Posts in Culture (20 found)

Notes on BDSM

BDSM, or more precisely BDDSSM , stands for Bondage and Discipline, Domination and Submission, Sadism and Masochism . BDSM is about creating a safe environment using frameworks, where people can safely play with those things . People practicing BDSM can do, in context , things they would normally never do in their daily lives. If they strike their partner, or say things that could considered as objectifying, humiliating, or emotionally painful ; most people would not find such behavior acceptable and would warn their relatives to step out of these relationships. Since BDSM is about playing together, it's inherently a game, and since it does it in a specific context it creates for the game, it can be seen as a magic circle , a space where normal rules of the world are suspended and replaced by new ones. The term magic circle was initially coined by the Dutch historian/sociologist Johan Huizinga in his Homo Ludens book, where he also listed what are the base characteristics of play. Those characteristics are: In addition to these characteristics, that can easily be interpreted as rules, BDSM tries to provide frameworks that enable play. Among them are SSC and RACK . When using the SSC framework, everyone involved in the circle has to play in a Safe, Sane and Consensual manner. Safe means preventing accidents and being equipped for emergencies. For example not choking someone without knowing how to do it properly. Not tying up a human being without having safety scissors nearby. Sane means not being intoxicated (alcohol, drugs), not doing stupid things (playing with fire and burning a house down). Think things in a sane manner. Consensual means asking if everyone on board is aware of what's going on. Is everyone in agreement, not intoxicated, not forced into this situation (see rule 5 mentioned previously). RACK, or Risk Aware Consensual Kink , was made in reaction to SSC, following the idea that nobody can be 100% safe or sane 100% of the time. People can slip up, safety nets cannot prevent everything, and not everyone has the same notion of what is safe. So what happens if one person goes further than the other anticipated? It means risks are taken. So RACK is about everyone consenting to take risks. Outside of the rules of SSC and RACK, the duration of play must be defined, details must be discussed about what each participant feels comfortable to do or not. As it can be culturally complicated to talk about sex and kinks in many societies, participants trying to create a sexual or kinky relationship can feel awkward when talking about their desires, and can find themselves unable to explicitly say things. BDSM encourages to make the conversation explicit and safe in a fun way: by making the conversation about kinks a game (and thus a magic circle) in itself. Establishing simple rules of talk that all participants agree to follow, like an order of passage, or a signal to notify others that the current kink discussed is not safe, can make the experience easier. This type of conversation also allows participants to think about details or events that may happen. For example, if a person decides to act as an animal, are their play partner OK with them peeing or pooping during the act? What happens if they fall from stairs? One of the most common rules is the definition of a safe word (the most common being "red", probably as a reference to traffic lights) that can be used when someone wants to stop. When used, the magic circle is immediately dissolved (as the rules are absolute) and everyone checks on each other. As explained before, BDSM allows its participants to play with dangerous things, and act in ways that are normally non-tolerated. Which is why, when the game is over and the magic circle is broken, aftercare must happen to help participants get back in the real world and their normal relationships . Eating chocolate together, drinking ice-cold water, cuddling, but also enforcing positivity and reminding everyone of their normal relationship, are ways of reinforcing that the game is over. It's also important to debrief it, for example the next day, to know what everyone liked or dislike. It's, again, important to make everything explicit. If the BDSM can seem intimidating, its play/magic circle aspect and frameworks for consent can actually be used by non-BDSM practitioners. The make it explicit in a fun way method when talking about kinks can also be used to get or give consent in situations where the participants might suddenly need it. Flirt, for example, has become a complicated topic due to the difficulty of balancing seduction and consent. Going directly for a kiss without consent can be felt as weird or aggressive. But asking for consent in a fun and explicit way can help everyone out. Asking for consent with something like "I've been looking at your lips for a while, and I really want to kiss them. Can I?" allows the participants to stay both safe and in the mood. The person on the receiving hand can also choose to play, for example by using banter, and answer something in the style of "In the future you don't have to ask" . Also, as terminologies like daddy or spanking have become cultural norm and shorthand terms, some people who are already intimate and practicing some kinky games involving power might think it's unnecessary to discuss them. But the reality is that nobody that didn't ask for it wants to get spanked. Asking for consent is also a way of slowing things down, and giving everyone the time to eliminate the rush, but also profit from the situation, which can make it even more enjoyable. When people talk about BDSM they immediately think about dominatrix women in leather, with long boots and whips ; stern men hitting women with their belts while being called "daddy". It is a part of the community, but it's not what BDSM is. It can be playful, joyous or celebratory too. BDSM is this magical moment that exists separated from everything else . Play is free, is in fact freedom, and is chosen. Play is not real life, it's separated from our daily lives. Play always has a duration and a location. Play is order, which means rules are supreme, absolute and not negotiable. Play is not tied to financial or material gain.

2 views

Running Regularly, And Other Habits

A few months ago, I started exercising regularly. I mean, I've been "exercising regularly" on and off for years, to no one's surprise, but I have been actually consistently doing it for probably my longest streak yet now. Also to no one's surprise, this has improved by mental and physical health, made me feel more confident, and expelled anxious energy. Here's a timeline of exercising in my life thus far: As a teen, my brother and his wife had a membership to a really bougie gym . I went sometimes, skinny as a twig, and thought it was pretty fun. They had a sauna, climbing wall, pool, hot yoga, guided cycling, the works. Eventually it cost too much money for my brother to continue going, and I didn't even attend that much anyway after a while. Use parents' home gym to work out every other weekday. Helped to be at home, as I have agoraphobic-adjacent tendencies, especially related to driving. Eventually they dismantled their home gym to use the room for something else. I used the free app Caliber to track and plan workouts, which I still recommend for people new to working out who don't know where to start. Lower standards for exercising and do it solely in my bedroom. I found that if I saw exercising as something you need a bunch of equipment and a gym for, it actually kept me from exercising more. I kept one pair of dumbbells in my room as my only equipment, and started working out every weekday. I was also off-put by having to change clothes to work out every day, since I get all sweaty, so I simply didn't wear clothes. That's uh, not something you can do at the gym. This is also when I started using the app Hevy , which I still use to this day. You can find curated workout routines for free and track them easily, with little videos on how to do sets. Get membership at Planet Fitness, because my job at the time covered gym expenses. This showed me the power of gyms, and how much easier they make working out. Having an actual treadmill, weights, and cycling machinery was awesome, and I started running the most I ever had since high school P.E class. I didn't do much strength training because I was (am) socially anxious and scared of people nearby. This was ultimately the downside of having a gym, because I had to drive to it. It wasn't that far, I just really am that anxious about driving. Present day, I use my fiancé's parents' home gym because it's on the same property. It has everything I need: dumbbells, treadmill, air conditioning. This means I now work out 4 days a week for an hour, which has been fantastic. I'm still working on being able to run longer and faster, and lifting more than 30 lbs. I do about 30-40 minutes strength training, and 20-30 minutes running usually. When I'm really feeling unmotivated, sometimes I only run, or I do high-incline walking instead of running if my leg muscles are feeling sensitive. From the beginning, the point was very much just doing some exercise each day, no matter how small. A walk, 10 minutes at the gym, whatever, just go do it . I can't really say it has gotten much easier to exercise; I'm procrastinating going to work out this second, writing this post... Something that helps me go do something I am mentally resisting doing, such as working out, has been to-do lists. This doesn't work for everyone, but I've found that having an annoying notification on my phone, set to repeat every day, gets me to Do The Thing. The satisfaction of clearing that day's tasks is phenomenal as well. I use Todoist for this. The free plan is more than enough for me, personally, and I even have a shared to-do list I share with my fiancé. This includes a grocery list, upcoming plans with friends and family, and a whole shared project just for wedding planning. My routines include simple stuff for now, such as working out, reading scriptures for 30 minutes 1 , and attending catechumen class every Wednesday at 20:00. Having a to-do list for my habits has been immensely useful, especially sorting them by day of the week, and having individual Home/School/Work projects. Hopefully I'll keep exercising like I am, and maybe even more, with more motivation. Subscribe via email or RSS If you're curious, I use the Orthodox Study Bible , and am a catechumen of the Eastern Orthodox Christian Church currently, under the OCA jurisdiction. My religious journey/life is a whole thing that I'm not sure I'll post much about besides references, but feel free to email/Signal me about it if you're interested. ↩ As a teen, my brother and his wife had a membership to a really bougie gym . I went sometimes, skinny as a twig, and thought it was pretty fun. They had a sauna, climbing wall, pool, hot yoga, guided cycling, the works. Eventually it cost too much money for my brother to continue going, and I didn't even attend that much anyway after a while. Use parents' home gym to work out every other weekday. Helped to be at home, as I have agoraphobic-adjacent tendencies, especially related to driving. Eventually they dismantled their home gym to use the room for something else. I used the free app Caliber to track and plan workouts, which I still recommend for people new to working out who don't know where to start. Lower standards for exercising and do it solely in my bedroom. I found that if I saw exercising as something you need a bunch of equipment and a gym for, it actually kept me from exercising more. I kept one pair of dumbbells in my room as my only equipment, and started working out every weekday. I was also off-put by having to change clothes to work out every day, since I get all sweaty, so I simply didn't wear clothes. That's uh, not something you can do at the gym. This is also when I started using the app Hevy , which I still use to this day. You can find curated workout routines for free and track them easily, with little videos on how to do sets. Get membership at Planet Fitness, because my job at the time covered gym expenses. This showed me the power of gyms, and how much easier they make working out. Having an actual treadmill, weights, and cycling machinery was awesome, and I started running the most I ever had since high school P.E class. I didn't do much strength training because I was (am) socially anxious and scared of people nearby. This was ultimately the downside of having a gym, because I had to drive to it. It wasn't that far, I just really am that anxious about driving. Present day, I use my fiancé's parents' home gym because it's on the same property. It has everything I need: dumbbells, treadmill, air conditioning. This means I now work out 4 days a week for an hour, which has been fantastic. I'm still working on being able to run longer and faster, and lifting more than 30 lbs. I do about 30-40 minutes strength training, and 20-30 minutes running usually. When I'm really feeling unmotivated, sometimes I only run, or I do high-incline walking instead of running if my leg muscles are feeling sensitive. If you're curious, I use the Orthodox Study Bible , and am a catechumen of the Eastern Orthodox Christian Church currently, under the OCA jurisdiction. My religious journey/life is a whole thing that I'm not sure I'll post much about besides references, but feel free to email/Signal me about it if you're interested. ↩

0 views
Chris Coyier 4 days ago

Oatmeal on AI Art

Reading Oatmeal stuff is always such a seesaw for me. It’s so riddled with like boobshark jokes and I’m like, yeah yeah ha ha. I don’t hate that kind of humor or find it offensive, I just don’t think it’s very funny. Then it’s also so riddled with such earnest heartfelt well-articulated thoughts that I’m super into it. None more than Let’s talk about AI art . I love the message. The process matters and if you work hard making stuff, that’s beautiful.

0 views
Manuel Moreale 4 days ago

Linda Ma

This week on the People and Blogs series we have an interview with Linda Ma, whose blog can be found at midnightpond.com . Tired of RSS? Read this in your browser or sign up for the newsletter . The People and Blogs series is supported by Aleem Ali and the other 120 members of my "One a Month" club. If you enjoy P&B, consider becoming one for as little as 1 dollar a month. Hey, I’m Linda. I grew up in Budapest in a Chinese family of four, heavily influenced by the 2000s internet. I was very interested in leaving home and ended up in the United Kingdom—all over, but with the most time spent in Edinburgh, Scotland. I got into design, sociology, and working in tech and startups. Then, I had enough of being a designer, working in startups, and living in the UK, so I left. I moved to Berlin and started building a life that fits me more authentically. My interests change a lot, but the persistent ones have been: journaling with a fountain pen, being horizontal in nature, breathwork, and ambient music. I was struck by a sudden need to write in public last year. I’d been writing in private but never felt the need to put anything online because I have this thing about wanting to remain mysterious. At least, that’s the story I was telling myself. In hindsight, the 'sudden need' was more of a 'wanting to feel safe to be seen.' I also wanted to find more people who were like-minded. Not necessarily interested in the same things as me, but thinking in similar ways. Through writing, I discovered that articulating your internal world with clarity takes time and that I was contributing to my own problems because I wasn't good at expressing myself. I write about these kinds of realizations in my blog. It’s like turning blurriness and stories into clarity and facts. I also do the opposite sometimes, where I reframe experiences and feelings into semi-fictional stories as a way to release them. I enjoy playing in this space between self-understanding through reality and self-soothing through fantasy. I also just enjoy the process of writing and the feeling of hammering on the keyboard. I wanted the blog to be formless and open-ended, so it didn’t have a name to begin with, and it was hanging out on my personal website. The name just kinda happened. I like the sound of the word “pond” and the feeling I get when I think of a pond. Then I thought: if I were a pond, what kind of pond would I be? A midnight pond. It reflects me, my writing, and the kind of impression I’d like to leave. It’s taken on a life of its own now, and I’m curious to see how it evolves. Nowadays, it seems I’m interested in writing shorter pieces and poems. I get a lot of inspiration from introspection, often catalyzed by conversations with people, paragraphs from books, music, or moments from everyday life. In terms of the writing process, the longer blogposts grow into being like this: I'll have fleeting thoughts and ideas that come to me pretty randomly. I try to put them all in one place (a folder in Obsidian or a board in Muse ). I organically return to certain thoughts and notes over time, and I observe which ones make me feel excited. Typically, I'll switch to iA Writer to do the actual writing — something about switching into another environment helps me get into the right mindset. Sometimes the posts are finished easily and quickly, sometimes I get stuck. When I get stuck, I take the entire piece and make it into a pile of mess in Muse. Sometimes the mess transforms into a coherent piece, sometimes it gets abandoned. When I finish something and feel really good about it, I let it sit for a couple days and look at it again once the post-completion high has faded. This is advice from the editors of the Modern Love column , and it’s very good advice. I occasionally ask a friend to read something to gauge clarity and meaning. I like the idea of having more thinking buddies. Please feel free to reach out if you think we could be good thinking buddies. Yes, I do believe the physical space influences my creativity. And it’s not just the immediate environment (the room or desk I'm writing at) but also the thing or tool I'm writing with (apps and notebook) as well as the broader environment (where I am geographically). There’s a brilliant book by Vivian Gornick called The Situation and the Story: The Art of Personal Narrative and a quote in it: “If you don’t leave home you suffocate, if you go too far you lose oxygen.” It’s her comment on one of the example pieces she discusses. This writer was talking about how he couldn’t write when he was too close or too far from home. It’s an interesting perspective to consider, and I find it very relatable. Though I wouldn’t have arrived at this conclusion had I not experienced both extremes. My ideal creative environment is a relatively quiet space where I can see some trees or a body of water when I look up. The tools I mentioned before and my physical journal are also essential to me. My site is built with Astro , the code is on GitHub, and all deploys through Netlify. The site/blog is really just a bunch of .md and .mdx files with some HTML and CSS. I code in VS Code. I wouldn’t change anything about the content or the name. Maybe I would give the tech stack or platform more thought if I started it now? In moments of frustration with Astro or code, I’ve often wondered if I should just accept that I’m not a techie and use something simpler. It’s been an interesting journey figuring things out though. Too deep into it, can’t back out now. The only running cost I have at the moment is the domain which is around $10 a year. iA Writer was a one-time purchase of $49.99. My blog doesn’t generate revenue. I don’t like the idea of turning personal blogs into moneymaking machines because it will most likely influence what and how you write. But — I am supportive of creatives wanting to be valued for what they create and share from an authentic place. I like voluntary support based systems like buymeacoffee.com or ko-fi.com . I also like the spirit behind platforms like Kickstarter or Metalabel . I started a Substack earlier this year where I share the longer posts from my blog. I’m not sure how I feel about this subscription thing, but I now use the paywall to protect posts that are more personal than others. I’ve come across a lot of writing I enjoy though and connected with others through writing. Here are a few I’ve been introduced to or stumbled upon: Interesting, no-longer-active blogs: I like coming across sites that surprise me. Here’s one that boggles my mind, and here’s writer Catherine Lacey’s website . There’s also this online documentary and experience of The Garden of Earthly Delights by Jheronimous Bosch that I share all the time, and Spencer Chang’s website is pretty cool. Now that you're done reading the interview, go check the blog and subscribe to the RSS feed . If you're looking for more content, go read one of the previous 110 interviews . Make sure to also say thank you to Ben Werdmuller and the other 120 supporters for making this series possible. Lu’s Wikiblogardenite — Very real and entertaining blog of a "slightly-surreal videos maker and coder". Romina’s Journal — Journal of a graphic designer and visual artist. Maggie Appleton’s Garden — Big fan of Maggie’s visual essays on programming, design, and anthropology. Elliott’s memory site — This memory site gives me a cozy feeling. Where are Kay and Phil? — Friends documenting their bike tours and recipes. brr — Blog of an IT professional who was deployed to Antarctica during 2022-2023. The late Ursula K. Le Guin’s blog — She started this at the age of 81 in 2010.

2 views
Manuel Moreale 4 days ago

My issue with the two sides

One fairly common concept you’ll inevitably stumble upon if you spend any modicum of time reading discussions on the web is the idea of “two sides”. Some will tell you that the two sides are not the same and one is clearly better than the other, others will argue that not taking one side means that you’re tacitly supporting the other, while someone else will tell you that trying to argue that maybe more nuanced positions exist, in addition to the two sides, is wrong and you’re a bad person for doing that. All this is fair, and I’m more than happy to concede that, in some circumstances, one side is indeed clearly better than the other. I’m also happy to concede that again, in some circumstances, not expressing a preference for one of the two camps, when one is clearly better than the other, can be seen as tacit support for the worse one. I’m also more than happy to agree that sometimes dragging a discussion into the mud that is the infinite fractal world of the fine details is not really all that helpful. Having said all that, I still think way too often conversations on the web have the tendency to completely obliterate any level of nuance. Which is understandable, considering most conversations are taking place on social media platforms that aren’t designed to have nuanced conversations in the first place. There are ideas and concepts that demand more than 300 characters to be expressed fully, but unfortunately, sometimes even saying that can be seen as problematic in some circles. And that is unfortunate. It is unfortunate because progress can only be had if people have enough space and time to express themselves fully and then have their ideas challenged constructively. And yes, I’m already hearing you screaming that some racist bigots out there don’t deserve to have their views treated respectfully and be given time and space. I get it, and I understand it. The problem I see with this, though, is that the internet is a weird place. A lot of people aren’t vocal. Most of them are just lurking around, absorbing content and forming ideas in their head and maybe discussing things in person with close friends and family. And amongst them, there probably are a lot of people who would be more than happy to support and join the good one of the two sides, but are probably kept at a distance because of the insanity they see unfolding. I’m gonna pick a stupid example to make this point a bit clearer. Let’s imagine the topic of the day is “kicking puppies”. One camp is happily going around supporting the kicking of puppies because it’s a fun thing to do, and puppies are worthless and annoying, while the other camp thinks puppies are adorable—they are—and they are living creatures and deserve to not be kicked and instead loved and adored. It’s fairly easy to see that one camp, clearly, is better than the other, and if you are a sane and decent person, you should not have a hard time figuring out which camp is worth siding with. And sure, you might be one of those people who might argue that in some cases, puppies can be problematic because maybe they are puppies of a terrible invasive species that will destroy the solar system in 3 years if we don’t kick them all now. But, generally speaking you should find it easy to side with one of the two sides, even if only with some asterisk attached. But what if the pro-puppies camp you hear from online doesn’t stop at "puppies should be loved" but also argues that people who kick puppies should all die now and be dissolved in acid and their families be shot into the sun? You clearly are supporting the puppies' cause, but you are definitely not on board with all the rest of the nonsense. What do you do then, when someone screams at you, asking which side you are siding with? You clearly love puppies, but you also don’t want to support drowning people in acid. So you’re fucked. You could try to explain your position, but nobody got time for that. Chances are, you say nothing, and you silently move away from the public discourse space, never to be seen or heard again. I don’t know about you, but I think that’s bad. It’s bad when a lot of people are scared to express what they think because they are scared of the repercussions. Because you can’t have a healthy society without open dialogue. And I don’t even know how we fix this at the internet level. I don’t think there even is a way to fix this to be perfectly honest with you. It’s up to the individuals to go through the effort of giving other people time and space to express themselves and engage in dialogue. And if that's the only way out, well, shit. Thank you for keeping RSS alive. You're awesome. Email me :: Sign my guestbook :: Support for 1$/month :: See my generous supporters :: Subscribe to People and Blogs

0 views
annie's blog 5 days ago

Reading notes: August, September

I need to get back on the monthly routine because I’m squinting back at August like Uuuuuuuuuuh I vaguely remember it  so anyway let’s see how this goes. What could she say? What sentence would pierce him while leaving her intact? She had built her life so carefully around him. To say something, to do something, to feel something, would be to self-destruct. Okay. So. I want to like this book. I love books about food, involving food, including food. And this book has a lot of food. Of course it’s a tool, a metaphor, a… I don’t know, an environment. But still: Food. Hell yeah. Actually maybe that’s what I don’t like. I love the messy earthy good realness of food and people taking pleasure in it, cooking and sharing and enjoying it. Food in this story is not that. It is a measure of control, self-inflicted punishment, purgatory, avoidance, annihilation. And that makes me sad. ALSO I think if we’d moved things along and had the final inevitable explosion happen at, say, page 215 instead of page 300-ish, that would have been better. Also also, I said the writing was good and it was but.   But there were a lot of stretches of text that went like this: She (did a food thing). She (did another food thing). She (did another food thing). Details of the ingredients. She (did another food thing). Sizzle. She (did a food thing). She (did another food thing). She (did another food thing).  Etc. I don’t know how you’d write it different but it got repetitive. It was too much. I was inwardly screaming OKAY I GET IT I GET IT SHE IS COOKING AS A WAY TO HAVE CONTROL SHE IS EATING AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR ALL THE OTHER THINGS SHE SHOULD BE DOING I GET IT. Also it annoyed me that he (the fiance) did a horrible thing that ruined it all but we treat it like a big mystery and it is never clarified. I know the point is it doesn’t matter what he did . The point is he betrayed her and instead of rising up with immediate willpower and boundaries and hell naw  she just cooks and eats and pretends it’s fine. (Until she doesn’t.) I get that in a really personal way of having done the same thing myself (less cooking, less eating, but just as much pretending it’s fine) and I know it doesn’t matter how  the betrayal happens, what matters is that the betrayal happened and what matters even more is the self-betrayal that happens and then keeps happening. Until it doesn’t. Again: I GET IT. But also: I WANT TO KNOW. Tell me what he did. This book both destroyed and healed me. I don’t want to talk about it. I want to talk about it. It’s beautiful, it’s full of music and connection and fear. It’s a time-outside-of-time book but you know, the whole time, that there is a reckoning, there is an end, and you know it will pluck your heart out and smash it like a grape and you go forward anyway. Because you are there too and the music you can’t hear is carrying you along and the slow threads are weaving together and you are somehow woven in and then your heart is broken and you have no one to blame but yourself. And Ann Patchett. Is there a satisfaction in the effort of remembering that provides its own nourishment, and is what one recollects less important than the act of remembering? That is another question that will remain unanswered: I feel as though I am made of nothing else. First pick for the book club. We had our first meeting the last week of August and I picked this book without knowing anything about it other than I wanted to read it. It wasn’t what I expected. I’m not sure what I expected. Something lighter, I guess. Anyway I loved it but I felt kind of bad about picking it for CBBC because it is weighty. It is depth. It is pondering.  It is kind of bleak. Also beautiful. Also heavy. It’s a book I want to read again in a few years and see how it hits me. Perhaps, when someone has experienced a day-to-day life that makes sense, they can never become accustomed to strangeness. That is something that I, who have only experienced absurdity, can only suppose. I guess this is a stranded-on-a-desert-island book, kind of . But only in the sense that the environment, the context, has been set up to give us this thought experiment, this experience, this long echoing question of purpose and the even more important unignorable thump-thump-thump of loneliness. Anyway this book is excellent. Read it. Or don’t. But do. Also read The Wall by   Marlen Haushofer. I was not sure about this book but Stewart wrote and produced Xena, Warrior Princess so I figured it would be worth a shot. And yes: It was. If you like well-written badass heroines doing cool shit in a dystopian world (I do) you will like this. Really quite gorgeous. I liked the characters, good adventure, good pacing, good story. A satisfying if bittersweet fantasy (don’t worry, the ending is good). Loved this one. Scifi, really, but reads like fantasy. I should say more about it but I’m tired and I have already said a lot of words. Okay thriller. Plot twist was not so surprising. Tolerable writing. Good escape for a few hours.

0 views
Preah's Website 1 weeks ago

(Guide) Intro To Social Blogging

Social networks have rapidly become so vital to many people's lives on the internet. People want to see what their friends are doing, where they are, and photos of what they're doing. They also want to share these same things with their friends, all without having to go through the manual and sometimes awkward process of messaging them directly and saying "Hey, how're you doing?" Developers and companies have complied with this desire for instant connection. We see the launch of Friendster in 2002, MySpace and a job-centered one we all know, LinkedIn , in 2003. Famously, Facebook in 2004, YouTube in 2005, Twitter (now X) in 2006. Followed by Instagram , Snapchat , Google+ (RIP), TikTok , and Discord . People were extremely excited about this. We are more connected than ever. But we are losing in several ways. These companies that own these platforms want to make maximum profit, leading them to offer subscription-based services in some cases, or more distressing, sell their users' data to advertisers. They use algorithms to serve cherry-picked content that creates dangerous echo-chambers, and instill the need for users to remain on their device for sometimes hours just to see what's new, exacerbating feelings of FOMO and wasting precious time. Facebook has been found to conduct experiments on its users to fuel rage and misinformation for the purpose of engagement. 1 2 When did socializing online with friends and family become arguing with strangers, spreading misinformation, and experiencing panic attacks because of the constant feed of political and social unrest? I don't expect anyone to drop their social media. Plenty of people use it in healthy ways. We even have decentralized social media, such as the fediverse (think Mastodon) and the AT Protocol (think Bluesky) to reduce the problem of one person or company owning everything. I think this helps, and seeing a feed of your friends' short thoughts or posts occasionally is nice if you're not endlessly scrolling. I also think it's vital to many people to be able to explore recommendations frequently to get out of their bubble and experience variety. There is another option, one I am personally more fond of. It can sit nicely alongside your existing social media or replace it. It serves a different purpose than something like Twitter (X) or Instagram. It's meant to be a slower, more nuanced form of socializing and communicating, inspired by the pre-social media era, or at least the early one. For the purposes of this guide, I will refer to this as "Blog Feeds." A little intro in one page can be explained by blogfeeds.net , 3 which includes an aggregation of blogs to follow, essentially creating a network of people similar to a webring. 4 This will help you explore new blogs you find interesting and create a tighter group. Another gem is ooh.directory , which sorts blogs by category and interest, allows you to flip through random blogs, and visit the most recently-updated blogs for ideas of who to follow. Basically, a blog feed involves making a personal blog, which can have literally whatever you want on it, and following other people. The "following" aspect can be done through RSS (most common), or email newsletter if their site supports it. If the blog is part of the AT Protocol, you may be able to follow it using a Bluesky account. More about that later. Making a blog sounds scary and technical, but it doesn't have to be. If you know web development or want to learn, you can customize a site to be whatever your heart desires. If you're not into that, there are many services that make it incredibly easy to get going. You can post about your day, about traveling, about gaming, theme it a specific way, or post short thoughts on nothing much at all if you want. All I ask is that you do this because you want to, not solely because you might make a profit off of your audience. Also, please reconsider using AI to write posts if you are thinking of doing that! It's fully up to you, but in my opinion, why should I read something no one bothered to write? Hosted Services: Bear Blog: In the creator's own words, "A privacy-first, no-nonsense, super-fast blogging platform." Sign up, select a pre-made theme if you want and modify it to your liking, make post templates, and connect a custom domain if desired. Comes with ready-to-go RSS, and pretty popular among bloggers currently. This site runs on it. Pika: “An editor that makes you want to write, designed to get out of your way and perfectly match what readers will see.” With Pika you can sign up, choose a theme, customize without code, write posts in a clean editor, export your content, and connect your own domain, with a focus on privacy and design. You can start for free (up to ~50 posts) and upgrade later if you want unlimited posts, newsletter subscribers, analytics, etc. Substack: You might have seen this around before, it's quite popular. It's a platform built for people to publish posts and sometimes make money doing it. You can start a newsletter or blog, choose what’s free and what’s paid, send posts (and even podcasts or video) to subscribers’ inboxes, build a community, and access basic analytics. It’s simple and user-friendly, with a 10% fee if you monetize. This may not be the most loved option by other small bloggers due to its association with newsletter-signup popups and making a profit. It is also the most similar to other social media among blogging options . Ghost: An open-source platform focused on publishing and monetization. Ghost provides an editor (with live previews, Markdown + embeds, and an admin UI), built-in SEO, newsletter tools, membership & subscription support, custom themes, and control over your domain and data. You can self-host (free, for full flexibility) or use their managed Ghost(Pro) hosting, and benefit from faster performance, email delivery, and extensible APIs. Wordpress: The world’s most popular website and blogging platform, powering over 40% of the web. WordPress lets you create a simple blog or a business site using free and premium themes and plugins. You can host it yourself with full control, or use their hosted service (WordPress.com) for convenience. It supports custom domains, rich media, SEO tools, and extensibility through code or plugins. Squarespace: You might have heard of this on your favorite YouTuber's channel during a sponsorship (you don't sit through those, do you?). It is a platform for building websites, blogs, and online stores with no coding required. Squarespace offers templates, a drag-and-drop editor, built-in SEO, analytics, and e-commerce tools under a subscription. You can connect a custom domain, publish blog posts, and manage newsletters. Self-hosted, if you're more technical: Astro: A modern web framework built for speed, content, and flexibility. Astro lets you build blogs, portfolios, and full sites using any UI framework, or none at all, with zero JavaScript by default. 5 It supports Markdown, MDX, and server-side rendering, plus integrations for CMSs, themes, and deployment platforms. Hugo: An open-source static site generator built for efficiency and flexibility. It lets you create blogs and websites using Markdown, shortcodes, and templates. It supports themes, taxonomies, custom content types, and control over site structure without needing a database. Zola: Another open-source static site generator. Zola uses Markdown for content, Tera templates for layouts, and comes with built-in features like taxonomies, RSS feeds, and syntax highlighting. It requires no database, and is easy to configure. 11ty: Pronounced Eleventy. A flexible static site generator that lets you build content-focused websites using plain HTML, Markdown, or templating languages like Nunjucks, Liquid, and others. 11ty requires no database, supports custom data structures, and gives full control over your site’s output. Jekyll: A popular static site generator that transforms plain text into self-hosted websites and blogs. Jekyll uses Markdown, Liquid templates, and simple configuration to generate content without a database. It supports themes, plugins, and custom layouts, and integrates seamlessly with GitHub Pages for free hosting. Honorable mention: Wow, that's a lot of options! Don't get overwhelmed. Here are the basics for a simple site like Bear Blog or a static site generator. You write a post. This post tends to be in Markdown, which is a markup language (like HTML) for creating formatted text. It's actually not too far from something like Microsoft Word. In this case, if you want a header, you can put a pound symbol in front of your header text to tell your site that it should be formatted as one. Same with quotation blocks, bolding, italics and all that. Here is a simple Markdown cheatsheet provided by Bear Blog. Some other blogging platforms have even more options for formatting, like informational or warning boxes. After you've written it, you can usually preview it before posting. While you're writing, you might want to use a live-preview to make sure you're formatting it how you intend. After posting, people can go read your post and possibly interact with it in some ways if you want that. I'm not going to attempt to describe AT Protocol when there is another post that does an excellent job. But what I am going to mention, briefly, is using this protocol to follow blogs via Bluesky or another AT Protocol handle. Using something like leaflet.pub , you can create a blog on there, and follow other similar blogs. Here is an example of a blog on leaflet , and if you have Bluesky, go ahead and test subscribing using it. They also support comments and RSS. You don't have to memorize what RSS stands for (Really Simple Syndication, if you're curious). This is basically how you create a feed, like a Twitter (X) timeline or a Facebook homepage. When you subscribe to someone's blog, 6 you can get a simple, consolidated aggregation of new posts. At this point, RSS is pretty old but still works exactly as intended, and most sites have RSS feeds. What you need to start is a newsreader app. There are a lot of options, so it depends on what you value most. When you subscribe to a website, you put that into your newsreader app, and it fetches the content and displays it for you, among other neat features. Usually they include nice themes, no ads to bother you, and folder or tag organization. You may have to find a site's feed and copy the link, like , or your reader app may be able to find it automatically from a browser shortcut or from pasting in the normal link for the website. To learn more about adding a new subscription, see my feeds page . Here are some suggestions. Feel free to explore multiple and see what sticks: Feedly: A cloud-based, freemium RSS aggregator with apps and a browser interface. You can use a free account that supports a limited number of sources (about 100 feeds) and basic folders, but many advanced features—such as hiding ads, notes/highlights, power search, integration with Evernote/Pocket, and “Leo” AI filtering—require paid tiers. It supports iOS, Android, and web (desktop browsers). Feedly is not open source, it is a commercial service. Inoreader: Also a freemium service, available via web and on iOS and Android, with synchronization of your reading across devices. The free plan includes many of the core features (RSS subscription, folders, basic filtering), while more powerful features (such as advanced rules, full-text search, premium support, more feed limits) are gated behind paid tiers. Inoreader is not open source, it is a proprietary service with a freemium model. NetNewsWire: A native, free, and open-source RSS reader for Apple platforms (macOS, iPhone, iPad). It offers a clean, native experience and tracks your read/unread status locally or via syncing. Because it’s open source (MIT-licensed), you can inspect or contribute to its code. Its main limitation is platform since it’s focused on Apple devices. It's also not very visually flashy, if you care about that. feeeed (with four Es) : An iOS/iPadOS (and recent macOS) app that emphasizes a private, on-device reading experience without requiring servers or accounts. It is free (no ads or in-app purchases) and supports RSS subscriptions, YouTube, Reddit, and other sources, plus some AI summarization. Because it is designed to run entirely on device, there is no paid subscription for backend features, and it is private by design. It is not open-source. One personal note from me, I use this as my daily driver, and it has some minor bugs you may notice. It's developed by one person, so it happens. Reeder: A client app (primarily for Apple platforms: iOS, iPadOS, macOS) that fetches feed data from external services, such as Feedly, Inoreader, or local RSS sources. The new Reeder version supports unified timeline, filters, and media integration. It is not itself a feed-hosting service but a front end; thus, many of its features (such as sync or advanced filtering) depend on which backend you use. It uses iCloud to sync subscription and timeline state between devices. Reeder is proprietary (closed source) and uses a paid model or in-app purchases for more advanced versions. Unread: Another client app for Apple platforms with a focus on elegant reading. It relies on external feed services for syncing (you provide your own RSS or use a service like Feedly). Because Unread is a reader app, its features are more about presentation and gesture support; many of the syncing, feed limits, or premium capabilities depend on your chosen backend service. I would say Unread is my favorite so far, as it offers a lot for being free, has great syncing, tag organization, and a pleasing interface. It also fetches entire website content to get around certain limitations with some websites' feeds, allowing you to read everything in the app without visiting the website directly. FreshRSS: A self-hostable, open-source RSS/Atom aggregator that you run on your own server (like via Docker) and which supports reading through its own web interface or via third-party client apps. It allows full control over feed limits, filtering, theming, extensions, and it can generate feeds by scraping or filtering content. Because it is open source, there is no paid tier in the software itself (though you may incur hosting costs). Many client apps can connect to a FreshRSS instance for mobile or desktop reading. If you're interested in something interesting you can do with its API, check out Steve's post about automating feeds with FreshRSS. Click this for a more detailed breakdown of available RSS newsreaders. Additional resource on RSS and Feeds. Okay, soooo... I have a blog, I have RSS stuff, now what do I subscribe to, and how do I make this social? I'll let blogfeeds.net describe this: This takes us to our final point: Feeds. You can probably get away with just the first two items and then sharing it with people you already know, but what about meeting or talking to people you don't know? That's where Feeds come in. The idea is to create another page on your blog that has all the RSS feeds you're subscribed to. By keeping this public and always up to date, someone can visit your page, find someone new and follow them. Perhaps that person also has a feeds page, and the cycle continues until there is a natural and organic network of people all sharing with each other. So if you have a blog, consider making a feeds page and sharing it! If your RSS reader supports OPML file exports and imports, perhaps you can share that file as well to make it easier to share your feeds. Steve has an example of a feeds page , and blogfeeds.net has an aggregation of known blogs using feeds pages , to create a centralized place to follow blogs who have this same mindset. Once you make a feeds page, you can submit it to the site to get added to it. Then people can find your blog! There is debate on the best method for interaction with others via blogs. You have a few options. And the accompanying CSS, 7 which Bear Blog lets you edit: For each post, I do change the subject line (Re: {{post_title}}) manually to whatever the post title is. That way, someone can click the button and open their mail client already ready to go with a subject line pertaining to the post they want to talk about. Change the values and to whatever colors you want to match your site! See the bottom of this post to see what it looks like. Next: Comments: Comments are a tricky one. It's looked down on by some because of their lack of nuance and moderation stress, which is why Bear Blog doesn't natively have them. There are various ways to do comments, and it heavily depends on what blogging platform you choose, so here is Bear Blog's stance on it and some recommendations for setting up comments if you want . Guestbooks: This is an old form of website interaction that dates back to at least Geocities . The concept is that visitors to your site can leave a quick thought, their name, and optionally their own website to let you know they visited. You can see an example on my website , and my recommended service for a free guestbook is Guestbooks . You can choose a default theme and edit it if you want to match the rest of your site, implement spam protection, and access a dashboard for managing and deleting comments if needed. Here are some ideas to get you started and inspired: Add new pages, like a link to your other social media or music listening platforms, or a page dedicated to your pet. Email a random person on a blog to give your thoughts on a post of theirs or simply tell them their site is cool. Create an email just for this and for your website for privacy and separation, if desired. Add a Now page. It's a section specifically to tell others what you are focused on at this point of your life. Read more about it at nownownow.com . See an example on Clint McMahon's blog . A /now page shares what you’d tell a friend you hadn’t seen in a year. Write a post about a cool rock you found in your yard, or something similarly asinine. Revel in the lack of effort. Or, Make a post containing 1-3 sentences only. Join a webring . Make a page called Reviews, to review movies, books, TV shows, games, kitchen appliances, etc. That's all from me for now. Subscribe to my RSS feed , email me using the button at the bottom to tell me this post sucks, or that it's great, or if you have something to suggest to edit it, and bring back the old web. Subscribe via email or RSS Washington Post – Five points for anger, one for a ‘like’: How Facebook’s formula fostered rage and misinformation. Link . • Unpaywalled . ↩ The Guardian – Facebook reveals news feed experiment to control emotions. Link . ↩ This website was created by Steve, who has their own Bear Blog . Read Resurrect the Old Web , which inspired this post. ↩ A webring is a collection of websites linked together in a circular structure, organized around a specific theme. Each site has navigation links to the next and previous members, forming a ring. A central site usually lists all members to prevent breaking the ring if someone's site goes offline. ↩ Take a look at this Reddit discussion on why less JavaScript can be better . ↩ Or news site, podcast, or supported social media platform like Bluesky, and even subreddits. ↩ If you don't know what HTML and CSS is, basically, the first snippet of code I shared is HTML, used for the basic text and formatting of a website; CSS is used to apply fancy styles and color, among other things. ↩ Bear Blog: In the creator's own words, "A privacy-first, no-nonsense, super-fast blogging platform." Sign up, select a pre-made theme if you want and modify it to your liking, make post templates, and connect a custom domain if desired. Comes with ready-to-go RSS, and pretty popular among bloggers currently. This site runs on it. Pika: “An editor that makes you want to write, designed to get out of your way and perfectly match what readers will see.” With Pika you can sign up, choose a theme, customize without code, write posts in a clean editor, export your content, and connect your own domain, with a focus on privacy and design. You can start for free (up to ~50 posts) and upgrade later if you want unlimited posts, newsletter subscribers, analytics, etc. Substack: You might have seen this around before, it's quite popular. It's a platform built for people to publish posts and sometimes make money doing it. You can start a newsletter or blog, choose what’s free and what’s paid, send posts (and even podcasts or video) to subscribers’ inboxes, build a community, and access basic analytics. It’s simple and user-friendly, with a 10% fee if you monetize. This may not be the most loved option by other small bloggers due to its association with newsletter-signup popups and making a profit. It is also the most similar to other social media among blogging options . Ghost: An open-source platform focused on publishing and monetization. Ghost provides an editor (with live previews, Markdown + embeds, and an admin UI), built-in SEO, newsletter tools, membership & subscription support, custom themes, and control over your domain and data. You can self-host (free, for full flexibility) or use their managed Ghost(Pro) hosting, and benefit from faster performance, email delivery, and extensible APIs. Wordpress: The world’s most popular website and blogging platform, powering over 40% of the web. WordPress lets you create a simple blog or a business site using free and premium themes and plugins. You can host it yourself with full control, or use their hosted service (WordPress.com) for convenience. It supports custom domains, rich media, SEO tools, and extensibility through code or plugins. Squarespace: You might have heard of this on your favorite YouTuber's channel during a sponsorship (you don't sit through those, do you?). It is a platform for building websites, blogs, and online stores with no coding required. Squarespace offers templates, a drag-and-drop editor, built-in SEO, analytics, and e-commerce tools under a subscription. You can connect a custom domain, publish blog posts, and manage newsletters. Astro: A modern web framework built for speed, content, and flexibility. Astro lets you build blogs, portfolios, and full sites using any UI framework, or none at all, with zero JavaScript by default. 5 It supports Markdown, MDX, and server-side rendering, plus integrations for CMSs, themes, and deployment platforms. Hugo: An open-source static site generator built for efficiency and flexibility. It lets you create blogs and websites using Markdown, shortcodes, and templates. It supports themes, taxonomies, custom content types, and control over site structure without needing a database. Zola: Another open-source static site generator. Zola uses Markdown for content, Tera templates for layouts, and comes with built-in features like taxonomies, RSS feeds, and syntax highlighting. It requires no database, and is easy to configure. 11ty: Pronounced Eleventy. A flexible static site generator that lets you build content-focused websites using plain HTML, Markdown, or templating languages like Nunjucks, Liquid, and others. 11ty requires no database, supports custom data structures, and gives full control over your site’s output. Jekyll: A popular static site generator that transforms plain text into self-hosted websites and blogs. Jekyll uses Markdown, Liquid templates, and simple configuration to generate content without a database. It supports themes, plugins, and custom layouts, and integrates seamlessly with GitHub Pages for free hosting. Neocities: This is a modern continuation of Geocities , mainly focused on hand-coding HTML and CSS to create a custom site from scratch. Not ideal for blogging, but cool for showcasing a site and learning web development. It's free and open-source, and you can choose to pay for custom domains and more bandwidth, with no ads or data selling. You can see my silly site I made using Neocities for a D&D campaign I'm a part of at thepub.neocities.org . Feedly: A cloud-based, freemium RSS aggregator with apps and a browser interface. You can use a free account that supports a limited number of sources (about 100 feeds) and basic folders, but many advanced features—such as hiding ads, notes/highlights, power search, integration with Evernote/Pocket, and “Leo” AI filtering—require paid tiers. It supports iOS, Android, and web (desktop browsers). Feedly is not open source, it is a commercial service. Inoreader: Also a freemium service, available via web and on iOS and Android, with synchronization of your reading across devices. The free plan includes many of the core features (RSS subscription, folders, basic filtering), while more powerful features (such as advanced rules, full-text search, premium support, more feed limits) are gated behind paid tiers. Inoreader is not open source, it is a proprietary service with a freemium model. NetNewsWire: A native, free, and open-source RSS reader for Apple platforms (macOS, iPhone, iPad). It offers a clean, native experience and tracks your read/unread status locally or via syncing. Because it’s open source (MIT-licensed), you can inspect or contribute to its code. Its main limitation is platform since it’s focused on Apple devices. It's also not very visually flashy, if you care about that. feeeed (with four Es) : An iOS/iPadOS (and recent macOS) app that emphasizes a private, on-device reading experience without requiring servers or accounts. It is free (no ads or in-app purchases) and supports RSS subscriptions, YouTube, Reddit, and other sources, plus some AI summarization. Because it is designed to run entirely on device, there is no paid subscription for backend features, and it is private by design. It is not open-source. One personal note from me, I use this as my daily driver, and it has some minor bugs you may notice. It's developed by one person, so it happens. Reeder: A client app (primarily for Apple platforms: iOS, iPadOS, macOS) that fetches feed data from external services, such as Feedly, Inoreader, or local RSS sources. The new Reeder version supports unified timeline, filters, and media integration. It is not itself a feed-hosting service but a front end; thus, many of its features (such as sync or advanced filtering) depend on which backend you use. It uses iCloud to sync subscription and timeline state between devices. Reeder is proprietary (closed source) and uses a paid model or in-app purchases for more advanced versions. Unread: Another client app for Apple platforms with a focus on elegant reading. It relies on external feed services for syncing (you provide your own RSS or use a service like Feedly). Because Unread is a reader app, its features are more about presentation and gesture support; many of the syncing, feed limits, or premium capabilities depend on your chosen backend service. I would say Unread is my favorite so far, as it offers a lot for being free, has great syncing, tag organization, and a pleasing interface. It also fetches entire website content to get around certain limitations with some websites' feeds, allowing you to read everything in the app without visiting the website directly. FreshRSS: A self-hostable, open-source RSS/Atom aggregator that you run on your own server (like via Docker) and which supports reading through its own web interface or via third-party client apps. It allows full control over feed limits, filtering, theming, extensions, and it can generate feeds by scraping or filtering content. Because it is open source, there is no paid tier in the software itself (though you may incur hosting costs). Many client apps can connect to a FreshRSS instance for mobile or desktop reading. If you're interested in something interesting you can do with its API, check out Steve's post about automating feeds with FreshRSS. Email: Share an email people can contact you at, and when someone has something to say, they can email you about it. This allows for intential, nuanced discussion. Here is a template I use at the end of every post to facilitate this (totally stolen from Steve, again) : Comments: Comments are a tricky one. It's looked down on by some because of their lack of nuance and moderation stress, which is why Bear Blog doesn't natively have them. There are various ways to do comments, and it heavily depends on what blogging platform you choose, so here is Bear Blog's stance on it and some recommendations for setting up comments if you want . Guestbooks: This is an old form of website interaction that dates back to at least Geocities . The concept is that visitors to your site can leave a quick thought, their name, and optionally their own website to let you know they visited. You can see an example on my website , and my recommended service for a free guestbook is Guestbooks . You can choose a default theme and edit it if you want to match the rest of your site, implement spam protection, and access a dashboard for managing and deleting comments if needed. Add new pages, like a link to your other social media or music listening platforms, or a page dedicated to your pet. Email a random person on a blog to give your thoughts on a post of theirs or simply tell them their site is cool. Create an email just for this and for your website for privacy and separation, if desired. Add a Now page. It's a section specifically to tell others what you are focused on at this point of your life. Read more about it at nownownow.com . See an example on Clint McMahon's blog . Write a post about a cool rock you found in your yard, or something similarly asinine. Revel in the lack of effort. Or, Make a post containing 1-3 sentences only. Join a webring . Make a page called Reviews, to review movies, books, TV shows, games, kitchen appliances, etc. Washington Post – Five points for anger, one for a ‘like’: How Facebook’s formula fostered rage and misinformation. Link . • Unpaywalled . ↩ The Guardian – Facebook reveals news feed experiment to control emotions. Link . ↩ This website was created by Steve, who has their own Bear Blog . Read Resurrect the Old Web , which inspired this post. ↩ A webring is a collection of websites linked together in a circular structure, organized around a specific theme. Each site has navigation links to the next and previous members, forming a ring. A central site usually lists all members to prevent breaking the ring if someone's site goes offline. ↩ Take a look at this Reddit discussion on why less JavaScript can be better . ↩ Or news site, podcast, or supported social media platform like Bluesky, and even subreddits. ↩ If you don't know what HTML and CSS is, basically, the first snippet of code I shared is HTML, used for the basic text and formatting of a website; CSS is used to apply fancy styles and color, among other things. ↩

0 views
ava's blog 1 weeks ago

the sims community's reckoning

As many of you have probably heard by now, the game company EA is intended to be sold to Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund, a firm managed by Jared Kushner (Donald Trump’s son-in-law), and the private equity firm Silver Lake Partners. This would involve the company going private and taking on a considerable amount of debt, making even harsher monetization, budget cuts, AI slop and layoffs likely. EAs portfolio includes games like Dragon Age, Mass Effect, and The Sims, and I own games of all three of these franchises. All of these have been dead to me for a while now, meaning I was done with any new Mass Effect game after Andromeda (even though I liked it!), not interested in playing Veilguard, and The Sims 5 (Project Renee) was cancelled, meaning Sims 4 is their "forever game" just receiving updates. However, I still enjoyed playing The Sims 3 or 4 every now and then, eyeing some add-ons, watched Sims YouTubers such as Plumbella . The Sims Creator community is generally rather diverse and left leaning, often doing fundraisers for marginalized groups as well, so it came as a shock to them that the company that sponsored them as a partner and whose game they were promoting was sold off to these genuinely horrible people. Not only would supporting EA now pour money into the Trump regime semi-directly, but it would also support Saudi Arabia, where gay and trans people are still being killed, among many other human rights violations. How does that fit together with the wholesome, cute, and safe image these creators created? A lot could be said about how a conversation about EA partnerships has been boiling under the surface already: The company has been genuinely awful for a while, especially around the state of the game, the buggy releases and the pricing. In my view, the role some creators adopted of making it their funny channel persona to roast EA and talk about what a shitty game it is and go "ha, EA, am I right?" was on thin ice already. It's one thing to say that and play the pirated version while not sponsored by them, but another to say that while playing the legit version and being paid by EA to do so. Good for EA I guess to even sponsor people who absolutely shit on the state of the game, but still. Now the situation has dramatically changed for the worse, and creators feel the need to come out with statements about how they feel and what they are going to do. And my god, has it all been embarrassing as hell! There are a lot of people in the world who cannot choose who to work for, who have to make ends meet, have no rainy day fund and have next to no power to leave an unethical company to work elsewhere. I'm not going to yell at abused, below-minimum wage workers because they have to work for Nestle or Amazon or fast fashion. YouTube Creators and influencers in general do not belong to that group , especially people who are paid to sit at home and play a game . They can most definitely find other sponsors and find other games to play. Many already do, as The Sims is seen as part of the Cozy Gaming niche, meaning they often already play Animal Crossing, Stardew Valley, Coral Island and many more. Not to mention that Sims competitors exist and more seem to come: InZOI exists 1 , Paralives is coming out, others are announced and there are smaller indie games on Steam that each fulfill different aspects of The Sims, like letting you build houses, custom designs, controlling a population, etc. Of course it will be a change, rocky for some, some subscribers lost; but it would be a small fraction of their subscriber count because the fanbase is similarly outraged and has values that go directly against this sale. They too are worried that the base game is going to get modified to be less progressive and inclusive, undoing a lot that EA has added over the past few years, like disability and illness items, trans options like top surgery scars or more pronouns, better skin tone selection and hair options, and more. So the response by some, particularly the creator lilsimsie , has been so pathetic. Why is she puppy-eyeing into the camera, saying: " This also raises the moral dilemma of: Do we want to continue playing and supporting a game that is owned by such awful people? [...] This is where I have been really struggling. Sims is my entire life, it's my livelihood, it's my hobby, it's my name! My last name is Sims. [...] But where does this leave me? I don't know. I'm going to keep playing the Sims. I'm going to keep talking bad about the Sims and about EA when I need to. Again, this is my jooob, sooo... it puts me in a really tough spot." Content creators are one of the groups that have it the easiest in switching employment in that sense - change products, brands, or niches and escape. Is that not the damn point so many of them try to make? For years now, I have witnessed them say how great it is that they're their own boss 2 , then use it! At least EA is not the platform you publish on, it is just one sponsor, and one game. People every day have to make really hard decisions, some have to give up other things, and you can't even ask these people to stop streaming a game when the funds go to these awful regimes. You could make the argument that the PIF has held 10% of EA before, and the fact that they are investing widely in the gaming industry the last couple years, making avoiding harmful support like that difficult. However, I believe you can't " There is no ethical consumption under capitalism " yourself out of everything, because while many of us cannot give up employment or buying unethical food or having to rely on clothes produced in bad conditions, just not uploading yourself playing a game is so easy and such a luxury problem to have; it's not a need, not to mention that a 10% share vs. a jump into private equity and ownership is a big change that deserves reevaluation. No one asks any of the creators to immediately drop content creation altogether and get a corporate job: they could simply pivot. They could stop being part of the EA Creator fund. They could have the same energy they did for Hogwarts Legacy and its boycott. It's so embarrassing to sit there raising funds for a trans charity and then not give a fuck about them being killed in Saudi Arabia because it would require to play a game that doesn't have your last name (why even mention that and leave that in, oh my god!), going: " You guys I am just so conflicted and confused 🥺 I'm just a smol bean playing a game ." Just so that we are clear: Human Rights Watch says, crediting Reprieve, that Saudi authorities have executed at least 241 people this year in total already. And people like lilsimsie make more off of all their online revenue than we ever will, so get up off your knees for this one. After that disastrous statement video (where she spent more time talking about feared ingame effects than the actual obvious politics) from a week ago, she has already uploaded 7 more Sims videos. You'd think that if all of this was weighing on her so heavily, she would at least take a break, but no. So no sympathy from me, at all. "I will just wait and see. " Wait and see for what, exactly? How bad it will be? You can already see how bad it is politically, and otherwise, does that mean it's fine that you promote that until they censor the game in a way that makes it less fun for you? This is the person that is praised in the Sims community for "standing up against EA" over this, so you can only imagine the rest of them. Applauded for doing nothing, and saying nothing. The impact it would have if the literal #1 Sims YouTuber quit that shit! But she doesn't use her power, at all. It's going to be interesting 6-9 months for the Sims creators and their fans; that's how long they have until the first effects of the deal are supposedly showing up. And I'm still waiting on Plumbella . Reply via email Published 07 Oct, 2025 Which also has some concerns, but it deserves to be mentioned still. ↩ Never mind that they are still beholden to the platform's opaque algorithm, vague rules, automatic bans, changes of ownership, payout conditions etc. with no warning, no benefits and no recourse, potentially losing all their content and that month's money in seconds... but they don't wanna hear that and get really upset when you say that. ↩ Which also has some concerns, but it deserves to be mentioned still. ↩ Never mind that they are still beholden to the platform's opaque algorithm, vague rules, automatic bans, changes of ownership, payout conditions etc. with no warning, no benefits and no recourse, potentially losing all their content and that month's money in seconds... but they don't wanna hear that and get really upset when you say that. ↩

0 views
ava's blog 1 weeks ago

a frank piece about influencers

I wish we were all generally more aware of what a lie the popular influencer lifestyle is, at least of the vast majority. People that read blogs like mine are probably more aware, but others less so, especially children. Some are more media-literate than others and are able to detect the foolery, but usually just bits and pieces of it instead of the entire picture. So I just want to sit down and discuss the whole picture. The obvious has been spread around far and wide: Everyone knows the products they show are not the ones they actually use or like, they were paid to promote it and they got it for free. Some influencers have since opened up about the flood of PR packages and how much they either donate or sadly throw away. But what less people know is: The designer bags are fakes a lot of the time. If you are in the right online spaces where people care for spotting this stuff, you can see them post proof by zooming in at a specific part of videos and showing the original bag has a different clasp or a wider rim or has a number there or different packaging. When actually showing off real designer items, some have admitted to simply renting or buying for the video and then returning them, or that they are able to claim these items as a tax write-off for being in a video. The trips they constantly go on are brand trips they get for free. Even if not, we have all seen how they rent parts of fake planes to take a picture and pretend. Others have pretended to be on vacation for far longer than they actually were, slowly releasing pictures from one day over the course of 2-3 weeks to make it seem like they’re still there. The cars they show driving in some videos are leased for the video, or a test drive at the dealership, or bought with money they don’t have and go into debt for. They’re indebting themselves in the hopes that having this luxury item for content will bring in the money to make up for it. They call this financial irresponsibility “investing into their career”. The houses they allegedly buy are rented or just a temporary AirBnB. What I’ve also seen is that the background they use that seems perfect and aesthetic is often a set in a rented warehouse or a single corner in their apartment, while their actual living space doesn’t look like that at all. Especially cooking content is often not filmed in their own kitchen, but one they rent. If you want to know how far some are willing to take the lies: One influencer always records videos cooking for one and cleaning the house where only her items are seen because her content strategy is about being a single woman, but she was exposed for having had a boyfriend all this time. It’s totally fine to not want to show partners or them not wanting to be shown, but this influencer went as far as to completely hide any sort of hint in the videos, cleaning up the entire side of his sink, hiding his shoes, coats, and all that just to keep up a false image to a downright creepy degree. Everything for the personal brand! A while ago, a video went around lamenting that so many influencers, especially in NYC, are so boring and the same. The reason seems to be that they aren’t recording their true life, as it’s been shown that many of them have the same content manager, who applies the same cookie-cutter copy-and-paste lifestyle onto all of her clients. Shana Davis-Ross is the founder of the Ponte Firm, which created this sort of content franchise and what’s known as the “West Village Girl.” That’s why they do the same workouts, go to the same studios, wear the same outfits, and get matcha at the same cafés. The goal isn’t to be authentic or show their real life, it’s to create a brand-safe image so that brands might want to work with them. You aren’t seeing someone’s life, you’re seeing someone’s job. If you know customer service voice, it’s the same here but with influencer voice. If you’ve ever had to say complete bullshit just because it is mandatory under corporate policy, this is the same. Everything is filtered through their team, their content manager, the pre-approved brand text down to what is allowed in the image and what isn’t. For relatability, they like to lie about having a job. The nepo babies under them usually don’t, and most hide and delete comments about their rich families, or the fact that they earn most of their money by being “yacht girls”. Some are bold enough to talk about this online stuff as a job and then show their “full calendar” and if you zoom in, the calendar/todo list is: You know, what the rest of us are doing next to a fulltime job. Their alleged routines shown on camera are a lie: the times shown as a text on screen are not the actual times that these were filmed in. This content is recorded over several days and stitched together to seem like it was one day, and the times aren’t right. If you zoom into clocks being shown (like a wristwatch, wall clock, laptop clock etc.) it shows a completely different time. Not only that, but people such as Hannah Alonzo actually went out of their way to prove that the times aren’t right based on the position of the sun and the lighting in the shots. Now onto the ones trending especially hard right now: The crunchy wellness, fitness, orthorexia influencers are not only filtering and editing themselves to high heavens, they also hide the absolute damage they are doing to their bodies. 4-5h of high intensity training every day with no rest on a diet fit for a toddler is not normal or “wellness”. Their migrated filler is causing their face to be puffy and saggy and therefore hiding the ana-face they’d otherwise have. It’s also so crazy to me that we have grifters on TikTok talking about being a trad wife - pretending they don’t work, that the man is the head of the household, some even saying that women shouldn’t work or be able to vote. Meanwhile, they themselves are often the breadwinner in their household due to their social media income, they are business owners aggressively spreading their views online instead of letting their husband speak, they go on making their own decisions attending podcasts and other events and they make political statements while influencing their viewers. If that’s not a modern woman, I don’t know what is. Then there’s alpha males talking about red pill stuff, getting any woman you want, and pretending they’re getting all or most of their money through their own social media content and bullshit courses they’re offering. They’re always flexing their wealth and vaguely talking about some “management” and showing themselves on a laptop “working” or as if they’d be analyzing stocks or daytrading. But what they’re actually doing most of the time is being an OF manager. Some admit it here and there, like that asshole Jack Doherty, but most are more hush hush about it. That’s right, the vast majority these “successful” hypermasculine men who pretend they’re selfmade on TikTok are leeching off of women’s success and are literally pimps and gold diggers. They manage online sex workers’ content and promote it, and in turn get a cut. The models also often show up in their videos for added exposure. The men usually shorten it to “OFM” for “Only Fans Management”, or talk vaguely about being part of “an agency”. Thinking about this entire eco system is so nuts. Stupid ragebait videos and podcasts and courses to pretend you don’t like “sluts” or “feminists”, meanwhile your livelihood depends on these women and your work is posting their creampie content to their OF page and you’re probably on chat duty responding to some gooner so he spends more money. You justify this with “I’m just taking advantage of these losers bro” “I’m getting my bag bro” but it’s actually so embarrassing to be such a hypocrite. You’re not selfmade, you were hired by that 19 year old that makes more money than you to do annoying work she doesn’t wanna do, while publicly looking down on people like her. Then there’s also the MLM huns and the people flexing wealth trying to get you into “high ticket sales”, which is also a scam, but way, way too much to even get into. All this is why education, media literacy and critique is important. In the end, the life you might be envious of isn’t even lived by the person that’s promoting it. Take care of yourself, you’re better than this, and stop giving these clowns further attention whose only job is to flex on the people who can’t afford groceries anymore. Is this phenomenon new? No. My favorite castle I sometimes visit has a beautiful dining room, and when you stand in it and look up, you see a small balcony on each wall of it, which was for when the common folk would be invited to watch the rich people in the castle eat from up there. Apparently, we have always been freaks who got a kick out of watching someone else live an extremely lavish life while we struggle, but still. We don’t have to entertain this complete web of play-pretend online that tries to convince us to buy crap we don’t need. Reply via email Published 06 Oct, 2025 Make Matcha Have meeting Film TikTok

1 views
ava's blog 1 weeks ago

attitudes around quitting your job

"Why I quit my job" texts and videos seem to be my current "Baader-Meinhof-Phenomenon" 1 subject, meaning I see it everywhere. Very obviously explained by my own focus on wanting to quit my current job either completely or transferring to a new position outside of my current department. Even my favorite podcaster/YouTube personality is currently dealing with that topic as she quit her cushy software engineering job at Google to focus on being a pottery artist fulltime, together with her podcast and YouTube channel. Controversial choice lots of people have opinions about! My coworkers know that I intend to leave as I have not made a secret about it and have been open as to why I want to do that whenever they asked. The opinions are almost as polarized as the YouTuber's subscriber reactions are. On one hand, there is my equally young coworker who also intends to leave and shares the exact same views and feelings as I do. She is optimistic in a sort of realistic way - that while you have to make plans for what's next and shouldn't leave on a whim, that you will always find something equal or better at some point, that the journey is worth it even if you land in other bad places for a while. She agrees that you shouldn't waste time working somewhere that grinds you down or changes you negatively. It makes sense because we are both from the generation that knows giving yourself up for a job doesn't lead anywhere, that you can be replaced any second, and that time spent on friends and family is more important in the end. You have to protect your health and only have one shot at this whole thing, might as well try things out. We recognize that we still have so much to see and offer and that this isn't the end - especially because many of us don't have things to afford like previous generations had. We aren't saving up for a shiny new car, or to afford a whole house, or to do fancy vacations all the time, or to be able to afford a child, or put things away for a retirement we know won't come. You need to stay in the safe, permanent position with acceptable pay for these kinds of things as you'd otherwise jeopardize them. But without all that, what gives? There is no financial obligation or reliance on you to keep you there. As a most likely perpetual childfree tenant with no drivers license, using public transport and being uncomfortable with much travel and has no need to fly, my money goes into hobbies which are significantly cheaper than all of these things. I can afford to leave for something else without worrying about a mortgage. So there's of course the other side from older coworkers, particularly one who needs to continue paying off a house and raising a child, that is more hesitant. Aside from the obvious financial obligations and needing flexibility to tend to the child, she feels very fulfilled by the job, and it fits her greatly. She had always just wanted to finish school and work, and the type of work didn't seem to matter to her much as long as it paid enough. That is where she landed, with a lot of job security and other benefits, so she is set. Has been doing this same job for over 15 years now if I remember correctly. So of course, she would emphasize the advantages that I am also very aware of - great boss, great flexibility, she thinks we are being overpaid (maybe), working from home. " Who knows where else you'll land! Maybe it will be worse than here and then you will regret it. You'll never know. " Which I also understand and think of frequently; remembering the things to be grateful for has gotten me through really annoying and exhausting times at the job, but it is also something I would frequently tell myself too if I couldn't afford to ever switch jobs due to the life I have built myself. But the thing is: " You'll never know " goes both ways. If people stay, they'll never know how good it would have been to leave, either. I am not for throwing the towel at every slight hardship, but I think after a while, you can tell whether it is a tough but temporary phase or whether you have truly outgrown the job. One thing I learned this year is to spot that, because I mistook the latter for the former, and if I had seen the difference sooner, maybe there would be less bore-out exhaustion and resentment associated with the work for me internally. Sometimes, you don't even need better. You just need different, even if it ends up being worse, because at least it is not the previous thing, or it makes you more grateful for the previous thing. And I think that's okay. This relates to a lesson I think I would give every person in their 20s in their first 'proper' job: Make sure you create paths out of this. Twice in my life, I felt ready to basically resign myself to the job I held at that time, because it fulfilled my low standards that I had, felt really good and new and I could not ever imagine wanting more or outgrowing it. But the truth is: Things change in ways you cannot foresee. Your needs might change, the work itself might change, your coworkers and bosses might change. If you don't work on something on the side - maybe more qualifications, maybe extra projects at the job that builds CV and networks internally, etc. - you will arrive at a point where you need to leave, and you can't. I am glad I did (and still do) my degree on the side, I networked internally, I took on extra projects and I got certified on the side too, just to open doors for myself that now make leaving easier. Because knowing you need to leave as soon as possible, but being unable to, and looking down years of getting some extra qualification on the side before you can use it to leave is soul crushing. My law degree started as something on the side for fun, and I didn't intend to use it for anything when I started. Since then, it helped me discover a new career path for myself, pursue it more deeply, and is now something I will actually use to leave and change my career. Without it, things would seem a lot more hopeless for me right now. So even if the job you hold right now seems ideal and like something you can just stay at forever, always create a possible way out. You never know when you suddenly have a tyrannical boss, unreasonable work, or cannot work that job anymore for mental or physical reasons, for example. Going back to the software engineer turned pottery artist, I think the negative reactions she got were pretty interesting, even if predictable. It made me realize how many people there are who have a sort of romanticized view of a job they don't even hold and how much it gets them through their own work day. An idea of a job looming in their head that would totally be better, and they're just not following that right now, but it's always there like a warm embrace, a Plan B, a "I totally could have if I had wanted to, and maybe still will" path in life. A desk fantasy. The fantasy might be different for everyone - whether it is becoming an artist, or software engineer, working at a farm, or similar stuff. There seem to be two scenarios to this: People who are mad you enter their romanticized job, and the people who are mad you dare to leave it. Of course, the former are obviously mad they have not, and will likely not, do that switch. They keep putting it off or it is realistically impossible for them, but you actually doing it is rubbing salt in the wound. The clock is ticking: " Others are achieving it but you don't, why? Time is passing, you can't keep putting this off or this door might close. " Or: Rubbing in that this is actually completely out of the question, ruining the fantasy, the only out. The second one is more interesting to me to talk about because in theory, people working other jobs who romanticize software engineering in their head and see someone leave it should be happy that there's a spot open for someone else (like them?). But instead, many seem to crash out about it, calling the person who left ungrateful, that they never even deserved the job, and that they will regret it. It seems like someone leaving triggers not only intense jealousy (why are they leaving what I would kill to have? My dream??), but the fear that deep down, maybe the desk fantasy they cope with is not all that in practice. If even their ideal job is something people leave because it makes them feel as burnt out as their current job, then what is left? Their dream of a job that is effortless, always fun, high paid and fulfilling is threatening to be crushed. I feel a little for these people, because man, did the tech industry do a great job of convincing us all for a while that it's about shooting the shit with the bros in what can only be described as an adult playground. News about integrated gyms and their own cafes and restaurants where employees get food for free; rooms with game consoles, billiards tables and kicker tables; vibrant colors in open workspaces furnished with whacky looking sofas and indoor gardens; relaxation zones and massages. I remember a time when all kinds of tech companies seemingly tried to one-up each other about who could be cooler and quirkier about their office design. The flex clearly was: " We still have an amazing product even while offering comfort and distraction! " Together with the pay and bragging rights, what else do you want? I think this image still sits in many people's heads who don't actually work there. But the many, many testimonials on LinkedIn or YouTube or Substack seem to underline the intense shift the industry had over the years: a lot of hard work, almost no play, working people to the bone while retracting a lot of freedoms and other aspects that made these companies' work culture stand out from others. Now it seems not unlike working in any other boring office job, or like the finance industry that has a stick so far up its ass you could see it come out the top. So many software engineers grew tired of having to develop garbage, arbitrary deadlines, threats of layoffs, working intense overtime, questioned the ethics, and were disappointed and blindsided by the turn into despicable politics their leaders completed. Acknowledging that shift and what people who left are saying would mean acknowledging that the dream of that job is dead, and that your "maybe one day" mind palace of completing a bootcamp and miraculously finding your way into FAANG is in the gutter. It would involve facing the fact that the positions you could have started in are now eliminated and probably done via LLMs. What makes this specific case even spicier is the fact that someone would trade something highly regarded and well-paid for something that is currently facing its probably biggest devaluation in society so far - art. The devaluation seems to be reinforcing itself, as the fears of artists being replaced has come true and in turn, people are told to leave art, or at least not do it professionally. This again narrows the field in who can be a career artist, making AI art seem even more like the path forward. Of course, AI is not creating pottery, so that is an art niche that is safe for now, but still: The way people talk about, and treat art now thanks to AI generation makes apparent that most people have no idea what art is, what kind of process is involved, and where they can even find art. Art, to them, is something meaningless and a waste of money that hangs in galleries. Even the biggest gamers at this point refuse to acknowledge the artists that created the worlds they love, instead acting as if a machine can just create all that in the same way, or even better, in mere seconds. The design in user interfaces, in devices, in furniture, in clothes, in comics and flyers and infographics is not perceived as art that is planned and worked on, it just somehow appears, and AI has made that a reality. Human art is seen as faulty, time consuming, expensive; machine-created art is corporate-clean, brand-friendly, cheap and versatile. No personal style, baggage, wishes and time constraints by the artist to consider, just a fully malleable piece of play-doh. Going from the place that creates the very thing that is intended to replace artists to becoming an artist professionally is bold in these times, and sends a statement. It may seem naive, outdated, too self-assured to others, but it's not only this specific scenario: lots of people in very digital jobs have pivoted into more hands-on, physical work, putting into question if just creating digital facsimiles long-term is sustainable and gratifying at all. This is bound to enrage people who see a sort of utopia achieved by radical digitization and digitalization of our lives. Seeing people quit their jobs, their reasons for doing so and their path forward is something I really enjoy, but I also love seeing some of the destabilizing effects this has on people who have (or preferred to) keep their eyes closed and their heads down. Reply via email Published 05 Oct, 2025 Also known as the frequency illusion - basically, you see a lot of something once you become aware of it. New band you never heard of? Now you see the band's name everywhere. ↩ Also known as the frequency illusion - basically, you see a lot of something once you become aware of it. New band you never heard of? Now you see the band's name everywhere. ↩

0 views
Manuel Moreale 1 weeks ago

On public online behaviour

I’m currently in “digital fasting” mode, trying to consume as little content as possible here on the internet. But I do have to be here for work, and so I still end up reading a few things here and there. Some of that content is sent to me via email by random people (always appreciate that) while other is just because I have to open links to blogs that are submitted to blogroll.org. And even though I am not on any social media platform, some of the nonsense that’s going on there still manages to reach me, albeit indirectly. Which is quite impressive, I have to say. It’s incredibly hard to both have an online presence and also completely seal yourself away from social media nonsense. And this is something that’s not going to get better anytime soon, unfortunately. Especially because the idea of a fediverse is blurring the line that separates these worlds. One thing that’s fun to observe, though, as a very passive and disinterested spectator, is how some patterns of behaviour seem to be platform agnostic. Which is just a very polite way for me to say that dickheads are omnipresent. It doesn’t matter what tech stack they have behind them: if you give them a public way to express themselves, they’ll inevitably shit on everything and everyone and just be despicable human beings, no matter what. And I really do believe that this is a byproduct of the public nature of social media. I sincerely doubt that they do this in private, because I don’t think it’s as rewarding. By doing it publicly, you can be part of the mob of the day, find yourself in the company of like-minded individuals (that you likely don’t know and might as well hate you in real life), and have fun berating someone. Then pat yourself on the back and get ready to join the next mob. This is something that’s entirely absent when interactions are moved to private channels of communication. I think it’s incredibly rare for a mob to try to pile on you via email. You can just keep marking everyone as spam, not even bothering to open their messages. And they get no kick out of it. There’s no personal reward to be found in sending a shitty email to someone. And that is why, even though I had nothing but enjoyable exchanges with everyone I crossed paths with online, I’ll still stick with email and DMs as the way to interact with the rest of you out there. And if you think you have a good argument to make to prove I’m wrong, I wanna hear it. My inbox is open . Thank you for keeping RSS alive. You're awesome. Email me :: Sign my guestbook :: Support for 1$/month :: See my generous supporters :: Subscribe to People and Blogs

0 views
Weakty 1 weeks ago

Just call

Just pick up the phone and call a loved one. Just call, don’t bandy messages back and forth about when a good time is. Pick up your phone, hit the little phone icon, and say "hello, I was thinking about you and wanted to say hello, is now a good time to chat?" If the person picks up and says, "sorry, now’s not a good time", that’s fine. You called. Maybe they’ll say I’ll call you back . In the end, you heard their voice and they heard yours. If the person doesn’t pick up, you can leave a voicemail. Maybe they don’t check their voicemail. Maybe they don’t know how. But you can still do it. When you call unannounced and your call is missed, that recipient might think it’s an emergency. Who would call unless it was an emergency? They might think. They might text you back and say, "is everything alright? I saw you called." As I continue the practice of "just call" I know to follow up a missed call with a message that says: "hey, I was just thinking of you and wanted to catch up and hear your voice! No need to call back, I’ll try again another time." A few years ago, I started my year with a resolution that if I thought of someone, I would send them a message . I did that. It yielded more connection in my life. But a text message was easy, though, and I think it is a poor stand-in for hearing a loved one’s voice. The point of all this, though, was to reach out when the feeling of being able to reach out was present in me . Then, I changed messages to phone calls for the closest people in my life. But it’s not easy. There are many things that stand in the way of calling. It feels more vulnerable and intimate and when it doesn’t go the way we want, it’s uncomfortable. So we might tell ourselves that people’s lives are so busy . We don’t want to interrupt. It might hurt, even just a little, to reach out and hear that a person can’t talk right now, or when they don’t pick up. I’m still learning to practice empathy and understanding when someone isn’t available, and you are; when you want human connection, but the other side can’t meet that need in the moment. If that moment hurts, acknowledge and feel that hurt, and then move on with the day. It can be difficult to feel feelings, of course, so we can also reassure ourselves rationally (if we must). By calling and experiencing a missed connection, you can know that you’ve shown up for the people you love, by trying to reach out. And, yes, the true reality is that people are indeed often busy— you weren’t when you called, but that was you , and this is them . Sometimes, you might try and try and try again, only for the pile of missed connections to grow, like loose threads coming off an old sweater. Sometimes the person won’t hit the ball back. Maybe you’ll need to try scheduling your calls. Maybe even that doesn’t work out so great. This is something we fear to experience — a connection we value growing weaker, or the other party simply is not able or willing to meet you where you are at. Sometimes that’s just life. Sometimes we grow apart. Sometimes we grow back again. But wouldn’t you be grateful to say you tried when you were able? Not many people call these days.

0 views
Preah's Website 1 weeks ago

Oktoberfest 2025

Made my annual trip to Oktoberfest this year. My two beers I tried this time were a Weihenstephaner Dunkel, and a St Arnold’s Oktoberfest. I’ve had both not on tap, but having it on tap at the event itself is just amazing. Also enjoyed was fried cheese curds and a pretzel with cheese dip. One vendor there had very unique and adorable crochet plushies. The rest of the day includes some goat cheese and crackers 👀

0 views

Trauma and Recovery

Judith Herman’s canonical work on trauma remains one of the core texts on the topic, over thirty years since its first publication. Critically—and in contrast to much current popular discourse about trauma—Herman locates psychological trauma in a social and political context, arguing that the political standpoint and testimony of survivors are necessary to an understanding of how trauma is remembered and mourned, and how stories can be reconstructed for more just futures. “Folk wisdom is filled with ghosts who refuse to rest in their graves until their stories are told,” she writes. We live in a time of ghosts; we live among storytellers. View this post on the web , subscribe to the newsletter , or reply via email .

1 views
Chris Coyier 1 weeks ago

Danger Gently

Danger Gently is the name of the band I occasionally get a seat in here in lovely Bend, Oregon. We played at the High Desert Museum the other week for their “Art in the West” event. We play at The Cellar every Wednesday night (I make it to as many as I can). Here’s a couple of tunes from a couple weeks ago that Jason Chinchen shot: Sometimes we busk, typically in downtown Bend. One night I brought my camera to catch the band doing their thing: Here’s a few grabs from when I’ve gotten to join: View this post on Instagram A post shared by Chris Coyier (@chriscoyier) We played a show at The Silver Moon during Bend Roots Revival and the sound guy recorded and sent us his “Board Mix” and it sounds pretty good to me! I was also on mandolin in this show. We also played a show at River’s Place last month and since Dale Atkin’s was playing and brought his nice PA, we recorded from that as well. Here’s our opening tune “Breaking up Christmas” from that show:

0 views
annie's blog 2 weeks ago

Shelter or prison

A mental model or set of values starts as a shelter from the unrelenting chaos of reality. We need these shelters. Living without them isn’t really possible. We can’t take in and process adequate information fast enough to make truly new decisions. We need to categorize things and go with default reactions, otherwise we’ll get stuck, overwhelmed, never able to move from processing and analysis to action. Beliefs, mental models, values: These are shortcuts to decision-making. We adopt the ones we are given, adapt them according to our experiences, and use them as a way to understand the world (at least in some fashion). They tell us what the best thing is when we face a choice. They tell us how to react to other people’s choices. These structures give us shelter from chaos. They give us shortcuts so we can live. We stack a bunch of these structures together and call it something bigger: a religion, a culture, civilization. The interactions between the structures form the system we understand as reality. The problem with every system is how it evolves. It begins as a means of supporting the structures, keeping everything working; it ends up as a self-referential entity with the core goal of sustaining itself. The individuals within a system may change and grow and need the system to change and grow with them. But systems resist change. The individuals in a system are often not served by the system, but they’re serving it. They’re trapped within it. Does it shelter them? Does it provide some resources? Does it, perhaps, even keep them alive? Sure. So does a prison. Scifi tell us to fear AI; at some point, the artificial intelligence will become real , exert will, take over. But we should, instead, look at what we’ve already created that has taken over: our structures, our systems, our organizations, our civilizations. Gaining sentience was not even necessary. We, the inhabitants of the system, provide the necessary sentience to grease the wheels, crank the gears, repair the breaks, patch the holes. How could we refuse? After all, it keeps us alive. This shelter, this system, this prison.

1 views
Brain Baking 2 weeks ago

What Philosophy Tells Us About Card Play

Given the extensive history behind a simple pack of standard playing cards, it should not surprise you that cards can be seen as a mirror of society: that’s essentially why the court cards have kings, queens, and jacks in them. In as early as 1377 , Johannes of Rheinfelden wrote De moribus et disciplina humanae conversationis, id est ludus cartularum ; a treatise on card play in Europe. It is the oldest surviving description of medieval card play. In essence, when you play a game of Whist, you’re playing with the remains of the medieval European feudal system. That sounds a bit ominous so let’s skip the grim history lesson and instead focus on what philosophy can tell us about card play. Would they be able to offer interesting insights on why humans like to play and why we should (not) keep on doing it? Arthur Schopenhauer detested card games or any form of leisure activity. According to him, the clear lack of an intellectual deed would distract us from pondering the real questions of life. Schopenhauer thinks that by playing cards, you’re merely fulfilling a basic instinct-level need instead of enjoying higher intellectual pleasures (from Aphorisms on the Wisdom of Life ): Dancing, the theatre, society, card‑playing, games of chance, horses, women, drinking, travelling, and so on… are not enough to ward off boredom where intellectual pleasures are rendered impossible by lack of intellectual needs. […] Thus a peculiar characteristic of the Philistine is a dull, dry seriousness akin to that of animals. In The Wisdom of Life, and Other Essays , he scoffs at us players, declaring us “bankrupt of thought”: Hence, in all countries the chief occupation of society is card‑playing, and it is the gauge of its value, and an outward sign that it is bankrupt in thought. Because people have no thoughts to deal in, they deal cards, and try and win one another’s money. Idiots! That’s certainly an original way of putting it. Schopenhauer is well-known for being the grumpy old depressive philosopher who bashes on anything he can think of, except for music and walking with his dog. Because people have no thoughts to deal in, they deal in cards, and try to win another’s money. Idiots! I guess he failed to see that just having fun is what makes living bearable. Criticising play in general is a common recurring theme in philosophy: play is said to distract from the very essence of thinking. In On Consolation , Seneca the Younger criticises Gaius Caesar for gambling to distract his grief after losing his sister Drusilla. According to Seneca, that’s evidence of moral failure. Speaking of which, Michel de Montaigne also seems to categorize card play as a stern morality exercise. In Of the Art of Conference , he notes that even in casual play sessions together with his wife and daughter, one has to stay honest by treating these small actions of integrity—by not cheating and following suit, I guess?—the same as the bigger stakes in life. In another of his essays, Of Drunkenness , he directly compares life to a game of chance where chance can easily mess up any plans we prepared. We, just like the card drawn from the deck, are at the mercy of Lady Luck. Maybe many philosophers dislike games of chance because they do not want to admit that much of our life’s experiences is left to chance 1 . Perhaps that’s why you gotta roll with the cards you’re dealt . Fifty years later, Blaise Pascal acknowledged Montaigne’s idea. He wrote extensively on wagering and views the human condition as one of uncertainty. We must make decisions with incomplete information—and live with the consequences that come with them. Doesn’t that sound like making a move in any game? On the very other end of the spectrum, we find Johan Huizinga’s Homo Ludens directly opposing Schopenhauer’s negative opinion on play. In the thick tome, Huizinga explores the very nature of play as a fundamental element of our human culture. Play is essential to keep our sanity/ Play is what makes us human. Huizinga briefly mentions card gaming as an example of a game with a clear set of rules defining boundaries and structure. Within that boundary, players can foster their skills. Huizinga seems to discard Schopenhauer’s bankruptcy idea completely. Play—including card play—is an essential part that embodies order, freedom, creativity, and even has a social and psychological function. Culture develops through play. Of course, Huizinga extensively studied play as part of his academic research meaning it would be a bit silly if he were to discard the subject as superfluous. In 1958, Roger Caillois built on top of Huizinga’s ideas in Les jeux et les hommes , investigating and categorizing games into different systems. Card games fall under games of chance but also contain a competitive aspect. The interesting Caillois notes is that some cultures handle dealing with chance differently: some celebrate it and embrace their fate, while others desperately try to master it (and usually fail). Guess which category our Western society falls under. It doesn’t take a big stretch to connect Caillois’ card play with the art of living. How do we live in relation to chance? Do we embrace it or try to resist and shape it? Life, just like card games, is not about winning, but about playing well. The act of playing cards can embody the act of living: we must navigate uncertainty, play and work within a set of constraints, read others and try to adapt to their moves, and perhaps above all find meaning in playing the game for the sake of playing the game. In the end, everybody wins, right? Or was it the house that always wins? I forgot. This article is part eight in a series on trick taking and card games . Stay tuned for more! Note that I’m interchanging the words luck and chance here even though depending on your interpretation, they are not the same.  ↩︎ Related topics: / card games / philosophy / By Wouter Groeneveld on 29 September 2025.  Reply via email .

9 views
Jameel Ur Rahman 2 weeks ago

Friction is necessary for Growth

The title of this article says it all. Overcoming friction leads to growth. Comfort leads to stagnation. ChatGPT and by extension “AI” is likely the biggest “revolution” of my generation. It is likely also going to be the biggest killer of creativity in my generation. I always thought the creativity killer was going to be access to infinite entertainment. I think I was wrong. I’ve come to believe that with the rise of convenience and comfort, it becomes harder for us to reach our potential. Technology and Capitalism is taking us towards an extreme. A certain level of convenience can lead to efficiency gains. Automation is important for a reason. Too much convenience though, that's a killer. When friction was inherent in the system, applying ourselves led to growth as we overcame that friction. We simply didn’t have an alternative that was viable. And this principle applies to everything. When I was a child in Sri Lanka, I ended up memorizing the landline numbers of all my close relatives. To this day I remember them. The moment I got a phone where my contacts could be saved, I stopped remembering numbers. It may seem like a small thing but it illustrates the principle. The ease of access to information has geared us towards efficiently looking up information instead of remembering it. I won't argue the utility of having hundreds of numbers saved on your phone, I simply want to make a point. Overcoming friction leads to growth. Let's take another activity where creativity is important, writing. When it's easier to prompt ChatGPT to write your college essay, you'll never apply yourself. Afterall, when everyone is doing it, why not you? As everyone uses ChatGPT, the expectation of high quality writing will increase, making it harder for people to be vulnerable. You can’t become a master without making mistakes and learning from it. Humans are creatures of comfort. Just like so many things in this world, we follow the path of least resistance. With access to technology being ubiquitous, and ChatGPT being so widely available, to choose not to use it is very hard. You need to deliberately prioritize your growth and choose to go against the current. You need to deliberately introduce friction to the process. That said, total abstinence is not the solution. ChatGPT is here to stay. Just like most advancements in technology are. As a child of the 21st Century, you’ll need to learn to utilize this new tool in a manner that aids you, not hinders you. More importantly, not hinder the future you.

2 views
Kix Panganiban 2 weeks ago

NAIA T3 is the world's worst airport

Here I am with my family, waiting to board a flight to Sydney -- and I’m reminded of just how bad NAIA T3 really is. The whole place is packed to the brim with travelers, and it’s hellishly hot. Not just the annoying kind of hot, but the ridiculous, humid, and sticky kind of hot. It feels like being a sardine in a sauna. I honestly thought this would be one of the first things SMC’s takeover would fix. The Seating (or Lack Thereof) There are barely any seats unless you’re cool with rubbing elbows with sweaty strangers. Sure, there are paid lounges -- but with the tiny real estate allocated for them -- they’re almost always full. If you’re traveling solo, you might luck out and snag a spot, but no dice if you’re with a group like us. The Food Choices There’s also barely any decent food options to make the wait bearable. Most stalls in T3 are pasalubong shops -- and yeah, some sell short orders and snacks, but if you’re craving a real meal or a solid cup of coffee, you’re out of luck. Even worse, the few spots with okay seating are just as packed as everywhere else. A Glimmer of Hope? After sweating it out for hours, I couldn’t help but compare this mess to our last international trip from Clark International Airport earlier this year. But before I get into that, I’ll admit one small win for NAIA T3: the check-in process seems smoother than the last time I was here, especially if you arrive early. The number of bag drop desks scaled pretty well with demand from what we’ve seen (checking into Qantas), and the immigration and security check queues were decent and well-managed. Still, these tiny improvements don’t make up for the overall hassle. In Comparison to Clark International Airport It’s no contest -- Clark wins hands down. For starters, Clark is more recently built and feels a lot more modern. The place is spacious, well laid out, and the air conditioning is what you’d expect in a hot, humid country. The food and dining options there aren’t exactly world-class for an international terminal, but with plenty of seating around, that’s just a minor gripe. Honestly, being there with my family felt like a breeze compared to this chaos at T3. Tips from a Frustrated Traveler After dragging ourselves through this sauna of an airport, I’ve picked up a few tricks to make the wait a bit more bearable for me and my family. Hope these help if you’re stuck here too: Look for Fly Cafe at the far end of airside. We stumbled on it after hours of misery, and its air conditioning is solid. They’ve got decent beverages like coffee and matcha. Plus, if you’re traveling with a kid like I am, they have soft-serve and a small play area out front that was a lifesaver. The farther you are from the security check, the better the ambiance tends to be -- less crowd, less heat. The restrooms will actually be (and smell) better too, which was a relief after the chaos near the gates. The terminal Wi-Fi is trash. Don’t even bother -- use mobile data if you can.

0 views