Posts in Writing (20 found)

2026-2: Week Notes

This week felt like a slow, slightly awkward return to routine. I worked from home , which I’m grateful for, but with the kids home (summer holidays) and my mum visiting, it took a surprising amount of energy to focus and do anything at all. Not productive necessarily. Just not completely stagnant. I noticed how easily I slip into managing everyone’s time and behavior when I’m physically around. It also made me notice, again, where most of my mental energy actually goes outside of work. One big chunk goes into managing my food and weight (as much as I hate to admit it). The second big energy drain is navigating the kids and electronics. (I am just mentioning it here, but I plan to write about it some more later). A bright spot was spending time creating my 2026 direction. I realised I don’t really want achievement-style goals right now. I want a way of being. My central theme is “Let myself be happier.” With gentler yoga goals, I managed to do yoga every day this week (15–20 minutes). I can already feel the difference. I went for almost two weeks without it and could feel myself getting stiffer. It doesn’t take long at this age. On the fun side, I’ve been watching Dark Matter and thinking about regret and the paths we don’t take. I’ve always enjoyed Blake Crouch’s work. It’s slightly terrifying and bordering on hard sci-fi. I also discovered (and loved!) Pluribus . If you’ve watched it, do the Others remind you of ChatGPT or other GenAI? (to save from spoiling it for anyone, I won’t say why). Family movie nights were dominated by Avatar rewatches and finally seeing the latest one in the cinema last night. It’s three and a half hours long, which honestly felt offensive. I kept thinking, who does James Cameron think he is, taking that much of my life? It was beautiful and fine, but not three-and-a-half-hours good. I would have happily traded that time for three more episodes of Pluribus. That said, the kids loved it, especially my (almost sixteen year old) son. My husband had a terrible cough, so I ended up sleeping on a mattress on the floor in my daughter’s room so everyone (maybe not him) could get some sleep, especially with my mum in the guest room. It reminded me (again) how much I care about furniture being practical and multi-use. I still regret not insisting on couches you can properly sleep on. Where I come from, all couches can become beds. It just makes sense to me. I don’t like furniture that only serves one purpose, no matter how pretty it may be. This also nudged me back toward the idea of doing another round of simplifying at home, not because the house is cluttered, but because less always feels lighter to me (makes me feel lighter, I guess). I will make a plan. Maybe start in February or so. Socially, I’m moving toward my 2026 direction of hosting gatherings and bringing people together. Drinks with a neighbour, lunches with my mum and the kids, and long phone calls with friends overseas. The first gathering of neighbours for 2026 is booked for next Saturday (granted, my husband organised that one, but nevertheless). I’ve been thinking more about how many social catch-ups become pure life recaps and updates rather than shared experiences. The life itself is lived somewhere else, not inside the friendship. I’d like to experiment with hosting and gatherings that create something memorable together, not just conversation. That idea has been sitting with me. Because of that, I’m feeling more drawn to creating gatherings that have some kind of purpose or shared experience, not just conversation. I’m reading The Life Impossible by Matt Haig. I usually enjoy his books. The lessons and themes tend to be obvious, a bit like Paulo Coelho, but that’s part of the appeal and probably why they’re so popular. And also, I have no idea where this book is taking me. It’s also nice to see an older protagonist. The main character is 72. I also just finished Better Than Happiness: The True Antidote to Discontent by Gregory P. Smith, a memoir I picked up from the library intending to skim, but it fascinated me enough to read the whole thing. There were some really nice insights around acceptance, self-acceptance, anger, and learning how to actually live in the present moment. “In some ways, it’s a paradox. To change something we first have to accept it for what it is. Only through accepting my perceived flows and limitations? Could I see that there were pathways to improvement? The same applied when it came to learning to accept one of the biggest conundrums in my life, the man in the mirror. Self acceptance is the main reason I’m not only here today, but able to look at myself in the mirror.” Overall, the week felt reflective. I’m noticing how hard I still am on myself and trying to soften that. Self-acceptance! If this year really is about letting myself be happier, then noticing these small choices and energy leaks feels like the right place to start. PREVIOUS WEEK: 2026-1: Week Notes One big chunk goes into managing my food and weight (as much as I hate to admit it). The second big energy drain is navigating the kids and electronics.

0 views
Manuel Moreale 2 days ago

A moment with tea

Learning to appreciate different flavors is something that comes very hard for me. And yet, for some reason, tea is one of those things that no matter how hard it is for my tastebuds, I’ll constantly come back to. Thank you for keeping RSS alive. You're awesome. Email me :: Sign my guestbook :: Support for 1$/month :: See my generous supporters :: Subscribe to People and Blogs

0 views
Weakty 3 days ago

Define: Sardonic

"Do you think being sardonic is a requisite of getting older?" "What the hell does sardonic mean?" Jeremy asked. He picked at the grass on the hillside and threw it into the air. "I think it means sarcastic . Or no, maybe just like cynical . Sometimes those two things go hand-in-hand. It’s like, the opposite of earnest ." "I haven’t seen an earnest person in a lifetime," Jeremy said, "'cept for you, of course." "What makes me earnest?" I asked earnestly. "Probably that you’re pretty open? I don’t know the definition of earnest, either." "We don’t know anything, do we?" "Maybe that’s part of being earnest—you’re eager and ok with your dumbness." "If we look up the definition does that make us less earnest?" "No, you can be earnest and educated," Jeremy postulated. This time he ripped up a whole chunk of grass with a clod of dirt attached to it and threw it down the hillside. We both watched it roll until it crumbled to pieces, and the grass, once detached again, blew away in the wind. "People don’t like earnest people, I think." Jeremy said. "You still like me?" "Most people, I mean. I think most people get so chucked around by life that earnest people come across as naïve, or someone who hasn’t had a hard go. Most people are too impatient or bitter for that, I suspect." "You mean the people who are sardonic, cynical, negative, or complain a lot?" "Hey, be nice to them. They’ve earned it. By their reckoning." I didn’t say anything. I just pulled a clump of earth from the ground and threw it in mimicry of Jeremy. I felt like an ass. The field we were in was practically pristine. It got mowed every Sunday. Even the steep hills we were sitting on—somehow a mower got up and down them. When we would leave today, we’d be leaving a bunch of holes, like gophers on a golf course. "Did you hear that Nicky and Jen hit it off?" "No! Jen hasn’t spoken to me since before the date. I’d say Nicky is pretty earnest, though." "Jen, too." Jeremy said. "What made you want to set them up?" Jeremy shrugged and stared out at the people using the park below. "When you introduced me to Jen, it just clicked, like a puzzle piece snapped into the right spot," he said finally. At this, Jeremy stopped plucking at the grass and leaned back on the hill and closed his eyes. I followed suit, nestling my head into his shoulder. I took a deep breath in. I smelled the grass and pretended it was his cologne. L’eau de Terre , it would be called. "Maybe we can all double-date someday, if things continue going well." "Between you and me?" Jeremy blinked. "No, between them, you goon." He laughed and settled back into his reverie. The sun was directly upon us. "We’ll build an enclave of earnest people," I said. "You’re halfway to starting a cult." Jeremy murmured. With the sun on my face and my eyes closed, my mind began to wander. I thought about Jeremy’s theory. By his reasoning, I was likely to be perceived as someone who had not faced adversity, or was naïve. A real softy, perhaps. Definitions of words floated through my head. Did any of it matter? To my surprise, these days I didn’t care much what people thought of me. Everyone already had plenty of assumptions about me. The people I ended up wanting to be around proved that they didn’t live by their assumptions. But the people I was around—what was happening to them? Jeremy seemed fine, but old friends, co-workers—they were accreting a sort of bitter residue. Their words were all coated with a cynicism that, at first, I had failed to notice. But it wasn’t already there. It was seeming like so many people I knew had had a switch flipped in their brain and seemed quite different now. I pictured that while I might be on a sun-covered grassy slope, picking at grass, they might be underground trying to dig to the surface—but every movement they made had them going deeper still. These thoughts made me uncomfortable. Maybe I did care more than I realized about what other people thought of me. Clearly, I was feeling an uneasiness toward my own earnestness—that it should float so freely while it seemed that others were held down by forces either in or outside their control. The more I saw this bitterness in the lives around me the more I realized I wasn’t conforming to the same sort of discourse and dialogue, and once again that feeling of fear of being different, long rooted deep in my past, surfaced. I opened my eyes and looked at Jeremy. His eyes were closed. He seemed perfectly at peace, lying in the sun. The sounds of the park drifted up the slope, mostly children playing, unencumbered by this sort of rumination. Time passed, the sun moved. Eventually we were in the shade. I woke up. Jeremy was propped up on one elbow watching something in the distance. "Are you ready to head home?" he asked, not turning to me. His voice tumbled down the hill and my ears tumbled after to catch it. Without saying a word, I grabbed my knapsack, got up, and extended my hand to help him up. As I pulled him up, there was a moment where, due to the slope of the hill, we both could have easily overshot our momentum and gone tumbling down (after his voice, after my ears). Instead, Jeremy righted himself, and we started walking down the slope toward the other side of the park. We passed his voice and my ears, talking and listening at the bottom of the hill. I looked back over my shoulder as we walked. There were no signs of uprooted grass. No holes in the hill. It was as if we had never been there.

0 views
Jim Nielsen 3 days ago

In The Beginning There Was Slop

I’ve been slowly reading my copy of “The Internet Phone Book” and I recently read an essay in it by Elan Ullendorff called “The New Turing Test” . Elan argues that what matters in a work isn’t the tools used to make it, but the “expressiveness” of the work itself (was it made “from someone, for someone, in a particular context”): If something feels robotic or generic, it is those very qualities that make the work problematic, not the tools used. This point reminded me that there was slop before AI came on the scene. A lot of blogging was considered a primal form of slop when the internet first appeared: content of inferior substance, generated in quantities much vaster than heretofore considered possible. And the truth is, perhaps a lot of the content in blogosphere was “slop”. But it wasn’t slop because of the tools that made it — like Movable Type or Wordpress or Blogger. It was slop because it lacked thought, care, and intention — the “expressiveness” Elan argues for. You don’t need AI to produce slop because slop isn’t made by AI. It’s made by humans — AI is just the popular tool of choice for making it right now. Slop existed long before LLMs came onto the scene. It will doubtless exist long after too. Reply via: Email · Mastodon · Bluesky

1 views

Books I Read In 2025

Author: Steve Coll Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: What an amazing book. This is the sequel to Coll's 2005 Pulitzer Prize-winning book Ghost Wars. Author: Ruth Ware Genre: Fiction Verdict: This book was sitting on the bookshelf at our post-Christmas Airbnb. I had heard of the author referenced as being the next Agatha Christie. Very happy to have serendipitiously found the book, read it in like 24 hours. Author: Ben H. Winters Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: This book fits nicely into one of my favorite genres which is science fiction meets noir detective meets apocalypse. Loved it, but lost interest reading the sequels. Author: Ernest Hemingway Genre: Fiction Verdict: Love Hemingway and the Sun Also Rises is unquestionably my favorite book of all time. I've even read it in multiple languages (Italian title is Fiesta). But this particular compendium was boring. Author: Ben H. Winters Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: The sequel to the Last Policeman (above). Good but not as good as the first. Author: Alexander C. Karp Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: Great, great book. Author: Blake Mycoskie Genre: Business Verdict: Great book written by somebody who seems to have figured out life. Author: Henry Kissinger Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: Good book but a few chapters too long. Author: Sylvain Neuvel Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Really loved this book, wildly creative. Author: Anupreeta Das Genre: Biography Verdict: This was a wildly repetitive hit piece. Is Bill Gates an opportunistic genius? Yes. Did Bill Gates change the world? Yes. Is he human and did he sometimes do human things? Also yes. I'm really not sure why people grind axes to the extent this author does. Author: Andrew Cockburn Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: Interesting book about the future of warfare. Author: Ronan Farrow Genre: Crime / Non-fiction Verdict: Had heard of Ronan Farrow before, so picked up this book on a whim at local bookstore. He's one hell of a writer and journalist. Author: Raj Shah Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: Akin to Kill Chain, a great book if you want to understand where the whole war thing is going. Author: Mary Elise Sarotte Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: If I wasn't so into software I'd probably have been a history professor. One related question I've often wondered about lately is why is Russia so obsessed with Ukraine? This book answers that question. Author: Tess Gerritsen Genre: Thriller Verdict: A fun book along the lines of the aforementioned One Perfect Couple . Author: William Gibson Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Neuromancer will forever be my favorite science fiction book of all time. It also happens to be, by far, his pinnacle of achievement because everything else he's written since has been practically incoherent. Not sure I can add anything more to this summary. Author: David Downing Genre: Fiction Verdict: Amazing historical fiction book! Loved it. Author: George Orwell Genre: Fiction Verdict: The only reason this book is on this list is because I finally finished it after reading it for several years. A terrible slog and I'm sorry I ever started it. That said I love everything else Orwell has written. Author: Chris Nashawaty Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: If you grew up in the 80's you will love this book! Chronicles the making of Tron, E.T., Poltergeist, The Thing, Road Warrior, Blade Runner, Star Trek II, and Conan the Barbarian, all classic movies which came in within a few months of each other in 1982. Author: Reed Albergotti Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: I've always followed the Tour, particularly when guys like Armstrong were competing. This book explains just how deep the rabbithole went with regards to doping. Wow. Author: Will McGough Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: As my 10,000 pushups post explains, in 2025 I got really interested in becoming physically fit and as part of the process read this book. Very funny and informative. Author: James S.A. Corey Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Wonderful science fiction book. Author: Benjamin Wallace Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: I feel like I've read everything that can be read about attempts to figure out who created Bitcoin and after reading this book have concluded I should stop wasting my time. There is nothing else to be said about the topic; nobody can figure it out and I'm not sure they ever will. Author: Joe Girard Genre: Business Verdict: Picked up this book at some used book store and it is now my favorite business book. I love it because despite what the title says it has very little to do with sales and everything to do with organizing a professional network. The author died a few years ago and for that reason I regret not having read this book earlier because I would have loved to have met him. Author: Arkady Strugatsky Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: This is a famous science fiction book which is little known to Westerners. Written by a citizen of the Soviet Union. I loved it! Author: Ramez Naam Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Good book, enjoyed it. Author: Blake Crouch Genre: Science Fiction / Apocalyptic Verdict: WOW! One of my favorite books of the year. Terrifying. Read it over Thanksgiving in maybe 48 hours. Author: Robert Harris Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Great book, I'm surprised this wasn't turned into a TV show. Author: Blake Crouch Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Another terrifying book by Blake Crouch, who also write Run (above). Loved it! Author: Atul Gawande Genre: Non-fiction Verdict: Interesting book, I've applied some of what I learned from it to my own life in the weeks since. Let's see if it sticks. Author: Lincoln Child Genre: Science Fiction Verdict: Fun book about a deep sea discovery gone wrong. I will have to check out what else Lincoln Child has written.

2 views
Brain Baking 4 days ago

Favourites of December (And a Short 2025 Recap)

A late happy new year to everyone! I almost forgot to publish last month’s favourite (blog) posts, and since last month was the last one of 2025, let’s do a short recap as well. Previous month’s recap: November 2025 . Last year was another eventful year. Browse the full 2025 Brain Baking archive for more juicy details. I selected one post per month that for me stands out: Our son also kicked me out of my cosy home office upstairs. Luckily, our renovations were finished in time, so we moved the living room and I took the old space hostage . One of the advantages of directly staring at a larger window is being able to admire the seasonal view: The window at my desk showcases snowy trees. For 2026, I only wish for one thing: stability . Let’s stop the craziness and try to get things settled down. No more kids, renovations, job changes, broken bicycles, and serious sickness please. Just, you know, breathing. Whoosah . Last month I joined the Advent of Code challenge using Clojure, a language I know absolutely nothing about. Since then I’ve been obsessed with Lisp-based dialects. Forgive me if most of the links below are programming-oriented: it’s been invigorating to learn something new and actually enjoy a programming language for a chance. It’s the reason I’m typing this in Emacs now, although I haven’t even installed CIDER yet. All in due time… Ok that was definitely too much Emacs stuff. The lack of other links shows how much I’ve been obsessed with the editor lately. No other random links for this month! Related topics: / metapost / By Wouter Groeneveld on 10 January 2026.  Reply via email . In January, I had the idea to compile your own philosophy . So far, I have collected lots of notes and summarised too many previous ones, but nothing has been published yet. In February, I shared my stationary drawers . I should really clean out all those fountain pens. In March, I dug up a photo of my first console , the SEGA Genesis/MegaDrive. In April, I learned that my sourdough starter has twins somewhere in Switzerland. In May, more thoughts about writing and publishing popped up. In June, I debunked (or confirmed?) the fact that IT freelancers earn more than their employee counterparts . In July, I got influenced by other board game enthusiasts and admitted to having too many games and too little time . In August, we welcomed our second little one and I turned forty —in that order. Yes, that is important to me. In September, I wrote too many articles about trick taking games and local traditions . In October, I fondly looked back at years of downloading warez software . In November, I recovered my late father-in-law’s 1994 IBM PC invoice . In December, I started shaving Emacs yaks . I haven’t stopped ever since. Nick George reports on building static websites with Clojure . Nathan Marz describes how he invented Specter to fill Clojure’s mutability hole. I don’t understand 90% of the technicalities there, but one day, I will. More Clojure stuff. Sorry… Mikko Koski helped me get started: 8 tips for Advent of Code 2022 in Clojure. A more official one, but just as interesting: the State of Clojure 2024 results . 76% of the people using it build web apps, 40% is on Emacs/CIDER, and Babashka is super popular! This Advent of Code GIF archive is crazy. Victor Dorneanu wrote about his Doom Emacs to Vanilla migration. I tried Doom/Spacemacs for about one whole day and then started back from scratch, but damn, it’s very challenging, even though you can “do what you want”—if you’re an Emacs/Elisp acolyte, that is. I’m planning to get babtized in the Emacs Church very soon. Alice from The Wallflower Digest shares her thoughts about personal curriculums ; a way to get started with deliberate life-long learning. (via Joel , I think?) Karthinks found fifteen ways to use Embark , a wonderful context-aware Emacs package. More “Emacs from scratch” blogs to share: this one’s from Arne and lies out the foundations in case you want to get started. Thanks, Arne. You’re in my RSS feed now. Frank Meeuwsen writes (in Dutch) about AI tooling and how they democratise digital literacy. Or rather, how they should . Gregory J. Stein wrote a guide on email in Emacs using Mu and Mu4e . I have more thoughts on that saved for a separate blog post. If you’d like to know how many Emacs packages you’re currently rocking, Manuel Uberti has an Elisp for you (via Sebastián ) Kristoffer Balintona helped me better understand the Vertico completion-at-point-function stack .

3 views

On the Compulsion to Record

“When I gave such importance to archiving my life, it felt as if I was already dead,” said Karen Kingston , as if the moment we begin prioritising the archive, we step slightly out of life itself. The need to have reality confirmed and experience enhanced by photographs. The compulsion to write every thought down. These ideas keep circling me. I came across an Anaïs Nin quote again recently: “I am lying on a hammock, on the terrace of my room at the Hotel Mirador, the diary open on my knees, the sun shining on the diary, and I have no desire to write. The sun, the leaves, the shade, the warmth, are so alive that they lull the senses, calm the imagination. This is perfection. There is no need to portray, to preserve. It is eternal, it overwhelms you, it is complete.” Why can’t I, too, feel that there is no need to preserve? Why does it feel almost impossible to let a moment exist without turning it into words, photos, notes, some kind of proof that it mattered? Anaïs Nin wrote this long before phones, notes apps, and digital storage, before all that enables us to document our lives as evidence (although I did this compulsively in binders and notebooks before, even as a child; I was cataloguing life). I don’t only record happy moments. I record feelings. Thoughts. Confusion. RELATED: My Writing Life so Far I don’t think this means we should stop writing or remembering. But I do think it asks a difficult question: When does recording become a way of avoiding presence? When does organising life become a substitute for living it? And yet, on the flip side, in The Fun Habit by Mike Rucker , which I read recently, he talks about how memories, both good and bad, continue to shape our wellbeing long after the moment itself has passed. When you have something tangible, like a scrapbook or a journal, you don’t just remember the moment; you get to relive it. There’s real joy in that kind of time travel. So many of life’s peak moments are brief and surprisingly rare. Reminiscing lets us stretch those moments out far beyond their original window. We all experience this when we catch up with friends we haven’t seen in years, especially when there’s shared history, and suddenly you’re laughing about old stories like no time has passed at all. Curation plays a role too, says Rucker. Memory keeping isn’t about documenting everything equally; it’s about highlighting the good, and also gently shaping how we hold the harder moments. I try to do this intentionally in my own memory keeping. That thought gives me comfort, and a bit of reassurance that all this effort isn’t for nothing. It’s helping me carry joy, meaning, and connection forward, not just archive the past. Maybe the real practice isn’t to give it all up (as I truly love better systems, better archives, better memory-keeping), but knowing when to stop. When to close the journal. When to trust that a moment doesn’t need to be saved to be real. Maybe one day I’ll sit somewhere warm and quiet, and feel,  genuinely, that there is no need to portray, to preserve. Just to be… Letting Go of Old Journals and Mementos The Cost of Organizing Ideas – But I Keep Doing It Anyway The Journal Project I Can’t Quit Letting Go of the Fear of Losing Data The Art of Organizing (Things That Don’t Need to Be Organized) If You Want to Capture Ideas, You Are Lost Why can’t I, too, feel that there is no need to preserve? Why does it feel almost impossible to let a moment exist without turning it into words, photos, notes, some kind of proof that it mattered? When does recording become a way of avoiding presence? When does organising life become a substitute for living it?

0 views
Manuel Moreale 5 days ago

Bix Frankonis

This week on the People and Blogs series we have an interview with Bix Frankonis, whose blog can be found at bix.blog . Tired of RSS? Read this in your browser or sign up for the newsletter . The People and Blogs series is supported by Brennan Kenneth Brown and the other 129 members of my "One a Month" club. If you enjoy P&B, consider becoming one for as little as 1 dollar a month. My name is Bix, and I’m a straight, white, middle-aged, cisgender man born in upstate New York who now lives in the St. Johns neighborhood of Portland, Oregon—my hometown since 1997 and the longest I’ve lived anywhere since becoming an adult. I’m actually-autistic and multiply otherwise disabled, and remain, as I’ve been for most of my life, financially dependent upon my remaining parent. (If that’s for some reason not enough, my homepage will tell you more than you possibly could want to know, and a previous birthday post serves as the first part of my, and my blog’s, manifesto.) “Bix” is a descendent and derivation of an online handle I’d once had that became my everyday name and then, in 2018, my legal one . To a large degree the modern era of my blogging is dedicated to posting through the above realities both present and future. I live alone except for a gray and white domestic shorthair cat named Meru after the protagonist of the comic book Mind MGMT. I’ve been online since a dialup gopher server run by public libraries in upstate New York allowed me to upload a file of Twin Peaks symbolism to an FTP server in Australia and telnet into an internet BBS based in New York City called MindVox . In the mid-90s, along with two other people I ran a large and cumbersome online petition effort against the Communications Decency Act which inspired a more rigorous one from the Center for Democracy and Technology, and which landed me in the pages of Rolling Stone . In the late-90s, I ran an Internet cafe , or more accurately ran it into the ground for reasons I now know to be the unaccommodated and unmitigated autism, since I wasn’t diagnosed until 2016. In the early-2000s, I blogged original political reporting (also at the time called “stand-alone journalism”) here in Portland that was widely-read in local government circles and got me profiled in The Oregonian and cited in two books. If you traveled in Firefly fandom circles, you probably at least once found yourself on one or another fansite I’d put together in my own decade or so. Finally, for a time in the mid-2010s, I project managed a nonprofit herd of urban goats here in Portland. These days, life mostly is just about listening to, reading, and watching things, and, of course, the blogging . As with most autistic people, habit and routine are foundational and self-regulating, and so every day I get in an hour of reading at a neighborhood coffeeshop; once a week I take myself for breakfast out (also in the neighborhood); and— fatigue willing —once a month I try to get across town to Oregon Zoo (where I’ll also indulge in my intermittent but long-standing photography hobby ) but over the past year this hasn’t happened all that often, much to my increasing chagrin. The current iteration of my blog goes back to 2019 when I received the bix.blog domain as part of Automattic’s “dotblogger” program (you can read my pitch for it), although I consider my actual modern blogging era to start the year before, in 2018 when I started blogging about my 2016 autism diagnosis on Medium. This current era includes earlier this year having had my twenty-fifth blogging anniversary (a post which also serves as the second part of my manifesto), since I’ve been blogging in some form since early in the year 2000—usually personal blogging but occasionally something subject-specific, using many different kinds of blogging software, hosting and self-hosted solutions, and domains. Since I cannot for certain remember what was my very first blogging, it’s not clear to me whether I was motivated to represent myself personally online or whether my first blog was project-specific—even though the latter undoubtedly still was infused by my personality. It’s unlikely that I’ve ever blogged in any kind of dry, “professional” tone and so, in that sense, it’s all personal blogging. As the late Christopher Locke once said, for better or worse, “Voice is what happens when you shitcan the cover-up.” These days, blogging also (at least in theory) includes the longterm project of working toward restoring as much of those two and a half decades as possible, using categories to designate a post’s original domain. It’s a positively gargantuan task —not least because I don’t have archives of everything and some things will need to be re-created post-by-post using the Wayback Machine. As I noted in my IndieWeb Carnival post on self-expression, blogging very much is a coping mechanism, without which I’d only be even more lost, despite the continually recurring mixed feelings I have about it because on the matter of ego (yet another reference to my manifesto post). One of the things that interests me about the restoration project is learning how that coping mechanism functioned for previous versions of me . Simply put: I blog when I cannot not blog. Depending on the post and how time-sensitive it is or isn’t, I might jot things down in Apple Notes (as I did with my initial pass at answers to these questions) before creating and saving a draft in Markdown on my laptop. Typically speaking, though, many if not most posts are written in one sitting, with a post now and then set aside for a second look later that day or the next morning before actually posting it. It’s not unusual for me to spot typos or remember something I forgot to add within hours after a post goes live, in which cases I will make edits. In most cases where I need to come back to post to add something days later, I include an Addenda section at the bottom where I include those updates. Any farther out than that, and mostly I just write a new post. It’s very rare for me to have posts “banked” for posting at a later date, like I know some other bloggers do, since publicly posting something is the final step to getting that thing out of my head where it’s been taking up space—and also because blogging for me is an ongoing process of self-narration (and self-belief ), which for me necessarily means it’s got to be happening in real-time. For that same reason of self-narration, many of my posts necessarily link previous posts somehow relevant to the post at hand. While writing, I’ll often have such posts in mind but don’t bother to do the work of actually adding the links to them until the post is substantively written. Those linked posts then carry a “referring posts” section. In this way, my blog partakes of a tiny bit of “digital garden” magic (the digital garden being the other popular way in which people who make personal websites organize them) by helping to tie together my thinking on specific matters over time. My blog, then, becomes (somewhat like my phone ) an external component of my autistic or otherwise-addled brain. As for what motivates me and the question of what I actually blog about : in the end anything and everything I write can’t help but be about myself—whether the specifics of what I’m writing about happen to be blogging itself, or a movie or television show I recently watched, or autism research, or the politics of solidarity. Over the past year or two, I’ve become especially interested in how important it is for us to spend time letting each other know that we are seen and we are heard. (There’s nothing quite like blogging a movie no one’s seen, one that’s emphatically about being seen and heard, and—this part, too, is in my manifesto post—having it make the filmmakers’ day.) All of this is subject to the whims of fatigue or, as has been the case lately, autistic burnout —which is why I’ve not been blogging as much as I usually do, and why, in fact, it took me nearly two months just to answer these questions. Never before have I felt such cognitive paralysis and claustrophobia when attempting to write, which as you can imagine is simply terrific when writing is one of your self-regulating activities. Only very rarely can I write outside of the house—say, at one of my neighborhood coffeeshops. As I’ve returned to again and again, my blogging is a sort of writing myself into existence and claiming the space I take up in the world, and this is a sensitive mindset that’s, perhaps ironically, best protected by being alone and home instead of up and about and subject to the stressors of being autistic and anxious out in the world. This in part is because the “spotlight effect” is real, and if I’m writing at a coffeeshop I can only do it with my back against the wall. (I mean that literally, not metaphorically.) It’s extremely rare, although not completely unheard of, for me to have anything else going on around me, like a television show or music, when I am writing. If I do feel the need for music, it’s generally going to be something instrumental like LoFi Girl playlists or the soundtracks to Station Eleven or The Fallout (of all things). It’s fairly common, at least when it comes to my longer posts, and almost surely when it comes to my more discursive ones, to fall into hyperfocus . If you’re autistic otherwise neurodivergent and know this state, this usually means looking up after an hour or two and realizing you’re light-headed from forgetting to eat lunch and with a very pressing need to go to the bathroom—themselves two things perhaps better realized at home than at a neighborhood coffeeshop. Early this year, I migrated to 11ty after several false starts looking at various static site generators and failing to come to terms with them—despite the fact that once upon a time in the mid-2000s I self-hosted MoveableType on an OpenBSD box over my home DSL, so it’s not like I’m incapable of understanding things. Right now, posts are written in Panda, the stand-alone editor from the makers of Bear (the Markdown notes app, not the blogging service), on my MacBook Air where I have my local 11ty install. Recently, I switched from manually uploading the built site directory to Netlify to using continuous deploy via pushing to GitHub, after a timezone snag with the latter process finally was resolved. For the rare post that includes an image or two, I currently host those on some.pics, a service of omg.lol, because my blog previously was on their weblog.lol service and it’s just easier to keep doing that for now. I’m still a Flickr Pro member, so at some point I might switch over to them, since that’s where all my photography is anyway, except that, even more rarely, sometimes I’m posting a graphic instead of a photo, and those I do not also have on Flickr. (This is one way in which I miss the ease of an actual blogging CMS, but there currently aren’t any such tools that don’t frustrate me past my point of patience. When I win the lottery, I will pay someone to build me one that does everything I need, and only what I need. Ironically, all these years decades later, Blogger and MoveableType still had the right idea: a CMS that publishes a static site.) There might have been some early iteration of my blogging which was done manually, but if so it’s lost to the severely deficient autobiographical memory and no archive exists. The earliest blogging software I would have used would have been Blogger, but (as noted) I spent many years self-hosting MoveableType over my home DSL, before moving on the WordPress for at least as long. Along the way I’ve tried many different things, from TypePad to Tumblr, micro.blog to weblog.lol, Proseful to (the other) Bear to Pika. I think I even very briefly used really simple a shell script on a VPS. (Full disclosure: I fully admit to an ethical conflict when it comes to “bullshit bots”, or generative so-called AI. I dislike their misuse of copyrights, I dislike their climate impact, I dislike removing cognitive friction from creation, and I dislike that ultimately these bots will just keep narrowing the breadth of human knowledge and expression and everything becomes increasingly self-referential. Nonetheless, I’ve used ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot when needing to solve specific technical challenges, especially when converting archived posts from previous blogs, or to create features such as my “on this day” and “recently read blogs” widgets. I am not a coder, and while I often can understand, for lack of a better way to say it, the story of a piece of code and make tiny, piecemeal adjustments to existing code because of that, I cannot myself code from scratch. My “excuse” in the end is inevitably a selfish one: the blog, in many ways, is all I have, and all that will be left of me when I am gone that said “I was here”, and I need it to function in a certain way. I’m up front about this, because people have a right to call me a hypocrite. That said, as I recently announced , it is my intention not to use these tools going forward, although any existing code will remain in use barring a clear route to replacement.) This is a pretty good example of the type of question I don’t know how to answer. I started blogging within a particular context and at a particular time, and that context and time, and their circumstances and people, are ancestors to who I am today. I don’t know how to blank out that past to imagine how I’d do it now absent that history. More generally, if we take this question as advice to others: there’s a saying (of a provenance I’m not even going to attempt to trace) that the best time to plant a tree was twenty years ago—but the second-best time is now. I think we are right now living in the second-best time to start a blog, because there’s a clear interest percolating in trying to re-center blogs in a way that hasn’t been seen since before the combined rise of content marketing and Twitter, as seen by the advent of sites such as ooh.directory and blogroll.org . Perhaps all we’re really lacking is something along the lines of Technorati and the other services that once existed to help us see not merely who is linking to what URLs but who is linking to whom . This unmet need, I feel, needs to be addressed if blogging truly is to become once again a blogosphere—or, more likely in this day and age, a whole, diverse, plural set of blogospheres . Two years ago, I ran with an idea Kevin Lawver had of blogging as the empathy engine of the web, and in today’s increasingly authoritarian environment we need more than ever as much public solidarity between and among whole persons as we feel we safely can put online. We have a real chance to reclaim an internet where we are people , not users. For anyone reading these interviews who isn’t themselves yet blogging: please start a blog. We need you here. (If someone is looking for some passionate motivation, I suggest watching Pump Up the Volume , the 1990 film that is the patron movie of blogging despite pre-dating blogging itself. “Talk hard.”) It currently does not cost me anything to run my blog beyond the domain which isn’t due for renewal until 2030, nor does it make any money. I’m technically part of One a Month Club , but I don’t really promote that beyond a site badge and in the footer of my RSS feed. However, I cap membership numbers because above a certain threshold it would affect my eligibility for SNAP and Medicaid benefits here in the U.S. without actually providing enough support to make up for those losses. (I’d never actually reach those kinds of membership numbers anyway, but I’d rather be safe than sorry.) More generally, people of course can do whatever they want with their personal blogs. That’s what makes them personal. I’d assume that I’m more inclined to expect personal blogs not to be behind outright paywalls, but your mileage may vary. I don’t have any inherent objection to blogging as a side-hustle, but blogs that specifically try to hustle readership behind paywalls or otherwise cumbersome hoops will tend to feel much less personal to me. That said, I’ll readily admit to an outright bias against anyone whose primary purpose is “content marketing” or growth hacking, or who obsesses over things like SEO, because I believe that the focus on these things is part of what helped push blogs to the edges of the internet and mainstream irrelevancy around the same time that Twitter not only consumed the subset idea of microblogging but also made it explicitly—and frictionlessly—social. Recommendations are always difficult for me because my brain dislikes ranking things or people. It’s why I don’t rate books on Goodreads and why I don’t rate movies on Letterboxd and simply mark the things I enjoyed. It’s also why I don’t maintain a blogroll, although I certainly did back in the OG blogging days. So, the first part of my answer here is going to be a bit of a cheat, if nonetheless a responsive one. At the bottom of the front page of my blog, above the four links to places to find more blogs, is what I’ve referred to as a “bloglog” (what others lately have taken to calling a “postroll”). In my case it lists the ten blog posts by other people that I’ve actually read most recently (or, at least, as of the last time my site was built)—and it’s also available as an RSS feed . It all runs off an Instapaper tag, and I’m sure there’s plenty of blogs there for people to discover. That said, I will offer a short list that splits the difference between some fellow OG bloggers, a couple of more recent finds, and some of the newer self-tagged “word vomit” bloggers on sites like Bear. This is less about placing any of these bloggers above any others in my estimation than about making some suggestions that help expand the types of bloggers represented in this series. Here I’ll just crib a couple of projects from the “sites” section of my homepage. Since late 2001, around the time that so-called “warblogging” became a thing, I’ve been hosting an ad- and cruft-free, minimalist presentation of Mark Twain’s The War Prayer which often finds itself shared with students by teachers. (It’s also on my longest-running domain.) Two years ago I returned to the internet the complete archive of a shipyard workers zine from World War II, updated my research into it, and this year I finally turned over the originals to Oregon Historical Society. Finally, although Joss Whedon became quite evidently problematic, I remain a fan of one of his unmade scripts , which I wrote about nearly a decade ago because I appreciate its (workable? impractical?) ideal that there are no expendable people. (If I can tack on a postscript of sorts: given my eternal struggle with my own ego , I thank Manu for inviting me to participate in People and Blogs.) Now that you're done reading the interview, go check the blog and subscribe to the RSS feed . If you're looking for more content, go read one of the previous 123 interviews . Make sure to also say thank you to Andrea Contino and the other 129 supporters for making this series possible. Absurd Pirate Elaine (my mom, who’s been blogging as long as I have) Jessamyn West Shelley Powers

0 views
iDiallo 5 days ago

What should you write about on your blog?

Whenever I hear someone express a thought really well, like they make a sharp observation, tell a funny story, or just have a moment of clarity, I ask the same question: "Why don't you have a blog?" Their answer is almost always a variation of, "I don't know what to write about." They fail to see that the idea they just shared is the thing worth writing about. In that moment, they weren't worried about credentials or impact; they were just sharing something interesting. That's the entire point. Sure, blogging isn't the mainstream medium for sharing ideas it used to be. The generation raised on polished social media often sees writing with a higher, more intimidating bar. You need to be an expert. You need perfect prose. You need a universe-altering thesis. I'm here to tell you that you don't need any of that. Your blog, before being anything else, is your own property. It's a public notebook. It belongs to you. There are no rules. You can write about anything, in any format you like. But I understand the hesitation. We are taught early on that ideas worth recording must be monumental. I remember the first year of middle school, when we started learning real history. Our textbook began with prehistory: Cro-Magnons, Neanderthals, those mysterious paintings in dark caves. Then it swept through Egypt's pyramids, the Roman legions, the rise of empires and religions, finally landing in the modern technological age of the '80s. I can't remember the book's name, but I've never forgotten the question it planted in me: Who decided what needed to be recorded? For every grand pharaoh or world war that made the cut, countless stories were left out. The everyday lives, the small discoveries, the personal triumphs and failures of millions of people, all erased by the sheer selectivity of history. We only see the peaks, never the vast, rich landscape that lay between them. And because I went to school in several countries, those peaks often varied depending on which country you were in. When people say they don't know what to write about, they're thinking like that history textbook editor. They believe every blog post needs to be a chapter on pyramids. It needs to be concise, complete, and deeply impactful. It needs to be a civilization-defining monument. But real life isn't like that. It's not all Marvel movies, where the fate of the universe hangs in the balance. It's more like those quiet, beautiful indie films where the stakes are relatable. A protagonist mustering the courage to ask a girl out, a person navigating a frustrating commute, some kids on a quest to get to a White Castle burger joint. The universe isn't at stake; just a tiny, precious piece of a single human heart. And that is more than enough. You don't need cosmic stakes to have a compelling story. You just need a story that is true to you. It's a lot like creative nonfiction. You're basically telling a true, factually accurate story, focusing on real-life experiences but filtered through your personal perspective for deeper meaning. Writing it down in your blog is a way of preserving it. It's how you structure that fleeting thought or experience into something you can revisit, and that others can understand and, hopefully, relate to. It's your own cave painting. When I get someone excited about having their own blog, there is a second question that always follows: "What if people don't like it?" Another variation is: "What if my blog post is wrong?" I have an answer to that as well: " Good news, nobody is going to read it ." At least not right away. Really. That's a good thing: Your initial blog is your personal training ground. It's where you get to be bad, be wrong, and learn to be better, all without the pressure of an imagined audience. It gives you the crucial time and space you need to write enough, refine your craft, and eventually produce something you genuinely want people to read. It's your rehearsal space. It allows you to write without the pressure of an audience, to find your voice in the quiet. When I find myself worrying that my life is too boring to write about, I remember these words from the story "Bored" by Regie Gibson: The most interesting people you will ever meet are also the most interested. In your rehearsal, you will learn to see the interest in your own mundane. You don't have to invent dramatic parts. Just observe your life from a slightly different angle. Find the universal thread in your specific experience. The minor frustration, the small joy, the momentary confusion. These are the building blocks of human connection. So, what should you write about? Write about the question that popped into your head in middle school. Write about the first time you drove in an electric car. Write about the thing you just explained so well to a friend. Don't write for the history books. Write for your notebook. Paint your cave. Trevor Noah, the comedian, recounts being stressed out about being the opening comic before Dave Chappelle. He asks Dave for advice, and this is the answer he got: "You are not here because you are funny. [...] You are here because you are interesting."

1 views
Ruslan Osipov 1 weeks ago

Looking back at 2025

2025 was a crazy year - a good kind of crazy for once. My daughter was born, and she’s pretty cool. Adjusting to life with an infant wasn’t easy, but we took on the challenge gladly - we lost our firstborn, and we’re grateful for every inconvenience or a sleepless night. But yeah, life won’t ever be the same. I took a lot of time off work to be with my kiddo, which was great for my mental health. This is the longest I haven’t worked in my adult life, and believe it or not - not working is nice, and I’m hoping I’ve been trying to keep this optimistically detached attitude as I got back to work throughout the year - with mixed success, but it’s nice to know what the north star feels like. The space to not work opened up room for other things. I got pulled into writing - a lot more than before. This year I published far north of 100,000 words across this and my gaming blog - publishing weekly across both outlets. That’s a thick novel worth of words, and while not everything I wrote was great, I enjoyed having to come up with new topics, having to get my thoughts out on paper, and getting to experiment with various voices as a writer. 4 of my articles got boosted on Medium this year (which I thought was pretty cool), and I had some incredible conversations with folks in email and comment chains. I especially enjoyed jotting down decades worth of unfinished thoughts about games - gaming is a hobby I deeply enjoy. We’ve done a few international trips - namely to Japan and Vietnam, and enjoyed both. Traveling with an infant was fun and weird, and I’m excited for even more travel next year. I also got to enjoy building different relationships with my parents and my in-laws, since we now primarily engage with them from the lens of having a kid. It’s fun, it’s frustrating, it’s novel. All of this - alongside many conversations with family and friends - really brought on a philosophical shift. More appreciation for the impermanence of things. Life won’t be simpler than it is today, things will only get more complicated. And that’s fine. I get to appreciate the way life was before, and I get to enjoy the way life is now. More complicated, more messy, much more full of life.

0 views
A Room of My Own 1 weeks ago

Apparently I’ve Been “Interstitial” Journaling All Along

I recently came across a blog post about interstitial journaling . Interstitial journaling apparently combines notes, to-do and time tracking in one. It’s funny how these things become “all the rage” when someone names them and popularises them, when in reality, many of us who cling to our journals have probably been doing some version of it for years. I know I have. For as long as I can remember, I’ve had a journal; not always in a structured way, but more as a place to talk to myself. I never thought of it as a technique; it was just something I did. I’d jot down the time and date, write about what was happening, berate myself over mistakes, work through challenges, and plan my next steps. It wasn’t about recording my life in a traditional diary sense - it was a way to process things in real-time, to be my own sounding board. Or something to fall back on when things get tough. That being said, giving something a name can make it more accessible, helping more people discover and benefit from it. These days, I use Day One for this kind of journaling, especially at work. I keep the web version open throughout the day, using it to vent, clarify my thoughts, and track how I spend my time. It helps me see patterns in my work, keep myself accountable, and avoid the stress of last-minute deadlines. I also use voice journaling when out and about, when I want to jot down a thought while walking or driving, and then add the transcript to Day One, my single source of truth. I kind of miss my physical journal because it was always my faithful companion, going everywhere with me. I was always a one-notebook girl, using one notebook for work and personal journaling, to-dos, and everything else until I finished it. At the height of my journaling, and before smartphones, I would go through a notebook in 3–4 months (that’s a project waiting for some free time for me to digitise all those notebooks in Day One and, if I am brave enough, let go of the physical copies that take up a significant part of my wardrobe cupboard). I tried to revive the physical, take-everywhere-with-me notebook, but while I still journal on paper every now and then and have long writing sessions, lugging a notebook around is no longer conducive to my lifestyle. I am often out and about with only my phone in my pocket and no handbag of any kind. At work, I am in front of my computer and it is just easier to jot things down there. Or dictate on my phone. But I still do have a small, cute notebook (A5) in my work bag, and it does sit on my desk when I work, because… well… every now and then I need to think on paper. It turns out I’ve been practicing interstitial journaling all along—I just called it … well.. journaling. Why Did I Wait So Long to Start Using Day One? The Journal Project I Can’t Quit

0 views
Kev Quirk 1 weeks ago

The Case for Blogging in the Ruins

Joan makes the case that the modern web, dominated by platforms and algorithms, has stripped away depth, ownership, and genuine thought. Blogging, she argues, is a quiet act of resistance that lets us think clearly, write freely, and leave something real behind. Read Post → I’m not sure where I first heard about Joan and her superb writing, but I’ve been following her for around a year or so now, I think. Anyway, I was catching up on my RSS feeds and came across this post from a few days ago. It’s fantastic, as it most of what Joan puts out. Start a blog. Start one because the practice of writing at length, for an audience you respect, about things that matter to you, is itself valuable. Start one because owning your own platform is a form of independence that becomes more important as centralized platforms become less trustworthy. Start one because the format shapes the thought, and this format is good for thinking. I couldn’t agree more. Thanks for reading this post via RSS. RSS is great, and you're great for using it. ❤️ You can reply to this post by email , or leave a comment .

0 views

Tyrannies and servilities

In an effort to understand the then-present state of women in the workplace, Virginia Woolf goes looking to the newspapers, where she finds a number of letters and articles declaiming that women have too much liberty, that they are taking jobs that men could do, and that they are neglecting their domestic duties in the process. She finds an immediate parallel to those complaints in other events of the day: There, in those quotations, is the egg of the very same work that we know under other names in other countries. There we have in embryo the creature, Dictator as we call him when he is Italian or German, who believes that he has the right whether given by God, Nature, sex or race is immaterial, to dictate to other human beings how they shall live; what they shall do. Let us quote again: “Homes are the real places of the women who are now compelling men to be idle. It is time the Government insisted upon giving work to more men, thus enabling them to marry the women they cannot now approach.” Place it beside another quotation: “There are two worlds in the life of the nation, the world of men and the world of women. Nature has done well to entrust the man with the care of his family and the nation. The woman’s world is her family, her husband, her children, and her home.” One is written in English, the other German. But where is the difference? Are they not both saying the same thing? Are they not both the voices of Dictators, whether they speak English or German, and are we not all agreed that the dictator when we meet him abroad is a very dangerous as well as a very ugly animal? And he is here among us, raising his ugly head, spitting his poison, small still, curled up like a caterpillar on a leaf, but in the heart of England. Is it not from this egg, to quote Mr Wells again, that “the practical obliteration of [our] freedom by Fascists or Nazis” will spring? The first quotation is from the Daily Telegraph ; the second is Hitler. (I would draw comparisons to the present moment, but they seem to draw themselves.) Woolf later concludes: It suggests that the public and the private worlds are inseparably connected; that the tyrannies and servilities of the one are the tyrannies and servilities of the other. That is, the tyranny of government is the tyranny of the workplace is the tyranny of the home. Each begets and creates the other. But perhaps that also suggests the reverse: pull the thread on one, and watch as they all come undone. View this post on the web , subscribe to the newsletter , or reply via email .

0 views
Kev Quirk 1 weeks ago

How You Read My Content (The Answers)

Two days ago I published a simple survey asking how you read the content I put out on this site. Here's the results of that survey. Originally I was going to leave the survey running for at least a week, but after less than 48 hours, I received an email from Zoho telling me I’d hit the monthly response limit of 500 responses. If I wanted more responses, I’d have to pay. Nah. 500 responses is enough to give me a good indication on how people consume my content, so I was good with that. Also, 500 responses in less than 48 hours is bloody brilliant. Assuming only a small proportion of readers actually responded (as that’s usually the case with these things) that means there’s a healthy number of you reading my waffle, so thank you! The survey simply asked “how do you read the content I put out on this site?” and there were a handful of options for responses: If someone selected the last option, a text field would appear asking for more info. There were a few people who used this option, but all were covered by the other options. People just wanted to add some nuance, or leave a nice message. ❤ So I updated all the something else responses to be one of the other 4 options, and here’s the results: A highly accurate pie chart Well, quite a lot, actually. It tells me that there’s loads of you fine people reading the content on this site, which is very heart-warming. It also tells me that RSS is by far the main way people consume my content. Which is also fantastic, as I think RSS is very important and should always be a first class citizen when it comes to delivering content to people. I was surprised at how small the number was for Mastodon, too. I have a fair number of followers over there (around 13,000 according to Fosstodon) so I was expecting that number to be a bigger slice of the pie. Clearly people follow me there more for the hot takes than my waffle. 🙃 This was a fun little experiment, even if it did end more quickly than I would have liked. Thanks to all ~500 of you who responded, really appreciate it. See, you don’t need analytics to get an idea of who’s reading your stuff and how. Thanks for reading this post via RSS. RSS is great, and you're great for using it. ❤️ You can reply to this post by email , or leave a comment . Mastodon / Fediverse Occasionally visit the site Something else

0 views
A Room of My Own 1 weeks ago

2026-1: Week Notes

For a while now, I’ve been playing with the idea of starting weekly notes on my blog. And if I’m ever going to do it, it feels like it needs to start cleanly, with the first week of the year. While I generally think I don’t need to share a lot of my very personal life here, I do like reading other people’s weekly notes. There is something excitingly voyeuristic about diving into other people’s weeknotes and what they choose to put in there. I also like the idea of having a weekly recap. As I mentioned in my One Year With Bear  post, I’ve been playing with the idea of some kind of weekly planning schedule, and this feels like it could go hand in hand with a weekly recap I could do every Sunday. This is not journaling, and I don’t want it to be. I don’t want it to be long. Just a few main points of what I did, what I learned, and what caught my attention. If I manage to do this for 52 weeks, I’ll have a pretty nice yearly recap. I used this week to prepare for 2026. I did my yearly reflections and managed to come up with about twenty highlights from last year. I wanted to set some goals, which I actually do every year. I know there are a whole lot of blog posts now starting with “I don’t do New Year’s resolutions, but…”. I always do set goals for myself at the beginning of the year. January feels like a clean slate. And I do try to make them SMART.  In 2025, the SMART ones got done. The high-level/generic ones didn’t. For example, I had a goal that said “dedicate time to hobbies like writing, memory keeping, and creative projects”, and I didn’t do almost any of that, apart from bits here and there. That’s something I want to be much more specific about when I set my 2026 goals (I plan to do that in Week 2). I spent time organising my writing and my blogging. Anyone following this blog may have noticed that I was quite prolific in the past few days. I published six (6) blog posts this week . That is mostly because I’m not working at the moment, had some time on my hands, and wasn’t completely sick of looking at my computer. A lot of what I published had been sitting in drafts for a while. What I really noticed was how much I enjoyed my slow mornings. I would wake up while the kids were still asleep, my husband would bring me a cup of coffee, and I would stay in bed for one, sometimes two or even three hours. I was sorting through my Bear notes, my journaling, my blogging, and writing. It was one of the more enjoyable things I’ve done in a while. True me time. I signed up for a free yoga challenge with Yoga Download , thinking that 2026 should be the year where I do yoga every day. I used to be a member a while back, but there was always so much (too much!) to choose from that I would end up overwhelmed and not doing anything at all. I started on 01 Jan and the class itself was great, but it was thirty minutes long, and the following ones were forty-five minutes. It felt daunting, so I ended up not doing any yoga at all after that. Once again, I fell into the same trap of starting off overly ambitious. Today, I went back to my trusted Down Dog  Yoga, where I can choose the length of the practice, the type, the voice, and how much they talk. Daily yoga is important to me, especially for my back, flexibility, and overall wellbeing, but it needs to be realistic. From experience, I know that even 15 to 20 minutes a day is enough to build stamina, strength, and flexibility. I didn’t do as well with food and walking as I wanted to, and routines are a bit messy at the moment. The kids are on holiday, my mum is visiting, and the dynamics at home are different. I’ve been trying to go with the flow, mostly successfully, apart from the sugar overeating, which always makes me feel worse. I am re-reading  The Easy Way to Quit Sugar  to get back into it. I stopped smoking over a decade ago using this method, and I trust it for everything. I’ve also been trialling a simple mood tracking app for the past two weeks. Unsurprisingly, it confirmed what I already know. Not moving enough and not eating well have the biggest negative impact on my mood. Time to do better in weeks 2 and 3. We are still starting this year, right? I’m hoping to keep space for blogging this year. Whether it’s useful/productive or not doesn’t really matter. The fact is - writing it makes me feel good, and it makes me feel even better knowing that others with similar thoughts might read it.

0 views
A Room of My Own 1 weeks ago

Where I Keep My “Bookmarks”

I recently got an email from a reader my blog (thank you for reading and reaching out!) who asked me how I keep track of my bookmarks. The short answer is: I don’t. Not in the traditional sense. I don’t really “bookmark” anything anymore. What I actually keep is a pile of short(ish) notes on all sorts of subjects, and those all live in Bear, tagged as topics with relevant nested tags. RELATED: One Year With Bear I used to be one of those people who clipped full web articles into Evernote and bookmarked every website I ever liked. Articles, quotes, screenshots, recipes, all of it went in there. At some point I realised I was hoarding information I’d never look at again, although it is now fun to occasionally find a full article someone once wrote on a blog that’s long gone, still sitting there in my Evernote backup. These days I keep far less, but even with that shift I still have over 2,000 notes in Bear. They’ve built up over the years: little observations, bits of learning, snippets from books, random thoughts I didn’t want to lose. Everything gets tagged by topic. That’s my whole system. If something feels worth keeping, I’ll drop it into Bear, tidy it up a little, and add the tag or tags it belongs with. Occasionally I’ll add backlinks to connect related notes, but I don’t force it. Some topics get deep enough that I end up with a dedicated tag I keep adding to until the “obsession” fades. RELATED: Refuse to Choose: Too Many Interests to Pick Just One? I’ve tried a bunch of “proper” bookmarking tools over the years. Pocket. Readwise Reader. Raindrop. Also my web browser. Without fail, they all turned into giant holding bins of things I meant to read “one day.” However, the time to read an article truly is the moment you encounter it or the moment you search for it. Everything else is not relevant now and will probably never be read again. It just adds to mental and digital clutter and overwhelm. Over the years, I learned to delete everything I saved to read later. And now, even when I still send articles to Readwise Reader, I am 99% sure I’ll end up deleting them later, unread. Saved links without context just become clutter. If something grabs me enough to keep, I’d rather save the idea in my notes, with the URL for credit. That works for me because it feels like I’m tending to something, not piling things up. A note has to earn its place. If it’s not worth the small effort of processing and tagging, I probably don’t need it. That said, I completely understand the appeal to save and bookmark, esp. that tools like Reader or Raindrop make it so easy to do that. Been there, done that. Admittedly, I still have a “links” tag as a nested tag under the main #resources tag in Bear, where I save links to websites on various topics that I’d like to explore at some point. There are 38 notes under that tag as of today, and today was the first time I checked it in a year. When I need something or a website to access, I just search it. I still read a few newsletters that go straight into my Yahoo “Subscribed” folder. RELATED: Beware of This Online Time Suck (Examine Your Subscriptions) I also subscribe to a lot of personal blogs like mine via RSS Feeder, and while I don’t read everything all the time, Feeder lets me quickly scan and dip into whatever catches my attention. It feels nice and low-pressure. Take it or leave it. And it’s free. If I read something I want to save, I do it right away by adding it to Bear and processing it there. RELATED:  My Digital Workflow (Jan 2026 Edition) I think I’ll take some time to round up all my newsletters and my current RSS subscriptions in a blog post. Seeing everything in one place gives it a bit more context and a sense of quantity. I actively unsubscribe from everything I don’t need or am no longer interested in. And I don’t “bookmark.” Not really. Not anymore.

0 views
(think) 1 weeks ago

How to Vim: Navigating Prose in Style

I don’t know about you, but I’m not using Vim solely for programming. I also write documentation in it, plus most of my blog posts (like this one). When dealing with prose (regular text), it’s good to know a couple of essential Vim motions: Vim’s check for beginning/end of sentence is not very precise, but it mostly gets the job done. And because paragraphs are just blocks of text surrounded by blanks lines that’s handy in programming contexts as well. The forward sentence motion positions the cursor on the first character in the next sentence, or on the line after the paragraph (if the sentence is the last in a paragraph). The backward sentence operates similarly - it goes to the first character in the previous (or current) sentence. The paragraph motions will take you to the empty lines before or after a paragraph. Due to the simple definition of a paragraph in Vim, those are quite reliable. I guess in the world of motions like the ones provided by and you might be wondering if learning the rudimentary motions is worth it all. In my experience it’s never a bad idea to be able to use someone else’s setup, and the built-in functionality is naturally the smallest common denominator. That’s all I have for you today. Keep hacking! and allow you to move backward/forward in sentences and allow you to move backward/forward in paragraphs

1 views
Evan Hahn 1 weeks ago

Notes from "On Writing Well"

I’ve been trying to improve my writing so I read On Writing Well by William Zinsser. My main takeaways: Clear thinking is a prerequisite for clear writing. How do you avoid cluttered writing? “The answer is to clear our heads of clutter. Clear thinking becomes clear writing; one can’t exist without the other. It’s impossible for a muddy thinker to write good English.” Reduce scope. Zinsser hammers this point repeatedly. For instance: “Nobody can write a book or an article ‘about’ something. Tolstoy couldn’t write a book about war and peace, or Melville a book about whaling. They made certain reductive decisions about time and place and about individual characters in that time and place—one man pursuing one whale. Every writing project must be reduced before you start to write.” Keep the thesis in mind. “Writers must […] constantly ask: what am I trying to say? Surprisingly often they don’t know. Then they must look at what they have written and ask: have I said it?” I don’t want to write like this guy. I think Zinsser’s writing is dogmatic, verbose, outdated, and above all: not to my taste. But that helps me clarify my own style by showing me what I don’t want to do. And despite all that, I agree with a lot of his recommendations. Even though there were many parts I disliked, I think On Writing Well holds better advice than a writing guide I read last year . I hope my writing improves as a result of reading this book. Clear thinking is a prerequisite for clear writing. How do you avoid cluttered writing? “The answer is to clear our heads of clutter. Clear thinking becomes clear writing; one can’t exist without the other. It’s impossible for a muddy thinker to write good English.” Reduce scope. Zinsser hammers this point repeatedly. For instance: “Nobody can write a book or an article ‘about’ something. Tolstoy couldn’t write a book about war and peace, or Melville a book about whaling. They made certain reductive decisions about time and place and about individual characters in that time and place—one man pursuing one whale. Every writing project must be reduced before you start to write.” Keep the thesis in mind. “Writers must […] constantly ask: what am I trying to say? Surprisingly often they don’t know. Then they must look at what they have written and ask: have I said it?”

0 views
annie's blog 1 weeks ago

To be defeated by ever greater things

How small that is, with which we wrestle, what wrestles with us, how immense; were we to let ourselves, the way things do, be conquered thus by the great storm,— we would become far-reaching and nameless. What we triumph over is the Small, and the success itself makes us petty. The Eternal and Unexampled will not be bent by us. …growth is: to be the deeply defeated by ever greater things. from  The Man Watching by Rainer Maria Rilke

0 views
A Room of My Own 1 weeks ago

One Year With Bear

I’ve now had a full year with Bear, and over that time I’ve gradually moved more and more of my life into it. My first post on the topic is here:  How I Finally Settled on Bear for My Notes The release of the web app made a huge difference. At work we’re all on PCs, and I can’t install anything on my work laptop - but I can use web apps. That single change completely shifted where and how I could use Bear, and suddenly it was viable everywhere. Over time, Bear has become my main place for pretty much everything. I touched on this in my Digital Workflow (Jan 2026) post, but here I wanted to go deeper and show how I actually use it day to day. This setup isn’t fixed. It’s always evolving, and that matters to me. I don’t want to commit to any system forever. What Bear has helped me do, more than anything, is stop tinkering and tweaking. There are no plugins, no endless setups to browse, and no temptation to rebuild everything every few weeks like I did in Notion or Obsidian. It’s just me and my notes, and that’s made me far more productive. I actually use these notes. I have several widgets on my phone, including my monthly note and a new-note widget. I clip articles easily, jot things down on the go, and return to them when I need to. Bear has replaced three or four other note-taking apps and has become my main one. It’s cleared a lot of mental clutter, and for now, this setup really works. When we’re flooded with information, organising systems can feel like progress, even when it’s just reaction (busy work). Tools become ends in themselves, a stand-in for action, and the system becomes the work. Bear, for me, pulls things back in the other direction. I have seven main categories (tags): Home  - Planning by year and month, plus context and links I need day to day. Personal  - Notes about me: ideas, reflections, lists, and things to explore. Admin  - Practical life admin I refer to regularly. Resources -  Recipes, links, ideas, and wish lists for later. Writing  - Short form writing: blog posts, essays, stories and writing drafts. Work  - Notes that support my work as a Programme/Project Manager. Topics  - Notes on interests that come and go over time. Each main tag has a number of nested tags under it. Home is something I’m trialling this year. It’s loosely inspired by the idea of Forever Notes . I did experiment with an Apple Shortcut for Forever Notes in Bear, but I don’t use Bear for daily journaling or true daily notes— Day One is my source of truth for journaling and memory keeping. I removed daily and weekly notes from the “forever notes” system, but I kept months and quarters. I have a 2026 Home note, which is very much a work in progress. The idea is that it will include: A quarterly overview Monthly sections Links to things like my 2026 goals Each month holds artifacts from that month: basic to-dos, links, and references. For example, in January I’ve stored links to my flight ticket and my mum’s ticket—she’s visiting at the moment and leaving on the 27th. We’re going to Auckland together, so I’ve also saved the accommodation details there. I’m also experimenting with weekly planning. I’ve pre-created weeks inside my monthly notes (as headings, not separate notes), but I’m not yet sure whether (or how) I’ll actually use them. That part is still very much an experiment. What I am planning to do is add monthly highlights at the end of each month. Whether I stick to this consistently remains to be seen. This whole section is still evolving. Personal is where things about me live. These are notes I want to explore, write about, or dig into further: lists, ideas, lifestyle planning templates, and things I want to remember. It also includes quotes and things I find inspiring at a particular moment. Because Bear’s tagging system is so flexible, these notes can live in multiple places. I can tag them temporarily and remove the tag when they’re no longer relevant. My Yearly Reflections  live here too. I’ve been writing them since 2017, and I find them incredibly useful. Admin took me a few months to commit to. These notes used to live in Apple Notes. They’re things I refer to often: random but important information, some finance notes, medical information, property details, and records. They’re mostly current and mostly text-based. Permanent attachments live in Dropbox rather than Bear (I link them to Bear). Bear notes act as reference points I return to regularly, I also add temporary attachments or screenshots and delete when I no longer need them. I went back and forth on whether Bear was the right place for this, but once the web app became available, I decided to go all in. I even asked about this on Reddit - here’s the thread and responses that helped me decide:
  From the Bear app community: Should I Move My Life Admin Notes to Bear or Keep Them Separate? Resources is exactly what it sounds like: recipes, travel ideas, various links, wish lists, anything I want to keep around and refer to occasionally. These aren’t things I look at every day, but I like knowing they’re there. Writing holds blog posts, drafts, writing to-dos, essays, short stories—essentially all my short-form writing. If I’m working on something written, it lives here. This is not my actual work system. My work tech stack is completely separate. This space is for notes I find useful as a programme and project manager: articles I’ve read, ideas from newsletters, bits of wisdom I want to revisit occasionally. It’s reference material, not active work. Topics is the biggest category. These notes have moved from system to system over the years. These are largely interlinked single topic notes that once lived in Obsidian. Before that, they lived in Evernote. At one point, I was into Zettelkasten/Digital Gardening and thought it was something I wanted to maintain. It turns out it wasn’t. RELATED:  The Rise of Digital Gardeners I still add to them occasionally when I discover a new topic I’m interested in, but most of the time they just sit there. Every now and then I’ll pull something out when I’m writing a blog post or looking for a quote or reference. Many of these topics reflect interests I’m no longer actively engaged with, and I’m okay with that. Bear’s archive feature has been especially helpful here—I’ve archived older study notes I don’t want cluttering search results, but don’t want to delete entirely. As I said at the start, the system is still a work in progress, but I’ve stopped tinkering. I just use it, every day, many times a day. RELATED:  My Digital Workflow (Jan 2026 Edition) Home  - Planning by year and month, plus context and links I need day to day. Personal  - Notes about me: ideas, reflections, lists, and things to explore. Admin  - Practical life admin I refer to regularly. Resources -  Recipes, links, ideas, and wish lists for later. Writing  - Short form writing: blog posts, essays, stories and writing drafts. Work  - Notes that support my work as a Programme/Project Manager. Topics  - Notes on interests that come and go over time. A quarterly overview Monthly sections Links to things like my 2026 goals

0 views