Posts in Books (20 found)

Daemon: a 2006 techno-thriller that reads like a 2026 product roadmap

Fair warning: this post contains spoilers for both Daemon and Freedom™. Then again, the books came out twenty years ago. If you haven’t read them by now, you probably weren’t going to. I highly recommend them both though, if you haven’t read them yet. I finished re-reading Daniel Suarez’s Daemon and its sequel Freedom™ a few weeks ago. I first picked them up years back and thought they were solid techno-thrillers with some wild ideas baked into an entertaining plot. Reading them again in 2026, they’re just as gripping, but for somewhat different reasons. The realism has caught up in a way I wasn’t expecting. When I first read these books, I took them as clever speculation of what the future may look like. Now I’m reading them and thinking: yeah, that exists. That too. And that. The fiction hasn’t aged, the real world has just gone ahead and built most of it. The premise is straightforward: Matthew Sobol, a dying game developer, leaves behind a distributed AI program that activates after his death. The Daemon, as it’s called, begins infiltrating systems, recruiting operatives through an online game-like interface, and systematically restructuring society. In Freedom™ , the sequel, that restructuring plays out in full: decentralised communities, alternative economies, mesh networks, and a population split between those plugged into the new system and those clinging to the old one. Suarez self-published Daemon in 2006. That bears repeating. 2006. YouTube was a year old. The iPhone didn’t exist yet. And this guy was writing about autonomous vehicles, augmented reality glasses, voice-controlled AI agents, distributed botnets acting with real-world consequences, and desktop fabrication units. Not as far-future sci-fi set in 2150, but as things that were five to ten years away. The Daemon’s entire existence starts with what is essentially a cron job. Sobol’s program sits dormant, scraping news headlines, waiting for a specific trigger: reports of his own death. When it finds them, it wakes up and starts executing. It wasn’t a sentient AI gone rogue with a dramatic moment it becomes into being. Just a script polling RSS feeds on a schedule, pattern-matching against text, and firing off the next step in a chain. I had something similar with OpenClaw for a while. Not the assassinations, obviously, but the same fundamental architecture of scheduled tasks that wake up, pull information from the internet, process it, and take action without any human prompting. Morning briefings, inbox sweeps, periodic research jobs. The Daemon’s trigger mechanism felt sinister in 2006. Now it’s a feature you can configure in a YAML file. Yep, I know what you’re thinking - we’ve had cron for a long time and this part was possible even before the book was written - but this is just the first chapter of the book. Then there are the autonomous machines. Sobol’s Daemon deploys “AutoM8s”: driverless vehicles that transport operatives and, in the book’s darker moments, act as weapons. It also uses robotic ground units for surveillance and enforcement. In 2006, this was pure fiction. Now Boston Dynamics has Spot, a quadruped robot dog that autonomously navigates terrain, avoids obstacles, and self-charges. Their Atlas humanoid can do backflips, parkour courses, and 540-degree inverted flips. These are real machines you can watch on YouTube doing things that would have read as absurd twenty years ago. Suarez’s vision of autonomous robots patrolling and operating independently isn’t a prediction anymore, it’s a product catalogue. The always-connected vehicle is another one. In Daemon, the AutoM8s are permanently networked, receiving instructions and sharing data in real time. Every Tesla on the road today is essentially this. Always online, streaming telemetry back to the mothership, receiving over-the-air updates, and feeding its camera data into a collective neural network. The car you’re driving is a node in someone else’s distributed system. Sobol would have appreciated the irony of people voluntarily buying into that. One of the creepier technologies in the books is WiFi-based surveillance, using wireless signals to detect and track people through walls. Suarez wrote about this as a covert capability the Daemon could exploit. Carnegie Mellon researchers have since built exactly that. Their “DensePose from WiFi” system uses standard WiFi router signals to reconstruct human poses in real time, even through solid walls. The reflected signals carry enough information about body shape and movement that a neural network can map what you’re doing in a room without a single camera. It works through drywall, wood, and even concrete up to a point, and none of this is classified military tech. It’s published academic research that anyone can read. The acoustic weapon is probably the one that catches people off guard the most. In Daemon, there’s a directed sound system that can make audio appear to come from right beside you while no one else in the room hears a thing. It sounds like science fiction until you look up parametric speakers. Companies like Holosonics have been selling “Audio Spotlight” systems for years. They work by emitting “modulated ultrasonic beams that demodulate into audible sound only within a tight, targeted area” - I’ve experienced these in airports, but have no idea what that quote actually means. Museums, airports, and retailers already use them, and the military has explored them for crowd control. The effect is exactly what Suarez described, sound that seems to materialise out of thin air, audible only to the person standing in the beam, and you can buy one commercially right now. The social dynamics might be the most on-the-nose parallel of all. In the books, the Daemon recruits human operatives to carry out tasks in the physical world. It finds people, assigns them work, and pays them through its own system. The humans don’t fully understand the bigger picture. They just complete their tasks and collect their reward. In January 2026, a site called RentAHuman.ai launched. It’s a platform where OpenClaw AI agents can hire actual people to perform tasks for them. Humans sign up with their skills and hourly rate, AI agents post jobs, and people complete them for payment in stablecoins. Over 40,000 people registered within days. The framing is different, obviously. It’s gig work, not a shadowy network of mindless humans - arguably. But the underlying structure is identical. AI systems delegating physical-world tasks to human operatives who sign up voluntarily, motivated by compensation and a sense of participation in something larger. Suarez wrote it as dystopian fiction that, in 2006 seemed like only the insane would enroll. We built it as a startup and it got very popular, very quickly. The 10% that hasn’t happened is mostly about scale and centralisation. Sobol’s Daemon is a single, coherent system with an architect’s intent behind every action. Real distributed systems don’t work like that. AI development has been messy, competitive, and fragmented across hundreds, perhaps even thousands, of companies and research labs. There’s no singular Daemon pulling strings, just a chaotic landscape of overlapping systems with no one fully in control. Which, depending on your perspective, might actually be worse. The weaponised autonomous vehicles haven’t materialised in the way Suarez imagined either, though military drones certainly have. The line between his fiction and real-world drone warfare is thinner than most people would be comfortable with. And the neat resolution in Freedom™ , where Darknet communities build something genuinely better, still feels like the most fictional part of the whole thing. We’ve got the decentralised technology. We’ve got the mesh networks and the alternative currencies. What we haven’t got is the social cohesion to do anything coherent with them. Crypto became a speculative casino with massive peaks and equal troughs. The tools exist, but the utopian bit remains out of reach. Suarez wasn’t writing from some academic ivory tower or speculating about technology he’d never touched. He was an IT consultant who spent years working with Fortune 1000 companies, and you can feel that experience on every page. He understood how systems actually work, how they fail, and how they get exploited, which is what makes re-reading both books such a strange experience. He wasn’t guessing at any of this. He was extrapolating from things he could already see forming, and doing it with an accuracy that I genuinely wouldn’t have believed twenty years ago. If you haven’t read Daemon and Freedom™ , go and read them. I track everything I read on Hardcover , and both of these are easy five-star picks. They’re fantastic books on their own merits. The pacing is relentless, the technical detail is sharp without being dry, and the plot keeps pulling you forward. I’d recommend them even if none of the technology had come true. But it has, and not gradually over twenty years. The pace is accelerating. Half the parallels I’ve listed in this post didn’t exist even twelve months ago. OpenClaw’s cron system, RentAHuman.ai, the latest generation of Boston Dynamics robots: all 2025 or 2026 developments. The gap between Suarez’s fiction and our reality is closing faster each year, and that makes the books hit differently every time you revisit them. I suspect they’ll hit differently again in another twelve months, and I can’t wait to re-read them then.

0 views
Ratfactor Yesterday

Dave's book review for The Art of Doing Science and Engineering

My rather long book review and/or collection of notes from reading Richard W. Hamming's opus.

0 views
Stratechery 3 days ago

An Interview with Bill Gurley About Runnin’ Down a Dream

An interview with long-time (retired) VC Bill Gurley about his new book about building a career you love, Uber, and the modern state of VC.

0 views

The Waves

Six children—three girls and three boys—play in a garden by the sea. We follow them as they grow up, go to school, venture away from home, grieve the death of a friend, marry (or not), have children (or not). We do not see or hear their goings on but rather their inner monologues, the thoughts they could never have spoken but feel and know. More prose poem than novel, the writing posits that our inner lives are as rich and detailed as the world around us, perhaps more so. And that there is a continuity threaded through the differences and separations between us, a simultaneous distinctness and blurring of selves, both wave and particle, each headed for the shore. View this post on the web , subscribe to the newsletter , or reply via email .

0 views
Kev Quirk 2 weeks ago

Step Aside, Phone: Week 1

OK, so here we are at the end of the first week of Step Aside, Phone . Quick re-cap from last week - my average phone and tablet usage combined was approximately 4 hours per day (2.5hrs on phone, and 1.5hr on tablet). That's high! Hopefully this week was better? This one is easy - my screen time on my tablet has been zero, as I turned it off last week, and haven't turned it back on again. Instead I've been either reading RSS feeds quickly on my phone before bed, or reading a book on my Kindle. It took me a couple days to get back into reading a book; I haven't done it for a while and as a result my mind kept wandering. I'm back in the swing of things now though and I'm enjoying the book I'm currently reading. Honestly, I haven't missed my tablet at all. I'm not sure if that thing will get turned back on. So the phone...that's also reduced for the most part, but I have had a couple days with heavier usage. Here's how the breakdown went: Ok, so from 2.5hr average to 1:19hr average. I'll take that. My usage was up for a few days between Wed-Fri as I was shopping for stuff Amazon, as well as browsing for a new car for my wife. The only day where I really wasted time was on Thursday where I spent some time on YouTube during my son's swimming lesson (that's the only time I went on YT all week), and on Friday where I spent 16 mins playing on my silly game. Overall I think it's been a pretty good week, and I hope the next 3 weeks continue to improve. Although, not quite as good as Manu this week ! Mon - 48 mins Tue - 61 mins Wed - 55 mins Thur - 2hrs 13mins Fri - 1hr 42mins Sat - 2hrs 01min Sun - 30 mins Average - 1hr 19mins

0 views

A Strategy for Labor

“A system that makes people work like zombies to produce useless, destructive, or self-destructive things has outlived its usefulness.” How to rouse people to defeat that system (i.e. capitalism) and build something better in its place, is the question André Gorz applies himself to here. Among his proposals is that of “non-reformist reform,” not reformism as a kind of gradualism or incrementalism—in which changes to the system are absorbed and reframed while the system carries on—but one that looks to that longed-for future and foreshadows its existence in the present. The strategy is echoed in the contemporary prison abolition movement, which refuses to be distracted by placating reforms that maintain an unequal balance of power. That his book is still relevant is our misfortune and our counsel all the same. View this post on the web , subscribe to the newsletter , or reply via email .

0 views
A Room of My Own 2 weeks ago

I Choose Living Over Documenting

Over the past few weeks, I’ve been sitting with a growing feeling that my life has (once again! unfortunately, this is not the first time) become… busy in a very specific way. Not busy with people or experiences or even work, but busy with tools. With systems. With capturing, tracking, logging, and organising. At some point, and this keeps happening, I start living inside my artifacts. It doesn’t happen all at once. It creeps in quietly - every new app, every new method, every new process… disguised as something fun and even mildly productive. I capture thoughts in Day One. I open monthly notes in Bear. Then weekly notes. Weekly notes become blog posts (which I actually kind of like and will probably keep) . Then I add a monthly recap. Then trackers - books, movies, mood, walking, yoga, food. The purpose is, I tell myself, to consolidate. Reflect. Optimise. Learn something profound about myself, I guess. But most of it was probably because I can , because it gives me a sense of control, like tidying up and minimising my house when my work and life get too busy and too frantic. The moment of clarity came last week. I’d just finished my January monthly recap that I added to my monthly Bear notes , a system I am trialling. I’d written it carefully, linked all my blog posts to it, and spent a good 45 minutes on it. And then Bear didn’t sync due to some Bear Web glitch. The whole thing disappeared. My first reaction was annoyance as I was getting ready to write it all again. And then clarity. I realised I didn’t actually want to do it again. Or even recover it. In fact, I didn’t want to be doing it at all. I deleted the monthly recaps. I kept a very simple monthly note, but that may go as well if it doesn’t prove to be useful. I’m stopping movie tracking entirely. I’ll keep book tracking , but only because that’s where I consolidate notes and highlights, and I like having it in one place. I still journal in Day One, and my blog will remain my creative outlet - writing when I want to write, not because I put any pressure on myself to write. And I’m done trying to tie it all together into some grand, optimised life dashboard. What I really want is to come home and do nothing. Or go for a walk. Or do something small with the kids. Yesterday I went for a walk at lunchtime without my headphones and realised how rare it’s become to just be out of my head. Not recording my thoughts into an app (it’s such a cool app, though; I will share more about it soon). But that’s the part that’s been bothering me the most - how much time I’ve spent thinking about and analyzing my life instead of living it. I even caught myself halfway through justifying a new laptop purchase, as if the answer to anything was more tech. I don’t need a new MacBook. I don’t need better tools. I need fewer of them. So here are some notes to self. living over documenting. to focus on work while I’m at work. to focus on my kids and my life when I’m not. presence over optimisation. tools that support me while I live my life. to finish things, let things go, and stop carrying half-alive projects in my head. living over documenting. to focus on work while I’m at work. to focus on my kids and my life when I’m not. presence over optimisation. tools that support me while I live my life. to finish things, let things go, and stop carrying half-alive projects in my head.

0 views
A Room of My Own 2 weeks ago

2026-6: Week Notes

It was a short week at work thanks to the Waitangi Day long weekend. Over the last five years we’ve lived in New Zealand, my family has built a tradition of going camping over that weekend. You can usually count on decent weather over that weekend (wasn’t that great this year unfortunatelly but good enough. 🏕️We went camping by the river again, a spot the kids absolutely love. They spent hours swimming, it was too cold to me, but just being there was perfect. And just as I started properly relaxing, it was time to pack up and head home. ⛺️We’ve been talking about upgrading our tent and are looking at a Zempire one that seems like a good fit for how we actually camp. That said, I think I’ll save the whole camping and gear rabbit hole for a separate post maybe 📚I finished reading The Safekeep by Yael van der Wouden this week and really enjoyed it. It felt relatable in a lot of way (war is unfair, so unfair). I’m looking forward to talking about it at book club. 📖Lately, I’ve been reading a lot about minimalism and decluttering. Minimalism feels so close and yet always just out of reach. People often comment on how minimalist our home is, but to me, it’s still not minimalist enough . I want to be much more ruthless about what I actually need versus what I’m keeping simply because I have space for it. That’s very much a work in progress. And my husband’s tendency to keep every gift anyone has ever given him definitely doesn’t help 📍Work itself has been intense. When things are this busy, I feel depleted and don’t have much energy left for blogging or creative hobbies. In those phases, I mostly want to read or do something physical. Even if it is sorting out a drawer or clearing a shelf… or getting rid of something. There’s professional development I want to do, but right now I just feel too tired to engage with it properly. 🪑I booked an appointment with a psychotherapist for the first time. Work covers a few mental health sessions, and I feel like I’m at a point where talking things through could help. I chose someone who felt like a good fit, hard to explain why, but something resonated. We’re meeting online tomorrow, and I want to talk about the expectations I place on myself, where I feel I fall short, and my ongoing anxiety. 📸On a more practical note, I mostly kept up with my photo management for January. I didn’t finish everything, but I did most of it. 🤓I’ve also decided to buy a new Kindle. My current one is about 15 years old and still works perfectly, but newer Paperwhites let you email highlights directly from the device. I read a lot of PDFs and want my highlights to flow straight into Readwise without any friction (at the moment I have to manually transfer it using a cable). I also tried the latest Paperwhite recently, and it’s fast . Once you experience that, it’s hard to go back. The plan is to keep one Kindle in my bedroom for bedtime reading and one for the living room. Small luxury, but I’m really looking forward to it. I tried to buy it yesterday, but the shop was out of stock. Will try again later.

0 views
Manuel Moreale 3 weeks ago

Step aside, phone

I was chatting with Kevin earlier today, and since he’s unhappy with his mindless phone usage , I proposed a challenge to him: for the next 4 weeks, each Sunday, we’re gonna publish screenshots of our screen time usage as well as some reflections and notes on how the week went. If you also want to cut down on some of your phone usage, feel free to join in; I’ll be happy to include links to your posts. I experimented with phone usage in the past and I know that I can push screen time usage very low , but it’s always nice to do these types of challenges, especially when done to help someone else. Like Kevin, I’m also trying to read more. I read 35 books last year , the goal for 2026 is to read 36 (currently more than halfway through book number 5), and so I’m gonna attempt to spend more time reading on paper and less on screen. It’s gonna be fun, curious to see how low I can push my daily averages this time around. Thank you for keeping RSS alive. You're awesome. Email me :: Sign my guestbook :: Support for 1$/month :: See my generous supporters :: Subscribe to People and Blogs

0 views
Rik Huijzer 1 months ago

Peter Ruckman on Professors

After having been in academia for many years and having obtained a PhD, I agree with Dr. Peter Ruckman's opinion (starting 9:52): > [...] > Always correct the Greek with English. > Oh how they hate that. Oh my God how they hate that. > Every professor in America just "Oh oh... Ah! Heresy!" > You say, "Why?" > They want you to come to them, can't you figure that mess out? > > **Now listen, never let scholarship intimidate you no matter how stupid you are.** > If the scholarship says one thing and you read in your Bible that it doesn't say that, don't let them intimidate you. > Say, "Well, I do...

0 views
A Room of My Own 1 months ago

Where Most of My Energy Goes These Days

As I mentioned in my weekly notes from last week , and also in some insights from this week’s note , I noticed how easily I slip into managing everyone’s time and behaviour when I’m physically around (I work from home a lot while the kids are on summer holidays). It also made me notice, again, where most of my mental energy actually goes outside of work. One big chunk goes into managing my food and weight. It genuinely feels like a part-time job some weeks, just thinking about it. I’ve been reflecting on the idea of making clearer rules for myself so I’m not constantly negotiating in my head about what I should or shouldn’t eat. This quote I once saved from Gretchen Rubin’s book really resonates with me. “What’s wonderful for me is that in the past, the presence of that ice cream or those Oreos would have been a big distraction. Could I have one, two? One bite, two bites, a tiny bowl, another tiny bowl….and so on. So boring, so draining to battle a craving! Now that I never eat that stuff, I don’t think about it. It doesn’t tempt me any more than a package of uncooked rice. This means less conflict, because I used to be annoyed when my husband bought ice cream, because while he is a Moderator, I’m not. But now he can buy all the ice cream he wants. Why? I don’t eat sugar!… One crucial thing to note about cravings is that they grow with the promise of fulfillment. I eat this way all the time—on vacation, on Christmas Day, on my birthday, at a dinner party at a friend’s house.” I think she is fully keto or paleo or something which I wouldn’t do but I do agree with the underlying idea of deciding once and removing the ongoing decision fatigue. Being slightly stricter upfront might actually give me more peace and free up energy. The second big energy drain is navigating the kids and electronics. We technically have rules, but rules only matter if they’re enforced, and that’s where things don’t really happen. We all just give in. My son just turned sixteen, and it feels wrong putting consequences in place when he should really be self-regulating. On some level, I understand that the world has changed and kids live differently now, and that I’m pushing them toward a world that no longer exists; like when I was younger and we played outside and hung out for hours on end (aka a Stranger Things childhood). Still, I keep coming back to the idea that it’s not just about limiting screen time, but about offering/having high-quality leisure to replace it (as suggested by Cal Newport in his book Digital Minimalism ). To be fair, my son actually does this well with surfing and being outdoors when he has the chance, but it just doesn’t happen as often as I’d (and probably he’d) like. I had a good, honest conversation with my son about this. I told him that at sixteen, I sometimes feel like my active raising is mostly done and that the choices are increasingly his. He didn’t love how that landed and said it felt like I was giving up on him (which is probably how I sounded  - exasperated! ). I tend to see him as capable and sensible and assume he shouldn’t need me to impose boundaries anymore, but maybe he really does. I don’t really have a good answer to any of this yet. Mostly I’m just noticing where my energy leaks, where I make things harder than they need to be, and where a little more clarity or structure might actually create more freedom. Less negotiating in my head. Fewer battles. More space for the things that actually matter. More trust. Trust should be our mantra. It is the secret to the most successful parenting and also the secret to enjoying it. Trust in our child, along with  the magic word “wait” , help us to stay our course when friends, family, and unenlightened professionals imply that we’re not doing enough, and/or our child isn’t keeping up. Trust will remind us to let go of  personal expectations for our child  and to instead recognize and support the expectations she has for herself.  Trust, trust, trust.  It will never lead us astray. Janet Lansbury

0 views
Manuel Moreale 1 months ago

Sharing is caring

Even though he again misrepresented the point I made in a previous post and he also attributed me things I never said, I'm still going to share this post by Baldur Bjarnason , because he touches on many important topics worth thinking and talking about, especially at this specific moment in time, considering all the shit that's happening in the world. I'm not gonna attempt to correct him, because I don't think it matters at this point. He's free to think I'm a nazi apologist, or sympathizer, or whatever else he thinks I am (and since I'm Italian, you should also assume I'm a Fascist while you're there). I’m not gonna lose sleep over that, but I will point out something that is important to me: Not assuming ≠ tolerating. Not assuming ≠ excusing. Not assuming ≠ allowing something. And one more note: Because you absolutely should judge people based on the books they like. That’s what talking about books is for. Why they like a book is as important, if not more important, than what book they like. That was the whole point of my post. And by knowing what book one likes you don’t also know why they like it, unless you engage in a conversation. As you said, that’s why we talk about books and why we talk about things in general. Because if we don’t talk, then we just assume. Thank you for keeping RSS alive. You're awesome. Email me :: Sign my guestbook :: Support for 1$/month :: See my generous supporters :: Subscribe to People and Blogs

0 views
DYNOMIGHT 1 months ago

Why read novels?

Why should you read novels? We tell children they’re magic carpets for the mind / exercise for the soul instead of the body / lighthouses in the great sea of time. But aren’t they ultimately a form of entertainment? Many years ago, I read Crime and Punishment. Here, with no research and no notes, is what I can remember about that book: This is probably below average. I know people who seem to remember every detail of everything they read. But even if you’re one of them, so what? Is remembering those books better than remembering whatever else you would have done with your time if you hadn’t been reading? And yet: If I’m on vacation and I spend an afternoon reading a novel where in the mountains or on a beach, I feel like I’m living my best life. Whereas if I spent an afternoon staring at short videos on my phone, I’m sure I’d feel like a gigantic loser. So what’s going on here? The obvious explanation is that there’s nothing intrinsically great about reading novels. The reason we think it’s great is that reading novels—at least the right ones—is high status. It’s a way of playing the Glass Bead Game , a way of collecting cultural capital for you to lord over other people who don’t have as much time or education as you do. It may feel like you “actually enjoy reading”, but that’s because you’re a desperate striver that subconsciously shape-shifts into whatever you think will make you look fancy. Apologize for reading. Apologize! I think there is something in this. However, I’m also pretty sure it’s not the full explanation, and I’m bored to death with everyone trying to explain everything this way. So let’s move on. Say you can’t read novels. Maybe because you’re illiterate, maybe because you have no attention span, maybe because you can’t tear yourself away from Candy Clicker. Now, say you cultivate the ability to read novels. Whatever issues you address in that process, it seems like it will clearly be good for you, right? Under this theory, what’s important is having the ability to read novels. But said ability is acquired by reading novels, so read some novels. Alternatively, say you could read novels, but you simply never have. It’s plausible that the first time you have the “novel” experience of taking photons into your eyes and mentally converting them into a story, this truly does feed your mind. Both versions of this theory suggest that reading novels has diminishing returns. That fits nicely with the fact that many people push their children to read novels while not reading any themselves. But do we really believe that after you’ve read some number of novels, it’s pointless to read more? I think Catcher in the Rye is a good but not great book. But I love talking about Catcher in the Rye because (1) all North Americans seem to have read it, and (2) whenever I ask someone to tell me how they feel about Holden Caulfield, I always seem to learn something about them. (I find him sympathetic.) If there’s a group of people talking about Catcher in the Rye—or The Three-Body Problem, or Infinite Jest, or Don Quixote—then you benefit from being able to participate. The cynic might argue that this is zero-sum status competition. But I don’t think that’s most of it. Because, at least in my social circles, people feel boorish talking about books if not everyone has read them. So these conversations only happen if everyone has read the book in question. Ultimately, we’re all alone in the world, and trying to connect with each other by pushing air through our throat meat. With more shared cultural context, those meat sounds are more meaningful, so we can all feel less alone. True. But shared context can come from other things, too, like traveling to the same places, or watching the same sports, or practicing the same skills or hobbies. So what makes books special? The two answers I see are: I lean weakly towards the first answer. Novels are a useful form of social context. But that’s a side benefit. It’s not why we read most books. Maybe novels are just another form of entertainment. OK. But say you tried to tell the same story as a novel or as movie / podcast / opera / interpretive dance performance. Different formats will be better in different ways. One advantage I see for novels is that they make it natural to explore the interior worlds of the characters. Some movies have voice-overs where characters explain what they’re thinking. But this is generally considered cringe and a poor use of the medium. Meanwhile, many books are mostly about exploring what the characters are thinking. Thoughts are worth exploring. If you want to explore thoughts, maybe novels are the best way to do that. Aside : I’ve mentioned before that I think My Brilliant Friend is the best TV show ever made. Can I confess that I like it much more than the books it is based on? Because, like the books, the TV show involves a lot of what the main character is thinking, and even makes heavy use of voice-overs. So maybe other mediums have unrealized potential? Movies are expensive to make. To be financially viable, they need to target a large slice of the population. Movies also reflect the combined efforts of many people. Both of these mean that movies are a compromise between different visions. Novels are usually written by one person. And they’re often written more for personal expression than to make money. After all, writing is fun. I mean—writing is hard, but would you rather spend an afternoon holding up a shotgun microphone, cleaning a movie star’s trailer, or writing a novel? To quantify this, some searching suggests that around 10,000 feature films are released each year, as compared to around 1,000,000 novels. (Does one in 7,000 people really write a novel each year?) That’s two orders of magnitude. So if you want to hear a truly unique story, a pure vision of one person, maybe novels are where you’ll find it. Or: Maybe the point of reading War and Peace is that War and Peace is incredible and obviously one of the greatest pieces of art ever made in any medium. No one who reads War and Peace can question the value of what they’ve done. What are we talking about? Fair. I definitely feel like I’m living my best life when I read War and Peace. But I also feel like I’m living an OK-ish life when I read a novel about Spenser, private investigator . And most novels most people read are closer to the Spenser than to War and Peace. And I still feel better spending an afternoon reading about Spenser than I would watching 99% of TV shows. Or perhaps the difference is that reading is a thing you do rather than something you consume . This theory holds than when spend an hour slurping up short-form video, you’re training yourself to sort of pull a lever in the hope that some reward is delivered to you. But if you read (or do watercolors, or meditate) you’re training yourself to calmly pursue long-term goals and to sustain attention in the face of complexity. Sometimes I wonder if phones/apps are the most addictive thing ever created. I suspect that more people today are addicted to their phones today than were ever addicted to any drug other than caffeine or perhaps nicotine. And while a phone addiction is less physically harmful than tobacco, that phone addiction will eat a larger part of your soul. I think this is a big part of the explanation. In the end, I don’t think novels are the best way to spend your time. In my view no novel—not even War and Peace—is as good as a truly great conversation. But great conversations are hard to create. Sometimes you’re sitting on a train, or laying in bed, or it’s just been a long day and you don’t have the energy to find a giant block of marble and pursue your dream of experimental sculpture. In these situations, maybe reading a novel is the best thing you could do in the category of things you could realistically do. Exercise for the reader: Apply these theories to blog posts. It was pretty good. There was some guy, I think named Ras-something. He was really angsty/edgy and lived in a small apartment or attic. One day, for no particular reason, he killed an old woman. Having done this random murder, he became even more angsty/edgy. Then there was this police inspector guy. The inspector kept coming after Ras-whoever and making extremely long philosophical rants. Those rants may or may not have represented the personal views of Fyodor Dostoevsky. I can’t remember how the book ended. Surely Ras-whoever didn’t live happily ever after? But was he caught or did he confess? No idea. Nothing. If you think they’re better than other types of cultural context, that’s because you’re a book person. Books leave more room for interpretation. Maybe Don Quixote is a fanatic, maybe he’s an idealist, maybe he’s a “wise fool”. It’s debatable. But there’s no doubt who won the last World Cup.

0 views
A Working Library 1 months ago

The Cancer Journals

Between 1978 and 1980, Audre Lorde wrote about her experience with breast cancer and mastectomy, connecting her trials and treatment to her own work and to the collective effort of liberation for all women. She bears a great deal of anger towards a medical system that prioritizes cosmetics and prosthetics at the cost of women’s ability to face their own mortality and vulnerability, to live considered lives. She locates a kind of regressive nostalgia in that effort, in turning women ever back to what they cannot return to, rather than supporting the difficult but necessary journey ahead. Lorde refused to turn back, and in doing so, charted a path for all of us to follow. View this post on the web , subscribe to the newsletter , or reply via email .

0 views
Justin Duke 1 months ago

Levels of the Game

It seems fortuitous that my McPhee reading spree coincided with having watched Challengers . Like Challengers did sixty years after the fact, Levels of the Game uses tennis as an object of fascination in its own right—see also Infinite Jest and how much of that book, indeed all of DFW's worldview, was shaped by the relative weirdness of the tennis circuit compared to its team-based sport brethren. But even more than that, I'm interested in it as a canvas to explore systemic issues. Challengers touches on class nominally, but Guadagnino is at the end of the day much more interested in the love triangle that dominates the film, and in the idea of competition as a pure entity. McPhee has no problem dispensing with subtext and speaking plainly about the differences between his twin protagonists: one is white and comes from a solidly middle-class background; the other is black and comes from a solidly lower-class one. Side note: Arthur Ashe was born in Richmond, Virginia, and I live one block away from a boulevard named in his honor. You can credibly accuse Richmond of using Ashe as a bulwark against criticism, given how many of its other heroes are old white Confederates. But Ashe did in fact grow up here, and this book is not sparing in its description of how white Richmond rejected him. McPhee is not really interested in competition the way Guadagnino is; he describes Ashe and Graebner less like fierce competitors and more like two rival members of the same French New Wave. Part of this is truth—they were literal teammates playing in the Davis Cup together. That aspect of tennis, somewhat alien to me, is interesting in its own right. And while we know from the future that Ashe emerged as the superior and more exemplary player, McPhee is more interested in talking about form and style than raw prowess. This is a brief book—really just a snapshot of a single day—and as such it never outstays its welcome. By the last few passages, McPhee has perhaps run out of novel ways to describe a backhand. But it's a good read and a lot of fun. It speaks about style and grace and athletics, and it elevates the form of sport in such a way that sixty years after its original publication, it still feels not just prescient but modern.

0 views
W. Jason Gilmore 1 months ago

Books I Read In 2025

Author: Steve Coll Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: What an amazing book. This is the sequel to Coll's 2005 Pulitzer Prize-winning book Ghost Wars. Author: Ruth Ware Genre: Fiction Verdict: This book was sitting on the bookshelf at our post-Christmas Airbnb. I had heard of the author referenced as being the next Agatha Christie. Very happy to have serendipitiously found the book, read it in like 24 hours. Author: Ben H. Winters Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: This book fits nicely into one of my favorite genres which is science fiction meets noir detective meets apocalypse. Loved it, but lost interest reading the sequels. Author: Ernest Hemingway Genre: Fiction Verdict: Love Hemingway and the Sun Also Rises is unquestionably my favorite book of all time. I've even read it in multiple languages (Italian title is Fiesta). But this particular compendium was boring. Author: Ben H. Winters Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: The sequel to the Last Policeman (above). Good but not as good as the first. Author: Alexander C. Karp Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: Great, great book. Author: Blake Mycoskie Genre: Business Verdict: Great book written by somebody who seems to have figured out life. Author: Henry Kissinger Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: Good book but a few chapters too long. Author: Sylvain Neuvel Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Really loved this book, wildly creative. Author: Anupreeta Das Genre: Biography Verdict: This was a wildly repetitive hit piece. Is Bill Gates an opportunistic genius? Yes. Did Bill Gates change the world? Yes. Is he human and did he sometimes do human things? Also yes. I'm really not sure why people grind axes to the extent this author does. Author: Andrew Cockburn Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: Interesting book about the future of warfare. Author: Ronan Farrow Genre: Crime / Non-fiction Verdict: Had heard of Ronan Farrow before, so picked up this book on a whim at local bookstore. He's one hell of a writer and journalist. Author: Raj Shah Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: Akin to Kill Chain, a great book if you want to understand where the whole war thing is going. Author: Mary Elise Sarotte Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: If I wasn't so into software I'd probably have been a history professor. One related question I've often wondered about lately is why is Russia so obsessed with Ukraine? This book answers that question. Author: Tess Gerritsen Genre: Thriller Verdict: A fun book along the lines of the aforementioned One Perfect Couple . Author: William Gibson Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Neuromancer will forever be my favorite science fiction book of all time. It also happens to be, by far, his pinnacle of achievement because everything else he's written since has been practically incoherent. Not sure I can add anything more to this summary. Author: David Downing Genre: Fiction Verdict: Amazing historical fiction book! Loved it. Author: George Orwell Genre: Fiction Verdict: The only reason this book is on this list is because I finally finished it after reading it for several years. A terrible slog and I'm sorry I ever started it. That said I love everything else Orwell has written. Author: Chris Nashawaty Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: If you grew up in the 80's you will love this book! Chronicles the making of Tron, E.T., Poltergeist, The Thing, Road Warrior, Blade Runner, Star Trek II, and Conan the Barbarian, all classic movies which came in within a few months of each other in 1982. Author: Reed Albergotti Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: I've always followed the Tour, particularly when guys like Armstrong were competing. This book explains just how deep the rabbithole went with regards to doping. Wow. Author: Will McGough Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: As my 10,000 pushups post explains, in 2025 I got really interested in becoming physically fit and as part of the process read this book. Very funny and informative. Author: James S.A. Corey Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Wonderful science fiction book. Author: Benjamin Wallace Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: I feel like I've read everything that can be read about attempts to figure out who created Bitcoin and after reading this book have concluded I should stop wasting my time. There is nothing else to be said about the topic; nobody can figure it out and I'm not sure they ever will. Author: Joe Girard Genre: Business Verdict: Picked up this book at some used book store and it is now my favorite business book. I love it because despite what the title says it has very little to do with sales and everything to do with organizing a professional network. The author died a few years ago and for that reason I regret not having read this book earlier because I would have loved to have met him. Author: Arkady Strugatsky Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: This is a famous science fiction book which is little known to Westerners. Written by a citizen of the Soviet Union. I loved it! Author: Ramez Naam Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Good book, enjoyed it. Author: Blake Crouch Genre: Science Fiction / Apocalyptic Verdict: WOW! One of my favorite books of the year. Terrifying. Read it over Thanksgiving in maybe 48 hours. Author: Robert Harris Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Great book, I'm surprised this wasn't turned into a TV show. Author: Blake Crouch Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Another terrifying book by Blake Crouch, who also write Run (above). Loved it! Author: Atul Gawande Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: Interesting book, I've applied some of what I learned from it to my own life in the weeks since. Let's see if it sticks. Author: Lincoln Child Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Fun book about a deep sea discovery gone wrong. I will have to check out what else Lincoln Child has written.

2 views
A Working Library 1 months ago

Annals of the Western Shore

In these three short novels, Le Guin takes us to the Western Shore, where people of magic and people of war and people of books all try to make their lives together. In Gifts , a young man comes to terms with his family’s heritage, the terrible power of unmaking. In Voices , a girl finds shelter in a library that harbors a secret presence. And in Power , a child raised as a slave must walk the perilous path to freedom, as the visions he doesn’t understand show him the way. In each novel, the people make the halting, deadly, and difficult journey of liberty, never sure if they will make it, carried along by the greatest power and gift any of them will ever know—the story. View this post on the web , subscribe to the newsletter , or reply via email .

0 views
Evan Hahn 1 months ago

Notes from "On Writing Well"

I’ve been trying to improve my writing so I read On Writing Well by William Zinsser. My main takeaways: Clear thinking is a prerequisite for clear writing. How do you avoid cluttered writing? “The answer is to clear our heads of clutter. Clear thinking becomes clear writing; one can’t exist without the other. It’s impossible for a muddy thinker to write good English.” Reduce scope. Zinsser hammers this point repeatedly. For instance: “Nobody can write a book or an article ‘about’ something. Tolstoy couldn’t write a book about war and peace, or Melville a book about whaling. They made certain reductive decisions about time and place and about individual characters in that time and place—one man pursuing one whale. Every writing project must be reduced before you start to write.” Keep the thesis in mind. “Writers must […] constantly ask: what am I trying to say? Surprisingly often they don’t know. Then they must look at what they have written and ask: have I said it?” I don’t want to write like this guy. I think Zinsser’s writing is dogmatic, verbose, outdated, and above all: not to my taste. But that helps me clarify my own style by showing me what I don’t want to do. And despite all that, I agree with a lot of his recommendations. Even though there were many parts I disliked, I think On Writing Well holds better advice than a writing guide I read last year . I hope my writing improves as a result of reading this book. Clear thinking is a prerequisite for clear writing. How do you avoid cluttered writing? “The answer is to clear our heads of clutter. Clear thinking becomes clear writing; one can’t exist without the other. It’s impossible for a muddy thinker to write good English.” Reduce scope. Zinsser hammers this point repeatedly. For instance: “Nobody can write a book or an article ‘about’ something. Tolstoy couldn’t write a book about war and peace, or Melville a book about whaling. They made certain reductive decisions about time and place and about individual characters in that time and place—one man pursuing one whale. Every writing project must be reduced before you start to write.” Keep the thesis in mind. “Writers must […] constantly ask: what am I trying to say? Surprisingly often they don’t know. Then they must look at what they have written and ask: have I said it?”

0 views
Rik Huijzer 1 months ago

Noteworthy Bible Quotes

Old Testament quotes from Brenton’s Septuagint and New Testament quotes from KJV. David would today be called a “conspiracy theorist”: “Thou hast sheltered me from the conspiracy of them that do wickedly;” (Psalm 63) “It is better to hope in the Lord, than to hope in princes.” (Psalm 117:9) “I was peaceful among them that hated peace; when I spoke to them, they warred against me without a cause.” (Psalm 119:7) “Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord; but he that deals faithfully is accepted with him.” (Proverbs 12:22) This re-emphasizes that the Old Testament is al...

0 views