Posts in Sports (20 found)
Manuel Moreale 2 days ago

Enhanced games

The other day that stupid thing called the Enhanced Games took place. As you might have guessed by the name, this is basically the Olympics on steroids, quite literally. The event itself is not even worth commenting on. I remember hearing about this concept ages ago and forgot about it, and only skimmed through a few headlines the day after the event. But reading about it got me thinking about what I’d love to see if we were to organise an Olympics spin-off. There are two concepts I’d be genuinely excited to see, and they go in opposite directions. The first concept is to let tech and engineers go wild. A lot of modern sports are infused with technology of all kinds: from running shoes materials, to laser stitched swimsuits, to tracks that are incredibly bouncy, the list goes on and on and on. I remember, almost a decade ago, Nike trying to break the 2 hours barrier for the marathon , and thought it was an interesting experiment. I’d love to see what kind of barriers we can break by letting the best athletes and the best minds join forces, but without doing silly things, like strapping rockets to someone’s feet. The other idea is the exact opposite. Remove all tech. Like all of it. No shoes, no fancy materials, no special equipment, no stadiums, nothing. We go back to ancient times, and we see how much just human bodies alone can achieve, with as little external help as possible. I’d very much enjoy seeing both of those events. Thank you for keeping RSS alive. You're awesome. Email me :: Sign my guestbook :: Support for 1$/month :: See my generous supporters :: Subscribe to People and Blogs

0 views
Manuel Moreale 4 days ago

14 down, 30 more to go

The stars are finally aligned again, and I’m back on the road for chapter 3 of this 10-part saga. Clear sky, not too warm, I have someone who can come pick me up and drive me back to my car, the calendar is empty, so we’re going for it. Contrary to the previous two segments of this walk, this one’s quite lean on the churches department—we’ll only see 3 of them—but it’s by far the most challenging one from a physical perspective. That is, if you’re a sane person and you do these walks the way they’re intended to be walked. There’s an upcoming one that’ll likely be more challenging, but we’ll get there eventually. For now, in front of us, we have about 16 kilometers to walk and roughly 1600 meters of elevation to gain. So we better get going. Breakfast is in—coffee and bread with Nutella + peanut butter if you’re wondering—and after a short drive, we’re back at the same parking spot where we ended our walk a few weeks back. Flip flops are off, hiking shoes are on, sprayed some SPF50+ on my face and head, and we’re ready to walk. I say we, but it’s just me. Well, me and you reading this. I walked this one solo, but it is quite fun to do these hikes while keeping in mind that I’ll have to write this newsletter. I’m very much enjoying it. We cross the road, walk through another parking lot, and we immediately see sings that tell us that we’re on the correct track. Quite a few trails run through here, apparently, I counted at least 4 different ones. But we’re here to follow the yellow and white marks (for the most part), so over the bridge we go and across the fields. We’re not even 5 minutes in, and already there’s a steep stone stair in front of us. We have 1600 meters to climb after all, we better start sooner rather than later. The initial part of the trail was a bit overgrown, and I was worried it was going to continue like that for quite some time because this is not a trail that sees a lot of traffic but, thankfully, that wasn’t the case. I was also surprised by how varied the trail is at the beginning. We’re not even 15 minutes in, and we have already walked through fields, up stone stairs, and now we’re on a stone “bridge”. And shortly after that, here we are climbing another stone stair, but this time built as part of the dry stone wall. Big fan of these walls, they’re so cool. The forest itself is also quite nice here. The problem we have at the moment is that as soon as the warm season hits, the vegetation explodes, and sometimes the trails become an absolute mess. 15 minutes into the walk and we have now connected with a proper road, and we’re no longer on a trail. There are a lot of these roads around here. They’re service roads for people who have properties, but they’re closed to general traffic. Still, it’s quite rare to see cars on these and you usually only see mountain bikes. Actually, you usually see nobody on these roads. We’re now almost at the first exciting part of this journey. The yellow and white marks take us right, but that’s the normal path. We’re going left because we have one of those pesky variants to take care of and, as you know, I don’t want to walk the same road twice which means I made some changes to the original route. The problem is, I am not 100% certain the trail I saw on the map exists. It’s there on the map, sure, but a lot of times I saw lines on maps that were not there in reality. Thankfully for us, the trail is there—and it is steep—and we can continue forward since the first church is not far from here. We have already gained enough elevation to see things from above, and the view is lovely. And just like that, we’re at the site of the church of San Leonardo Abate (12/44) likely built around 1540. The church is similar to many of the others we saw in previous walks, but the interesting aspect of this one is that it has the old bell visible on the outside porch. Apparently the was a bell tower that got demolished, and I guess they decided to put the bell on display. I tried to take a picture of the inside, but it was too sunny. And in case you’re wondering, the church still has a bell outside. This church is the one that’s part of the variant, so we’re now standing at the end of that part of the trail. Which means we need to walk back to the main path, so off we go in that direction. The weather is still absolutely gorgeous. Out of the woods, across some fields, through a tiny, tiny village, and we’re now back on asphalt for a little bit, heading towards the next church, which is just right around the corner. But first, no, not a Mary, we get our first Jesus out in the wild. There’s gonna be a few more, I think we’ll see more Jesuses and Marys this time around. I should probably start counting these. 1 hour and 15 minutes in, and we have reached the church of San Zenone (13/44). Which, I’ll be honest with you, is everything but small. Consecrated in 1493, it’s probably the most luxurious one of the bunch I’ve seen so far. And it has a nice view. If you’re team Mary, it’s your time to be happy because look what we have here, just outside the church. This also doubles as a memorial for the fallen during both world wars. We’re only 20% into this walk, and we have already seen 2 of the 3 churches we’ll visit today and the next one is waiting for us roughly 3kms ahead. So we leave civilization behind us, we climb up through the forest, and we emerge on another of those service roads. I decided to try something different this time around since I was alone, and I recorded a couple of minutes of the walk. It’s unlisted on YouTube; hopefully, you don’t get bombarded by ads. The video is embedded below, or you can watch it on YouTube . Part of me was tempted to title it “You’ll not believe what happened on this trail”. On our way up, we stumble on this interesting-looking tree. I have no idea what could have caused this. If you happen to know, send me an email. I’d love to learn more about this. Also on our way up, in the middle of nowhere, stuck inside a retaining wall, another Jesus. Finally out of the woods and back into civilisation for a little bit. We’re almost halfway through our walk, and I was planning to take a quick break after 2 hours, but the remaining church was not too far, so we keep going. Like my dog, they’re also not massive fans of the hot weather. We’re less than 200 meters from the final church, where I was planning to take a quick break, but look how lovely this spot is! There’s a bench—yes, there is a bench hidden in the tall grass—two big trees that provide some much-needed shade, and a swing! We’ve found our resting spot. And since we’re stopping here, I'll use this opportunity to let my shirt dry a little bit. This place is so relaxing, I contemplated taking a nap, but we still have 8kms to walk and some 800 or so meters of elevation to gain, so the nap will have to wait. Shirt is back on, backpack is back on, we’re walking again, ready to visit the third and final church of the day, the church of San Lorenzo Martire (14/44) We’re now done with the churches, and we can set our sights on the top of Mount Matajur, our next target. The official trail would not take us up there and walk around it but, come on, if we get that close to the summit, we might as well go up to the top. And so into the forest we go again. I’m not sure who’s getting a point here between team Jesus and team Mary. I’ll let you decide. I never walked on this side of the mountain. I walked this general area many, many times, but never walked here, and I’m loving it. I also found this interesting construction. It’s currently used as a shed, but I wonder if it was used for something else in the past. It does look quite old. Time to record another short video , I think one day I should attempt to make a video of a full hike recorded in 60 seconds chunks all stitched together. Could be fun, I might do it the next time around. We’ll be out of the forest soon, but first we need to walk through a lot of flowers. There are so many colours out here at the moment, between the flowers and the butterflies. What a lovely time of the year this is. We have emerged, we’re now fully under the sun, and it is hot. I’m also starting to feel the fatigue a little bit. But we’re powering on because we’re almost there. We also have a great view on a ridge I’m dying to walk, but can’t figure out the logistic of the trip. It’s a 30+ kms walk from one end to the other, I can’t take the dog with me, and I also can’t leave him alone at home that long. So this is a walk that will have to wait for a better time. But damn if it is tempting. The summit is in sight, we’re almost there. That’s not the end of the walk, just the highest point, but once there, walking the final part is gonna be super easy since it’s all downhill. And here we are, at the top of Mount Matajur , quite literally on the border between Italy and Slovenia. I hiked this mountain more times than I can remember, at all times of the day, during all the seasons and with all sorts of weather. I walked it with snow, with rain, with winds at 100kmh, at night, at sunset, at sunrise, you name it. And on the other side, we have a view of lovely Slovenia. Way too many people up here today though, but that was expected. This is a very easy hike, and plenty of people come up here over the weekend. We’re not gonna spend much time up here, but I might come back another time and take you for a hike with me from a different route. That could be fun. Today’s hike is gonna end down there, at the parking lot next to Rifugio Pelizzo. Down the mountain we go, which feels so nice after having walked uphill for the entire hike. I could go on another 6 hours, but there’s no need to do that because we only have 1km left to walk. And just like that, we’re at the parking lot. I actually walked down some more to a secondary parking spot because there were too many people yelling and screaming at the main one. And the next chunk of this walk passes through here anyway, so next time we’ll start from this same spot. And there you have it, we have walked from Pulfero sitting at 185 meters above sea level, up to the top of mount Matajur at 1643 meters and visited 3 churches on our way up. This was fun, and less tiring than I was expecting. The data recorded by my watch during the walk is available if you’re interested in that type of stuff, and I have dumped all my photos on the shared iCloud album . The only thing left to do now is eat a proper post-hike snack. See you next time! You love the outdoors and RSS. You're one of the special ones.

0 views
W. Jason Gilmore 1 weeks ago

Ironman Training Diary - May 18, 2026

A lot of pushups and dialing back my run pace

0 views
Harper Reed 4 weeks ago

Note #733

Quite a change of locale. Also I wear hats now. Sports hats. But motorsports. Thank you for using RSS. I appreciate you. Email me

0 views
Manuel Moreale 4 weeks ago

Hyde Stevenson

This week on the People and Blogs series we have an interview with Hyde Stevenson, whose blog can be found at lazybea.rs . Tired of RSS? Read this in your browser or sign up for the newsletter . People and Blogs is supported by the "One a Month" club members. If you enjoy P&B, consider becoming one for as little as 1 dollar a month. Hyde Stevenson is a nickname I've been using online for years. It's a mix from Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, and its author Robert Louis Stevenson. Privacy is important to me, so I generally avoid using my real name. My parents are from Serbia, but I was born in Paris. I lived in London, and, now, I live in southern Europe. More vitamin D was needed in my life. I had two passions as a kid: sport, and computers. Sport has always been a big part of my life. When I was a kid, all my friends played football, but I was always more into basketball. I don't mind watching a good football game, but that's where it ends. But, basketball is another thing. I'm a big Nikola Jokic fan, and I haven't missed a Denver game for the last four years. When we were kids, we all dreamt about the NBA. There weren't many games available to watch. We had one guy who ordered games on tape direct from the US. Then, we shared, and copied them. Basketball was our life. We played at school, after the school, the weekends. We were chasing the best playgrounds to compete with other players. It was great. It was the end of the 80s. Bird, Magic, Jordan, the Pistons Bad Boys, and also Yugoslavian players like Vlade Divac and Dražen Petrovic. The Dream Team too, the real one. I'll always wonder what might've happened if the war in the Balkans hadn't happened and the USA and Yugoslavia had played each other in the Olympics final. That love for the game made me play at a semi-pro level. But, a bad coach put me off the courts. I was young and didn't understand why I couldn't play more when I knew I had the level. I remember one shooting training where I got 46/50 on 3pts, and the guy behind me got 36/50. Did the coach say something to me? Nope. That was enough, and I took a break from the game for a few years to pursue another passion: boxing. My love of boxing probably stems from those nights when my father would wake me up at 4am to watch Mike Tyson's fights. I've always loved boxing. My father's mate's nephew was a boxer. He invited me to train at his gym. And I got hooked. Sad story about this young man. He went pro, but after a bar fight, I heard he was murdered out for revenge by someone involved in that brawl. I also had a great group of friends, and we trained grappling, and MMA for four or five years. A good friend trained us grappling. Today, he trains fighters who fought in the UFC, and got lucky to meet many MMA fighters like Jon Jones . Another one, Guillaume Kerner trained us Thai boxing. Guillaume was one of the first western European Thai boxer who won a World Title in Thailand. You can check some highlights of his career . That was before I moved to London. When I got back in France, I was training exclusively in boxing until 2021, when I moved abroad. Since I relocated, I've really missed the camaraderie of the boxing club. I'm lucky enough to have a garage where I've hung a punching bag and can keep training. For those interested, I started last year a #50kPushUps challenge . The goal is to make 50,000 push-ups in one year. I could write many anecdotes about people I met, but I want also to share my other passion: computers. When I meet people, the first thing they say to me is that I don't look like a computer guy. Stereotypes... 🤷 My passion probably started when one night my father brought home the VCS, the Video Computer System, later renamed the Atari 2600. It's not a computer, but that's where it all started. Later, I asked if I could have a computer, and they offered me the Amstrad CPC464 with its 64Kb RAM, and cassette deck. Later, my grandmother offered me the updated version the CPC6128 with the same RAM, but with a 3-inch floppy disk. After that I had many other ones. I started to build them. I tried my first Linux distro in 1995. It was a Debian. Today, my main distribution is still Debian, even if I tried, and used many others. I've tried probably many window managers over the years. But, for the last 15 years more or less, I've been using only awesomewm , a tiling window manager, light, and customizable if you know Lua a bit. I could write a lot about Linux, but I don't think it'd be of much interest to our readers. What I can say is that my love for computers is what got me to where I am today in my career. My first blog was about Debian, the GNU/Linux distribution. It was in 2001, and it was called debianworld.org. I used to write how-tos, and articles about Linux. I used the blog to post English to French translation of the Debian Weekly News, but also the Securing Debian Manual , and some part of the Advanced Bash scripting guide . Then in 2014, after a long summer, I found out I got cyber squatted. And, just like this it was gone. Then, for five years, I didn't set up anything online until 2019. I met a colleague that asked me if I participated in any conferences, or if I had a blog. That's when I wanted to have a personal place online again. I love bears, that's why I chose that domain name. And, lazy, because I am sometimes. About the theme, it took me some time to create it, and be happy with the final result. But, then, it didn't really change. It depends. First, I need a topic, or an idea. Sometimes a blog post, a news, a new tool, or basically anything can inspire me to write directly a post. But, often, I like to go through my Zettelkasten. Every morning, I use this keybinding -0. That opens a random note. If it doesn't sparkle anything, I hit the same keys again. A "new" note appears, and, sometimes, a discussion starts. I will add more content, or argue with previous thoughts. That's how some drafts start. English not being my mother tongue, I read the different parts multiple times to be sure to make sense. My goal is to make simple sentences, but that connect with everyone. Once done, I check if some grammar hasn't been forgotten by my LSP. Then, a script will sync the content to my blog, and post it also on Mastodon. I don't. I just need my laptop, a terminal, and a coffee. That's all. Maybe the physical space could help some people. Maybe if I had a seaside view, it could impact my creativity 😅. Previously, for other projects, I used Drupal, then Wordpress. But, for this one, I wanted something easily to maintain. No database, or plugins updates. Something simple. That's why I went for a SSG, a Static Site Generator. I chose Hugo , and I've been happy with it for years. There is some JavaScript from Carl Schwan's post to add Mastodon's comment on the blog. So far it works well. Everything is hosted on a dedicated server. All post have been written in Neovim, my go-to editor, on a Tuxedo laptop. My local repository has a backup on a Synology DS1812+ NAS, which also had a remote backup. That repository is pushed on a private Codeberg repository too. Domain name was purchase at Unlimited.rs , a registar in Serbia. Originally, the name of the blog was lazybear.io, but since the announcement that it will disappear in the future, that's when I switched to a Serbian one. For other projects, I use also Porkbun that I love. I don't think so. A few of my friends suggested that I should specialize and monetize it, but that was never its goal. It's my little corner on the web where I can do whatever I want. I can tweak it as I want, try new things, post photos the way I want, without having to follow a specific format. It was always meant to be my place to experiment. I don't track visitors, I don't care about numbers. Now, and then, I get some emails, and I like the discussions I get there. Keep them coming 🙌 The domain name is around €24 per year. The dedicated server around €30 per month, but I use it for other things too. It doesn't generate any money. I could add a Ko-fi account, and maybe I will... just in case. 😇 If people want to monetize it, I don't see any issue with that. Everyone is free to do whatever they want. Ok, I have a couple of them! And, two French photographers: I also have a list of blogs I enjoy, and follow . Yeah start a blog, value your privacy, and send an email to Manuel so we can find more about you. Now that you're done reading the interview, go check the blog and subscribe to the RSS feed . If you're looking for more content, go read one of the previous 139 interviews . People and Blogs is possible because kind people support it. Rldane.space Zerokspot.com Joelchrono.xyz Benjaminhollon.com Christiantietze.de Jeremyjanin.com GregoryMignard.com

0 views
David Bushell 1 months ago

RSS Club #007: Running

Today Sabastian Sawe ran an historic sub-two-hour marathon in a competitive race. A marathon is around 42 kilometres, aka 26 miles in freedom units (we use miles in the UK too but not for running distances). I feel the record is a little unfair on Kipchoge who achieved the milestone first under non-competitive conditions. Even more unfair on Kejelcha who finishing second today in 1:59:41. Two unbelievable athletes in the same day. If my maths is correct that’s not far off a 14 min 5km pace. That’s simply outrageous! My personal best for a 5km is 22 mins. With the caveat of questionable GPS cutting a park corner. My fastest half-marathon is 1:51:42. Basically half as slow as an elite marathon runner. Of course, they run half-marathons even faster. I do not believe my knees could withstand double that distance. Anyone who can drag their body 42km deserves applause. I doubt I could even sprint 100 metres as fast as these guys maintain a marathon pace. More napkin maths suggest that is 100 metres in around 16 seconds? Usain Bolt did it once in 9.58s. Maintaining a pace of 16s/100m for 42,000 metres in incredible. If the maths ain’t exciting you see this video of runners attempting to match Kipchoge’s pace . Elite sprinting in anaerobic . Long distance running is aerobic (aka “cardio”). I wont feign expertise on the exact science. All I know is the 200 metre sprint is notoriously difficult. It pushes the human body beyond what it can maintain for anaerobic sprinting. You gotta just start sucking in oxygen and try to ignore the fact that it feels like you’re dying. When it comes to superiority over other animals, top of the list is our brain and our dexterity. But more impressive I think is our endurance . Our ancestors started walking upright and evolved as persistence hunters . Prey cramps up and physically cannot move to save its life. Brutal way to go! Long-distance running is more about breathing, a steady pace, and good form to avoid injury. The perfect running shoe is less important than people want to think. A good fit matters. Pheidippides didn’t run the first marathon in Nikes (fashion sneakers fall apart instantly). He probably wore sandals or was barefoot. The most important attire is short shorts, underwear of synthetic material to keep your bits in place, and plenty of lube on the thighs. Never wear a cotton T-shirt unless you want bloody nipples. Chafing is like the boiling frog parable. You don’t realise until it’s too late and you’re walking like a cowboy for a week. Unless you’re running competitively, never compare yourself to others. It does not help you in the slightest. There is no “good” time to run any particular distance. Thanks for reading! Follow me on Mastodon and Bluesky . Subscribe to my Blog and Notes or Combined feeds.

0 views
W. Jason Gilmore 1 months ago

My 1/2 Marathon Strategy as a Slow Starter

This Saturday (April 25, 2026) I'm running the Ohio health half marathon here in Columbus and unlike past races where I was merely trying to survive, this time I actually have a goal of finishing in approximately two hours and 10 minutes. I'm feeling reasonably confident about meeting this goal despite a rain forecast because I've been training pretty diligently for the past few months and know I can achieve the required pace. However, I’ve noticed anytime I'm out on a run I'm just a very slow starter. For the first maybe 2 to 3 miles my stride tends to be very short, I don't seem to be able to catch my breath, and generally speaking I just feel very uncomfortable. Naturally I've been fretting about this in light of the ambitious desired finish time. Even just a few weeks ago I was on an 8 1/2 mile run with my training partner Charlie and once again during those first 2 to 3 miles I just did not feel good at all, but starting around mile 4 both my pace and comfort level increased significantly to the point that my pace towards the end of the run far exceeded the beginning! So over the weekend I spent some time yesterday talking to our good friend ChatGPT and it actually came up with a pretty good suggestion that's apparently called a negative split strategy. In a nutshell, ChatGPT said I can't hide the fact that I'm a slow starter and so I should just incorporate it into the plan. For the first 3 miles I'm going to run a 10:30/mile pace then starting at mile four I'm going to run a 10:05 pace until I complete mile 8. Starting at mile 9 I'll increase pace again, accelerating to 9:50/mile pace and maintain it through the end of mile 11. Naturally at this point all bets are off but my guess is starting at mile 12 I'll be able to accelerate one final time to 9:30/mile pace through to the finish line. In summary my race pace will be: If I can meet this pace then my finish time will be approximately 2:11:22 (10:02/mile average), which would be a new PR (by far) for me. These days I'm also paying much closer attention to my diet, and want to be particularly diligent in the days ahead of the race. So 48 hours before the race I'm going to focus on eating grilled chicken, rice, vegetables, yogurt, granola, and fruit. The day before the race I'll have oatmeal, a banana, toast and peanut butter. For lunch I'll have a turkey sandwich and fruit, and then for dinner I'll have some pasta and chicken. On Saturday the race starts at 8am. Around 6am I plan on having oatmeal, banana, and coffee. At 7am I'll have another banana. During the race I plan on consuming a gel pack at the following times: My gel pack brand of choice is the Gu pack, specifically the salted caramel flavor. In past races I've worn a fannie pack to carry my phone and gel packs and absolutely hated it so this time around I bought a vest from Amazon. Nothing fancy, it's light and has a few pockets where I can store my phone and Gu packs. Miles 0-3: 10:30/mile pace Miles 4-8: 10:05/mile pace Miles 9-11: 9:50/mile pace Miles 12-13.1: 9:30am/mile pace First pack: start of mile 4 Second pack: start of mile 8 Third pack: start of mile 10

0 views
Stratechery 1 months ago

An Interview with F1 Driver and Venture Capitalist Nico Rosberg About the Drive to Win

Listen to this post: Good morning, This week’s Stratechery Interview is with F1 driver-turned-venture capitalist Nico Rosberg . Rosberg started his F1 career in 2005, and retired after winning the world championship in 2016; Rosberg spent his last four years as teammates on Mercedes with his childhood friend Lewis Hamilton in one of the most intenst teammate rivalries in F1 history. Over the last several years, however, Rosberg has reinvented himself as a venture capitalist, founding Rosberg Ventures , with a specific focus on leveraging his F1 background to build connections between European money and Silicon Valley startups in one direction, and startup products and German businesses in the other. In this interview we cover all aspects of Rosberg’s journey, from having a steering wheel in his crib, pioneering the use of sports psychology in F1, and his decision to retire on top of the world. Then, we discuss how F1 builds connections, the similarities between founders and drivers, and how he realized he could leverage that in a new competition: winning as an investor. What I found particularly interesting is how Rosberg’s background and history seems so varied and unconnected on the surface, yet are clearly linked by a consistent ethos of maximizing opportunity in the service of winning. As a reminder, all Stratechery content, including interviews, is available as a podcast; click the link at the top of this email to add Stratechery to your podcast player. On to the Interview: This interview is lightly edited for clarity. Nico Rosberg, welcome to Stratechery. Nico Rosberg: Thank you very much, Ben, it’s really an honor to be on the show. I hear so much about your show always especially when I’m in the Bay Area. Well, I don’t normally interview venture capitalists on Stratechery, but you are no normal venture capitalist, which you use to your advantage. I want to ask you about that, but needless to say, that made this an easy exception to make, particularly since I’m a big Formula 1 fan. To that end, I always start my interviews talking about the subject background, we may spend a bit more time on yours if that’s okay with you, it’s pretty fascinating. NR: I understand. With pleasure. Okay, good. Well, you were born in 1985 in West Germany to a German mother and a Finnish father. Your father Keke was the 1982 Formula 1 world champion. Was there a steering wheel in your crib when you came home from the hospital? NR: There was actually, yes. (Laughing) Oh, that’s funny. NR: On my Facebook page you would see photos of me in a go-kart when I’m like three years old with a helmet on and everything, so yeah, it was an early discovery of that passion. I’m interested about that because obviously your father was tremendously successful, is he immediately all in on, “You have to do what I did”, or was there ultimately a bit of humoring you, “You can come along and try this but I’m not sure you could ever measure up to what I did?”. NR: There was a go-kart track near our house and he was going there with his friends even before I was born and then when I was born, and then I was six, seven years old, we just gave it a go, I enjoyed it, and I looked pretty fast also. So then he was like, “Maybe this can become a father-son hobby”, it just went from there and then you start doing a race here, a race there, I started winning the races kind of immediately and so that even that hooks me even even more than when you win, of course, it’s amazing, it’s an amazing motivation. So that’s how we just kind of got going and it became an amazing father-son hobby to share. We spent a lot of time with each other, we traveled in a motorhome to the races, so it was really lovely. There definitely is a bit to driving a car very fast. On one hand, of course, you started early, and you see the history of Formula 1 drivers, they start early, but you took to it right away. It’s definitely like father, like son in that regard. NR: Indeed. I think as in every sport — you also see it with golf or tennis — you have to start pretty early now it just gives you a head start and in practicing those skills. And I think, yeah, I guess I inherited some of those genes from my father because we need to be very good at hand-eye coordination, that’s super important. NR: We need to be also very good at processing things very quickly because we have things coming at us at 220 miles an hour, our eyes are flickering left and right all the time, just taking in all the inputs that we’re seeing and also feeling, so I think that also probably has to be a strength of ours. There’s a lot of stuff in your background about your parents really pushing you in terms of academics, learning lots of languages, all that sort of thing. Was that unique to you, or to your bit, it always strikes me that Formula 1 drivers all come across as very intelligent. And to your point, there’s such a high degree of information processing that’s happening on, is that the norm, generally speaking? NR: I think you probably need to be a bit street smarter, at least, to be a successful F1 driver than maybe in some other sports, because we depend so much on this high technology car, and if we’re not able to understand the car, set it up properly, be at least street smart about all these things, then it doesn’t matter how talented you are, you’ll never be able to go fast. So probably I would say that in our sport, yeah, that comes a little bit more to the fore than maybe in other sports. But in my case, actually, my parents pushing me at school was the contrary, my mom and my dad would usually come in late at night and say, “OK, stop now”, because I was always very hard working at school. Somehow we had a group of friends, everybody wanted to achieve, and I wanted to achieve as well, and I had to catch up because I was missing half the week every other week because I was racing. So my parents were more actually telling me to stop now because I was trying to make too much of an effort to catch up. Interesting, because a bit I want to get to here is you’ve had such a widely varying career, even since you finished racing, you finished relatively young , and so that has been a theme for you all along, is like you born with the steering wheel in your crib, but you’re interested in more than that. NR: Yeah, I really always enjoyed the academic side. In fact, if I wasn’t going to make it as a driver, I already had a place reserved for me in Imperial College in London to study aeronautics, that was my plan B of how to get into F1, which would have been as an aerodynamicist. Right, design the car instead of driving it. NR: I don’t know if I would have gotten there in the end, but I think I had a good shot, so that was my plan B was already set. You’re most famous for your rivalry with Lewis Hamilton but as I understand it you actually met him quite young you were teammates in carting as well? NR: It’s a pretty crazy story because the McLaren Formula One team wanted to set up a little go-kart team at the time, and the two rising star drivers at the time was Lewis Hamilton from Great Britain and myself down south, and so they actually funded our two go-karting seasons. And so it was just the two of us driving for the McLaren Mercedes go-karting team and we were winning all the races and championships. Unfortunately for me, more often than not, it was Lewis winning and I was second, but there we go. So it’s incredible because we were best friends at the time and we were 13 years old and we were on holiday together all the time and dreaming, “Imagine what it would be like in 15 years to be in the F1 team together, winning races and championships?”, and it was impossible to achieve that dream, just seemed so far away. And yet really 15 years later, we’re in the Mercedes F1 team as teammates fighting for races and championships, so it’s a pretty incredible story. I mean, why did it seem even that impossible, though? I mean, your dad was an F1 driver, you’ve been racing in karts. What makes F1 feel so far away? NR: Well, come on, you can imagine if you’re 13 year old and you’re playing in your regional tennis camp in the middle of nowhere that you look at the television and you see [Jannik] Sinner and [Carlos] Alcaraz fighting for the Monaco Masters that’s going to look like extremely impossible and far away. Right, but there wasn’t a bit of total self-belief that, “I’m going to be there, there’s no question”? NR: Well maybe Lewis is a little bit more like that, I’m more sensitive, more insecure, less self-belief, so I never actually really believed of myself that I could get there and be good enough, which has pros and cons to think like that, because it also is an incredibly strong motivator. When you don’t have that self-confidence, you just fight so hard to prepare to the best of your abilities all the time. So it has pros and cons, and it was nice to see that, of course, someone like me that did not believe until the very last corner, I was still able to actually win in the end, so that was reassuring. I’m curious about this mindset bit, because this has been an area that you’ve actually talked a lot about. In 2007, you stopped working with your father as closely as you were, went to work with a sports psychologist. At what point was it clear to you that this mental aspect is going to be super important to your success? NR: That became clear to me in my first year of F1 because it was mentally just an enormous struggle. We had a bad car, so we’re either breaking down or finishing well out of the points all the time and it was a really rough start to my career. And this is with Williams at the time? NR: Yeah, with Williams. At times it was almost as if like, “Oof, I might not get taken on for the second year”, because it was such a rough start. So mentally, it was incredibly hard because my dream is at stake, my dream is to be an F1 driver, to win races, so that was difficult. So I decided that, “I’m spending four hours a day on training my body, why am I not training my brain? There must be solutions out there to improve my mental state”. So I sought out help, and I found a psychologist/philosopher and this was incredible for my life, for my performance, I worked 10 years with him. In the winter, two hours every two days, so it was like an incredible effort, it was harder than the physical training was actually the mental training. It was a combination of learning to meditate, learning to visualize, to learning the power of repetition, and also learning to understand myself better. “Why am I scared?”, “Why am I anxious, jealous?”, because then you cannot switch those emotions off very easily or almost not at all. But when you understand why they’re there, you can really adapt your reaction and that has a snowball effect, because when you react in a much better and more appropriate way, it has an enormous snowball effect on your life so it’s these kind of learnings that really helped me so much. Was this pretty novel for an F1 driver to seek this out and do this sort of training at the time? NR: Yeah, it’s a bit like in the startup world. Founders are not really allowed to admit that they’re scared of failing or that they’re working with a brain doctor, as some like to call it at the time in F1, so it was not something that I could really tell anybody about this because it would look weak in a way, but actually it became my superpower to go through that process. And now there’s a little bit more acceptance now, there’s been a couple of other drivers talking about it. I think even Lando Norris, the world champion last year, he sought help in the middle of last year as he was struggling mentally, clearly, and his championship was slipping away from him, and he went out and sought help and made enormous progress, and that’s what got him the world championship in the end so that was great to see. Lando’s always interesting because he seems to wear his insecurities on his sleeve, they just come through sort of so tangibly. Did you feel a lot of like sympathy for his sort of struggles and working through that? NR: Yeah, totally. That’s the state of mind that I can very much relate with, and that’s what people love also because he’s very authentic, so that’s really appreciated. At the same time I wrote Lando a direct message on Instagram and he never replied, but at least I wanted to see if maybe he would read it, because I’ve been through what he’s what he’s been through, and one of the obvious things that I would change if I was Lando, and he did change it a little bit, is to not always talk about the glass half empty, even when he was on pole position he almost only spoke about that one corner where he messed up rather than like, “Hey, that was almost the best lap of my life”. I mean, both is right. “Hey, that was almost the best lap of my entire life”, that would be correct or, “Ah, damn, I messed that last corner up so bad”, that would also be correct. You know? And he just says, “I messed that last corner up”, and, “I need to get my stuff together”, and that’s just unnecessary because it’s repetition, and it really ingrains itself in your mind that you always, if you say, “I make mistakes always”, you’re really going to believe that you make mistakes always. So that’s something that he could quite easily just adapt, even if he keeps on thinking that that, but don’t say it, and don’t say it out to the whole world, because that’s a whole tsunami that you’re setting off there repeatedly, which is not going to be beneficial to your performance. You’ve talked about talking to founders and not being able to show weaknesses. Have there been any examples in the times that as you’ve been an investor and talking to different companies, where you’ve identified someone and been like, “Look, you’re kind of a Lando Norris here” — maybe that’s not the words that you used — but, “Let me talk to you about your mindset and how you can shift that”, has that come in handy yet? NR: I really enjoy that because founders are really very similar to high performance athletes. NR: They’re extremely competitive, their drive is unbelievable, they’re very courageous also, because you have to be so damn brave to bet the company over and over as you’re innovating and pivoting, so there’s great similarities, and that’s why I really enjoy speaking to founders. Just now in the Bay Area, that’s very often the topic that I speak to founders about and they enjoy that as well, to discuss that kind of topic mentally, how they approach that and everything, and so that’s really enjoyable. I think I can really add value as well as I learned for myself also, but I can really add value by adding from my experience. The more founders that you talk to, is there a bit where — if you go back to F1, it’s very visible who’s the best, like it’s very measurable in a certain sense, but it’s interesting at F1 because sometimes you could have a great driver who doesn’t have a great car, and yet people will still say, “That person is excellent, they’re just limited by their circumstances”. Do you get a similar sense in being in tech, dealing with founders, and being able to separate the circumstances from the person and saying, “There’s something there even if the circumstances aren’t allowing it to show”? NR: That’s one very, very important ingredient for a successful founder, because actually it will be often many, many years until there’s any validation as to what he’s building or she’s building and the best founders have to be extremely resilient and not feel the need to bow to consensus thinking of people around them or of their board or whatever. They are the visionary and they have to believe with such high conviction in their idea, in what they’re building and see it through. Because if it was obvious, then everybody would be building it, and most of the time, they’re creating something that’s just not obvious to sometimes anybody except for themselves in the early stages, so that’s absolutely a very important trait. However, in combination with an extreme curiosity and desire to learn and remain open to new ideas and everything, so it’s a balance that has to be found. And again, that’s pretty rare to find both attributes within a founder, but usually that’s the case. Is that tension between the sort of insecurity and confidence and uncertainty and curiosity? Is that what you’re zoomed in on, what you’re looking for? NR: Yeah, totally. Because sometimes it’s like it opposes each other. Right, it’s a paradox. NR: Someone who’s very self-confident their idea will be will be completely arrogant and just so sure that their way is is the right way and that’s it and then they will not be very curious, so that’s why you don’t find it in every person and it’s important. I think these two character traits are very, very important. Continuing with the background, you have a YouTube channel that has 1.46 million subscribers, you haven’t posted on it for a while, but there used to be a whole host of videos. But I went back, scrolled all the way to the bottom, and the original upload was in 2011. A lot of people didn’t know what YouTube was at that point or barely did, how did you find YouTube and why did you start posting videos? NR: As an athlete, there was an opportunity that suddenly that came in those years, which was to connect closer with those out there that were supporting me. Were you the first one to really do that? NR: No, not the first, but I joined some of the early movers and it was amazing to see how you could directly connect with your fanbase, and there was also the belief that, of course, with time, Formula 1 is also about marketing and that can give you an edge over some other drivers. If you build a big following, a big brand for yourself, and you become highly relevant to brands for sponsorship, etc., then a team might choose you over someone who just drives fast. So there’s also that element that to be a successful F1 driver, usually it helps to really try and excel in every single domain that may be relevant and that domain plays a role, as well as working well with the media, because the media is so powerful and that’s a game you also need to try and nail. I’m curious about the sponsorship angle. F1 obviously has huge amounts of sponsorships, it’s an amazing sport where people will willingly wear gear with a bunch of sponsorships on it — I guess all racing is sort of like this. But right now, now that tech is huge and F1 is huge, there’s a lot of tech sponsorships of F1 and I’m just sort of curious: I’m in tech, but generally a lot of these companies are enterprise companies , a lot of B2B things, and this whole world of sponsorships and what goes on around that is somewhat foreign to me. I’m just a blogger here in Wisconsin before in Taiwan, what is in that game and how involved are the drivers? Is that a huge thing? You have to go out and actually help win these sponsorships too? Or you should show up to a bunch of events? I’m just curious, how does that world work? NR: So a few things here. First of all, because of Netflix , the sponsorship fees that the teams are now requesting are like 2-3x from what they were just six, seven years ago. Is that just because it’s more popular or because they also their logos also show up on Netflix? NR: Because it’s so much more popular and because it’s now become relevant in the US. So the whole tech industry has become interested and you’ll see most companies are now also sponsoring. I mean, look at just the Mercedes team , of course, but look at the Audi team also . They have Revolut, so the bank that’s come out of the startup ecosystem, ElevenLabs , the voice AI global Leader, all of these companies. In fact, I’m actually, because I’m so deeply connected now with Silicon Valley, I am more and more also kind of casually supporting some of these tech companies with sponsorships in F1. I’m just presenting one dev tools company, multi-billion dollar, with an opportunity to sponsor a team this week, I’m just sending that through. Because the sponsorship fees have increased so much, a team like Mercedes has $400 million in annual sponsorship revenue. $400 million! That’s so crazy. And then you add their share of TV revenues on top, so they get to beyond like $600 million in annual revenue, and because they inserted budget caps in F1, they don’t spend more than $300 million, even including driver salaries and everything. So they are so hugely profitable, these F1 teams, or especially the successful ones and that’s why the CrowdStrike founder now, George Kurtz , he just bought 5% of the Mercedes F1 team. And that stake, I mean, the Mercedes F1 team was valued at $6 billion, unbelievable. you know so so he paid three hundred three hundred million dollars he paid for a five percent share. Do you feel like you were 10 years too early? NR: I missed that train, because I think with a bit of effort probably at some point I could have had a nice little share in a F1 team somewhere, but I completely missed the train. It’s incredible how this sport has become has become really a business case now, and these these F1 teams have become investable assets, which never used to be the case, so it’s quite phenomenal. So these sponsors, we drivers spend a lot of time with these companies then, they invite all of their customers, I do dinner with them then even during a race weekend or the next morning for breakfast. Monaco Grand Prix, I’m at the Hotel de Paris having breakfast with one of the sponsors, so the drivers do spend a lot of time with those sponsors. And apart from that, the sponsors want visibility because visibility for their logo is just an amazing credibility stamp, and also they want to bring and host people at the races, so that’s what it’s about and I think it works amazingly well. I was talking to Michael Cannon-Brooks , Atlassian is now sponsoring Williams, and this idea of you actually have 24, or this year 22 , around the world, pre-planned, clear places to meet customers and bring them there. He’s like, “It makes scheduling very easy, it’s very straightforward”. NR: And for someone like Atlassian the customers are there anyways in the paddock, because the C-levels of all big companies are always there. To make deals in the paddock is incredible, an incredible opportunity and even I myself, so I do work for Mercedes F1 and they don’t actually pay me in Euros, they actually pay me most of the time with tickets for the F1 races, because I too, I love to host the VC community at the races, it’s such a great way to get to know people, build friendships and of course, yeah, it’s very important for me to really build relationships in this ecosystem. That’s super interesting. Speaking of Mercedes, when Mercedes rejoined F1, acquired Brawn , you were the first driver alongside Michael Schumacher, who was then replaced by Lewis Hamilton — two pretty impressive names to have as teammates to say the least. The rivalries between teammates is the stuff of lore in Formula 1 but is it actually underrated how intense that is? NR: So the norm in F1 is always that a team has a number one driver and a number two driver and that’s clearly kind of set in stone, and that’s the way you go racing. It’s very unusual that a team has two number one drivers, the most legendary such pairing was Ayrton Senna and Alain Prost at McLaren, and that ended in total disaster after only two years. They were crashing, then one guy quit, and it was just a total mess. It’s okay and not too bad as long as you’re racing for like fifth and sixth and seventh place — but as soon as you have the best car and you as teammates are fighting for every single race win, it just becomes so hard because you’re always going to push the boundaries and go into those gray areas because there’s a championship at stake and that’s your childhood dream and that’s what then happened between Lewis and I also. It kind of just spiraled from one going a little bit too far, then the other one paying back and then back again and then crashing and it just became very, very tense and difficult to manage. It was a very uncomfortable environment to be in because not only are you kind of enemies within the team, but also the whole team as such cannot really take a side anymore and they need to stay neutral, so they can’t really support you either anymore, so it’s a complicated dynamic. Well, you lasted longer than Prost and Senna, because I think you made it three years with Lewis Hamilton. Is that right? NR: Four, actually. We would have kept going, I had another contract for a few more years so it was kind of borderline manageable, but only after Toto Wolff made us sign a contract whereby it didn’t matter who was at fault, but if ever we crashed together, then we would have to split the bill, the repair bill, 50-50, and my most expensive one was $360,000 and after that, I made sure to leave extra space when Lewis was anywhere close. (laughing) That’s amazing. Why did you decide to retire? I mean, you finally win, you overcome Lewis, and then you’re done at 31. NR: I gave it a thousand percent, really, much more than any that I thought I could give. Total life commitment, insane intensity, the whole thing, mentally, physically and I achieved my dream, I achieved my dream in the best possible way, I beat the greatest of all time, I won that Formula 1 World Championship with Mercedes , the legendary car brand, it’s not possible for me to do better. I had a young family at home, a child at home, baby at home so it just felt like the right moment for the most beautiful exit possible for me that would carry me for the rest of my life. So it was a bit of a rational decision in that way and I just felt that was what I wanted to try and do. Of course, it was scary because when you make such a decision, you don’t really know how it’s going to go and how you’re going to feel. But now in hindsight, for me personally, it was really the best thing I could do and a great decision, which I’m very lucky to have been able to exit in that way. And a lot of founders listening, because I know you’re very popular with founders, also your podcast, they will be able to relate, it’s kind of the $10 billion or $50 billion dollar exit. NR: Once you put your life into it and you’ve created an enormous success and change people’s lives and then you go out on a high, I think that was my dream to do it that way. You made a lot of changes before that last year, too. But then there’s all these stories of that last year where you won the title, focusing on things like jet lag or like your nutrition and all those bits and pieces. Was that just like, “I have to figure something else to finally get over the hump”? NR: I tried to perfect every single possible marginal gain possible, that was really what I was about, and it went from working with a Professor of Sleep at Harvard , and who now has created a startup based on what we were working together at the time called Timeshifter , actually, which is a nice anecdote. And so there, for example, the secret was eliminating jet lag for the whole year because jet lag is a disaster. As an athlete, the difference between 99% focus and 100% focus is the difference between coming first and second, and jet lag just destroys you, and we’re traveling from continent to continent all the time. I managed to do a whole season with absolutely 0.0 jet lag, and it’s pretty simple. Of course, it takes a lot of discipline, but pretty simple. The secret was one-and-a-half hours maximum of time shift per day and then blackout glasses in the evening, two hours before needing to go to sleep and then also immediately upon waking up, 10,000 lux, like a light, you know, which you’re staring into, which you also see with Bryan Johnson , he does that and then, yeah, I mean, as long as I followed that, it was incredible. So I eliminated jet lag from my whole life for that year and every detail I worked on in that way, you know, really everything. So you see my helmet was black and it was bare carbon because I realized that the helmet was 80 grams and every gram counts in our sport so I took the paint off my helmet, just every single detail. I really tried to work on every single marginal gain possible. This sounds absolutely hellish with family and little kids at home. I can see why you once you accomplished it, you were done. NR: Yeah, of course. I mean with a little baby at home it required a lot of a lot of a great commitment also from my wife Vivian at the time and great support and and she did that awesomely so I’m very very grateful for that. Now you’re sitting here as an investor, but we’re a decade on from when you retired, what was the path to get to where you are now and to realize that, “This is what I want to do with the rest of my life”? NR: Seven years after retiring was first of all, just trying everything and nothing, trying to figure out what could be next in my life. And it’s hard because as an athlete, you are like CEO, you know, you’re top of the company, and you feel like being the king and then after your sports career you drop to zero. There’s nothing there and you cannot use your skill that you learned for something new, it’s just gone. And it’s very hard to accept that you really start from zero and you don’t even know if you’re going to have success in something new or not. So I tried a lot of things and and now finally I’ve landed on what I really enjoy doing and it’s being fully into the venture capital ecosystem building my own VC firm, Rosberg Ventures , out of Europe, investing a lot in the USA or even primarily in the USA. So super exciting and yeah, and I hit the ground running and I’m able to win also pretty quickly, which is what is really motivating. What made you realize there was this opportunity? If you sort of zoom out, this idea that there’s money in Europe, there’s opportunity in the U.S., someone needs to connect those two things together. But was there a specific conversation or something that came along that’s like, “Oh, I could actually do this and be good at it”? NR: Well more than money in Europe it was money in my bank account which was just sitting there. That makes sense. NR: And I was like, “What am I going to do with that?”, because it’s really really hard to invest capital across generations in a smart way. It’s like super, super difficult, as most people will know that or many people know. The way led to the Yale Endowment — everybody who’s interested in finance has once looked at the Yale Endowment because David Swensen is the gold standard for investing capital across generations. And my light bulb moment was then seeing that David Swensen had by then put 20% of the Yale endowment into venture capital, 20%, that’s $8 billion, and it was by far his best performing asset class with 21% yearly performance, 21% IRR. So that was my light bulb moment because I said, “Wow, I love startup anyways”, but I didn’t know you could make an asset class out of this, “Let me try and replicate what David Swensen did”, and I believe that with time because I have my unique angles, including F1, that with time, I can also build the right access by adding value into the ecosystem and everything to kind of replicate the approach that David Swensen took to the asset class. And that’s where we are now, we actually made it work. What are those unique angles? I think that sort of ties this together. You have the F1 background, you’re European. NR: So the unique angle, of course I have the F1 platform, which is a really unique advantage to be able to meet people from the VC ecosystem, make friendships, get insights. Appear on this podcast. NR: (laughing) I’m very, very lucky in that sense. But that’s something you seem to think about very strategically. Like, “This is an advantage that I have, I’m going to exploit this and push this”. Is this part of the thesis up front, particularly once you started? NR: Well, first of all, I really enjoy welcoming this incredible community to my sport, it’s amazing for me to be able to showcase my sport in a way. So this is where you did better from Drive to Survive in the end, because even if you sort of missed that era, now suddenly everyone’s interested in F1. NR: Oh yeah, definitely, I would not be here today if it wasn’t for Drive to Survive because that’s what has really engaged the whole tech community in my sport. It’s lovely to be able to invite people, bring them up close, show them what my sport is about, and see how excited everybody is and to share that with them is really amazing, so I enjoy that. And it’s a great opportunity to, as I said, build friendships and get insights, but then also to add value. How does that start? First of all, of course, curating the group that I invite. I invite the founder and then I invite the CIO of a big company and they then actually have a very valuable exchange. The CIO happens to be looking for the product that the founder is building, the founder obviously needs to go to market, so there’s a great way for me to build connections, and that’s how you start adding value. And beyond that, what we do is also we bring U.S. innovation to the German large corporates, we help with that. So Germany is your specific focus in particular in Europe. NR: Because I’m German, and because of my history and everything, I’m very well connected in Germany to all the C-levels in the large corporates. Does this even go back to like not just growing up in Germany, but also working for Mercedes, being the driver who’s interacting with all this? NR: Yeah, of course. All these large caps have been sponsors in F1, they’re all in the paddock, so I know them very well, and they’re all in desperate need of transformation now. Of course, there’s AI, there’s sustainability, there’s all these points and they’re not exactly the fastest, the German companies. They’re a little bit — many of them are real legacy businesses, who are not necessarily known to being the most brave when it comes to adopting new innovation and things like that. And are these generally like just regular companies, like manufacturer companies, things like that? NR: It goes all the way to the car manufacturers, whether it’s BMW or Mercedes and we have found a unique positioning where we’re able to support, just selectively, with bringing their attention to a couple of products that are just being built in the US in the startup ecosystem, whether it was vibe coding or it’s even legal tech, all these different things, and we can bring their attention to some of these innovations and really add value by creating these connections. So this is one of the secret sauces to Rosberg Ventures and to adding value, which works very well, and we’re hosting dinners with some of the C-levels and inviting some of the startups, etc., and it works very well. So you recently announced a new fund, $200 million assets under management . How did you grow your network on the asset side? Is that mostly then German money that’s coming back to the U.S. and you’re completing the cycle there? NR: Mainly German, so it’s German capital because the Europeans really lack connectivity, I realized that the Europeans lack access to U.S. venture capital and they know of the importance and the value that’s being created there, but they don’t have the access and they really kind of miss the boat on that, so it’s not too easy to convince them that, “Hey let’s join forces and partner up here, and let’s invest in the best opportunities in the U.S.”. So that’s been working very well and my way to raise or to convince these families is really going via the principle who I may know from F1 or whatever and then I say — I don’t even say too much like what i’m building because you don’t want to sell straight away — it’s more like, “Hey can you introduce me to your family office? I would love to just have a conversation with them”, and then the introduction, and I speak to them, I explain what we’re doing, and it’s just an obvious one. We’re kind of indexing the top 10 VC funds in the U.S., and also the top 10 growth stage companies, startups in the U.S., and indexing those and it’s kind of a no-brainer then, that’s how we’ve been able to raise capital very, very quickly. That makes sense. So everyone sees the opportunity, it’s not clear to get the capital in, you go in first sort of as like a seed investor with your own money, and that sort of starts that virtuous cycle, and that makes sense and then they get access to the German market in the long run. You’re bringing a unique angle and it’s just all about deal flow, I think it’s pretty compelling. Why is it so hard to do business in Europe ? Has everyone just given up on having a big startup ecosystem there and, “Let’s just get our money into the U.S.”? NR: So you mean the startup ecosystem in Europe? NR: There are flashes of real hope at the moment. Vibe coding was pioneered in Europe, the vibe coding for prosumers, that’s Lovable out of Sweden, and there’s many other examples. I mean, ElevenLabs, the global leader in voice AI, European, and many, many more examples. So there is flashes of real hope. But of course, we lack the breadth in the whole ecosystem and that’s as a result of a few things. It’s a bit of a chicken-and-egg. One, of course, it’s much harder to scale in Europe because of the geographical limitations, it’s so hard to go from Germany to France, different language, different regulatory framework, it’s just a huge friction there in the go-to market, so that’s one challenge. And then historically also, there’s been quite a lag in the distributions and liquidity in that asset class in Europe and so therefore, funding is not as ample as in the U.S. So it’s kind of a chicken-and-egg there also. But I think Europe is really working on trying to introduce one regulatory framework across the entire Europe, across all countries for startups, so that’s in the plan, so a lot is happening, and let’s see if Europe can develop more and more such promising companies. How have you managed this shift? You started out sort of a fund of funds sort of model, then you mentioned you’re doing more direct investing. Is that just a natural evolution of getting more access, having more assets under management? Or what was that explicit goal and strategy that you were seeking to pursue? NR: Well I think the holy grail in venture capital is is to invest directly in the startups and the fund of fund was the natural starting point from an asset class point of view, also from from copying and being inspired by what Yale did, and then from there the fund of fund is like a Trojan horse because it gets you positioned well into into the market where you see everything and then it really helps to identify which are the breakout startups, which are the most promising with the generational founders. So it really helps to create a short list and also to create those connections and to build those opportunities to actually invest directly in the startups. We met in San Francisco a couple of months ago, you had just met with Dreamer , I actually met with them the next day, they launched and were immediately acquired by Meta , was that your first exit of a direct investment? NR: So this is an important point that I don’t just like try and support the companies that I’ve backed. So in this case, this was the CTO of Stripe, the ex-CTO of Stripe, who was my friend, David Singleton , he built this together with Hugo [Barra] , who used to have a senior role at Facebook. Yep, I knew him when he was at Xiaomi , he was at Google, he was at Meta, he’s been all over the place. NR: Everywhere, it’s an incredibly promising founding team, and so I was just trying to support. And they happened to say that Stratechery, that they were the biggest fans in the world of you and Stratechery, so I was like, “Okay, well, that’s easy, I just met Ben yesterday, so I can make the connection there”. Yeah, it’s a pity how that went — I mean, pity because also from our point of view, I was so excited about that product, actually, it was vibe coding AI agents. Yep, it’s very compelling. I was looking forward to writing about it, they got snapped up before I could even get there. NR: I was looking forward to really using it at scale, but, yeah, now it’s bought by Meta and let’s see what Meta does with it, but it will certainly be, I’m sure, very promising what they build with that. As you’ve made this transition and levered up into tech and going from fund of funds to direct investment, it’s a time of great upheaval in tech , given AI. Theoretically, this should mean more startup opportunities. On the other hand, the frontier lab models might just eat everything. How are you thinking about that as an investor? Is it like, “I’m finally getting to the stage where I can get into startups, and now I’m not sure that I want to”? Or are you optimistic? NR: I’m very optimistic. I’m very optimistic because AI, the value creation within this wave of AI is going to be something like we’ve never seen before, and I do think there’s a lot of opportunities beyond just the frontier labs to capture market share, create new markets. But at the same time, you do need to be careful because we see the legal tech. Legal tech is a really big new market that’s being created there with a leader like Harvey and Legora , the two leaders, and then now Anthropic came out with a product which kind of starts to threaten their position a little bit. And Anthropic has been doing that for every sector, it feels like almost, so that is a little bit of a concern. It does feel like a safer place at the moment to be invested in frontier labs and neo labs, that does seem the more safe place to be. But nevertheless, I think there’s like, for example, Elevan Labs, voice AI, it’s very defensible what they’re building. They are a frontier lab themselves, by the way, because they build their own models. But still, voice probably is going to commoditize, the research, as in many cases and there it’s then going to be about the platform, distribution, products. And there, ElevenLabs is doing an excellent job. So it does look at the moment like they’re going to be able to really win and sustain any potential threat from these frontier labs so there are examples where beyond the frontier labs, many, many examples where they can be success stories, so it’s an exciting time. You mentioned platform and distribution, and this sort of seems to be a theme: you’ve thought about the F1 reputation and background, “I can leverage that, I know these sort of companies, I can leverage that”, you saw YouTube early on, you were on that, you’re here on this interview. Is that why you still do Sky Sports? Everyone’s favorite commentator , is that you love to commentate, does that keep Nico Rosberg sort of front and center? NR: You’re right. I do enjoy staying connected with the sport, but there’s the second reason that it’s really helpful for me to stay kind of relevant and it does help me also with relevance, even in the tech ecosystem. Because, of course, if then some people enjoy watching me and things like that, it’s easier to connect with them in future, even in the tech ecosystem. So that is twofold. We talked before, you were born with sort of steering wheel in your crib, in some respects, a advantageous background. But what I see as an overall theme is pretty consistently you identifying and leveraging your advantages and like what we just articulated is a good example. So now you’re in the investing world, totally separate, but figuring out what you have, how to work with it and build towards that. Is that the overarching sort of theme that you see in your life? What still drives you, is it that bit about being a little bit insecure and wanting to prove yourself and being super competitive? Is that just like you can’t turn that off and that’s what that’s why you’re still here? NR: I’m a super extreme competitor, I need to compete, I want to win, and I have now chosen venture capital as my space to try and win more and more in future. And I think, yeah, this is what I’m carrying over from the sport. I was very methodical about how do I get that win, in sports, every detail. I worked on every single detail possible to put all the pieces together to be the best that I could be and to get to that win eventually and I think that’s something that I’m now replicating in the world of venture capital, trying to optimize for everything and put everything together to be able to win more and more. How do you think about that with your kids, just out of curiosity? Your daughter sort of popped into the background on the call here. NR: So with my kids, because I went through such an extreme intensity in my sporting career, I, with them, am more focused on well-being rather than pushing them towards some success. But at the same time, you just credited your massive drive and competitiveness with your success. NR: Exactly, yeah, but wellbeing and happiness is what I put at a higher level for my kids and that doesn’t necessarily have to be success. So I’m very eager to push to try and help them discover their real passions, and we’re getting there. So my daughter, I put her in a go-kart two weeks ago, she drove slower than I could walk, so I could walk faster, and she ended up crying, so I hope she doesn’t listen to this one day, but I don’t see which one it is either, so we’re fine because I have two daughters. So it was clear that this is not her passion, and then we will never go again. But I can see that her passion is music, guitar, singing and so there I do nudge her towards more lessons, guitar lessons, drum lessons, without overdoing it, because I see that that’s her natural passion, you know? So that’s the approach I’m taking, but definitely really focused on happiness and well-being. So you mentioned you’re on holiday in Ibiza. I understand you have an ice cream shop there , is that right? NR: So yeah, with my wife, because she’s an interior designer, so she’s super creative and for some reason, we both of us, we love ice cream and we’ve been coming to Ibiza all our life, and there’s never been a nice ice cream place. So just as a hobby, we just said, “Hey, why don’t we open one ourselves?” — our friend, our common friend, he likes to make ice cream, so we do that, and it’s become a huge business. We have now a chain here in Ibiza, and very successful, and it’s the number one ice cream place. So Ben, next time you’re in Ibiza, ice cream is on us. (laughing) Sounds like a deal. You have an interesting life in terms of you learn five languages growing up, you have parents from different countries. Obviously, as part of being an F1 driver, you’re all over the world. You’re doing this connection between Germany in particular and Silicon Valley. Do you feel like, you talk about eras and riding them and starting and beginning in terms of F1 — do you feel that era, you’re like the pinnacle of like globalized civilization? Do you feel that that is an era that is going to persist past you, or do you feel that sort of cracking and changing? NR: This is related to the sport or? Just in general, just given you are like an international man of mystery, although maybe not that mysterious, but it’s like your superpower is connecting and linking all these disparate pieces together and seeing the ability to sort of build through them. And I’m wondering, is that something, an opportunity, that you think is going to persist given the way the world is going? NR: Well, I’m very optimistic in that sense, I’m very optimistic. And I see a long road ahead. And I think it’s an amazing time for venture capital now, it’s incredible, a time that we’ve never seen something like that before, the speed of innovation, and there may be my F1 speed also helps me, it doesn’t scare me at the moment because I’m used to driving 220 miles an hour. So maybe I’m one of the only people in the world where I’m not getting scared by the speed of innovation that we’re seeing in the startup ecosystem, because I’m quite used to speed. You actually focused a lot on e-mobility and electric vehicles. I do have to ask you, how are you feeling about the current F1 regulations , this 50-50 split? A lot of complaints that driver’s skills being taken away. What’s your view? NR: I saw a message from Toto actually recently, and he said, the F1 driver job might be the very last place that AI is going to endanger that job. Because it’s very, very hard for AI to try and replicate what we are doing in that racing car at the edge of physics. But has it been diminished a little bit if you’re going around a curve or you’re on a straight and your car’s just slowing down on its own? NR: No, I understand, F1 has tried to stay technologically relevant so they have gone full hybrid which is one of the most efficient powertrains in the world, the way they’ve done it, but of course yeah it’s a little bit to the detriment of racing on the edge, because now they’re going through a high speed corner towards the end of the straight and they actually downshift on the straight after the corner which is unheard of in the sport. But to be honest I’m quite easygoing about that because I like to really focus on just, “Is the racing exciting?”, “Is there good battles?”, “Is it unpredictable?”, “Is there rivalries?”, and as long as that’s happening, I think all fans will kind of forget about these regulations and will just enjoy the sport once again and be super excited. I think the season is shaping up really nicely. We have this super underdog, this 19-year-old who was really having a struggle last year, who suddenly has come to life and is showing his real talent and is dominating the championship so far, 19 years old, he’s still like a child, it’s incredible, Kimi Antonelli , Italian guy, driving for Mercedes. So it’s so exciting to see him in front and now everybody else trying to catch up to him, I think it’s great. You are associated with Mercedes, they are doing very well, I am a Kimi fan, my kids got a picture with him last year, so he’s by default who we’re cheering, for sure. But who do you cheer for in F1? NR: I do cheer for Kimi as well now because he used to be my driver in go-karting as well, so I know him since he’s 12 years old, and he is a generational talent of the level of [Max] Verstappen, Hamilton. His talent is exceptional and he’s so humble and authentic and nice guy also, so you can only cheer for him. It’s such a challenge that he’s facing, being a driver of the Mercedes team, leading the championship all of a sudden, an incredible challenge, and I can so relate because I was in that position and it’s so hard. It is so hard what he’s getting himself into now for the rest of the year. I’ve been writing him also and I said, just without telling him what he should do, I just told him like what I did and what worked for me, I’ve been writing him. And one thing, for example, was just really take it race by race, don’t think about the end of the season, don’t think about championship, just race by race, try and optimize for the next race, go in to win, and that’s it and then the rest will just see how it goes. Are you surprised it’s been a decade and Lewis [Hamilton] is still in F1? NR: I am quite surprised, because that’s a long time, and we weren’t exactly young at the time. So when I stopped 10 years ago, he was already almost 32 and he’s still going now, which is incredible and huge respect, respect for him to keep going, keep grinding, keep the motivation. Still seems as motivated as ever, driving really well again this year, he’ll definitely win some races this year, I think he’ll win some, so he’s doing really well. And every win that Lewis gets is another notch on your belt, right? NR: (laughing) That’s a little bit of an egotistical view to it, which sometimes I do think about. Yes, the better my success looks, which is nice, yeah. You won one, you beat Lewis. It’s a championship, if you’re going to win one, that’s about as good as it gets. But, hey, you didn’t stop there, it’s super impressive what you built, very interesting to learn more and I look forward in 10 years when Nico Rosberg is the champion VC investor. What is it, the Midas list ? Are you gunning for number one? NR: Yeah, sure, Midas List, that’s gonna be a hard one, but those kind of targets, at some point, yes. Nico Rosberg, great to talk to you. NR: Thank you very much. This Daily Update Interview is also available as a podcast. To receive it in your podcast player, visit Stratechery . The Daily Update is intended for a single recipient, but occasional forwarding is totally fine! If you would like to order multiple subscriptions for your team with a group discount (minimum 5), please contact me directly. Thanks for being a supporter, and have a great day!

0 views
Stratechery 2 months ago

2026.13: So Long to Sora

Welcome back to This Week in Stratechery! As a reminder, each week, every Friday, we’re sending out this overview of content in the Stratechery bundle; highlighted links are free for everyone . Additionally, you have complete control over what we send to you. If you don’t want to receive This Week in Stratechery emails (there is no podcast), please uncheck the box in your delivery settings . On that note, here were a few of our favorites this week. This week’s Stratechery video is on Agents Over Bubbles . R.I.P. Sora, 2025-2026. AI Sam came, AI Sam saw, and AI Sam stole those GPUs. We’ll always have the memories . Unfortunately, it turns out that Sam would rather have the GPUs , so on Sharp Tech this week, Ben and I eulogized the app that took over the world for about two weeks last year . That included thoughts on copyright battles that may have sealed its fate, why Ben’s reluctant to be too critical, and more signs that OpenAI is serious about its enterprise pivot. Come for that conversation, and then stay for a rollicking spring mailbag that includes a great take on search advertising, F1 venting, the Vision Pro and my wife, kids and phones, and more. — Andrew Sharp The 2026 Bullseye List. The NBA Playoffs are only a few weeks away, which means Ben Golliver and I are already in preparation mode, including a delightful episode today running through a “Bullseye List” of superstars who will be under pressure this spring . We discuss everyone from Kevin Durant and Alperin Sengun to Jalen Brunson, Chet Holmgren, and Victor Wembanyama, a debatable inclusion, but undeniably the most magnetic star in the league right now. And yes, given my Luka takes in January , and Luka looking incredible throughout March, I did take accountability and add myself to bullseye list. — AS Arm’s Big Shift. If you wanted more evidence that AI is changing everything, look no further than Arm: the company was famous for its high margin IP-licensing business model, but this week announced that instead of (just) facilitating other company’s making chips, it would start making and selling chips itself. Naturally, their first offering is explicitly focused on AI data centers. I explained Arm’s motivations in Wednesday Update , and interviewed Arm CEO Rene Haas to get his point of view on Thursday . — Ben Thompson Arm Launches Own CPU, Arm’s Motivation, Constraints and Systems — Arm is selling its own chips, not just licensing IP. It’s a big change compared to Arm’s history, but not surprising given how computing is evolving. An Interview with Arm CEO Rene Haas About Selling Chips — An interview with Arm CEO Rene Haas about the company’s decision to not just license IP but make their own chips. Tilting at Windmills — As the Iran war continues, let’s take a look at the Democratic Party, institutional media, and offshore wind farms. John Ternus and Responsible Individuals Sora and Mac Pro Dead Singapore’s Sound Card Hero A Giant Mess with Super Micro; Completely Correct Xiong’an Progress; The PRC’s Balancing Act on Iran; Manus, Apple and Router News The Intrigue(?) in the East, Peterson and Acuff On Center Stage, Revisiting Draft Kevin Durant The BULLSEYE List in 2026: Playoff Questions for Ant, Chet, Tatum, Mitchell, Wemby, and Beyond A Spring Break Mailbag: RIP Sora, Ads and Surplus, F1 Going in Reverse, Elon Inc., Smartphone Parenting, and More

0 views

Let yourself fall down more

Last week, I got a pair of inline skates. I haven't had skates since high school, about twenty years ago. The first day I put them on and skated, I didn't fall down. The second day I put them on, I fell down a lot, and I'm more proud of that. I made a lot faster progress that second day. We want to stay upright. At some point early on in life, we learn to avoid falling down. Maybe we skin our knee, or we get a bruise. Whatever the case, it hurts. Naturally, we want to avoid pain! But have you ever watched a child learn how to walk? It's not a smooth, linear process. The child usually first learns to crawl, and along the way probably bumps their head a bit—ouchies! Then they learn to stand up, and they'll fall on their bum a lot, sometimes bumping other parts when they do—also ouchies! And that continues when they start walking. Lots of little falls, little bumps, and big cries. After each one, the kid will eventually get back up and try again. And eventually, they're walking and running and jumping. When an adult learns a new skill like skating, though, it usually looks very different. They put on their skates and teeter around, careful to not fall down. They hug the wall of the roller rink to have something to hold onto. They take small, ginger steps with short glides and eventually get rolling. Given enough time, they do learn to skate. This instinct makes a lot of sense. As an adult, if we fall, it's more likely to hurt us. Recoveries take longer. Complications increase. So we protect ourselves by avoiding getting hurt. But the thing is? Falling doesn't have to be dangerous. You can fall a lot without getting hurt, if you learn to fall safely. With inline skating, you have protective gear (helmet, knee/elbow pads, wrist guards) which protect you, and you have techniques for falling which let you use this gear to its fullest potential. If you let yourself fall safely, you can learn skills a lot faster. Being afraid of falling means that you never commit . You don't put your full self into something, because you are always ready to bail if things go sideways. That tension prevents you from doing your best and it slows down your learning. I'm not just talking about physical skills here. This is true across all the things we do as adults. We can build up a lot of anxieties and fears that hold us back from doing our best at things. We're afraid to try something and fall flat on our face, so we hesitate and in that moment of hesitation—that's when we do end up failing. We fall down because we held ourselves back because we were afraid of falling! This has come up for me concretely a few other ways recently. In each of these, the stakes for failure were really, really low. But even if the stakes are high, worrying about falling will just make it more likely. I think this is one of those skills that some people develop that helps them get where they want to go. If you're willing to fall, you're willing to take chances. If you take a lot of chances, that adds up eventually and you'll have some big wins. Just do it safely, so that they don't add up to a lot of big losses, too. My teacher has me do exercises from Rhythmic Training by Robert Starer, and it has dramatically improved my musical abilities. It's an incredible resource. ↩ At my voice lessons, I used to be concerned I was going to hit the wrong note or be out of tune. I would think about it a lot, and those moments of doubt would lead me to be tense, or distracted, or just late and panicked. When I let go of that and decided to just commit to doing what I'll do, right or wrong, that's when my vocal technique improved by leaps overnight. At my saxophone lessons, I was also worried I'd do some of the rhythm exercises wrong [1] . I got them wrong before, so I tried to focus on doing it right. But when I started embracing just doing it and trusting myself, and let myself fail? Then, again, my technique improved immediately, because I could actually use my skill. When writing poetry, I used to worry that my poems would be bad, and I'd over-analyze them. I was afraid to write a bad poem, so I didn't write much at all, and what I did write I would never share. When I stopped worrying about that and let myself write bad poems? Suddenly I was writing good poems. And with inline skating, of course, I was holding myself back when trying to skate faster or do T-stops or spin stops. Once I decided to fall down (my daughter held me to this goal: "mom, you didn't fall yet! no, the one on purpose doesn't count!"), I fell a few times but made much faster work of improving. My teacher has me do exercises from Rhythmic Training by Robert Starer, and it has dramatically improved my musical abilities. It's an incredible resource. ↩

0 views
Gabriel Weinberg 3 months ago

Simulating likely 2026 World Cup matchups (for all matches)

I’ve been using Cursor for coding for some time, but I finally gave Claude Code a try for this short side project: simulating the 2026 World Cup bracket to predict likely matchups for all matches, which is useful when considering which matches to potentially go to. Methodology: Start with the official World Cup tournament schedule (including yet-to-be played playoff matches) Blend Elo rankings with FIFA rankings (50/50) Use the Elo formulas to probabilistically predict winners (assuming no draws, even in group stage) Run one million individual simulations of the full tournament (it reaches diminishing returns around 50K, but hey, why not!) Run again with a home field advantage boost (+180 Elo) for the U.S., Canada, and Mexico based on prior World Cup outcomes Count up who participated in each match Some interesting findings (at least to me as a U.S. fan) are below, followed by a rundown for every match (in reverse order). Big Disclaimer 1 : The above is of course a gross simplification of the actual tournament. For example, it doesn’t take into account team matchup histories, game models, etc. etc. I do think, however, it is useful enough for the designed purpose of generally predicting likely match participants. Big Disclaimer 2 : I did a lot of output validation so I think the results are largely accurate (to the extent they can be given Big Disclaimer 1). However, I didn’t write or review every line of code, so it is likely there are still some bugs in there. If you think you see anything that seems off, let me know and I’ll try to track it down (and update anything if necessary). Aside on Claude code: Like many others, I found this process both productive and frustrating. It was definitely faster than I could have done it alone, but Claude kept forgetting basic context, and was way overconfident in the accuracy of the results. That is, many rounds of validation at every stage of output was absolutely necessary despite Claude saying things were good. I couldn’t trust its word at all. HA+ = with home field advantage (anytime this comes into play there is a + next to the team name) HA- = without home field advantage Here’s a visualization of the above made by a reader (thanks!) Start with the official World Cup tournament schedule (including yet-to-be played playoff matches) Blend Elo rankings with FIFA rankings (50/50) Use the Elo formulas to probabilistically predict winners (assuming no draws, even in group stage) Run one million individual simulations of the full tournament (it reaches diminishing returns around 50K, but hey, why not!) Run again with a home field advantage boost (+180 Elo) for the U.S., Canada, and Mexico based on prior World Cup outcomes Count up who participated in each match

0 views
Daniel Mangum 4 months ago

3,500 Miles in 2025

A few months ago I wrote Make it Possible, Then Make it Normal, in which I described unceremoniously running my 3,000th mile of 2025 nearly two months before the year concluded. While I didn’t have a total mileage goal for the year, after hitting 3,000 with time to spare I naturally locked on to trying to reach 3,500. I crossed the threshold on December 30th, 2025 and finished with a final tally of 3,507.

0 views
Stratechery 4 months ago

Apple: You (Still) Don’t Understand the Vision Pro

Dear Apple, I was, given my interest in virtual and augmented reality, already primed to have a high degree of interest in the Vision Pro, but even so, I appreciate how you have gone out of your way to make sure I’m intrigued. You let me try the Vision Pro the day it was announced , and while I purchased my own the day it shipped (and had it flown over to Taiwan), you recently sent me a demo version of the M5 Vision Pro (it’s definitely snappier, although I don’t like the Dual Knit Band at all; the Solo Knit Band continues to fit my head best). However, the reason I truly know you are trying to win my heart is that not only did you finally show a live sporting event in the Vision Pro, and not only was it an NBA basketball game, but the game actually featured my Milwaukee Bucks! Sure, I had to jump through VPN hoops to watch the broadcast, which was only available in the Lakers home market, but who am I to complain about watching Giannis Antetokounmpo seal the game with a block and a steal on LeBron James in my M5 Vision Pro? And yet, complain I shall: you have — like almost every video you have produced for the Vision Pro — once again shown that you fundamentally do not understand the device you are selling. I’m incredibly disappointed, and cannot in good faith recommend any model of the Vision Pro to basketball fans (or anyone else for that matter). Apple, you are one of the grandfather’s of the tech industry at this point; it’s hard to believe that you are turning 50 this year! Still, you are much younger than TV generally, and sports on TV specifically. The first U.S. television broadcast of a sporting event was a Columbia-Princeton baseball game on May 17, 1939 on NBC; there was one camera accompanying the radio announcer. Three months later NBC televised the first Major League Baseball game between the Brooklyn Dodgers and Cincinnati Reds; this time they used two cameras. All televised sports face a fundamental limitation when it comes to the fan experience: the viewer is experiencing something that is happening in real life 3D on a 2D screen; the solution NBC discovered from the very beginning was to not try and recreate the in-person experience, but to instead create something uniquely suited to this new medium. Two cameras became three, then four, then 147 — that’s how many cameras Fox used for last year’s Super Bowl broadcast . Of course many of those cameras were specialized: included in that number were 27 super slow motion cameras, 23 high resolution cameras, 16 robotic cameras, 10 wireless cameras, and two SkyCams. The job of stitching all of those cameras together into one coherent broadcast falls on the production team, housed in a specially equipped truck outside the stadium; that team coordinates with the broadcast booth to provide a seamless experience where every jump feels natural and pre-meditated, even though it’s happening in real time. It’s a great experience! And, of course, there is the pre-game, half-time, and post-game shows, which used an additional 64 cameras, including 12 wireless cameras, eight robotic cameras, seven augmented reality cameras, and a FlyCam. No broadcast is complete without something to fill the time when the game isn’t on. After all, as advanced as TV broadcasts may be, they still face the fundamental limitation that confronted NBC: how do you translate an in-person experience into something that is compelling for people on their couch looking at a 2D screen? When I first tried the Vision Pro the demo included a clip from an NBA game that was later cut from the demo that shipped with the device (which was the one available in Apple Stores); it jumped out at me at the time : What was much more compelling were a series of immersive video experiences that Apple did not show in the keynote. The most striking to me were, unsurprisingly, sports. There was one clip of an NBA basketball game that was incredibly realistic: the game clip was shot from the baseline, and as someone who has had the good fortune to sit courtside, it felt exactly the same, and, it must be said, much more immersive than similar experiences on the Quest. It turns out that one reason for the immersion is that Apple actually created its own cameras to capture the game using its new Apple Immersive Video Format. The company was fairly mum about how it planned to make those cameras and its format more widely available, but I am completely serious when I say that I would pay the NBA thousands of dollars to get a season pass to watch games captured in this way. Yes, that’s a crazy statement to make, but courtside seats cost that much or more, and that 10-second clip was shockingly close to the real thing. What is fascinating is that such a season pass should, in my estimation, look very different from a traditional TV broadcast, what with its multiple camera angles, announcers, scoreboard slug, etc. I wouldn’t want any of that: if I want to see the score, I can simply look up at the scoreboard as if I’m in the stadium; the sounds are provided by the crowd and PA announcer. To put it another way, the Apple Immersive Video Format, to a far greater extent than I thought possible, truly makes you feel like you are in a different place. The first thing that has been frustrating about the Vision Pro has been the overall absence of content; Apple, you produced a number of shows for launch, and then added nothing for months. The pace has picked up a bit, but that has revealed a second frustration: I think that your production stinks! One of the first pieces of sports content that you released was an MLS Season in Review immersive video in March 2024; I wrote in an Update : I have a lot to say about this video and, by extension, the Vision Pro specifically, and Apple generally. Let me work my way up, starting with the video: it’s terrible. The problem — one that was immediately apparent before I got into all of the pedantry below — is that while the format is immersive, the video is not immersive at all. This is the big problem: This is a screenshot of a stopwatch Mac app I downloaded because it supported keyboard shortcuts (and could thus use it while watching the immersive video). There are, in a five minute video, 54 distinct shots; that’s an average of one cut every six seconds! Moreover, there wasn’t that much gameplay: only 2 minutes and 32 seconds. Worse, some of the cuts happen in the same highlight — there was one play where there was a sideline view of the ball being passed up the field, and then it switched to a behind-the-goal view for the goal. I actually missed the goal the first time because I was so discombobulated that it took me a few seconds to even figure out where the ball was. In short, this video was created by a team that had zero understanding of the Vision Pro or why sports fans might be so excited about it. I never got the opportunity to feel like I was at one of these games, because the moment I started to feel the atmosphere or some amount of immersion there was another cut (and frankly, the cuts were so fast that I rarely if ever felt anything). This edit may have been perfect for a traditional 2D-video posted on YouTube; the entire point of immersive video on the Vision Pro, though, is that it is an entirely new kind of experience that requires an entirely new approach. I had the exact same response when you released a video of a Metallica concert last March : As for the concert itself, the video was indeed very cool. The opening shot following James Hetfield walking into the stadium was very compelling, and, well, it was immersive. And then you cut to another camera angle, and while that camera angle was also immersive, the video as a whole no longer was. What followed was a very enjoyable 30 minutes or so — I’ll probably watch it again — but it felt like a particularly neat documentary, not like I was at a concert. You had a monologue from each member of the band, you had shots of the crowd, you had three songs, all, as Apple proudly noted in their press release, shot with “14 Apple Immersive Video cameras using a mix of stabilized cameras, cable-suspended cameras, and remote-controlled camera dolly systems that moved around the stage.” That means the final product was edited together from those 14 cameras and the four interviews, which is to say it was a produced artifact of a live experience; at no point did I feel like I was at the concert. News flash: I didn’t watch the video again. I’m just not that interested in a TV-style documentary of Metallica. I added: We are nearly two years on from that introduction, and over a year beyond the actual launch of the Vision Pro, and there has yet to be an experience like I envisioned and thought was coming. What is frustrating is that the limiting factor is Apple itself: the company had 14 Apple Immersive Video cameras at this concert, but what I want is only one. I want an Apple Immersive Video camera planted in the audience, and the opportunity to experience the concert as if I were there, without an Apple editor deciding what I get to see and when. Needless to say, you probably already know why I thought Friday’s telecast was a big disappointment. I understand, Apple, why it’s not easy to record or even take a screenshot of a copyrighted game; please bear with me while I describe the experience using text. When I started the broadcast I had, surprise surprise, a studio show, specially tailored for the Apple Vision Pro. In other words, there was a dedicated camera, a dedicated presenter, a dedicated graphics team, etc. There was even a dedicated announcing team! This all sounds expensive and special, and I think it was a total waste. Here’s the thing that you don’t seem to get, Apple: the entire reason why the Vision Pro is compelling is because it is not a 2D screen in my living room; it’s an immersive experience I wear on my head. That means that all of the lessons of TV sports production are immaterial. In fact, it’s worse than that: insisting on all of the trappings of a traditional sports broadcast has two big problems: first, because it is costly, it means that less content is available than might be otherwise. And second, it makes the experience significantly worse . Jump ahead to game action. The best camera was this one on the scorer’s table: I have, as I noted, had the good fortune of sitting courtside at an NBA game, and this very much captured the experience. The biggest sensation you get by being close to the players is just how tall and fast and powerful they are, and you got that sensation with the Vision Pro; it was amazing. The problem, however, is that you would be sitting there watching Giannis or LeBron or Luka glide down the court, and suddenly you would be ripped out of the experience because the entirely unnecessary producer decided you should be looking through one of these baseline cameras under the hoop: These are also not bad seats! I’ve had the good fortune of sitting under the basket as well. These are the seats where you really get a sense of not just the power but also the physicality of an NBA game: I would gladly watch an entire game from here. But alas, I was only granted a few seconds, before the camera changed again. This was absolutely maddening — so maddening, that I am devoting a front page Article to a device no one but me cares about, in the desperate attempt to get someone at your company to listen. What makes the Vision Pro unique is the sense of presence: you really feel like you are wherever the Vision Pro takes you. In other words, when I’m wearing the Vision Pro, and the camera actually stays fixed — like, for example, when you set up a special fourth camera specifically for the Lakers Girls performance, which I think was the single longest continual shot in the entire broadcast — I get the sensation of sitting courtside at Crypto.com Arena, and it’s amazing. Suddenly $3,499 feels cheap! However, when I’m getting yanked around from camera to camera, the experience is flat out worse than just watching on TV. Just think about it: would it be enjoyable to be teleported from sideline to baseline to baseline and back again, completely at the whim of some producer, and often in the middle of the play, such that you have to get your bearings to even figure out what is going on? It would be physically uncomfortable — and that’s exactly what it was in the Vision Pro. What is so frustrating is that the right approach is so obvious that I wrote about it the day you announced this device: one camera, with no production. Just let me sit courtside and watch an NBA game. I don’t need a scoreboard, I can look up and see it. I don’t need a pre-game or post-game show, I can simply watch the players warm-up. I don’t need announcers, I’d rather listen to the crowd and the players on the court. You have made a device that, for this specific use case, is better than TV in every way, yet you insist on producing content for it like it is TV! Just stop! There will be more games this year; from your press release last October : Basketball fans will soon be able to experience NBA games like never before in Apple Immersive on Apple Vision Pro, with a selection of live Los Angeles Lakers matchups during the 2025-26 season, courtesy of Spectrum SportsNet. Viewers will feel the intensity of each game as if they were courtside, with perspectives impossible to capture in traditional broadcasts. The schedule of games will be revealed later this fall, with the first game streaming by early next year, available through the forthcoming Spectrum SportsNet app for Vision Pro. That schedule was announced last week , and there are six games total (including last Friday’s). Six! That’s it. I get it, though: producing these games is expensive: you need a dedicated studio host, a dedicated broadcast crew, multiple cameras, a dedicated production crew, and that costs money. Except you don’t need those things at all . All that you need to do, to not just create a good-enough experience but a superior experience, is simply set up the cameras and let me get from the Vision Pro what I can’t get from anything else: the feeling that I am actually there. And, I would add, you shouldn’t stop with the Lakers: there should be Vision Pro cameras at every NBA game, at every NFL game, at every NHL game, at every MLB game — they should be standard issue at every stadium in the world. There should be Vision Pro cameras at every concert hall and convention center. None of these cameras need a dedicated host or announcers or production crew, because the Vision Pro isn’t TV; it’s actual presence, and presence is all you need. $3,499 is a lot of money for physically uncomfortable TV; it’s an absolute bargain if it’s a way to experience any live experience in the world on demand. But, alas, you refuse. So nope, I still can’t recommend the Vision Pro, not because it’s heavy or expensive or has an external battery, but because you, Apple, have no idea what makes it special.

0 views
Justin Duke 4 months ago

Levels of the Game

It seems fortuitous that my McPhee reading spree coincided with having watched Challengers . Like Challengers did sixty years after the fact, Levels of the Game uses tennis as an object of fascination in its own right—see also Infinite Jest and how much of that book, indeed all of DFW's worldview, was shaped by the relative weirdness of the tennis circuit compared to its team-based sport brethren. But even more than that, I'm interested in it as a canvas to explore systemic issues. Challengers touches on class nominally, but Guadagnino is at the end of the day much more interested in the love triangle that dominates the film, and in the idea of competition as a pure entity. McPhee has no problem dispensing with subtext and speaking plainly about the differences between his twin protagonists: one is white and comes from a solidly middle-class background; the other is black and comes from a solidly lower-class one. Side note: Arthur Ashe was born in Richmond, Virginia, and I live one block away from a boulevard named in his honor. You can credibly accuse Richmond of using Ashe as a bulwark against criticism, given how many of its other heroes are old white Confederates. But Ashe did in fact grow up here, and this book is not sparing in its description of how white Richmond rejected him. McPhee is not really interested in competition the way Guadagnino is; he describes Ashe and Graebner less like fierce competitors and more like two rival members of the same French New Wave. Part of this is truth—they were literal teammates playing in the Davis Cup together. That aspect of tennis, somewhat alien to me, is interesting in its own right. And while we know from the future that Ashe emerged as the superior and more exemplary player, McPhee is more interested in talking about form and style than raw prowess. This is a brief book—really just a snapshot of a single day—and as such it never outstays its welcome. By the last few passages, McPhee has perhaps run out of novel ways to describe a backhand. But it's a good read and a lot of fun. It speaks about style and grace and athletics, and it elevates the form of sport in such a way that sixty years after its original publication, it still feels not just prescient but modern.

0 views
Lambda Land 4 months ago

Running

I guess I’m a runner now. I never liked running. I did swim team in high school and that was pretty much the only sport I enjoyed. During the pandemic I started running a little bit, but I didn’t know very much and when I moved to Salt Lake City to start my PhD I pretty much stopped running entirely because everywhere was so hilly. Last year I moved again and I saw that I had a nice, flat route I could take for running if I wanted to. I got some better shoes and started following the Couch to 5k training plan. I thought the first weeks would be too easy. I was wrong: every week turned out to be perfectly tuned to what I needed. I finished the training plan and just tried to get out on a run 2–3 times a week. I ran just shy of 200 miles last year! This is a big change for me health-wise. I was in a bad spot during the first few years of my PhD. I wanted to improve my cardiovascular health to improve longevity and cognitive function. I am really enjoying my runs now, and I feel energized and clearer-headed whenever I finish one. This is not something I thought I would ever say. Some things that made a big difference for me: Running is good. I enjoy getting out, and I enjoy seeing improvement both in my speed as well as in my alertness and mood post-run. I get a little grumpy on days that I don’t get to go for a run. Best kind of addiction I suppose.

3 views
HeyDingus 5 months ago

2025 & 2026 Fitness Goals

I’m on a flight to Vegas for New Year’s with only about 30 minutes left before touchdown, so let’s quick recap a few fitness-related goals I set out to achieve in 2025. I have a friend who, a few years ago, set out to do 360,000 feet of elevation gain in a year. That seemed a big bite to chew, so I settled for 500 feet per day — or 182,500 feet in 2025. Well, I crushed it. I did a ton of hiking this year for work, plus a bunch of uphill ski touring last winter. They contributed to 319,914 feet of elevation gain tracked this year. I only counted ascents during workouts like hikes, skiing, and running, so my overall number with rock and ice climbing, and day-to-day life is likely much higher. Maybe I could have gone for 365,000 after all! (I love that the little tracker I built for my self tells me that I’m 275 days ahead of schedule on this goal. 😆 ) I aimed to run a total of 365 miles this year. One mile per day seemed pretty reasonable, but this goal was a real challenge. I love to run, but going through motions of getting ready and out the door are sometimes a challenge to push myself to do. And momentum plays a huge role. If I miss one run, I’m more likely to miss the next. Suddenly, I haven’t gone out in weeks and the mileage needed to catch up starts looking daunting. By the end of November I still needed to run over 100 miles — almost a full third of the total mileage for the year. I needed to decide if I was going to commit to it or not. Thanksgiving’s Turkey Trot was the clincher. I had a great time, and was all in. But it meant I needed to average four miles of running every day until the end of the year. I started putting in the miles, trying to go more than four miles any opportunity I got in an effort to get ahead. Six miles turned out to be my sweet spot, but I managed to eek in a few eight, 10, and even 13.1 (half-marathon) runs. Even so, getting runs in around the holidays and my work days that are often 10+ hours was a big challenge. I ran on treadmills (yuck), in the 0°F or colder temps, and when I was sick. But, in the end, I got it done. 114 miles over 17 run in December. Next year, I won’t leave it so late in the year. 😅 Though I’ve guided most of the Adirondack high peaks multiple times, there were still a few that I hadn’t yet summited. This had to be the year I got them done! I hiked the last of the 4,000+ foot tall peaks, Big Slide, on July 30th of this year. It was my 132nd high peak summit. Feels great to have that off my back! These number-based goals seem to do well to motivate me, especially when I can break them down to daily or weekly totals. With that I mind, I’m aiming for three 365-based objectives. I’m not setting an elevation goal because I think that just comes with my profession now, and I often have to defer to the mountains that my clients want to hike. But I’ll keep an eye on the total, and if I get close to 365,000 feet, you know I’ll be gunning for it! Mostly these goals are intended as motivation to continue to get outside and do what I love. The added bonus of getting to tick off a few more miles or pitches on the chart is sometimes just enough to get me off the couch. 2026, bring it on! HeyDingus is a blog by Jarrod Blundy about technology, the great outdoors, and other musings. If you like what you see — the blog posts , shortcuts , wallpapers , scripts , or anything — please consider leaving a tip , checking out my store , or just sharing my work. Your support is much appreciated! I’m always happy to hear from you on social , or by good ol' email . A repeat of my 365 miles of running. (I’m going to think of it as seven miles a week this time. I know I can bust out six miles pretty easily at this point, so one of those and one more run a week would keep me on or ahead of schedule.) 365 miles of biking. (I didn’t hardly touch my bike this year, and I want to change that!) And 365 pitches of rock and ice climbing. (I haven’t even checked how many pitches I climbed this year… It could be a reasonable number, or might turn out to be a massive undertaking. We’ll see!)

0 views