Latest Posts (20 found)
ava's blog 4 days ago

how i enjoy movies

I'm not much of a movie watcher. I somehow prefer watching multiple episodes of a TV show over a few hours over investing 2 hours into a movie. I get antsy in the second half of the movie and episodic stuff can more easily be paused for a break. My wife has gotten me into more movies the past few years though, especially the recent months. Catching up on classics like all the Star Wars movies, Lord of the Rings 1-3, American Psycho, Fight Club, some popular Studio Ghibli movies, some old genre-defining horror movies, and more. What makes movies a lot more bearable to me is talking about them while watching them, even pausing the movie while discussing. I know many people hate this and just want to watch something in peace, not tear it apart during or even be interrupted. Understandably, they don't want the fantasy and make-believe to be destroyed during. But my wife and I are on the same wavelength about this. She is my favorite person to watch movies with because of this. It would bore me to death to sit through 2+ hours in silence, just staring, and then both of us moving on from it and just saying "Yeah it was good.". I need to have some breaks to readjust my position, get something from the kitchen, drink some water, and have minutes in-between just psychoanalyzing characters, giving our interpretations of things that are still unclear, or saying what we would do if we were the characters. Also discussing the broader context, production, if something was real or CGI... I love it. It keeps me engaged, and it makes the movie more memorable for me. I also learn so much more about it and plot details I would have otherwise missed get revealed to me. I especially love watching something with my wife when it's something she is really interested in or has seen multiple times. Last night, we watched an Indiana Jones movie ( Raiders of the Lost Ark ), and I got so much info from her during it. "Harrison Ford improvised this scene because he was tired of reshooting it all the time." "In this scene you can spot C3PO and R2-D2 in the background. And you can see the Ark in the background of a Clone Wars episode." "I think this shot is actually a matte painting on glass." I'm more of a Lara Croft person, and so we also talked about the similarities and differences between the two, especially with Lara's reboot content and her grappling with the fact that her work tends to cause more harm than good, something Indiana doesn't seem to have to face that much. We also discussed some silly stuff; like how the snakes would realistically survive in that pit, and whether a bunch of snakes are flammable or not. All while watching it and occasionally pausing. Technically, we also do this for TV shows. Severance and Pluribus especially, but even X-Files . It's just so good! I just need to engage with someone about what I'm seeing and pick their brain about an aspect of it. Acknowledging something was produced, these were all actors, this didn't really happen, this was CGI, this is a plot inconsistency etc. doesn't ruin the entertainment for us at all :) Reply via email Published 11 Apr, 2026

0 views
ava's blog 6 days ago

the public

Don't you hate it when you go out in public, and the public is there? Jokes aside, my relationship with the public is difficult. I think most interactions are actually neutral; just passing each other, sitting next to each other, exchanging glances, paying for things. Some are good, and they are so rare that it restores a lot of faith in me. I love that the barista at the coffee shop is always so heart warming and genuinely happy and kind; I have brought him a little chocolate Santa before to thank him. The negative experiences unfortunately stick with me longer, and are the first thing I think of. Vomit, dog poop and litter on the sidewalk, loud music in public transport, smoking and spitting everywhere, getting honked at while walking down the street, people under the influence or in a mental health episode harassing others, public spaces filled with either intense perfume/deodorant or piss and sweat smell... just to name a few. I'm very sensitive to smell and sound, and it often feels like my skin is peeling off and my head will explode when I am exposed to these. My home is my retreat, my silent refuge. I go there to recharge. Basically all of my hobbies can be done independently inside by myself. Aside from work, I don't really go out that often because I don't feel welcome or comfortable outside a lot of times. The above negative experiences, together with urban car-centric design, overfilled cafes or restaurants, and infection risks just don't make it that enticing for me. The exceptions are going out in the dark when the streets are empty, or on long walks in the forest. I need my solitude and quiet, and the few people I see in the forest usually have the common decency not to act like teenagers in a small park area do. When I want to do outdoor stuff with my wife or friends, of course I have to step outside. The museums lately were wonderful, for example. I enter the public, but mainly because my focus is spending time with them. When I dress in bright colors, put on one of my colorful wigs, adorn my hair with stuff and put rhinestones on my face, I mainly do that for me and them; any onlooker is welcome to enjoy it too, of course. Maybe it makes someone feel happy or brave to see that. Still, there is this expectation by many that once you put yourself out there, you consent to what happens to you, and that you perform for others... and that can be disappointing and make you question whether you wanna commit to this at all. Like you should have anticipated rude comments if you dress like that, for example (hasn't happened in quite a while, but still!). I find my relationship to the internet similarly complicated, if not even more so. After all, the internet is where the very same public is that I otherwise tend to have issues with. I have to go outside for necessities, work and enjoyment; but do I have to expose myself on and to the online? Why do I do it? Walking outside, I have very rarely wondered what that person on the opposite side of the street thinks about a topic, or their opinion on how I am dressed; yet at home, in my refuge from the public, I open the internet, and invite the public into my safe space via me seeing their stuff. I see their thoughts, despite being at home. I see things and it's like seeing dog poop not picked up on the sidewalk. I put things online about myself, and therefore invite the public to consume it, to comment on it. It feels weird to acknowledge that. The same thing from above applies here: If you make it public, anything goes. If you didn't want that , you shouldn't have put that online. Makes sense, depending on what it is. An online presence feels so at odds with being a private person in some ways, or being picky about people, and being intentionally harder to access in real life. It can even feel like a narcissistic shrine to oneself at times, or a hardening cast around you that makes it more difficult to change it and let it grow with you as time goes on. I deal with that right now. Online, you can't really retreat; either you're there or you're not, obscurity by using smaller platforms doesn't help much. It also feels weird because in a way, you are expected to put on a performance for an online crowd once you are there. In the offline public, I simply exist in the space to go where I need to go, or to enjoy a meal or the time at the lake. In the online public, I am content to be consumed. We are invited to criticize people like product reviews, or as if they are annoying ads shoved down our throats (and I guess influencers are that). The reactions to people changing up their online presence seem less like they're about a person and more like anger when the formula of a product you like got changed. If someone comes up to you on the street saying you'll never find a man in that getup, they're rightfully seen as a weirdo, but online, it's discourse and engagement is farmed. Recently, I've been wondering why I put in the effort of putting my stuff online to the very same public I don't particularly care about, or sometimes even dislike, on the street 1 . In the offline world, I don't really give them anything, but online, I give them so much. My art, my thoughts, my research, my help. Is it worth it, is it hypocritical? Is it believable when I say I do this for me, my wife, my friends, and some drive-by eyeballs? I could just keep it to myself, keep it all in the journal, start a password-protected blog elsewhere. I don't have any good answers to this; for now, it seems I have to walk around as a contradiction. In real life, I cannot make myself selectively visible to just a few people (I wish I could!); online, I could find a way, but I don't. That's odd. Maybe there is pride in my work and what I do, an urge to be seen by others who understand me, something to prove I was there too, a way to show people alternative ways of being online, or spreading more awareness about specific rights or health issues. Still, it's curious that I would do this online, but not offline - I would not walk up to a random person and say something, or walk around with a banner, or stand at a town square with a megaphone. But do I have to? Or is online simply the best way for me to find a way to interact with, and be in, the public? It's easy to see the internet as a self-obsessed thing, filled with navelgazing; people might read personal blogs online and go "Why should we listen to you? Who even are you? Who cares, who asked? Why do you think anyone needs to hear this from you? Isn't this just digital garbage? This isn't even an original thought." I understand how this view is fostered in a time when anyone can throw their opinions online in seconds; but in a way, this is unprecedented, and previous generations in history would have appreciated the ability to be so easily heard/seen and making their feelings known to so many people without relying on flyers or a newspaper. So maybe this is a privilege we should not take for granted, especially as tensions and censorship across the globe rise. And as always, you have to let in nasty stuff if you also wanna let in love. Close yourself off, and you receive neither. I have to walk past dog poop and sit in sometimes excruciating trams for 45 minutes to reach the nice barista or have a good in-person talk with a coworker. I have received some truly shitty emails over the years 2 , but the good ones outweigh them. I wade through the Discover feed to see some beautiful gems. What makes the online public so difficult is that once it's out there, it's out; even when you change your mind or grow. While we want our online presence to be a continuous process readjusting boundaries, it's more like committing to the most vulnerable piece that is still online, over and over again. In contrast: Before I step into the offline public space, I can readjust how I want to appear every time. The stranger on the street doesn't see all the history attached, doesn't see all the past versions of me that have stepped outside. And here I am, once again, stepping out into the public. Reply via email Published 09 Apr, 2026 Of course I care in the sense that everyone should have a home, money, healthcare, a support network, access to education, fulfilling work etc etc., but that's not what I'm talking about here. ↩ No, socially anxious person reading this and thinking this could be about you, it wasn't you. It could have never been you. The people I am talking about don't care about how they come across and haven't spent a second self-reflecting. You're good. ↩ Of course I care in the sense that everyone should have a home, money, healthcare, a support network, access to education, fulfilling work etc etc., but that's not what I'm talking about here. ↩ No, socially anxious person reading this and thinking this could be about you, it wasn't you. It could have never been you. The people I am talking about don't care about how they come across and haven't spent a second self-reflecting. You're good. ↩

0 views
ava's blog 1 weeks ago

2 museums, 3 exhibitions - work culture, oceans, sex work

Used the free days to go to two museums; ended up visiting an exhibition about work culture, about the oceans, and about sex work. All museum texts include an English portion, so don't get discouraged when you spot German words; feel free to look for the translation if you do not understand the German portion :) This exhibition reminded me again why museums are so great. I can go years without stepping foot in a museum at times, and some bad and disappointing experiences make it harder to justify it. This one made me happy to go again :) Not only was the art really interesting and inspiring, but the participation options were varied and engaging. Lots of stats, options to discuss, being able to put stickers on what applies to you, rating different activities on whether they qualify as free time or labour by using red or green felt balls, using string to vote on labour strikes, adding your own thoughts on a little paper you stick on a board with questions... it's so cool when museum visitors become part of the exhibition. I learned about Taylorism too. They had various books and ads in the exhibition that were used to share that model back then. It was praised as revolutionary, as the new way forward... and the optimization was intense. Everything had to be normed and unified, every production step analyzed, broken down and written down... searching Taylorism online shows a very watered down, basic-productivity-type of stuff; it seemed to be much more hardcore in these materials in Germany back then. It wasn't just applied to stuff like building machinery and conveyor belt type work, where this genuinely made some work faster, safer, easier to reproduce, quality higher, but was also imported to the private. They had a book there was was about "the new way to run the household" which applied Taylorism to the household chores and even the design and layout of the house. They had whole kitchen layouts that were optimized so that the path between different items and kitchen devices was short and not blocked by the table or chairs; the housewife operating like a worker in a factory, learning specific steps and paths by heart to be the most efficient. It reminded me so much of the culture and language around AI. Ask anyone nowadays and probably no one is doing a taylorist layout of their home or directly referencing Taylorism in their own self improvement journey; still, Taylorism changed work and work culture. Seeing the book saying Taylorism is the new way forward in the home, and knowing how it actually is now, it felt very similar to the marketing around smart homes, and AI bros telling everyone it will run everything, and you should let it run all your personal projects and self improvement or else you'll get left behind both privately and professionally. Pretty interesting! Also, look at this caricature predicting Zoom/Teams calls in 1926 already: Have some of the interesting explanation signs I saw: The worker as Christ that is sacrificing himself for capitalism (the glass art not pictured). Some stats: As a surprise to no one, Germans would like to sleep and hike more: Hurts to see how proud we used to be about our social security systems; the spending was seen as progressive, positive, a sign of wealth and power. Now we starve these systems to death. We went out to eat after: I was a little let down by this one because of my own expectations. I had expected more focus on the actual ocean, instead of centering the human so hard. It was all: We sent this device down there to do research, we built boats, we use things to cross the ocean, we deliver stories and ideas via crossing the ocean, we make up creepy stories about the ocean; transatlantic slave trade, migration, etc. and some of our impact on destroying the ocean, climate change, overfishing (while not daring to criticize fishing, really, because they don't dare offend the visitors who still eat fish, I guess). It was depressing, but accidentally so; it didn't feel like they actually wanted to focus on teaching people anything about the ocean itself, or what they can change to not contribute to the issues the ocean faces; it was more a shrine, an altar to human intervention, celebrating oil rigs and the extraction of resources from the ocean. It didn't seem to celebrate the animals and other organisms much beyond just using them to gawk at or eat. So I didn't take many pictures... The highlight was definitely the huge yarn corals (bigger than just the part on the picture) Next up is the exhibition on sex work! This one was emptier and nicer to visit, and definitely worth it. Beautiful, interesting, very good graphics about legislation around the world, notable sex work spots over the course of history in Germany, big events and personalities in the sex work scene. I was surprised that digital modes of sex work were mentioned on one text sign and otherwise not shown or discussed; it was very, very focused on street sex work, bars, clubs, brothels. I think instead of a section covering witches (for some reason?), I'd have appreciated a section on ""modern"" sex work, in which people livestream, sell pictures and videos, and make custom content. OF especially has changed the respectability of some sex work and has enabled many sex workers to do it from the safety of their own home, more comfortable, and reach more customers all around the globe. People who would not otherwise have done sex work now do sex work due to these platforms (even I did, in 2019). I think that deserves to be covered and discussed. Look at this beautiful but very sad quilt about sex workers facing police violence: Here's Marsha: Lots of art had stories included with them. I liked how it humanized sex work and its workers; everyone can relate to weird, funny, odd, dangerous or morally grey work experiences, especially with customers. AIDS and Covid are very difficult topics. The distrust in governments due to the AIDS epidemic is justified and it was handled wrongly; and you can see how Covid measures were also used to punish the unwanted, the criminalized, the ones without a lobby. All kinds of companies in a variety of industries got financial support and workarounds to still remain in business, while sex workers were left to fend for themselves; no support, just prohibition. No dialogue with the workers on how to make their work safe, just seeing them as a danger. Covid of course posed different challenges than HIV transmission, but it could have been handled better. It shows you how the government handles crises for people who they cannot milk for money. Sex workers are generally disregarded as victims of the Nazis. Of course, sometimes their other identities overlap with groups that were honored and have public memorials (Jewish, Sinti and Roma, queer, disabled etc.) but the part of them that was targeted for their sex work, or people who were only targeted for their sex work and not other parts of their identities never got any justice or memorial. Sex workers were regarded as "asocial" and "degenerate" and institutionalized and were also subject to involuntary hospitalizations, forced labour and more. Just as the NS regime tried to argue for born killers and other supposed sign someone was going to become a criminal or otherwise "undesirable", it argued that some women are just "born prostitutes". The exhibition had different maps of bigger German cities like Cologne, Hamburg and Berlin and their popular cruising and sex work spots. This piece of info stood out to me: The biggest, most well-known trans and gay bar in Berlin was converted into the headquarters of the SA. Other than that, the exhibition had some examples of makeshift dildos, the first condoms, and some amazing video interviews. A little chapel with a water fountain serves as a memorial for all the sex workers who have been killed. Cool that you made it this far. Reply via email Published 06 Apr, 2026

0 views
ava's blog 1 weeks ago

small thoughts part 9

In ‘ small thoughts ’ posts, I’m posting a collection of short thoughts and opinions that don’t warrant their own post. :) It's been a while! I know self love exists, because I feel it and my body lives it (most of the time). I know it’s easy to pretend that self love doesn’t exist, because a (negative) ego should not exist; but in my view, seeing yourself as a part of a whole instead to cope with depression is also done out of self love. Your body wants to survive. Even if you hate yourself, there is a part in you mental illness cannot touch (for now?) that wants to heal and seek ways on how to live regardless and make it bearable. If you have to pretend like self love isn’t real because you can’t consciously do it yet, that’s fine. But I know it is there because otherwise I would not care about what I eat or drink, about healing illnesses, about fitness, about community, about higher goals than survival, like education and hobbies. I wanna enrich my body and my mind. I wanna act on my potential. I wanna be the best partner and friend I can be. Loving myself made loving others better, easier, healthier. Loving myself makes me show up for communities better. Loving myself makes me sacrifice for others within my boundaries and without burning out and without resentment. Self love is seldom selfish. It doesn’t have to be. I think there’s a misconception that self love inherently includes self-obsessed navel-gazing and that in turn makes you constantly nitpick yourself and your life and focus on what you deserve but aren’t getting and therefore makes you sad, but I disagree. It doesn’t have to be narcissistic and obsessive at all. It doesn’t have to mean putting yourself before others constantly, just in a way where you’ll put on the oxygen mask on yourself before you can help others put theirs on. Sometimes I am afraid to show my kindness online. My kindness naturally ebbs and flows - never truly gone, but there are phases where I really go out of my way and go extra hard, and phases where it’s just basic kindness. But as everyone, I can have bad days or a disagreement, I am low energy, my patience runs out or I need to criticize someone, set boundaries or call something out. In theory, all of that can be done kindly or do not detract from kindness. They can even be kindness. But in practice, some people don’t respect things until you say it in a very sharp tone, or you’ll let your negative feelings show. And realistically, the second you don’t let people do what they want or you criticize them, no matter how softly, they’ll see you as unkind. Kindness, to them, is you always being unconditionally supportive. I am a little scared of people feeling tricked when I can’t upkeep a strong habit of kindness at all times. I’ve seen it in the past, when people who made kindness one of their most prominent features (or were just being seen that way) were dragged for suddenly being unkind - like arguing with someone, being rude during a bad day or whatever. It was unfair. People felt as if they had used kindness to cover up actually being an asshole, like being kind was just an act. It makes me sad and scared that one bad moment can undo months or years of consistent kindness. I don’t know if I can be that perfect. On one hand, I get it - there really are these love & light girlies who preach all that stuff but are really toxic, mean and gossipy in real life. I acknowledge the stories of past school bullies always posting about ‘positive vibes only’ online. But it also makes it hard to show open kindness without putting yourself in a very limiting box of perfect behavior. Not to mention that there’s a gender aspect to it too; higher kindness requirements for women and more situations where you’re required to be kind, and normal behaviors read as unkindness because you’re not a servant, doormat, motherly etc.; looking young, feminine, maybe wearing dresses, or predominantly pink stuff increases the effects, in my experience. People, especially men, expect me to be a lot more motherly, forgiving, patient, kind and servant-like than I am. I actually just want to act and behave like myself, without someone slapping onto me that I must be very kind or motherly as a defining trait, just to accidentally violate that invisible role and have people claim that a rude moment is somehow my true self and all the genuine kindness was a mask. Hot take I am willing to change my mind about: I think looking back, it was a mistake that we saw people liking, commenting and following the same individual (as in, a social media account of a private person, not a company or band etc.) as a “community”. There is no community-building or organizing going on in comment sections of LA influencers, for example. Your readers (or viewers) all consume it independently from one another. There is barely any interaction between them, and often not positive or in-depth. No one bonds over “😂😂😂” or “Agreed.” or “Good post.” or some summary of the post. The views and likes you get are also partly people that checked you out once and that’s that. Really, the people that see you online have nothing in common most times. They’re most often not gathering under a shared message, movement or artstyle, nor are they really knowing each other, and pretending it is so has had a role in para-social behaviors. Implying you have a community or fanbase as a simple social media account or blogger is like implying the people who watch the same ads on YouTube are one. Reply via email Published 04 Apr, 2026

0 views
ava's blog 2 weeks ago

offer: blogmaxxing class

Looksmaxxing is all the rage nowadays, but what about your blog? Look no further! I am easily one of the bloggers ever, and I have compiled everything I have learned in the years on this platform. And you guys get it first, for 50% off! ✍️ For only 67.67 Euro , you'll get course material covering ✨ For a steal of 69.99 Euro , you unlock access to everything about 🚀 The final lessons are yours for 42.00 Euro : Your blog deserves more than mediocrity. It deserves at least 50 upvotes . With this, you’ll unlock the secret 3-step system top bloggers use to dominate the Trending page while looking effortlessly perfect. ⏳ WARNING: Only 17 spots left for VIP access , and only available until 01.04.2026 23:59:59 CET ! Reply via email Published 01 Apr, 2026 High-impact writing and leveling up your Word/Memorability Ratio . Striking the balance between Jestermaxxing and Corporatemogging . Sharp sentence structure for a chiseled outline! Lessons learned from beating your header with a hammer. Smoothing out your CSS wrinkles with hardcore AI Sculpting ™. How the optimal font-weight changed my life! The art of biohacking Cortisol and Dopamine spikes that turns readers into fans. FOMO Widgets : “ 15 people are reading this now, ” and other social proof hacks that build core community moments! The undeniable magic of using OpenClaw to auto-respond to reader mails and letting it clean your Inbox for you :)

0 views
ava's blog 2 weeks ago

rose ▪ bud ▪ thorn - march 2026

Reply via email Published 31 Mar, 2026 I was featured as a Country Reporter on noyb's channels! My summaries made it into their newsletter 4 times this month. I reached Gold Status in my volunteering (20+ summarized and translated decisions for GDPRhub) now. Next up is the Magenta Status at 35+ :) I've written 4 exams this month; if I'd pass all of them, that's 30 ECTS! I think I'll pass 3. Switched away from Discord . I have no issue with being classified as a teen on the platform because it doesn't stop me from doing anything, but the move fit in with living my actual values like I do with other tech/media things (preferring open source, EU, etc.). I'm both on Matrix and Fluxer. Did some spring cleaning, like clearing out the fridge, wiping the inside, and rearranging the contents, together with throwing away expired toiletries, putting like 2 years of used batteries in the battery collection bin, decluttering a drawer, and vacuuming under and behind the sofa and bed. I've really felt like pouring extra energy into my looks lately. Got back into oil massages for my scalp, hair treatments, sheet masks, teeth bleaching, and got my nails done again (after going natural since December) and got a pedicure, too. I bought new dress pants that are so insanely comfortable, good looking and flattering, it's ridiculous! My yearly gyn checkup came back fine, and I finally caved and got proper treatment for my PCOS and endometriosis. I went out for some runs in the late evening :) haven't run outside in ages, I usually limit it to the treadmill. I went out to parks and forests , enjoying the weather and my free time after the exams. It was super healing and relaxing. Journaled more. Went to a vegan food fair. I applied to a job opening sent to me by a fellow blogger (James) and got an interview !!! I think I did well :) Upcoming: More decluttering and selling, tidying up the basement. Planning to go to two museum exhibitions soon before they close. Gonna go on vacation with two friends for 8 days next month! Booked tickets for an upcoming data protection event. Working on business cards (and maybe stickers?) for it. I've had some issues with my illnesses . :( The stress of intense studying most of February and March, weird weather changes, straining work stuff, eating a little too much sugar, the family situation, and starting two new medications this month sent my body over the edge. That made my fitness goals and studying a bit harder. I also unfortunately didn’t taper off a bigger dose of an anti-anxiety med I occasionally take as needed and accidentally caused agonizing withdrawal symptoms without realizing in time 🥴 I cut contact to last family member I was still talking to. It's stressful to withstand all the attempts to reach out to me, and to stick with the decision without guilt. My wardrobe is stressing me a little. I preferred not to own much. Unfortunately, the less you have, the more you wear the same things, the more they get washed and worn out. At some point, you want to replace a lot of it at the same time. That's not only financially hurtful, but also annoying when you have the goal to sew most of your clothes yourself, and you currently neither have the time nor the energy to buy fabric and sew the things you need. I am annoyed at walking into these fast fashion places, seeing nothing I like, then forcing myself to look at stuff more closely and everything is XS, feels like a trash bag, and costs too much for how flimsy and unethical it is. I'll have to try my luck with thrifting more, but even that has been overrun with Shein trash. If I make it to the second interview round, I might have to deny it. I like the company, they’re a great and respected employer, generous, and the interview was fun… but there are some dealbreakers for me, which hurts. I sat with it after, and slept over it now, and I just don’t think I’ll be happy in these circumstances. :( I wish it wasn’t so, because they were in the Top 3 of places I’d wanna work at, and I want a job in data protection badly. But it doesn’t feel right, and I can’t justify moving forward with it, all things considered. It feels like the wrong time for me. Maybe another open position in a couple years?

0 views
ava's blog 2 weeks ago

some silly art

Made some silly art of my online friends and myself today, redrawing memes or other images I saw online. I love mango. (this is referencing this meme ) These are Suliman as purple Keroppi and Mono as a mix of his Jiji icon and Googie . >:). ( orginal art ) This is Kami :3 ( original art from an anime called House of the Sun) Reply via email Published 30 Mar, 2026

0 views
ava's blog 2 weeks ago

using AI to inflate your ego

Personally, I’m open to retrying AI use cases every now and then. I’ve written about it before, and I freely share the fails and wins in chats I am part of. In my case, it’s no use to endorse it based on hype online, nor to try it once and keep my opinion fixed on that experience. I’m expected to engage with it somewhat at work, and independently, I want to know what I can expect from these tools so I can make better decisions and write better when it comes to the data protection impact these tools have. No use to stick my head in the sand when my desired career path is touched so heavily by it. What bewilders me is how many people seem to use the tool (and topic in general) to inflate their ego. I don’t just mean the literal sycophancy displayed in the model outputs, but also in the conversation around its use. There’s a group of people that are saying they do very important, difficult and smart work every day thanks to AI, in a pace and way humans just can’t. The gist of it is: “ I am better than you because I use AI, and have more productive output than you, and do more difficult work. The fact I need AI to do it means my work is very demanding, very admirable and at the bleeding edge, and humans could never do it like this, or have an output this fast. The fact that you don't want or need to use AI for your work must mean it's low-value. ” Often, they remain very vague about what that work even is, so it's hard from the outside to verify that. On the other hand, there are also people who do the inverse: They don’t plainly say that AI performed badly in their use cases, so it’s not useful for them, but instead, it becomes a way to prove that the work is so difficult and demanding that AI could just never do that. Something like: “ Behold, I am god’s gift to research and problem solving, and the machine cannot beat my perfect brain. The fact that you are able to use AI for your work must mean you are stupid and your work is easy, since AI can, at best, only do stupid and easy work. ” Both of these groups then make sweeping generalizations of what other people should do. The former group tends warn that “ you’ll get left behind! ”. It’s such a pathetic cope. It looks like people who were never the top at any skill in their environment, but now think they can finally have an edge thanks to adopting early and shitting out as much as possible in the quest to "learn" or hit some kind of jackpot, attract the right eyes. They have to cling to the fantasy that the nay-sayers will have a disadvantage somehow just so they can feel justified and special. But tell me, were you left behind when you started using Excel late? Was it bad you only learned office stuff when you needed it? Were you not able to catch up? Chances are, it makes no difference and with some effort and a workshop or YouTube videos, you can use the tools equally well. In the case of LLMs, using it has never been easier. You can just use plain, natural language! No submenus, settings, buttons, search operators and the like to remember. It‘s designed to be easy . Prompt engineering is and was always a scam. There are no secret incantations you only learn in a 500 Euro class. Anyone can use the tool, learn, and refine. It’s embarrassing to pretend otherwise. Coworkers that have trouble with basic Outlook and Word do surprisingly well with ChatGPT. And why wouldn't they? They have spoken a natural language all their life and have probably trained multiple other new employees in their career; they know how to explain standards and expectations, and how to explain tasks, to a human and a tool. The other group I mentioned is so weirdly dismissive based on their attempts at a very niche, still unstable use cases. I understand criticism that’s about directly advertised claims by the companies that aren’t fulfilled, or commonly seem use cases online that just don’t actually seem to reliably work; I wrote about the same thing in the past, and how the free models available are not capable enough to do many of the advertised things we are inundated with. What I don’t understand is thinking “ The LLM couldn’t generate a PDF with all my branding included and a table with this and that and accurate graphs and footnotes with sources. That means it’s not even useful to create an email draft, or for grandma’s grocery shopping list, and you shouldn’t use it for a motivational letter. ” Why can’t there be nuance? It obviously sucks bad for some complex stuff, but it really hits the corporate bullshit text creation just right. Don’t tell me I don’t get it - I recently tried out what it would recommend for a business card and it said I should use a transparent plastic card to signal transparency in my work. Of course I see how stupid it can be, even for some simple stuff. I get how it could royally screw up grandma's shopping list. But for me, both of the groups previously identified also ignore that most people simply aren’t in these high-stakes positions, interested in these hobbies or working these jobs. Many have no need or interest to vibecode some custom solution for their smart home or a family app that rewards homework time of the kids with gaming time automatically just to sell it to VCs or make a SaaS out of it, and they aren’t researchers or problem solvers coding complicated stuff or writing the next bleeding-edge paper in the field. They aren't hustlers scared of being outpaced by competition. Many people on this planet are taxi and bus drivers, nurses, kindergarteners, cleaners, cashiers, baristas, warehouse workers, construction workers, and the like. Or doing a boring secretary job that is about writing e-mails and sending out meeting details via buttons, using templates or pre-generated e-mails. They’re some boomers or part-time parents who aren’t that good with tech or don’t need much of it and pass office time clicking a couple buttons. What are you optimizing for, when you realistically only work like four hours of your eight hours a day and it’s the easiest work ever, just following protocol? They sure as hell aren’t interested in automating themselves out of a job, and they don’t wanna work anything else or do something more demanding. They wanna earn money with the least amount of effort and with the least amount of changing their workflow, and they don’t particularly care for computers or hustle. But if they can get out of some annoying text-based stuff like some e-mail aspect, maybe they’ll use it. And that's fine! They shouldn't be told by some AI fans that them not letting AI take over everything is making them a redundant NPC that has nothing to offer, or told by AI haters that doing easy work that AI can actually somewhat do means they're doing worthless work. The funny thing is: Their jobs often are just easy enough that it is faster and more foolproof to do it themselves than attempt a vibecoded or generated solution, while also having many use cases that work most reliably at this point and can actually be recommended. For example: Writing a short email thanking your boss for something is faster done by yourself than typing the prompt; but asking an LLM to make your angry email disagreeing with your superior sound nicer and more diplomatic works. My coworker can’t vibecode a solution to let AI enter text fields in the database automatically, but she can ask ChatGPT how to hide cells in Excel (nevermind that a search engine could also do this). I definitely am in that boat of “ no use, better done quickly myself ” with the core part of my job. So I just don’t understand why so many people need to brag that they’re moving the needle so much with their daily work either by using or not using AI, and subtly also shitting on people whose jobs are either replaceable with AI or aren’t fit for AI use, which I allege many fall into! It can’t be everyone that has such an unusual, high impact knowledge worker job where AI is either the magic enabler or not capable enough. I mean for fucks sake, seems like most of them posting the stuff are students, trainees, junior devs, or vague office job. It’s like people use this controversial topic to present themselves as less expendable and more important than they actually are. There’s also a group of people who won’t intellectually engage with the topic at all because they just do what everyone else does. Their personal podcast idols have about AI? Better give it all the data and put together a self-improvement plan and let it talk you through some journaling prompts. They don’t wanna discuss the bad sides because the people they admire love it. In my experience, they’re also very easily impressed with shoddy work just because it’s written in a charismatic way. “ This was groundbreaking ” and it’s something a Tumblr girl would have posted at age 14. All your friends hate AI? Better not touch it, out of fear of social repercussions. They can’t talk with you about the bullshit it did last time they tried it, or ethical, privacy, or environmental concerns, because they just never actually cared to develop an opinion aside from not wanting to be hated by their circle. That’s boring and people pleaser behavior. I think you look silly if you have no deeper reason to not use something, no interesting arguments. A tangent about arguments: I no longer care about whether images created by AI are good or bad and I don’t care about water or electricity usage. That is because the capabilities as well as resource usage can and will likely improve, and to me, are more representative of missing regulation and a shitty government than the tech itself; it’s better happening in a context more removed from the actual core of the tool and in how the industry needs to be regulated. I want to be more precise in what is actually the fault of the tool vs. the fault of the region many of these services are located in, and its political problems. If you claim to hate the tool, but only for the fact that it makes soulless images and it starts making better ones, what then? I'm sure you won't suddenly have no concerns! You usually hate the tech for other reasons than that, so we should focus on these better arguments instead. I think it’s much more interesting to debate whether it is art or not, about responsibility in war or accidents, or focus on the privacy aspect, the intellectual theft, the e-waste, job market effects and so on. Additionally, if we truly focus on electricity and water use (irrespective of regulation, placement, and other factors that cause issues of droughts and rising prices thanks to data centers), I think we would quickly have to argue against the terabytes of useless bullshit we all hurl onto the net to be stored for ages, take up space, and are another reason for more data centers and people’s increased use of their devices. Even your well-meaning blog post about enjoying a good sandwich counts, or your favorite cat video. I don’t want to discuss an intellectual bar or importance metric that online content has to clear before it can be uploaded because of our precious resources, because it would hit most of us, and it would hit art and marginalized voices. If we haven’t ever seriously discussed looking critically at each search engine use, each video we watch etc. as something potentially excessive that uses too much resources compared to how useful it was, I don’t know if this is the right way to start. I think for many, it’s only okay to start that conversation because it’s about something they don’t (yet?) use. It’s hypocritical, as many are not ready to give up their other online consumption behaviors for resource reasons either, because they don’t even cease them when mental health and privacy are harmed. 🤡 Lastly, there is some weird ego stuff going on about talking or not talking about AI. “You hate AI, yet you talk about it. Curious!” “Why do you wanna focus on something negative?” “The more you talk about it, the more you speak it into existence.” I don’t need to speak it into existence; billion-dollar industries funnel money into the bubble and force it into every device and software and ad. Don’t be disingenuous. Each industry, or art form (if you believe AI art is art) needs its critics. And as AI fans love to bring up, every new invention has had its moral panic, so if that also applies here, why are you mad? On the other side: Boohooo, you avoid the word "AI" to “ not give it more power ”; fine, have fun self-censoring for virtue signalling reasons, Mr. I-did-it-with-all-ten-fingers-and-a-few-braincells. I will keep writing about it, because everywhere I look, I just see people exploiting both ends of the spectrum for views and money, making extreme claims to get engagement. Who screams the loudest and makes the most absolute judgments is seen as more correct, after all. I will write about the AI Act, about labeling requirements, and more of the spectacular failures and okay-ish results I’ve had, though, and I will have to name the beast. And I don't care to read weird ego boosting shit swirling around elsewhere. Reply via email Published 28 Mar, 2026

0 views
ava's blog 2 weeks ago

art feelings

Inspired by Vaudeville Ghost’s make bad art . I’ve always felt a resistance towards learning how to do art “properly”. Over the course of my life so far, I did occasionally look at short tutorials for some things, or booked one-time art workshops, but I just couldn’t find anything in there that made me want to stay at it perfecting it, and I don’t think I kept any technique long term. I also felt restricted by art class in school (despite great grades), which just wanted me to reproduce a style as closely as possible. I know most people in art progress by emulating others and learning the rules before producing stunning art in their own style. They grind practice sessions and drawing exercises and use palettes that have all the right values and complement each other, and they set all the shadows and highlights just right, their use of color underlines the piece. The result is something really amazing and kind to the eyes, but it’s also very technical and mechanical at times. Some of it treats art like this thing you can win, that can be graded finely and put neatly into boxes, and that it’s something you perform for others. That if you follow the rules to a T, the result is always good art. And they’re mostly right about that. But I’ve never had the drive to optimize my art this hard, for it to be checking off a list. I never could see it as a challenge to master and learn specific techniques (aside from some oil stuff I tried). For me, the more I look at what others do in art, the more my creativity and style disappears, and I want to protect that instead. I don’t want to feel limited by having to think about whether I’m doing something right. I know some limits and rules can set others’ art free, or polish the piece, but not mine; too much time spent looking elsewhere and I just emulate others, too many limits and I just stop. Some things in art also sound too serious to me, mathematical and snobbish. Like colors are formulas you are only allowed to calculate in a specific way, or a language whose vocabulary lists you learn by heart. I was never good at math, and my difficulties with my mental eye has forced me to be more experimental and see where I end up. Color theory is a law to others and an optional guide for me; I think the rules are not bent and questioned enough. For a lot of things, I think “This only “looks right/better” to you because we are inundated with this style or use of color everywhere.” I hate that people’s style is called wrong due to weird dimensions, weird use of color or not respecting the rules of the medium, but if they stick to it enough and it becomes popular, suddenly it’s “allowed” and taken seriously, analyzed and retroactively has reasons and interpretations applied to it. It only gets legitimized when close enough to an existing style or palatable enough or following some made-up rules. I think if I really tried, my art would be so much better objectively, and it would be nicer for others to see, but simultaneously, it would ruin the experience for me. It would introduce guardrails I don’t wanna have. This used to be a point of shame for me, like I’m choosing to stay uneducated, ignorant, and with unused potential. Then years ago, I read a post by an artist whose art I really like who said they ignored all advice that’s usually given for the medium (you aren’t allowed to do this, only xyz is the proper way to do it!) but now they’re successful with their style. I know people will say a good study will have you learn in a few weeks what could otherwise take you years to learn on your own (if at all), but I am fine with it. I don’t want to become a professional artist, and I don’t wanna become good at this hobby; I just wanna do it when I feel like it. This is also protecting me from the effects of perfectionism. Some hobby artists seem like they’re only allowing themselves to enjoy and engage with this hobby if they’re aiming for a specific standard and pretending they’re gonna have to pass an exam about it, because free time has to be productive as well, and they cannot bear to spend time on something that isn’t useful or earning admiration by others. Time is scarce, why throw paint on the paper for fun, if you can follow a YouTube guide in earnest tension and afterwards say you have studied a technique? So much more worth your time in today’s metrics. A while ago I was obsessed with drawing butterflies, currently it’s circles and gradients and colorful waves. Nothing impressive. I would like to draw more pixel art of rooms, more nature landscapes with gouache again, and - surprisingly, after writing all this - I’d live to try the jelly art style. Probably the closest I’ve ever come to wanting to submit to a set of rules, because obviously I need to adhere to nail the style. We’ll see. I like my mixed stuff the most. I have a canvas where I mixed acrylics, gouache and makeup. I have another that has acrylic paint and some crystals stitched on it. Honestly, looking back on it all, I think there’s also been too many times where I felt like making art for others was a net negative for me, or that my style wasn’t understood or respected and people didn’t go about feedback in a respectful way. Like, if their character feature is big, it’s “stylized”, when I do it it’s “awkward”; and I know it’s because one works within the established rules and one doesn’t, so one is seen as skill and one as an accident or lack of skill. People will always see a person as more skilled even they make art that’s more harmonious to look at, and it seems to me I just don’t consistently create art that looks harmonious to anyone else but me; makes sense, with so many mediums and months or years of not making art. If I wanted to make better art, I’d have to draw more often, and draw like others do. I remember a time a teacher scribbled over my art, and I never want to experience that again. So I released that expectation, and I make “bad” art for me. Reply via email Published 27 Mar, 2026

0 views
ava's blog 3 weeks ago

vegan with a soy sensitivity

As a kid, I got diagnosed with a soy allergy; it caused me to itch everywhere and scratch until it bled, all over the body, and worse. I went through a desensitization process of weekly shots until my symptoms improved and went away. Until last year, I could eat soy with no issue; very convenient when you’re vegan. Then it seemingly came back and caused some nasty rashes. Took me a while to identify the culprit. Unfortunately, another round of desensitization is contraindicated for me and likely won’t work again, so I’m just having to roll with it. I really love tofu, edamame, natto, miso, soy sauce, tempeh, lao gan ma and more, so that sucks, but avoiding it has been easier than I thought. I’m not really that fond of eating many replacement products; I like veggie pans with just seasoned vegetables and some beans or other protein the most, and I prefer oat milk to soy milk. The only things I consciously had to switch were going from sugarfree soy skyr to a sugarfree pea-based yoghurt. Other than that, whole foods have been my friend, and there are a surprising amount of replacement products made from bean or pea protein, even chickpeas. I like the chickpea tofu I found, Beyond’s stuff is with pea protein as well, Seitan still works, and we replaced the TVP soy chunks with ones made from field beans, whose powder is also great for egg replacement in baking and for scrambled egg. Kidney beans patties are awesome, too, and red lentil stews are a comfort food to me. I can just use coconut cream instead of soy creams. So aside from losing some of my comfort foods, this has been a rather painless switch. Reply via email Published 23 Mar, 2026

0 views
ava's blog 3 weeks ago

what's in my todo app

I use a gamified todo app that I log into daily, and have been using it for almost a year now. The interaction with six of my friends kinda drew me in; we can have goals together, send each other encouraging messages, visit each other in our rooms and gift each other items. Each day I check off enough on my list, I send a little bird off to an adventure and then it discovers something. I also get little micropets. What I also enjoy is that it's not strictly a productivity-focused app, it's more about selfcare. It offers soundscapes, meditations, a mood tracker, breathing exercises, physical exercises, mental health quizzes, journaling prompts and more. Initially, I used it like any other todo app, meaning I wanted to get everything on the list done in a day and wanted to build a streak. That didn't work out, like it always does, and I chose to embrace the format of the app more. Now, I use it as a list of suggestions to do, from optional and kind things to gentle reminders of what needs doing. I used to struggle a lot with sitting around wanting to do things or knowing I needed to do stuff, but not exactly being sure what, or feeling like I'm missing something. For years, I made lists for everything. Nowadays, it's all combined in that app and not spread between different notes. I have set all goals to just continue being there until they're checked off, and they can be skipped and snoozed as well, all neatly sorted into categories. Let me show you. The hygiene category reminds me to This holds all the stuff I consider productive. Daily stuff is: The less frequent stuff: This is category is usually intended for daily reminders to reach out to people, suggestions to make plans, to remember everyone that loves you, and all that. For me, it has This checks my daily drinking and goals for when to eat. This takes into account that I am mostly hungry in the evening and that eating early, especially sweet or carb-y stuff, seems to spike me a lot and makes me very hungry the rest of the day. So I try to eat breakfast and lunch later, and currently working on delaying it until even later. All of this is daily. I don't always feel good enough physically to fully commit to a routine for weeks or months, so this is basically a platter to pick and choose from each day. Some days, I do all. Some, I only do one or none. This is for stuff that gets me into the flow, or meditative stuff. Also daily! This is also a daily goal, but only holds one at the moment: "Do one thing makes me happy". It's very vague on purpose, and I count a lot of things based on the day. It gets me to go through my day and see what good things happened, practice gratitude. I check if I have treated myself well, and see if there's maybe something I'd like to do for myself. Reminders for myself. Very helpful for my chronic illness stuff! It can be hard to see rest as something productive and needed, instead of just something that holds me back. It also helps me see small good things and wins I had that day that otherwise, I would have just forgotten or downplayed again. So I get these three daily tasks: Still working on perfecting my sleep schedule and quality. Daily goal: Reminders to take some stuff. Only my injection is scheduled for every two weeks. Haven't had this category for long yet! But my hair is longer now and I take great care regrowing it, together with other things I want to focus more on. I don't put my usual skin care in there, because it's so embedded into my routine and easy to think of that I don't need it to be in there. I love that I don't have to just do the very productive or exhausting stuff; I can just do enough . Sometimes, selfcare is all you can manage, or you procrastinate on hard stuff but do lots of other things. That should still be rewarded, and you're still making progress. I feel like this setup finally acknowledges that for me. It's not a stressor anymore, just a wide selection of things I get to do , and even self-kindness and rest count. Most days, I don't do all of these, and it's not even an expectation. I'm just happy to see that I did stuff at all, and have an easy list of things that I can go through and see "Oh yes, that fits my mood and energy right now." and feeling like I make progress even by resting or affirming or acknowledging small wins. Reply via email Published 22 Mar, 2026 change the bed sheets on every Sunday do laundry on Saturday clean the bathrooms on Tuesday take out the trash on Saturday (or as needed) vacuum on Monday and Friday dust and wipe surfaces on Wednesday. spend 5 minutes tidying my home (I usually do this automatically, because I tidy up a bit first thing in the morning and before going to bed, and I always try to take stuff with me whenever I go through the apartment) read a book or magazine water plants (Thursday) do a case for Noyb (Friday-Sunday) do favors for my wife take a stretch break (this is under connection because this is my wife and I's shared goal we do together) drink water (3 bottles) breakfast after 10 am lunch past 1 pm go for a walk 20+ mins indoor cycling read a simple affirmation for myself (tapping this launches the affirmation part of the app, where I can skip through ones and find one I need for the day) give myself permission to rest (this one changed a lot of how I see breaks in my fitness plans!) name one small success from today avoid caffeine after lunch (usually, I treat this as noon, because I usually have lunch later) go to bed at 22:00 Supplements daily (a general one, my extra iron stuff, Vit D during the winter) Endovelle daily in the evening Minoxidil twice daily Injection every two weeks on Friday hair oiling on Sunday monthly teeth bleaching

0 views
ava's blog 3 weeks ago

how to properly ask for help

I’ve been noticing more disregard for a more respectful way to ask for help recently, both in private, at work, and between strangers online. It seems like a growing group of people is comfortable with just barking words at other people to receive answers. No please, no thank you, no further explanations and no attempt to first solve it on their own. I don’t know if this is some sort of effect search engines and LLMs have, but either way: Here’s how you can do better. You message your friend, a coworker or a stranger “ My printer won’t print. ” Now you have to wait until they see it and have time to respond. That could be hours or days. Then when they get back to you, they have to establish some context first. “ Okay. Have you tried turning it off and back on again? Are your drivers up to date? ” Now they have to wait for you to answer again. What usually happens now is further slowing down the actual resolution. “ Yes I already tried all that. ” This can go back and forth for ages , just dragging on about what you did or didn’t do, and wastes both your time and the other person’s time. It’s disrespectful to make the other person do all the work of getting the right info out of you, and put together a detailed guide, just to be shot down with “Already did that.” So before you reach out to another person, use the tools available to you, depending on the problem. If you have exhausted all options and tried all the suggestions, then reach out. You might not even need to do that, and solving it on your own this way was faster than just involving someone else from the getgo! A respectful message would be: “ Hey, I’m having issues with my printer, can you help me? It’s a [model number] and I have consulted [resources] and tried [everything you actually tried], but still no luck. Do you have any other ideas? Thank you. ” This is polite, not commanding or imposing, and it gives the other person all relevant information that makes helping you easier and faster. Instead of dragging every piece of information out of you and each having to wait for a response, they can immediately research the model, and focus on the things you haven’t tried yet, and find other resources. This is respectful of the other person’s time and efforts, and this way, they are more inclined to help you in the future. It’s not only about tech support or a defective device; apply it to other situations as well. It shouldn’t need to be said, but of course, it’s okay to ask “ What’s dirtbiking? ” when someone brought up they like to do dirtbiking in conversation, even if you could research it yourself. That’s normal bonding and socializing, and you wanna hear it from them and find out more about how they do it or why they like it. It’s also okay to ask someone what their opinion or stance is on something, or whether they have recommendations for something. Of course you could also find opinions and recommendations online, but this is obviously about valuing this exact person’s opinion and insight, which you will not find online. I’m sure the other person is delighted to be asked and get to tell you something about that topic. I hope this is a worthwhile reminder; send it to people who do this, hang up a version of this at your workplace, whatever. It’s okay to need help, it’s okay to not know something, but you need to go about this the right way and remember some etiquette. Otherwise, people will think you are just too lazy, difficult to work with, and weaponize your incompetence just so someone else does it for you. Reply via email Published 22 Mar, 2026 Check the manufacturer website, check the manual, or check if the manual is available online; check FAQ’s and similar informational pages. Use a search engine. Check a wiki, search the problem + ‘reddit’ to find a relevant Reddit thread, check if YouTube has a video on how to solve the problem. Ask an LLM. Know what the problem is or what topic you wanna know more about. Make sure you use the correct words and names, and you are specific. For example: don’t just ask your coworker to help with “that one database” when you all use multiple. Exhaust your options first. Give the other person as much information as possible.

0 views
ava's blog 3 weeks ago

a love letter

I love that I am so passionate about a topic that makes me research and learn so much, that I go to conferences for, that I get newsletters and magazines about. I especially love that I feel so intensely about it that nothing could stop me from it. I’ll find ways to engage with it anyway, somehow. Nothing can ruin this for me. I don’t force myself to read or write about it, it pulls me in. I’m never too sick or too tired. I’m never satisfied about how much I know, I always want more. This drive helps me so much in having the audacity needed to actually make it. I don’t see my aspired career paths as a possible dream that could be made true under the right circumstances; I just can’t view it that way, not even if I tried. Internally, it feels like an inevitability, a fact, that I will progress and go far in this field. Ironically, that reassurance makes doing the work for it easier. I can’t know whether that prediction will become true, but even just feeling that way makes me act differently, which is increasing my surface area for opportunities and cool coincidences to happen. Instead of waiting for a sign, for permission or for things to fall into my lap, I get going. It’s the typical effect of “Just act like you belong here”, I think. I don’t hesitate or think twice before I message people in the field that I could learn from. I sign up for volunteering or apply to jobs without worrying if I’m good enough. I am not ashamed or afraid of being annoying when I contribute more, ask questions or share news that could be interesting in that space. I don’t feel impostor syndrome when I write about the topic. In my mind, I absolutely deserve to be here and be heard and considered. It just clicks, it makes sense, there is no other outcome in my mind; because either I contribute well, or I learn. There’s no other option. Something in me feels like it is all being taken care of somehow, that things will happen the way they should, and I can fully focus on the work and letting my passion carry me. I also have delusional goals on purpose: Be asked to speak at a panel, and get my own Wikipedia page one day (only once I deserve to be there for something great!). These keep me aiming higher and higher, ans have more standards for myself. I wasn’t always that way, and I’m not like this in every area of my life either. I’ve actually been insecure for most of my life, with a crippling fear of failure and preferring not to even try, and dropping everything I wasn’t immediately good at. I’d prefer not to ask than receive a no. I thought I was very annoying to others, and that everyone was so much further ahead in anything. But times change, and if you’re lucky, the right interest/hobby builds up your confidence and ability to showcase your skills with ease. With this, I feel things are just perfectly falling into place, and I’m ready and grateful for whatever happens. Everything feels like a reward, like one step closer to something. I finally, for the first time in my life, feel like I truly and thoroughly enjoy the way there, the process itself, instead of just craving the finish line. To me there is no one to compete with in a negative way, no one to measure against and feel insecure - I just see amazing people to learn from and future mentors. I see people I’d love to work with and for. I see them as proof I can do it too. I look at some things and go: This is great, but I think I can do better; and then I try exactly that, and use it as an opportunity to grow and to prove myself. Mostly to myself, but an audience is also nice. And it makes sense, doesn’t it? If you don’t believe in yourself, it can be very hard for others to do so and it impacts your ability to put your best foot forward. Nothing of this felt like a deliberate choice or a process I put myself through to “become better”. It just happened to me, and now I’m gladly riding the wave this special interest has given me. And I’m so proud of myself. Thank you to everyone sending encouraging emails, will respond soon! Reply via email Published 21 Mar, 2026

1 views
ava's blog 3 weeks ago

bad parents know / being the villain

This is for the ones with abusive parents. Bad, abusive parents know a lot more about it than you’d think. We all know the saying “ The axe forgets what the tree remembers. ” And I’m sure for some stuff, that is true. But I’ve seen when they act clueless while knowing what what happened. Sometimes, the mask slips. Things they claim never happened and that they can’t remember are suddenly mentally present. I remember a time when all the yelling and abuse over math homework allegedly never happened. That our neighbors informing my teacher and my teacher ringing our doorbell to come in after another screaming match, and finding me crying, never happened. But at a restaurant dinner in adulthood, suddenly the she says “ I ruined math for you back then. I messed that up .” Funny how that happens. The amnesia is selectively lifting sometimes, I guess. Then you cut them off and decide to end the relationship for good. They notice. Messages like “ I hope you are safe. Did something happen? ” “ Please reach out, it’s urgent. ” It’s supposed to make you respond in case something bad happened to them or another one. Then they try and catch you in front of your home. That’s when they reveal they know exactly what’s going on. They don’t really think something happened to you. If they did, or at least of they cared to put on an act, they’d say: “ Oh hey!! Thank god you are alright! I wasn’t able to reach you, I wanted to make sure you’re good and if maybe yours or my phone are broken? ” But instead they act like everything is fine, as if this is just randomly happening, like they were just randomly outside your place, running into you. “ Hey, how are you? ” With a demeanor and face as if nothing is wrong. You then say you don’t wanna talk. The mood shifts. “ Yeah I have noticed! But why? ” There’s not even any visible concern for your feelings, no discernible feeling of guilt, apology or shock that they apparently did something that was the final straw. Others would be aghast, apologetic, shocked. But here, there’s only offense and an attempt to regain control. How dare you cut me off, how dare you enforce boundaries, how dare you not tell me why or give me an option to argue - that’s what’s being communicated. There’s no genuine attempt to be sorry, to understand, to hear you out. No “ I respect your decision, but understand I will always love you and if you decide you want contact again, just reach out. You’re always welcome and you will always be my daughter. ” Just attempts to rope you into conversation, stall for time, get in your head, argue and try to invalidate your feelings about certain events. Then suddenly it’s all your fault. The relationship is bad because you aren’t giving anything, you don’t put enough effort in, you don’t want to be close. And you know what? That’s partially right. This is what happens when your child doesn’t feel comfortable around you, can’t feel like letting their guard down, feels harshly judged and shamed by you, and is scared of you. I used to be a very cuddly child. I loved my mother. Then she turned into a monster. Without the words to describe what happened and without knowing anyone else going through the same, even as a kid as young as 6, I likened it to something or someone “possessing” my mother. It felt like over night, someone else replaced my mum that looked like her, and it never got better. Later on when I was older, my dad revealed he noticed it too and begged her to get psychological help, but she refused. Even she remarked on my change in behavior. I remember her being mad about me no longer wanting to cuddle with her when I was a kid. I remember her angrily asking “ Why are you so scared of me?! I never did anything to you!! ” every now and then growing up, and I either lacked the words to say why, or I was too scared to say it, or I said the reasons weren’t believed or respected. I was just gaslit. This never happened, this is wrong, this is just normal, you are overreacting, you’re too sensitive, this isn’t fair… I heard it all. So why explain to someone why you’re scared when that happens? All you have left is greyrocking them. They always love to make it seem like it’s all in your head, you chose this, this is your fault. As if a child would choose to be scared, choose to cry, chooses to dream of being adopted into another family, chooses to dream of running away, hopes it was switched up in the hospital and would find its true family one day. As if the same child, but as an adult, would choose to be diagnosed with ©PTSD for it, change their first name because the original one is too traumatic, and is still scared when they hear keys turn in a lock and someone arriving home. Yeah sure, I was just born defective, born to hate my parents somehow! Nevermind that I wanted to reconcile so bad, gave endless chances, ignored my own needs and wants and tried to just “ accept who they are ” and preferred to endlessly question if I am the problem. I went to years of therapy! Everyone I talked to, mental health professional or not, were shocked of how I grew up and said it’s not normal! And why would I lie? Because it’s so cool to pretend your parents are trash? Sure. I just live for the pity, apparently? Yes, at some point, I changed and created distance. But I still said yes to every request to see me. I always responded to messages. I gave gifts. I reached out to ask how it’s going. I agreed to spend some festivities together. I stayed in contact and agreed to meet more just to make her more comfortable and to do my part as a daughter. I don’t wanna be a bad daughter. I didn’t wanna give up yet. It could get better, right? Maybe she ages out of it, maybe we can find ways to make it work. I do want a family, and it’s hard to cut off the only family you still have. Further in the final conversation, the diversions start. Was this only because ( insert very harmless interaction that would make you look insane if you were truly mad about that )? No, of course not. They know the relationship was bad for most of your life. They know you’re not seriously cutting them off because they cancelled on you when they were sick. It’s all searching for reasons that are not their fault and easy to make you look bad. They also remember those years, and they can reference some of the bullshit they did in rare occurrences (see above) or they can at least suddenly lament all these years where the relationship was bad because of you . They just choose to switch multiple times in the same convo between pretending they believe everything was actually fine and this is out of nowhere, and knowing everything’s bad but it’s yours to fix instead of moving on. Anything but taking accountability or acceptance. Sometimes they can’t even look you in the eye during all of this. It’s like even they are afraid it’ll all just spill out, all the rot they try to ignore. I think deep down they know they fucked up, but thought you forgot or would just continue to bear it. Them acknowledging it out loud first would make it real, would be unbearable, I assume. We’re just all expected to dance around it. You giving up and choosing no longer to keep contact is bringing it all into the open, in a way. You don’t need to actually recount specific situations or times, or summarize all those years. Simply choosing to abandon them, doing the unthinkable for a child, is enough. Even they know realistically it can’t all be you. They have to have done something bad bad . That means it’s all real, it all happened, and it has an effect. It can, for a brief moment, no longer be denied. They lose control over it, and are faced to reckon with it at least in the situation. Of course they’ll run to other people for validation. Leave out info, make you look insane, moody, unreliable, and “always having been difficult”. Maybe they’re proudly telling people that if you’d ever reach out again, they’d just ignore you. You went too far, now you can never go back, etc. As if you’d ever reach back out. It’s funny that their fantasy isn’t about you reaching out again and making up and being a happy family, but about hurting you back, and holding it against you, and it being their turn to refuse contact now. It’s never about love, it’s just about revenge. It’s about who gets to leave first. It’s less about having a good relationship, and more about not being seen as a bad parent by others. She has always hated when she lost control over the narrative. Wanting to sway me into cancelling therapy, screaming at me that I make her look bad, that all I speak about is just bullshit, and wanting to know exactly what I said in the sessions. I planned to cut her off when I moved out. That was 8 years ago. All this time, I wanted to make it work. We had better times that gave me hope. I was scared of having no family anymore, and I felt guilty and sad imagining my mother no longer having her child. I was scared of the harassment and abuse it could cause. I couldn’t go through with it, I always delayed it. I empathized more with her than myself, and put her needs over mine. I tried to mold myself into something she could accept and could always feel her disappointment. I had to keep my own wedding from her so she wouldn’t show up or guilt me into inviting her. Each meeting felt like we were two strangers on a theatre stage, acting out our roles, with zero chemistry or acting skills. It all left me drained and shamed. Ashamed, too, when she told me really bad things, like the fact that she is yet again being the affair of a married man. But it’s over now. I can finally move on. I know I tried. I gave it enough time and chances. Now I have to be comfortable being the villain, the bad daughter, being badmouthed, and being shamed by people who have a great relationship with their parents because “ You can’t do that to your parents! ” Too bad they were never there to step in and say “ You can’t do that to your child! ” Reply via email Published 21 Mar, 2026

0 views
ava's blog 4 weeks ago

i got featured @ noyb!

Every now and then, Noyb (European Center for Digital Rights) highlights some of their volunteers for their GDPRhub project. Now I got my entry :) Check it out on Mastodon and LinkedIn . Fittingly, one of my translated and summarized decisions finally made it into the weekly newsletter last Thursday! Also, they give you some goodies when you reach some of the volunteer milestones they have. I received mine :) Reply via email Published 17 Mar, 2026

0 views
ava's blog 4 weeks ago

radically accepting my flawed and dysfunctional body

I remember years ago, especially early on in the pandemic (2020/2021), I was still not diagnosed with my illnesses ( Bechterew's disease and Crohn's disease ). For a decade at least, I had dealt with a variety of symptoms, most of it around joints, my spine, and my digestive tract, and separately from those, also hormonal issues. Food was unpredictable and made me feel sick and caused me a lot of pain, and all the inflammation showed on my skin too: Around that time, gut health information was really booming online (probably still is, but I keep away from that content now and I'm less online). The idea was that by cutting out certain stuff or mostly eating this or that diet or taking these supplements would regenerate your gut health and make all the symptoms go away - the joint pain, the sluggishness, the acid reflux, the rashes, the hormone imbalances, the allergies and intolerances, and so on. If you see your body as a naturally wholesome and healthy body that is just temporarily imbalanced by some exposure and can be brought back into balance, these products and lifestyle changes are basically the magic pill. Just do this and avoid expensive pharmaceutical drugs with side effects! I'm not trying to act like that can never happen; people have successfully reversed or lessened some illnesses and issues by eating differently, working out, losing weight or limiting their exposure to something. But for me, this approach just led to disordered eating habits and holding off on effective treatment in some things for a while. The thing is, lots of people online peddling this stuff are in the business of snake oil. Buy their classes, their book, their supplements to finally be free from all these issues that doctor's can't or won't diagnose or only have evil medicines for that have side effects! Your body is good as is, it just needs a nudge in the right direction! It puts so much responsibility on you. Yes, we should limit our exposure to pesticides, PFAS etc., but you go insane in the grocery store thinking: " I can't buy this, it's not organic, can't buy this, it's wrapped in plastic, can't buy this, it's canned, can't buy this, it's high inflammatory/against FODMAP diet, can't buy this because it's too processed, can't buy this because it has so much sugar... ". Back then, every grocery store trip had me on the verge of a mental breakdown or actually breaking down. Everything felt contaminated, unsafe, or something my body couldn't tolerate. It felt impossible to " treat my body naturally " or bring it " back into balance ". Even when you do manage for a while, it significantly inhibits your ability to socialize with people because so much of it is about food: going out to eat together, attending festivities, being invited to dinner, being gifted food, traveling. A very restrictive diet can also cause deficiencies or starve you. It's also a bottomless pit: If it doesn't work for you and you don't see results, they say you need to try harder, also cut out this and that, buy this other supplement, and now consider other areas of your life too. Aggressively filter all your water, move away from any kind of busy street to limit the exhaust fume exposure, have your home checked for mold, switch out all your synthetic dyed clothes for unbleached undyed linen, switch out all your cooking utensils and pans to the "non-toxic" varieties, check if you live near some kind of coal plant or electricity lines or so, and if you are in the really weird circles, you will hear about chemtrails and Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity and all that. Yes, mold exposure and harmful substances in water are a problem, but I'm just saying: Doing all this next to everything else in life is a huge undertaking, mentally taxing, making people extremely paranoid and isolated, and bleeding them dry when it's often not even the issue . It's taking advantage of vulnerable people who either have no access to healthcare or aren't taken seriously or cannot afford the testing or medication required. It's good when one simple change can genuinely help you - for example, I know what foods not to eat to avoid triggering acid reflux. I love it for you if you figured out that eating gluten was behind it all and are now happy and healthy. But my body was never a naturally healthy and balanced one that got out of whack by some behavior or exposure, and even if it happened because of exposure in utero, or as a child, or just living in our modern environment nowadays, I can't undo or change that. My body, in its natural state, is not normal or healthy, and all that helps is proper medication. It's not temporary, this is just how my body functions. The baseline I was born with isn't the norm, and as experience showed, no amount of gut health stuff or limiting exposure or other lifestyle changes were going to change that. All that helped was finally getting properly diagnosed and receiving treatment . It was easy for me to accept treatment for the above issues because life had become unlivable with my intense flare ups and affected by daily ability to function all the time, and any possible side effect was worth the risk. I still don't regret any of it, and it works fine for me. Where I struggled to seek and accept help was for my hormone issues, as they only affected me every other month or so and were easier to ignore otherwise. As I talked about in a different post, I received hormone therapy as early as 11 years old because my periods and hormone levels were not normal and I otherwise wouldn't have developed how I am expected to as a cis woman 1 . I needed T-blockers like cypro to have the puberty my body and mind needed 2 . I stopped at 19 or 20 because I had started having issues with pain and spotting for a while and thought I could try and see whether after puberty, my situation had resolved and I'd naturally have the hormone levels I needed. It hadn't. So since then, I either took nothing, or tried reigning in my PCOS and endometriosis with things like Maca root powder. It did bring down my cycle days from 60-70 down to 30, but other issues still persisted. Lots of menstrual pain, flareups of my other issues, PMDD , and so on. When I still went to therapy years ago, my therapist suggested getting antidepressants to take just for the phase between ovulation and period, so I'd stop feeling the awful effects of PMDD. I declined, because while I had been on antidepressants previously for a while and they helped, I also knew what it was like to start and stop them, and I didn't want to constantly put my body through that; plus, the scary side effects! The same happened with hormone treatment. Even though I had spent years of my life on artificial hormones, I was scared to go back on it because I couldn't rule out that they had played a part in my depression back then (or at least amplified it). I was also scared of thrombosis, meningioma and other issues 3 . I thought it would just naturally fade away, or I could make without until menopause, or later: My treatment for my Bechterew's and Crohn's will finally bring my body into natural alignment! At first, it looked like it; I suddenly experienced cycles like a normal person. On time, barely or no pain, very light bleeding. But it went back to how it was over months, even after switching from infliximab to adalimumab. So turns out, fighting the inflammation in my body didn't do anything to normalize my hormones. I wrote something about accepting my natural menstrual cycle that retroactively is just a huge cope. There it was again, the idea that there is a natural state a body can return to and that everyone's default state is automatically healthy, now warped into the idea that I was just naturally meant to have elevated androgens and all this, and that I should just accept how it is. The idea that natural is automatically good is such an easy fallacy to fall prey to, and natural also meant unmedicated to me. I tried to find so many reasons for why being so destroyed by my cycle every time was actually somehow a good thing or had any advantages. There's no shortage of supposedly empowering and encouraging content online about this as well: People who present having a cycle as something magical and romanticizing it as living with the moon tides or living in tune with nature. Just be proud of it and feel like those TikTok witches brewing your own herbal solution and gulping it down with some pumpkin seed oil. Ugh! Recently, I just grew tired of it all. The weeks of feeling sluggish, moody, forgetful and weak; my Crohn's and Bechterew's flaring up with it every time; feeling suicidal and calling in sick due to menstrual pain. 2-3 weeks until I felt normal again derailed good routines and fitness goals all the time, and it was hard to plan around such an irregular cycle. These times could fall on important dates at work or in my degree (exam season etc.) and jeopardize my reliability and skills. If I wanted to reach the goals I had set myself and would thrive in and feel the happiest in, I needed to address this. I owe myself that. No one will ever notice your avoidable suffering and pat you on the back for enduring it when there is another way. You aren't impressing anyone with choosing "natural" over comfortable and happy. All people will see and remember are the times you seemed unhappy, uncomfortable, snappy or missed out on being even being there. In that one post about accepting my cycle, I wasn't actually accepting it. I see now that to actually accept my sick body, it also means accepting treatment where possible . Everything else is not acceptance, it's just giving up and ignoring the issue. So recently, I had my yearly checkup at the gynecologist and finally got help. I am very lucky to have a very attentive and knowledgeable gynecologist 4 , and we went through all the options with pros and cons, also in connection with my Crohn's that can affect absorption, and we settled on dienogest daily and skipping my period altogether. Independently of that, I finally accepted that my hair needs additional help as I am prone to telogen effluvium and androgenic alopecia , and if I am regrowing it now since cutting it off in October 2024 due to losing like half my hair back then, I need to do something. So I am trying out minoxidil on top of going back to scalp massages and all. I know seeking medical help can be daunting, stressful, humiliating, costly, inaccessible, and scary. I almost cancelled that appointment about four times. But I hope it motivates you to seek help for the thing you put off or gave up on. You don't need to suffer, you don't need to self-sabotage or prove it to yourself, and you weren't " meant to be like this ". If " natural remedies " or snake oil and obsessive rules don't work for you, allow yourself to accept proper help. Reply via email Published 17 Mar, 2026 This is also why I have very small hands and feet, and remained at an average size. I was expected to become 1,80m tall, now I am just 1,66m, with a EU shoe size of 36/37. I didn't change that much from that age in terms of size. ↩ Yes, they do that for cis children, so stop clutching your pearls about trans children getting the same care! ↩ This is unfortunately what happens when you work with medical data, particularly side effects and adverse events; you know way too much about some meds. ↩ She's always been great, but it felt like in the year since we last saw each other, she went extra hard in researching how my illnesses can interact with my cycle before I showed up. ↩ This is also why I have very small hands and feet, and remained at an average size. I was expected to become 1,80m tall, now I am just 1,66m, with a EU shoe size of 36/37. I didn't change that much from that age in terms of size. ↩ Yes, they do that for cis children, so stop clutching your pearls about trans children getting the same care! ↩ This is unfortunately what happens when you work with medical data, particularly side effects and adverse events; you know way too much about some meds. ↩ She's always been great, but it felt like in the year since we last saw each other, she went extra hard in researching how my illnesses can interact with my cycle before I showed up. ↩

0 views
ava's blog 1 months ago

how i stay up-to-date on data protection & privacy law

Data protection, privacy and tech is a very dynamic field; every day, there are new court decisions, actions by big tech companies, and resulting questions, so thought I could share my resources that keep me informed. Unless marked with a German flag 🇩🇪, these are English. Not everyone has an RSS feed or their newsletter has additional info, so I settle for it. These are less interesting/applicable to you as a reader, but are still helpful for me. Reply via email Published 12 Mar, 2026 Interface-eu.org 🇩🇪 Zentrum für Digitalrechte und Demokratie 🇩🇪 Stiftung Datenschutz 🇩🇪 Netzpolitik.org European Law Blog Epicenter.works (🇩🇪 by default, but lets you select English version) Electronic Frontier Foundation TheCitizenLab 🇩🇪 Datenschutzkonferenz 🇩🇪 TÜV SÜD Datenschutz Blog Meetings with the data protection officer at my workplace. Following specific, notable people in the space - like via the RSS feed of their BlueSky or Mastodon. Magazine subscriptions like the Datenschutzberater My volunteer work at noyb.eu , translating and summarizing court cases, and learning about new events and projects in their Country Reporter meetings. Attending conferences, like the Beschäftigtendatenschutztag in Munich (2025) and Computers, Privacy and Data Protection (CPDP) in Brussels (2026, upcoming).

0 views
ava's blog 1 months ago

privacy vs. anonymity

A service promising to protect your privacy is not able to keep you anonymous. Why is that? This distinction is actually really important in data protection and privacy laws. Anonymity is about the inability to link an action, message, or data point to a specific individual. If attribution is possible (even if difficult, like with pseudonymization), you are identifiable and therefore not anonymous. Privacy , however, is about the ability to limit or control access to personal information. The focus is not identity removal, but boundaries of who can observe, store, or process personal data. Personal data has to, by default, be linked to an individual, which makes you identifiable and not anonymous. If it isn't, it no longer counts as personal data. You can see this in the way the GDPR works; it doesn't apply to anonymous data, but personal data, and pseudonymous data still counts. Privacy can exist with full identification: Your doctor knows you and your diagnoses, but is protecting your health file from unauthorized access. On the other hand, anonymity can exist without privacy, like anonymous browsing that is still heavily tracked behaviorally. The way we ensure privacy has different mechanisms. In data protection law, this is referred to as "technical- and organizational measures" (TOMs). For example, these can be access controls, confidentiality obligations, encryption, and following the general principles of data minimization, storage and purpose limitations in the way your systems and organization are set up. Where we think they overlap is when we expect an entity to protect our privacy so an external actor cannot identify us. This is problematic in a variety of ways: When we are offered privacy, we implicitly assume privacy from everyone , while most privacy guarantees actually mean privacy from the public or third parties or less tracking than other services; not privacy from the service provider itself, or legal obligations/the state. Companies who aim to protect your privacy act more like privacy intermediaries : They shield users from outsiders or offer a service where less data is harvested or data isn't sold to third parties, but they still maintain some capability to associate activity with an identity. If you want anonymity at a service offering you privacy, you have to create it yourself by not giving the service a way to identify you. This can be done via using a fake name and address, using a way to pay that doesn't directly link your bank accounts or other payment info (privacy.com cards, or crypto, etc.), accessing it via a VPN, and possibly more precautions on an OS level (Kali Linux, containers etc.). That's cumbersome and not realistic for most people, as their threat level is not one of a whistleblower; however, you can of course decide to do it anyway. Even then, it might be impossible, depending on the service and what you share with it. You can be anonymous on a blog, but over the years, the very little vague information you share can paint a picture. If you use an email service for your normal email needs, you will likely receive all kinds of de-anonymizing information: Doctor's appointments, booking confirmations, event tickets and more, all with your real name and location. The correct move here would be to separate your different email needs into different accounts and addresses. Sensitive political organizing, for example, should be separated from your personal information, either the one you give the service directly, or any other private email coming in. Just remember at the end of the day: Privacy is conditional access to identity. Anonymity is the absence of an identity link. If the right legal conditions are met, access to identity is given. But if the service doesn't know who you are, it cannot reveal it. Reply via email Published 11 Mar, 2026

0 views
ava's blog 1 months ago

'human oversight' is a meaningless buzzword

When talking about using AI for decision-making, you often hear that there will be " human oversight " or " human intervention ". One popular example that I have come across in conferences and webinars about data protection law is the hiring process and recruiting: Companies are already proudly using AI to select applicants. It summarizes CVs, compares qualifications with the job profile, and ranks candidates. At the end, HR decides who to invite for interviews based on this output. The fact that AI isn't just sending out the interviews itself immediately and instead, a human is required to write an email or press a button is the idolized "human oversight". The fact that someone could intervene and make a different decision is supposed to be enough. What bothers me is that despite being ranked as "high risk" under the AI Act (together with using AI for medical diagnosis, financial and legal advice, etc.), we aren't looking at how these systems are realistically used in practice. We shove a human in the loop ("HITL") somewhere to assuage fears and comply with legal requirements, but almost no one wants to talk about the fact that Think about it: You have an IT company that gets 400-600 applications on each open spot. Spending time on every single application weeding people out takes a lot of time. You want to save time using AI so the people whose CVs and motivational letters most closely match the job description are already pre-selected for you and ranked. You know the next few weeks will bring new application deadlines again and you're already behind. You just can't check all of the applications to see whether the AI messed up or not. You can do a random check here and there, but at what point will you just look at the top candidates, check their applications, see it was correctly summarized (or well enough), and assume the rest of applicants that weren't considered were assessed correctly as well? Why would you look at all or most of the applications again anyway when the AI system is advertised as saving you that time and step entirely? If anything, the human intervention here is for the companies - making sure that the AI didn't accidentally rank someone top that is completely unfitting for the task. It's not there for you . No one will notice if your perfectly fitting application has been disregarded by AI for no discernible reason, and no one will find it as part of the oversight process in the hundreds of other applications to make sure. If the AI makes the task quicker and the first top candidates sound fitting and plausible, that's it, nail in the coffin, why would HR put in more work? All you can realistically do is make them explain and check after each rejection where you were a good fit and know AI was used. If you don't do that, you can't know whether you've been unjustly treated by their AI hiring process or were rejected on a justifiable basis. As long as AI continues to hallucinate or leave things out inexplicably just to say sorry afterwards, this is a huge liability. Companies don't seem to really care for possible poor data quality, biases and systemic inequities that are subtle or deeply embedded, requiring more work and possibly an outside view to detect and mitigate. We are lacking nuanced oversight mechanisms, and I hope companies are prepared for the lawsuits this will generate. If a company wants to use AI in the hiring process, I'd at least expect them to do the following bare minimum: Unfortunately, companies have no incentive to do this! This is seen as more bureaucracy, more time and money wasted, restrictive to innovation. They're competing with companies who are grabbing talent even faster than them who don't give a shit about fairness in AI hiring. Each day they don't find a replacement or candidate for a new role is bad. And why hire more HR personnel to sift through hundreds of applicants if less HR personnel can handle it with AI? Organizational priorities and financial pressures don't allow enough checks and considerations to go into this delicate process. We need to question " human oversight " more closely and require more explanations on how they plan to combat opaque decision-making, automation bias and the pressure to optimize and make work as easy as possible. Until adequate systems are in place that combat this, it will always be ineffective and a buzzword to me. Reply via email Published 11 Mar, 2026 while HR does receive training on how to use AI and how it works, the reasoning behind AI selection and summaries is a black box for the users, AI recruiting is advertised as a huge time save, which stands in contrast to the checking you should technically be doing as a human to make sure the AI did a good job, most users will follow the AI recommendations blindly because they are presented in a way that sounds plausible and as time goes on, we get lazy and suffer from automation bias and oversight fatigue. having a clear documentation of AI capabilities and limitations for their employees incentivizing taking the time to question AI suggestions and do some 'manual' labor requiring detailed justification when accepting the AI suggestions/rankings the ability to explicitly name why the disregarded applications were denied by their AI system in each case (you're going to need this anyway when an applicant challenges the decision) testing the system and the employees by periodically entering a candidate application that should fit perfectly vs. one that is very unfitting, and see where they land and what HR does with them (similar to the existing practice of IT sending out fake phishing e-mails sometimes to test you) collecting decision patterns and errors to correct and adjust the AI system

0 views