all out of the box and requires a lot of in-depth configuration of the underlying Arch distribution for it to become actually useful. Let’s look at only a few details. There are some fairly basic things you’ll miss on the “lightweight” 15GB installation of Omarchy : With the attention Omarchy is receiving, particularly from Framework (Computer Inc.) , it is surprising that there is no option to install the system on RAID1 hardware: I would argue that RAID1 is a fairly common use case, especially with Framework (Computer Inc.) 16" laptops, which support a secondary storage device. Considering that Omarchy is positioning itself to compete against e.g. macOS with TimeMachine , yet it does not include an automated off-drive backup solution for user data by default – which by the way is just another notable shortcoming we could discuss – and given that configuring a RAID1 root with encryption is notoriously tedious on Linux, even for advanced users, the absence of this option is especially disappointing for the intended audience. Even moreso when neither the installer nor the post-installation process provides any means to utilize the additional storage device, leaving inexperienced users seemingly stuck with the command. Omarchy does not come with a dedicated swap partition, leaving me even more puzzled about its use of 15GB of disk space. I won’t talk through why having a dedicated swap partition that is ideally encrypted using the same mechanisms already in place is a good idea. This topic has been thoroughly discussed and written about countless times. However, if you, like seemingly the Omarchy author, are unfamiliar with the benefits of having swap on Linux, I highly recommend reading this insightful write-up to get a better understanding. What I will note, however, is that the current configuration does not appear to support hibernation via the command through the use of a dynamic swap file . This leads me to believe that hibernation may not function on Omarchy . Given the ongoing battery drain issues with especially Framework (Computer Inc.) laptops while in suspend mode, it’s clear that hibernation is an essential feature for many Linux laptop users. Additionally, it’s hard to believe that Hansson , a former Apple evangelist , wouldn’t be accustomed to the simple act of closing the lid on his laptop and expecting it to enter a light sleep mode, and eventually transitioning into deep sleep to preserve battery life. If he had ever used Omarchy day-to-day on a laptop in the same way most people use their MacBooks , he would almost certainly have noticed the absence of these features. This further reinforces the impression that Omarchy is a project designed to appear robust at first glance, but reveals a surprisingly hollow foundation upon closer inspection. Let’s keep our focus on laptop use. We’ve seen Hansson showcasing his Framework (Computer Inc.) laptop on camera, so it’s reasonable to assume he’s using Omarchy on a laptop. It’s also safe to say that many users who might genuinely want to try Omarchy will likely do so on a laptop as well. That said, as we’ve established before, closing the laptop lid doesn’t seem to trigger hibernate mode in Omarchy . But if you close the lid and slip the laptop into your backpack, surely it would activate some power-saving measures, right? At the very least, it should blank the screen, switch the CPU governor to powersaving , or perhaps even initiate suspend to RAM ? Well… Of course, I can’t test these scenarios firsthand, as I’m evaluating Omarchy within a securely confined virtual machine, where any unintended consequences are contained. Still, based on the system’s configuration, or more accurately the lack thereof, it seems unlikely that an Omarchy laptop will behave as expected. The system might switch power profiles due to the power-profiles-daemon when not plugged in, yet its functionality is not comparable to a properly configured or similar. It seems improbable that it will enter suspend to RAM or hibernate mode, and it’s doubtful any other power-saving measures (like temporarily halting non-essential background processes) will be employed to conserve battery life. Although the configuration comes with an “app” for mail, namely HEY , that platform does not support standard mail protocols . I don’t think it’s a hot take to say that probably 99% of Omarchy ’s potential users will need to work with an email system that does support IMAP and SMTP, however. Yet, the base system offers zero tools for that. I’m not even asking for anything “fancy” like ; Omarchy unfortunately doesn’t even come with the most basic tools like the command out of the box. Whether you want to send email through your provider, get a simple summary for a scheduled Cron job delivered to your local mailbox, or just debug some mail-related issue, the command is relatively essential, even on a desktop system, but it is nowhere to be found on Omarchy . Speaking of which: Cron jobs? Not a thing on Omarchy . Want to automate backing up some files to remote storage? Get ready to dive into the wonderful world of timers , where you’ll spend hours figuring out where to create the necessary files, what they need to contain, and how to activate them. Omarchy could’ve easily included a Cron daemon or at least for the sake of convenience. But I guess this is a pro system , and if the user needs periodic jobs, they will have to figure out . Omarchy is, after all, -based … … and that’s why it makes perfect sense for it to use rootless Podman containers instead of Docker. That way, users can take advantage of quadlets and all the glorious integration. Unfortunately, Omarchy doesn’t actually use Podman . It uses plain ol’ Docker instead. Like most things in Omarchy , power monitoring and alerting are handled through a script , which is executed every 30 seconds via a timer. That’s your crash course on timers right there, Omarchy users! This script queries and then uses to parse the battery percentage and state. It’s almost comical how hacky the implementation is. Given that the system is already using UPower , which transmits power data via D-Bus , there’s a much cleaner and more efficient way to handle things. You could simply use a piece of software that connects to D-Bus to continuously monitor the power info UPower sends. Since it’s already dealing with D-Bus , it can also send a desktop notification directly to whatever notification service you’re using (like in Omarchy ’s case). No need for , , or a periodic Bash script triggered by a timer. “But where could I possibly find such a piece of software?” , you might ask. Worry not, Hr. Hansson , I have just the thing you need ! That said, I can understand that you, Hr. Hansson , might be somewhat reluctant to place your trust in software created by someone who is actively delving into the intricacies of your project, rather than merely offering a superficial YouTube interview to casually navigate the Hyprland UI for half an hour. Of course, Hr. Hansson , you could have always taken the initiative to develop a more robust solution yourself, in a proper, lower-level language, and neatly integrated it into your Omarchy repository. But we will explore why this likely hasn’t been a priority for you, Hr. Hansson , in just a moment. While the author’s previous attempt for a developer setup still came with Zellij , this time his opinions seemingly changed and Omarchy doesn’t include Zellij , or Tmux or even screen anymore. And nope, picocom isn’t there either, so good luck reading that Arduino output from . That moment, when you realize that you’ve spent hours figuring out timers , only to find out that you can’t actually back up those files to a remote storage because there’s no , let alone or . At least there is the command. :-) Unfortunately not, but Omarchy comes with and by default. I could go on and on, and scavenge through the rest of the unconfigured system and the scripts, like for example the one, where Omarchy once again seems to prefer -ing random scripts from the internet (or anyone man-in-the-middle -ing it) rather than using the system package manager to install Tailscale . But, for the sake of both your sanity and mine, I’ll stop here. As we’ve seen, Omarchy is more unconfigured than it is opinionated . Can you simply install all the missing bits and piece and configure them yourself? Sure! But then what is the point of this supposed “perfect developer setup” or “pro system” to begin with? In terms of the “opinionated” buzzword, most actual opinions I’ve come across so far are mainly about colors, themes, and security measures. I won’t dare to judge the former two, but as for the latter, well, unfortunately they’re the wrong opinions . In terms of implementation: Omarchy is just scripts, scripts, and more scripts, with no proper structure or (CI) tests. BTW: A quick shout out to your favorite tech influencer , who probably has at least one video reviewing the Omarchy project without mentioning anything along these lines. It is unfortunate that these influential people barely scratch the surface on a topic like this, and it is even more saddening that recording a 30 minute video of someone clicking around on a UI seemingly counts as a legitimate “review” these days. The primary focus for many of these people is seemingly on pumping out content and generating hype for views and attention rather than providing a thoughtful, thorough analysis. ( Alright, we’re almost there. Stick with me, we’re in the home stretch. ) The Omarchy manual : The ultimate repository of Omarchy wisdom, all packed into 33 pages, clocking in at little over 10,000 words. For context, this post on Omarchy alone is almost 10,000 words long. As is the case with the rest of the system, the documentation also adheres to Hansson ’s form over function approach. I’ve mentioned this before, but it bears repeating: Omarchy doesn’t offer any built-in for its scripts, let alone auto-completion, nor does it come with traditional pages. The documentation is tucked away in yet another SaaS product from Hansson ’s company ( Writebook ) and its focus is predominantly on themes, more themes, creating your own themes, and of course, the ever-evolving hotkeys. Beyond that, the manual mostly covers how to locate configuration files for individual UI components and offers guidance on how to configure Hyprland for a range of what feels like outrageously expensive peripherals. For the truly informative content, look no further than the shell function guide, with gems such as: : Format an entire disk with a single ext4 partition. Be careful! Wow, thanks, Professor Oak, I will be! :-) On a more serious note, though, the documentation leaves much to be desired, as evidenced by the user questions over on the GitHub discussions page . Take this question , which unintentionally sums up the Omarchy experience for probably many inexperienced users: I installed this from github without knowing what I was getting into (the page is very minimal for a project of this size, and I forgot there was a link in the footnotes). Please tell me there’s a way to remove Omarchy without wiping my entire computer. I lost my flashdrive, and don’t have a way to back up all my important files anymore. While this may seem comical on the surface, it’s a sad testament to how Omarchy appears to have a knack for luring in unsuspecting users with flashy visuals and so called “reviews” on YouTube, only to leave them stranded without adequate documentation. The only recourse? Relying on the solid Arch docs, which is an abrupt plunge into the deep end, given that Arch assumes you’re at least familiar with its very basics and that you know how you set up your own system. Maybe GitHub isn’t the most representative forum for the project’s support; I haven’t tried Discord, for example. But no matter where the community is, users should be able to fend for themselves with proper documentation, turning to others only as a last resort. It’s difficult to compile a list of things that could have made Omarchy a reasonable setup for people to consider, mainly because, in my opinion, the core of the setup – scripts doing things they shouldn’t or that should have been handled by other means (e.g., the package manager) – is fundamentally flawed. That said, I do think it’s worth mentioning a few improvements that, if implemented, could have made Omarchy a less bad option. Configuration files should not be altered through loose migration scripts. Instead, updated configuration files should be provided directly (ideally via packages, see below) and applied as patches using a mechanism similar to etc-update or dpkg . This approach ensures clarity and reduces confusion, preserves user modifications, and aligns with established best practices. Improve on the user experience where necessary and maybe even contribute improvements back. Use proper software implementations where appropriate. Want a fancy screensaver? Extend Hyprlock instead of awkwardly repurposing a fullscreen terminal window to mimic one. Need to display power status notifications without relying on GNOME or KDE components? Develop a lightweight solution that integrates cleanly with the desktop environment, or extend the existing Waybar battery widget to send notifications. Don’t like existing Linux “App Store” options? Build your own, rather than diverting a launcher from its intended use only to run Bash scripts that install packages from third-party sources on a system that has a perfectly good package manager in place. Arguably the most crucial improvement: Package the required software and install it via the system’s package manager. Avoid relying on brittle scripts, third-party tools like mise , or worse, piping scripts directly into . I understand that the author is coming from an operating system where it’s sort of fine to and use software like to manage individual Ruby versions. However, we have to take into consideration that specifically macOS has a significantly more advanced security architecture in place than (unfortunately) most out-of-the-box Linux installations have, let alone Omarchy . On Hanssons setup the approach is neither sensible nor advisable, especially given that it’s ultimately a system that is built around a proper package manager. If you want multiple versions of Ruby, package them and use slotting (or the equivalent of it on the distribution that you’re using, e.g. installation to version-specific directories on Arch ). Much of what the migrations and other scripts attempt to do could, and should have been achieved through well-maintained packages and the proven mechanisms of a package manager. Whether it’s Gentoo , NixOS , or Ubuntu , each distribution operates in its own unique way, offering users a distinct set of tools and defaults. Yet, they all share one common trait: A set of strong, well-defined opinions that shape the system. Omarchy , in contrast, feels little more than a glorified collection of Hyprland configurations atop an unopinionated, barebones foundation. If you’re going to have opinions, don’t limit them to just nice colors and cute little wallpapers. Form opinions on the tools that truly matter, on how those tools should be configured, and on the more intricate, challenging aspects of the system, not just the surface-level, easy choices. Have opinions on the really sticky and complicated stuff, like power-saving modes, redundant storage, critical system functionality, and security. Above all, cultivate reasonable opinions, ones that others can get behind, and build a system that reflects those. Comprehensive documentation is essential to help users understand how the system works. Currently, there’s no clear explanation for the myriad Bash scripts, nor is there any user-facing guidance on how global system updates affect individual configuration files. ( finally… ) Omarchy feels like a project created by a Linux newcomer, utterly captivated by all the cool things that Linux can do , but lacking the architectural knowledge to get the basics right, and the experience to give each tool a thoughtful review. Instead of carefully selecting software and ensuring that everything works as promised, the approach seems to be more about throwing everything that somehow looks cool into a pile. There’s no attention to sensible defaults, no real quality control, and certainly no verification that the setup won’t end up causing harm or, at the very least, frustration for the user. The primary focus seems to be on creating a visually appealing but otherwise hollow product . Moreover, the entire Omarchy ecosystem is held together by often poorly written Bash scripts that lack any structure, let alone properly defined interfaces . Software packages are being installed via or similar mechanisms, rather than provided as properly packaged solutions via a package manager. Hansson is quick to label Omarchy a Linux distribution , yet he seems reluctant to engage with the foundational work that defines a true distribution: The development and proper packaging (“distribution”) of software . Whenever Hansson seeks a software (or software version) that is unavailable in the Arch package repositories, he bypasses the proper process of packaging it for the system. Instead, he resorts to running arbitrary scripts or tools that download the required software from third-party sources, rather than offering the desired versions through a more standardized package repository. Hansson also appears to avoid using lower-level programming languages to implement features in a more robust and maintainable manner at all costs , often opting instead for makeshift solutions, such as executing “hacky” Bash scripts through timers. A closer look at his GitHub profile and Basecamp’s repositories reveals that Hansson has seemingly worked exclusively with Ruby and JavaScript , with most contributions to more complex projects, like or , coming from other developers. This observation is not meant to diminish the author’s profession and accomplishments as a web developer, but it highlights the lack of experience in areas such as systems programming, which are crucial for the type of work required to build and maintain a proper Linux distribution. Speaking of packages, the system gobbles up 15GB of storage on a basic install, yet fails to deliver truly useful or high-quality software. It includes a hodgepodge of packages, like OpenJDK and websites of paid services in “App” -disguise, but lacks any real optimization for specific use cases. Despite Omarchy claiming to be opinionated most of the included software is left at its default settings, straight from the developers. Given Hansson ’s famously strong opinions on everything, it makes me wonder if the Omarchy author simply hasn’t yet gained the experience necessary to develop clear, informed stances on individual configurations. Moreover, his prioritization of his paid products like Basecamp and HEY over his own free software like Rails leaves a distinctly bitter aftertaste when considering Omarchy . What’s even more baffling is that seemingly no one at Framework (Computer Inc.) or Cloudflare appears to have properly vetted the project they’re directing attention (and sometimes financial support) to. I find it hard to believe that knowledgeable people at either company have looked at Omarchy and thought, “Out of all the Linux distributions out there, this barely configured stack of poorly written Bash scripts on top of Arch is clearly the best choice for us to support!” In fact, I would go as far as to call it a slap in the face to each and every proper distro maintainer and FOSS developer. Furthermore, I fail to see the supposed gap Omarchy is trying to fill. A fresh installation of Arch Linux, or any of its established derivatives like Manjaro , is by no means more complicated or time-consuming than Omarchy . In fact, it is Omarchy that complicates things further down the line, by including a number of unnecessary components and workarounds, especially when it comes to its chosen desktop environment. The moment an inexperienced user wants or needs to change anything, they’ll be confronted with a jumbled mess that’s difficult to understand and even harder to manage. If you want Arch but are too lazy to read through its fantastic Wiki , then look at Manjaro , it’ll take care of you. If that’s still not to your liking, maybe explore something completely different . On the other hand, if you’re just looking to tweak your existing desktop, check out other people’s dotfiles and dive into the unixporn communities for inspiration. As boring as Fedora Workstation or Ubuntu Desktop might sound, these are solid choices for anyone who doesn’t want to waste time endlessly configuring their OS and, more importantly, wants something that works right out of the box and actually keeps them safe. Fedora Workstation comes with SELinux enabled in “enforcing” mode by default, and Ubuntu Desktop utilizes AppArmor out of the box. Note: Yes, I hear you loud and clear, SuSE fans. The moment your favorite distro gets its things together with regard to the AppArmor-SELinux transition and actually enables SELinux in enforcing mode across all its different products and versions I will include it here as well. Omarchy is essentially an installation routine for someone else’s dotfiles slapped on top of an otherwise barebones Linux desktop. Although you could simply run its installation scripts on your existing, fully configured Arch system, it doesn’t seem to make much sense and it’s definitely not the author’s primary objective. If this was just Hansson’s personal laptop setup, nobody, including myself, would care about the oversights or eccentricities, but it is not. In fact, this project is clearly marketed to the broader, less experienced user base, with Hansson repeatedly misrepresenting Omarchy as being “for developers or anyone interested in a pro system” . I emphasize marketed here, because Hansson is using his reach and influence in every possible way to advertise and seemingly monetize Omarchy ; Apart from the corporate financial support, the project even has its own merch that people can spend money on. Given that numerous YouTubers have been heavily promoting the project over the past few weeks, often in the same breath with Framework (Computer Inc.) , it wouldn’t be surprising to see the company soon offering it as a pre-installation option on their hardware. If you’re serious about Linux, you’re unlikely to fall for the Omarchy sales pitch. However, if you’re an inexperienced user who’s heard about Omarchy from a tech-influencer raving about it, I strongly recommend starting your Linux journey elsewhere, with a distribution that actually prioritizes your security and system integrity, and is built and maintained by people who live and breathe systems, and especially Linux. Alright, that’s it. Why don’t any of the Bash scripts and functions provide a flag or maybe even autocompletions? Why are there no Omarchy -related pages? Why does the system come with GNOME Files , which requires several gvfs processes running in the background, yet it lacks basic command-line file managers like or ? Why would you define as an for unconditionally, but not install Rails by default? Why bother shipping tools like and but fail to provide aliases for , , etc to make use of these tools by default? Why wouldn’t you set up an O.G. alias like in your defaults ? Why ship the GNOME Calculator but not include any command-line calculators (e.g., , ), forcing users to rely on basics like ? Why ship the full suite of LibreOffice, but not a single useful terminal tool like , , , etc.? Why define functions like with and without an option to enable encryption, when the rest of the system uses and ? And if it’s intended for use by inexperienced users primarily for things like USB sticks, why not make it instead of so the drive works across most operating systems? Why not define actually useful functions like or / ? Why doesn’t your Bash configuration include history- and command-flag-based auto-suggestions? Or a terminal-independent vi mode ? Or at least more consistent Emacs-style shortcuts? Why don’t you include some quality-of-life tools like or some other command-line community favorites? If you had to squeeze in ChatGPT , why not have Crush available by default? Why does the base install with a single running Alacritty window occupy over 2.2GB of RAM right after booting? For comparison: My Gentoo system with a single instance of Ghostty ends up at around half of that. Why set up NeoVim but not define as an alias for , or even create a symlink? And speaking of NeoVim , why does the supposedly opinionated config make NeoVim feel slower than VSCode ?
Security
Open Source
Python
AI
Media
Programming
JSON
Linux
Java
JavaScript
Web Development
Ruby
DevOps
Hardware
HTML
Rust
Cloud
API
Go
Business
Music